Must resist using the fabled quad facepalm. That they even still exist, is somehing of a mystery.
Unfortunately, the companies and gamers seem more and more disconnected daily. I've had the feeling for years now, that more games become samey as time passes on.
I'd hate to see one genre become so dominant, that other genres are overshadowed, and eventually be forgotten entirely.
5 - 6 years is just enough to outlast its welcome. Otherwise it'll be too far behind like last generation.
@Deadgara, indeed. You saw what happeend from reveal to release with W3, and how they were dodging questions plus misleading customers. EA would just make that even worse.
Cyberpunk is their chance to redeem themselves, otherwise i'll just ignore them in the future until a sale.
If the rumor about a late 2016 release is true, then that would be suicidal for a game more ambitious than W3.
Indeed, we'll never know what would've happened, if MS had taken the initiative instead of EA. Maybe they would've even had proper time to create ME2 as well.
Well, they changed the models of Bayonetta and Jeanne in the Wii U release, because they were ''too well endowed''. Not sure if that was before the SJW madness kicked in fully, but that was pretty silly.
Indeed, Tim shouldn't be let near any kind of money management. Someone else should be in charge of that, because he's simply not to be trusted with it.
Squeenix will make TellTale games proud, because they can price it high, and people would still fork over money for it.
I don't get why it's a thing to add dialogue choices, unless they're running out of ideas. Most choices in games are irrelevant, either way.
I think it's safe to say, that this won't be played on Twitch.
Indeed, FF VI: Phone Edition. They really know how to ruin those games.
Resonance of Fate was definitely turn based. I don't think you remember the game well, if you think it's anywhere close to something realtime.
You could run around in the battle area, but it was still turn-based.
@Kyosuke_Sanada What about games like Resonance of Fate? That game didn't sell enough copies for a sequel, either.
I can probably find 7 reasons for something else, such as sending someone to the moon as well.
People are rightfully giving their opinion on this, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.
The FF7 re-imagining seems to be nothing more than market broadening, because they're making it for people never having played a FF game before. It's such a disgusting move for long time fans, but not too surprising from Square Enix.
Squeenix looked at FF7, and thought about how to max the amount of money they could milk from it. It's no wonder you can't expect much from them anymore.
And i stocked up on popcorn to see the excuses, because you know they're coming.
And now, Dragonknight, you see the side of the coin i've been against for quite some time now. Well, at least you see it with some more opened eyes. People will do almost, if not anything to defend their decision to do this, and not question why they didn't do what you suggest.
Microsoft may be in the right on this issue, but make no mistake, the console manufacturers are in this for nothing but their own companies.
The PC is much more open in nature,...
Not really, no. This is just another victim of turning the industry into more samey games. At some point all we'll have is action games, and we have the new generations to thank.
Well, there goes another classic down the drain. Other than the MMO (Currently), i know to look elsewhere for games.
I used to think CDPR was a light in the industry, but after what happened from Witcher 3 reveal to release, you could see their true intentions. Maybe in a few years, the eyes of other fans will be open by then.
It's a good thing they're patching the game, but some of those patches shouldn't even have been necessary for the game.
oh, and the Expansion story is better than the main story, which is quite a shame.