a Star Wars MMO. Does that count Arcturus?
definitely in. 2 players only though. the minimum specs for Sacred 2 is a joke. I'm trying to run it on pentium 4 @ 2.8ghz, 1 gb ram, X1950 (256mb ram)AGP radeon, windows xp. running it at 1024X768 all minimum. using hack to turn off grass completely and I finally get playability at 20 to 25 FPS. When I had grass on 10 to 15 FPS. WTH??? that's why I say always go by the recommended spec for games to run properly on PC.
Fable 2 tomorrow!!!! Amazon.com overnighted it to me. Damn their fast this time. Usually they take their sweet time sending out video games. I guess this is a priority game. LOL
I saw videos of the xbox 360 version and it's framerate isn't that fast. It looks to me like the xbox 360 version is running at 25-30 fps at best and that pc version probably close to 60. 've been a pc gamer for 15 years and I'm pretty good at eyeing framertate plus I benchmark my pc on new games and tweak settings until I'm blue in the face (LOL) for maximum performance. Crysis was a huge challenge. Looks like Far Cry 2 blows away Crysis in performance while still looking decent. I tip my ha...
Sacred 2 is going to pwned Diablo III
get the fastest processor you can and throw in 3 nvidia 280 gtx's and your all set. now run it in 2560x1600 rez with very high settings at 30 fps! Enjoy!
will be getting it for pc instead. my dual 8800gtx will run it much better.
is there a difficulty level? The combat seems kind of easy.
Sacred 2, that comes Nov 7 for Xbox 360 and PS3. If anybody cares about hack and slash games. I say it will be better than Diablo III.
they can't put it on the pc. you think those platforms can handle physics better than modern pc's. I don't think so. what a bunch of BS their shoveling. Why lie about it. Just tell us it's because of piracy and not make up stuff.
Oh. sorry wrong thread. Go Diablo III!!!! with color. WhooHoooo!!
Neptune is not on here because its just a minor planet. What he meant to say was Pluto. Neptune is a big gas giant planet
designed to run crysis warhead at 30 fps on high. didn't say what resolution they were running it at but my guess is 1024X768. the computer doesn't come with keyboard, mouse or monitor. not even sure if that includes windows or not but it should.
Fable 2. I can't afford 2 games that month. crappp!!!! Decisions, decisions...
2560 X 1600 resolution. 4 megapixal display. 2X 1080P
dx9 uses 1/3 more memory than dx10. Second I played the original Crysis and it never used up more than 2 gigs of ram for me and my max ram is 2 gigs on my computer. I highly doubt I'll have problems running warhead with just 2 gigs of ram. Third the more memory you have the more it uses perhaps.
on the price point. Xbox 360 launch prices were: $400 premium/$300 core. I would agree that if Microsoft had known about Sony's delay to Nov 2006 they would have launched at a later date with an internal HD-DVD drive.
The author of the article doesn't know it's a $30 game. You can't complain about that. You can call it an expansion all you want it's priced as one. I'll still enjoy this "expansion". I loved Crysis!
Play Crysis on very high and you will see what low framerate looks like. lol
If you increase the gamma or brightness settings on the desktop you will see much better on this video
new beta drivers for this game to improve performance and sli support. I suspect that ATI will release new drivers soon for their cards.