Wow Gears is getting great reviews and is setting a new graphics high mark that will be unmatched by consoles. OH and it's EXCLUSIVE to Xbox.
"Gears 3 easily trumps Resistance 3 – and even the near-perfect Killzone 3 – as the best threequel we’ve seen in quite some time."
I was really looking forward to Duke but in the end it was just a big letdown.
The other battlefield games have always been better on xbox. They know that the ps3 fans are fanatics. If they were to show all xbox footage and let the public know that the game looks better on xbox then the ps3 fans wouldn't buy it out of spite to Dice. Lens of Truth will do a head to head on this game and we'll all see the 360 winning, again, as usual with no mandatory install.
Wow Gears is blowing the competition out of the water. EXCLUSIVE to Xbox. BAM!!
"Gears 3 easily trumps Resistance 3 – and even the near-perfect Killzone 3 – as the best threequel we’ve seen in quite some time. "
Wow imagine that. A Sony drone trolling a gears of war article. Envy brought him here. Oh and also, look, he's got 5 bubbles. That's a sure way to identify someone from the Sony camp on this site. You can bet that Coopertone's comment also won't get marked for trolling either. If a Gears fan how said the same thing on an Uncharted review thread they'd be banned for 30 days for trolling and lose ALL their bubbles too. What a joke of a site.
But on topic...Gears sets...
This can't be legal. But it's not surprising from Sony.
OMG this game is phenominal. It easily blows away the competition. Here's a new benchmark in console fidelity. Good thing xbox has such an advance architecture any other console would choke, sputter, drop/tear frames, have to be dumbed down, and require a 5 gig "mandatory" install to even come close to this xbox only masterpiece. See what happens when you don't have to program to the lowest common denominator ps3.
EA is fighting a losing battle. I mean 30 fps (less if you're playing on ps3) vs 60 fps for a fps is no contest. If they would develop a 60 fps engine then they may be able to compete. But as it is 30fps/60fps just isn't going to cut it. Activision is going to dominate again.
I hope they don't just develop for the lowest common denominator ps3. If all someone has is a ps3 that's fine but don't dumb down the 360 version just because trying to pull off 360 fidelity on ps3 is damn near impossible without getting a very high percentage of torn and dropped frames accompanied by massive "mandatory" installs.
I can see trading your ps3 for and xbox, good idea. But if you just want and HD wii just buy yourself a Move and you'll have it. I mean it's a just a blantant copy of Wii, right? Yeah it is.
Man this game is going to rock on 360 http://www.lensoftruth.com/... . I can't wait.
I will get the vastly superior MW3 first. Once I've played through the campaign and spent a few hundred hours with the xbox live online modes and maybe got some dlc (first on xbox live) then I'll consider it.
I mean lets fact it. Mondern Warfare and Activision on xbox are da bomb. Battlefield too slow and better for ps3 with smaller online community too. Modern Warfare is fast, edge of your seat action better suited for xbox that can keep the frame rate up with all the effects...
It probably got cancelled because of lack of interest.
I mean why pour millions and millions and spend years and years maybe up to 6 years and 60 billion dollars (hello gt5) on a game when you know that the competition can spend have the time and money making a games that you can't really compete with anymore. Good decision Sony.
I heard that after John Carmacks comments regarding the ps3 " http://www.ripten.com/2011/... that SCE Santa Monica was tired of trying to get corvette performance from an old ford pinto and were moving onto 360 to enable them to develop on a piece of hardware that could actually achieve what they wanted. Did anyone else hear that?
Well ps3 has to get extra content to make up for the ps3's pitiful performance. Dropped frames, torn frames, dumbed down effects, etc. I mean Carmack already said that PS3 was SECOND best console and 360 was the BEST console (FACT). Oh it's a good day to be a 360 gamer.
http://www.ripten.com/2011/...
@Nopuctuation
LOL. You just said that Carmack was on MS payroll LOL. Wow. I mean just wow. id. on MS payroll ROFL.
You're really desperate. Carmack has forgotten more about game development that most people will ever know in their lifetime. He's just the only one with the balls to tell the truth about the PS3. Go Carmack. Someone from the industry (not a first party developer funded by either) telling the truth about the PS3's inferior hardware. YES. And you can...
There are already a bunch of shooters that look better than killzone. I mean killzone is pretty average. It looks pretty good but not that much better than kz2. But it does have vastly improved controls. But as far as looks its just average.
1. If have a 360 (Where MW3 will definately be far better than the ps3 version)
2. If you prefer 60fps instead of 25-30 fps (additional tearing and dropped frames via the ps3 version)
3. If you like fast heartpounding action rather than the slow (perfectly suited for PS3) paced yawning action this series is known for.
4. Because Activision puts out the best cutting edge games on the market.
5. If you are an xbox live subscriber where you're sure to get...
That sounds a lot like the "We don't need Netflix and wouldn't use it even if I did have it", ps3 fan babble we used to get. lol. But hey you can get yourself one of those HD Wii copy Move thingys I guess.
ROFL go visit Lens of Truth there Cornholio. ROFL. Still blaming developers LOL. Give me a break.