frickn awesome game.
Day 1
Come on Sony, get your act together.
And also form a gaming alliance with Google who would undoubted get all your internet security issues sorted, once and for all.
Free is free and there's some mighty fine games there.
Just wished they had included Warhawk, for those sorry souls that still haven't tried the best console shooter to date.
How are these confirmed?
Out of that list I'll take the Su-35.
Hope they have pilot black out when pulling high Gs in combat. What I wanted to see in Warhawk ... realism baby, realism.
StarHawk could be the start of something really big if they do it right....
...A shooter that is also a RTS game.
Build and Battle adds the RTS aspect to the TPS awesomeness that is Warhawk.
But for this to become really big, they need to expanded and develop classes and limit what that class can build with various pros/cons and the need for all to be present in a successful team ... and expand the player count and map sizes eventually.
Aus and NZ are usually tied in with Europe
Time for some Warhawk after all the lastest Starhawk news.
...
No, still not ready.
Starhawk should be an awesome new shooter come RTS.
Hope the game engine is made available for MAG 2 or Resistance 4?
Vehicles, vehicles, and more vehicles pls.
This is not a true Warhawk sequel .... just a "spiritual successor."
Auto aim sucked in Warhawk.
Get rid of the noob ability.
Okay, I'm going to say it.
The transforming mechs are lame and unnecessary/pointless.
Warhawks were already overpowered with the hovering ability.
In Warhawk, you can hover at ground level in your plane, firing missiles and guns at ground forces, push jeeps and tanks over bridges into the water etc, quickly land and nade or knife a sniper...then boost out into the skies. This is what us pro players were always doing.
Tra...
Warhawk is very different to Starhawk.
Surprised nobody has mentioned it yet:
Starhawk seems to be full of gimmicks.
This will limit its market appeal and tastes of the majority of shooter fans ie. Modern Warfare fans.
Warhawk has simple, fun gameplay .... my favorite video game.
Cod has simple, fun gameplay ... I personally hate it.
Battlefield has simple fun gameplay.
No gimmicks.
There's a lesson to be l...
EA own DICE who make Bad Company and Battlefield 3.
And DICE do want to better CoD.
Rubbish
DICE isn't/hasn't with Bad Company and with Battlefield 3.
They are already better games but simply not as popular due to the MW fanboyz that like that sort of gameplay.
I am a diehard Warhawk fan that hates the confined twitch ground warfare in MW.
But I want all the modern looks, weapons, vehicles of MW and Battlefield in a FPS. And there are clearly alot of "modern-equipment" shooter fans out the...
Not even worth thinking about this game unless they have large maps with jeeps, tanks and jets for mulitplayer.
Bring on the best shooter for 2011, Battlefield 3.
Transforming Warhawks is a stupid idea.
The Warhawks were already too powerful.
They needed automated turrents, Heat seeking or radar guided missiles(requiring chaffs/flares in Warhawks), and Stinger & machine gun equipped tanks, minigun equipped jeeps with depleted uranium, etc, more realistic physics especially when flying(highG/blackouts & collisions) .... to ensure a balance between the vehicle classes.
These would have made comba...
And they should have being that they are "Transformer" games.
Rssistance and Killzone could have destroyed Halo if they had copied the best from Halo.
They didn't and we know the rest of the story.
Enough of the maps.
Just deliver the game already.
Rather have official confirmation of all the vehicles ... jets mainly.