Please. They'll complain about this for years to come. They've already blamed some imaginary group of people who wanted this one lewd element changed apparently but none of the plethora of other lewd elements (meaning, this was an internal decision, not a complaint), so they've set themselves up to blame imaginary people for their inability to see cleavage on this one outfit versus all the others.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine...
Annual flu shots still use it and there is no 'pretending otherwise' on its safety.
So, an inconsequential element to the 'product' was altered for solely visual reasons and that ruins, let alone in any way changes, the 'actual' product? Amazing logic here.
Been like this for a decade now. Not really big news here.
You do realize that much of these changes like this aren't to appease the sensitive media, it's about the ratings boards.
$250? Do they not know all the other games that already exist or will be made in the future that can do similar?
I mean, it's at least something. It's 'good' news compared to the alternative. Not darth's fault even.
Also, I highly believe this will get fixed. PR nightmare if they don't since the PS store doesn't differentiate/have different text for those with or without the PS+/PS Collection version.
While I kind of get the author's take (I don't think it belongs as part of the overall review tbh, just make an opinion piece about the design choices that don't affect the overall gameplay and aren't, as the author points out, even poorly characterized in the game itself but are just there), seems weird to spend a lot of time discussing something that can be solved by just choosing an outfit that suits how you would want to see your character.
Even in the s...
Why would anyone downvote this? Don't be silly. This is great news. Thanks for sharing, darthv72.
GoT the show is a crime against women. Specifically Lady Stoneheart.
I agree, but I also agree if it was the women saying this about this game and not the usual crowd of gamers who complain about too many ugly women in video games then it would come off as more meaningful and expressive of the feminist movement.
Oof. Other than the battery life not lasting more than about 6-8 hours on a charge, hard disagree on this. It feels great in the hands and is of good quality. Still using my original two without issue.
I said the opposite, jambola. But I don't think you're really reading what I say, only what you want me to say.
IMHO, it's done the opposite. They responded quickly to something that could be seen as offensive to some. They heard a problem, the found a solution, they fixed it ASAP. That's good. No one should see any hate in this, only a developer that is listening to the community as a whole and not just some of it.
***1st I’m far from being ignorant,***
You literally said you were ignorant...
"I wouldn’t have even noticed this until someone brought it to my attention. "
That's the ignorant part.
*** second I’m a black male and I think I’m an authority on what I consider offensive towards my people.***
Sure. I'm white therefore I represent all white people! Nonsense. This is about being sensit...
It helps. But, as an individual, I still have my own opinion. I do wish conflict didn't sell as well as it does.
***not difficult to be offensive either
dumb comment ***
You prove both of those statements in your comment.
Listen here you, that's not how this is supposed to work. You choose a side and you defend it. None of this little "what if there's more than one good game out there" nonsense.
You asking for an Ubisoft crossover w/Manor Lords?