Well your one of the lucky ones cause i for one am on my second, now the second one is cracking my games. Dont ask me how cause i dont know but my gears of war is no more.
HBlaza i agree with you 100%, the difference is though sony has never future packed any of their consoles the way they did the ps3. It seems to me their goal is to extend the life cycle of the systems starting with the ps3. As seen with the ps2 it is more profitable for them this way
So your saying would have rather they released an unreliable system with great games that you cant play anyway if you dont have a system to play it on, that to wait for a complete product? That logic doesn't make sense to me, they probably would have lost even more money as a result of even higher production costs a year earlier
Good to see you have a lot of time on your hands seeing as you took the time out to comment in the playstation section on a so called flopp. You better hope Too Human doesnt flop cause if it does it will have to take its place with NG2, two worlds, and other various flopp60 titles
Im not positive so correct me if i'm wrong, but didn't haze "to date" outsell NG2, and for you info "Two Worlds" for the 360 was the biggest fail of 2007
@ 13.6, the only reason the first killzone was rated an 88 was because it was touted by the media to be a halo killer. It was a great game in its own right.
They cant do it that way because it was pattended by MS, for now this is the only way that they can do it at least until home comes out
Hold up, if anyone coppied a control format it was MS,
1. their the ones who have remodelled their controller 3 time counting the first xbox. they just added 2 rights and left sony has always had that.
2. Just because the xbox was released a year earlier does not meant Sony coppied the control power on button (all three systems have this)
3. An if you give MS the credit for bringing hard drives to console, then you have to give sony the credit fo...
I hear what you both are saying and agree, but dont you mean 07, it was only out for a little over a month in 06
Yeah i want the fists of plastic on to, i love the smash bros style to it
The difference is from my understanding is that Insomniac is a first party developer, Naughty dog is second party, and the metal gear guy is an artist with a clear vision on what is product should be. I don't see you throwing stones at Bunjie.
@ 5.2 i thought the same thing about ninja gaiden, but i was wrong. I hope you are right though
@ 3.10
a better question would be what games have they released besides Halo that are first party to MS, if you can answer that you will know how much they depend on 1st party
JOLLY:
historically speaking you are correct, but not in the context he is speaking in. In this day and age the term is associated with young black deviants. And to answer your question, yes i am pissed that because of the attire and grammar the interviewer used, that guy assumed he was in your words a peon
Edit: this is my last comment on this subject, but i am not being over sensitive at all. I feel this was because i read something i found offensive and addressed ...
.. mis-post
I found that statement really funny when he said he owned all three, its like he was back peddling trying to look less bias or something. not saying that its a bad thing he owns all three, but he's always downing the other 2. He not being completely honest with himself, if he was so satisfied as a "gamer" with his 360 he would see no need for the other 2. Just my take on it
And what is "thuggish gangster appearance" usually associated with? The whole "he looks dumb at first but im surprised that he's really smart" is a assumption that has followed blacks for years. The word for it is profiling, and i wasnt scanning for anything those are your demons not mine.
Why do you insist on calling him a POS? Is it because he made the MS rep stutter, or because he speaks his mind and doesnt agree with you.
A: you have never met the guy
B: you wouldnt call him that to his face
C: you making yourself look like the POS
as an african-american i'm not sure how to take your statement, what do you mean he's actually quite intelligent? I dont like where that assumption is going, everyone to speaks proper english is not necessarily smart either
dont need a whole bunch of flamers disagreeing with me, just something that stuck out to me
Neither would MS so whats your point? Sony was the first to put games on dvd's, and as you may see in the future was the first to put them on blu-ray. If it were left to nintendo games would be played on cartridges
@1.8 unless they pull a "Sony" and support both the 360 and the newer system. It seems they are trying to remain as competitive as possible so there is a strong possibility that they will