I think that we could've put a collection of flash based games together for E3 and upstaged MS. I mean I was really impressed by Halo Reach and Gears 3 but besides that what did they show? Kinetic would have been kool if they didn't hype it up to be a gift from Mars. Good job Nintendo...now Sony it's ur turn. The ONLY way Sony's conference can be worst than MS is if someone goes and kicks in all the TV's and PS3's at the event...and even then that very spectacle mi...
rabid fanboyism to bash MS conference...I'm not naive. I haven't seen the conference but from the media and the few screen shots that I've seen of Kinetic and MS conference in general...I'm EXTREMELY disappointed. Like I feel like I need to go to bed right now and wake up again because today CAN'T be the day that MS is having an E3 conference. And no I'm no fanboy of any shape but now I'm very much looking to what SONY has to offer. I mean...MS signing a freaki...
look at how long it took people to adopt HD. I mean the government practically had to force consumers to switch by dropping analog so think that consumers are just going to jump on the 3D bandwagon because of AVATAR or a handful of 3D games? Technophilies and Vidophilies yes....the average consumer no. ESPECIALLY not when they JUST bought an HD TV just to be able to watch TV. But if anyone can help accelarate the adoption rate of technology it's SONY. Whether you like PS3 or SONY, yo...
I'm willing to bet the MS will stream from LIVE and you can always check here for post about news and more likely than not the site that the news got it from will be streaming or atleast have an abundance of news. Hope you enjoy it.
for doing that crap. I'll never for get the Final Fantasy 7 commericals and everyone was like ole crap...PS1 looks soooo much better than the Saturn and then you play it and it looks nothing like the commerical. Disagree all you want but the facts are there. Go youtube it. Everyone likes to bash MS for their marketing but SONY was pretty good back in it's younger years because they sure had people thinking the PS1 and 2 could do PS3 graphics back in the day.
MS can show the exact type of games as PS MOVE and they will still get ridiculed by delusional fan boys. MS has clearly stated that their intial intent for mo tech is to expand their casual market...how they supposed to do this? By releasing a hardcore game that would take the average soceer mom hours to get past the first stage? Use your brain. PS and MS aren't going to have too many hardcore games at first because for one 1) Most of you are already whining about, "Bu bu but I ...
I simply state my opinion on the MOVE...then move(no pun intended) to discuss mo-tech in general without bashing of any kind and yet I get 3 disagrees(which is okay because that means you don't...agree) WITHOUT an explanation. Normally a simple disagree would be okay someone things the game or device sucked. But when you get like numerous disagrees without an explanation its normally a sign of a fan boy stampede. I remember now, I forgot to choose sides in this game war. After all, al...
I like what Sony is doing with the MOVE. I'm more impressed with what MS is ATTEMPTING to do with NATAL but that doesn't not take away what SONY has SHOWN that it has accomplished with their Tech. You can say that it's a HD Wii or whatever but any advancement in the mo tech is good for gaming in general. As a side note...even though SONY has shown more games than MS(Natal), how are these games more impressive than the infamous red ball or the painting game they have? I look at...
All one can do at the moment is wait and see. I have faith for some reason that MS is on to something big. I mean to have Hideo Kojima and a slew of other developers big up the tech says alot in itself. But who knows. MS could've paid them right? After all, if Natal is just an upgraded eyetoy then we all know that the MOVE can't be an upgraded wii-mote right?
And why must everyone disagree without posting why? Is it because they're too immature to type one complete sentence defending why they clicked the disagree button? I only mentioned Crysis 2 because if you go to ANY KZ3 thread what gets mentioned? Crysis 2. And don't give me that Crytex hasn't proven themselves crap. GG was a third rate developer who worked hard to be were they were so if they beat the odds then why can't Crytex? I mean, for the most part, we are compari...
How in hades is KZ3 in pre-alpha? And what I'm referring to is the GRAPHICS ENGINE. It is merely being optimized but that doesn't make it pre-alpha. The thing is DONE. Finished, completed, and whatever other word you wanna use. Like I stated in another thread, KZ3 will look nice but I dont think it will look better than Cyrsis 2. Now or in the future.
"A: that is correct. the 360 has been out a year more then the PS3 and yet have failed to produce even 1 game that can match a PS3 exclusive." [Technically standpoint this is very true. But I'm willing to bet, that if MS got off there a$$ and put more money into 1st parties the disparity between the two wouldn't be so great. Say what you want but GOEW2 is no slouch. Doesn't it looked better or rather is more technically impressive that Uncharted 2? No. But it still...
RE: ". i really have to disagree with you if you think the footage of crysis looks better then KZ2. you really need to get your eyes checked. "
I have 20/20 vision and an opinion and that opinion says,"Mr. Cure, Crysis 2 looks better than KZ3 at the moment." This is what MY 20/20 vision allows me to see.
You contradicted yourself in the whole "maxed out" counter arguement. You go on to say RE:
"th...
This doesn't look much different from KZ2 in my opinion... is that bad? In short "No". But the fanboyism that goes on N4g is laughable. PS3 fanboys downplayed GOEW2 as looking the same if not worst than the first one. Everyone made such a big deal out of it...stating even that the 360 had been maxed out. Then we have the Crytex call outs from envious PS3 fanboys who will fail to realize that Crysis 2 is on the 360 and at LEAST surpasses KZ2 in graphics(which moots the 360 is...
I promise as of late, after every freakin "shocking news" we get these why I don't need threads. "Why you bought your console" or "Why console A is better than console B" or "Why Console Manfacturer A doesn't need to worry about Console Manfacturer B". I, nor anyone with good common sense needs these dang threads to tell them what to think. Yea I know I know, "If you don't like it why are you here?" And the answer is simple. I...
For starters, just because MW2 was buggy doesn't mean that IW sucks. Let me say this another way....IW has a PROVEN history of making quality games. One buggy game that is better than 90% of the games out today doesn't make the developer...suck. Itagaki didn't leave TECMO because he didn't like the direction of management. He left because he was geting screwed out of his money. READ the articles that description that situation. If you do, you'll notice that both Itagaki and IW both rele...
GOW3 might take Castelvania in raw visuals(graphically) but artistry is another thing. I don't think that argument will be so clean cut. Plus I think that the voice acting will be decisively better than GOW3 IF and only IF it holds true to the trailer. The music and all of that was just EPIC and I think it's hard to deny that. GOW3 is great but I don't see anything so far from keeping Castlevania from being great too.
Do you know what innovation means? Innovation is "the introduction of something new". So by the PS Move offering 1:1 motion...I think that would be called innovative. By the NATAL allowing users to play with NO controller or allow the option of using motion with a traditional...I think that is something NEW and can be classified as an innovation. Now have fun proving my interpretation and what webster said innovation is. Not what I think you meant revolution and that right now ...
@GTA_Maniac- Why wouldn't NATAL be innovative IF it actually does what MS says it'll do. Yes, for hardcore games it'll probably be use to supplement the gameplay...which is a GOOD thing considering everyone whines about using the remotes. The fact that NATAL is flexible enough to be used solely without anything for casual games and used with a controller or whatever peripheial is pretty innovative to me...maybe not a revolution but a big evolution in the tech.
I could say the same thing about KZ3. Why am I bringing of KZ3? To make a point to the PS3 fan boys that are trolling this thread. I believe that title will be a good/great shooter but me personally it's more of the same. I was really impressed with REACH after not really caring for another HALO game. Bungie has done an excellent job of making the game more realistic while maintaining the core feel of Halo. And need I mention that can draw you into a game's atmosphere like Halo ca...