ivant

Member
CRank: 5Score: 9050

No explanation needed.

The consoles simply aren't as powerful as the PC ... lead platform.

PC fanboys are behaving like numnuts, again.

The console gamers are happy with what they get as they don't have expensive PC gaming rigs.

4710d ago 0 agree7 disagreeView comment

Battlefield's roots are from the PC, plus in has all the tech DICE needed to do justice with a sequel to Battlefield 2.

Also, strong communities on consoles usually favor shooters like Halo and Modern Warfare, and their arcade gameplay. Converting them to BF3 won't be an easy task, if at all, achievable.

4711d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

The whiners are PC fanboys.

The console gamers understand that they will never get the same quality as the PC due to the lower/older hardware specs of their console, and are satisfied with what they get.

But for some strange reason, the PC fanboys take issue on the'inferior' console version of the game, even though they will be playing it exclusively on their beloved PCs.

Weird, huh? Indeed, they are.

4711d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

I am getting sick and tired of these PC fanboys.

" ... And now we’re getting even more confirmation that the PC version will indeed be the superior one...."

Talking about half-wits.

Any intelligent person knows that the PC version is, and will always be, the superior version of the game.

But, apparently these numnuts needed more confirmation. More like they needed an excuse to rant on.

Just enjo...

4711d ago 3 agree12 disagreeView comment

These console vs PC comparisons are lame just like the 360 vs Ps3 multiplat game comparisons.

Both flamebait.

We always knew it wouldn't be as good as the PC but still is pretty good nonetheless....unless you are a fanboy.

Curious to know was there as much fuss about the console vs PC version of Bad Company 2 ... followed up by the endless rantings of fanboys.

4712d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

there ..

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

4712d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Meh.

No kidding the PC is the better version. Afterall, it has more than 8 x the Ram, newer CPUs, GPUs, MBs etc.

But remember that a Ps3 costs less than a decent Graphics card ... let alone an entire gaming rig.

The Console version is still good enough, even with the pitiful 12 vs 12.

4712d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Get real. As good?

It's OBVIOUSLY way better than BC2.

4712d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

I can only dream of all the vehicles and destruction KZ3 multiplayer could have had with the Frostbite 2 engine.

.... or imagine what DICE could have done with KZ3.

4712d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

As we already knew ...

... it's not as good as the PC version but still much better than BC2.

Would love to see the Ps3 version of Thunder Run

But at the end of the day, would have preferred to have MW2/BC2 level of graphics so that we console gamers could enjoy 64 players online like the PC.

4712d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

10 years

This is why console gaming is better than PC:

* you have the same SKU for 10 years
* SKU usually gets cheaper and cheaper ove the 10 years
* easy and simple plug & play

Not so with PCs.

But in retrospect, I still would have preferred Sony to have released the Ps3 at the same time as the xbox 360, but with 2 Gbs of RAM and NO BLURAY. At the same price, this would have destroyed the 360.
...

4713d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

I don't give a toss about any pre-order bonus.

I just want to get online with Battlefield 3 and join the stampede to get a Jet.

Tough luck pal. The F-35B is mine. Later.

4716d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

The core Warhawk gameplay is very much like Battlefield 2, and 24 player games are simply not as fun as 32 .... let alone 64.

DICE really should have dumbed down the graphics(make like MW2) and the destruction so we could have the 64 players and maps of the PC.

Big mistake DICE.

4717d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Thunder Run sealed the deal.

It pretty well sums up what Battlefield is all about, and easily pawns the MW3 gameplay shown at the xbox conference.

4719d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Remove the Map

Battlefield 3 .... all shooters per se .... should remove the live map tuck in the corner.

It will make the combat even more exciting as you have no idea where your opponents are.

All the CoD fanboyz would have noob killstreak stats if there was no live map showing their foes.

4719d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

No problem.

Commonsense would only draw a conclusion that the console version will be BETTER than Bad Company 2.

....especially when they are using an much improved Frostbite 2 engine.

This is good news.

4719d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

It sucks ...

I want to play the good guy(cops) working out ways to take down those low lifes in the bank with little or no hostages killed.

4720d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Okay, no more urban warefare.

Battlefield is large maps and vehicle combat.

MP footage of jets, tanks and copters wanted not urban warfare.

4720d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Unfortunately the bulk of the console shooter fans will be loyal to Modern Warfare 2/3

But DICE could change this by not gimping the maps, having plenty of fun modes, and similar perks of Cod etc.

The console version should have had 64 player MP with reduced destruction/graphics quality.

4720d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't want any costly DLC just so you can practice using the vehicles, playing bots on the various maps.

Multiplayer Vehicle/Map practice should come with the disk .... bots a bonus.

4720d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment