yeah, i am...since I already played it over half a year ago and the fact that i was able to play ME1 before that and import my saved data into ME2.
yes, the majority of 3rd party developers are lazy....that makes so much more sense than to realize that the ps3 is just less efficient and more difficult to work with. /s
it makes so much more sense to think that hundreds of 3rd party developers are "technically inept" than to realize that a couple Sony owned developers are just really talented and can overcome the ps3's shortcomings. /s
sure, that makes soooo much sense.
i really prefer the crappier graphics of the ps3 version...it's so much better with crappy graphics.
halo reach does have some fantastic graphics...you can try to pretend they aren't good all you want but the truth is, they are better than most ps3 exclusives except for maybe uncharted 2 and killzone 2...and even that is debatable.
oh and multiplatform games still continue to generally do worse on the ps3 as the recent enslaved and dead rising 2 comparisons have shown.
no, it's a lot worse now....go read the old articles...the comment section is tame compared to the way it is now.
very, very impressive. the production values are out of this world.
I don't see how any game can kill another game....it's not like the other game will just cease to exist or not be as good as it always was.....however, i do think that castlevania lords of shadow looks better than gow3 based on everything i have seen.
yeah lots of screen tearing on ps3....didn't see any on the 360.
that's alright, i wasn't overly impressed with god of war 3 which was a game digital foundry said similar good things about.....i mean it was a nice looking game but it didn't blow me away or live up to the way ps3 fanboys were hyping the graphics to be.....Castlevania lord of shadows looks better anyway.
it has just as much anti aliasing as killzone 2.....and it's not like killzone 2 doesn't have any faults....it has pixelated shadows and the textures are often sort of low resolution....reach might not have as many dynamic shadows but at least the shadows aren't all pixelated and jaggy and the HDR lighting looks really good....it also has some of the best textures i have ever seen in a FPS.
Exactly, units....that's the problem with some people, they pick and choose what they want to pretend is significant.....so for example they will act like the dynamic shadows in killzone 2 supercede all the great strengths of Reach's graphics.
i mean, just the fact that i can drive in a vehicle at fast speeds over big environments in halo reach and the engine can keep up with the quick geometry changes makes halo reach particularly impressive to me.
Reach hangs with killzone 2 visually just fine....I don't understand why people exaggerate how good killzone 2 looks....it looks really good in its own way just like Reach....but it has plenty of faults too.....for example, mediocre textures, pixelated shadows, and mostly boxed in environments.
Far worse?....yeah right...Reach looks just as good as killzone 2.
The co-op is not broken...i have played it with 3 different friends and it works great.
i have seen that in other games but i have not noticed it in Halo Reach....all i know is that Reach has some of the best graphics i have seen in a console game.....the huge vistas, detailed textures, amazing gun models and character models, the colors and art work...it all adds up to a visual buffet.
Looks good...which means I will probably get the limited edition Dead Space 2 for the PS3....but I might still get the 360 version of Dead Space 2 and just pay to download Extraction off the Playstation store....I wonder if that is still their plan.
I agree with you that it is the best Halo game in the series...I am loving every minute of it.
who cares who submitted it?....attack the article if you think it is wrong.
oh i see, you couldn't counter the facts in the article so you want to divert attention towards something else.
pfft!...rekof claims to love Halo and love Fable but all he does is bash the 360 and those games....he's a fraud....just another ps3 fanboy worshiping the ps3 and hating the 360.
sorry, buddy...I played lots of games on my 360 this year...
Alan Wake
Metro 2033
Splinter Cell Conviction
Mass Effect 2
Halo Reach
Red Dead Redemption --better version than ps3 version.
and soon Fable 3
complete BS....the 360 had a much better lineup of games this year than the ps3....at least for my tastes....I am not trying to say the ps3 sucks or that some people might not prefer the ps3's lineup this year, the issue i have with people like you is that you are being completely dishonest and acting like your opinion is law.
in my opinion there was way more exclusives i wanted on the 360 this year than on the ps3.
on the ps3 all i like this year is god of war 3....