YES, it looks better on PS3 compared to the X360 version, but it's the same game with a plus of more content on the PS3 (all X360/PC DLC on blu-ray disc).
When Mass Effect 2 X360 released, it looked and played great...an improvement over its sequel. The PS3 version is running on an updated Unreal Engine 3, which will power Mass Effect 3 hence the visuals look refined on the PS3 version. Play the game on X360, the player experiences the world of Mass Effect 2; play the gam...
The fact remains that it's still the same game.
...definitely Elder Scrolls 5 because people weren't expecting its debut - Skyrim was the bigger announcement due to the fact that its development is the best kept secret. On the other hand, Mass Effect 3 was already known to be coming.
Between the two, Mass Effect 3 is my game.
Mass Effect 3 keeping it single-player ONLY, I wouldn't want it any other way...the game was conceived from the ground up as a pure single-player game.
Out of the three, if I only had $60 I will opt for Mass Effect 3
All the three will be heavy hitters when they release.
In my opinion, I think the four months release gap for Dragon Age and Mass Effect 2 was fine...(too) close, but not to the point of affecting the sales of either game.
And although Dragon Age and Mass Effect 2 are competing in the same genre (RPG), I regard them as products complimenting each other and BioWare's talents. I'm a huge BioWare fan who got both games – bought Dragon Age and Mass Effect 2 together a month after the latter released. The good thing about thes...
I'm SPEECHLESS
$149 is an acceptable price for the Xbox 360 Kinect device. Kinect falls in the same price category as the band kits that have hit the market, which have sold in the millions of units.
For instance, the band kit 'Band Hero featuring Taylor Swift' on Amazon is priced as follows: Playstation 3, $149.99; Xbox 360, $99.00; Wii, $159.99; and Playstation 2, $148.14.
The band kits are limited to one genre (sometimes one game)…the music genre. But with Kinect...
Generally, I believe that the AI in a game must be interesting to interact with. For instance, the enemy AI has to be fun to 'attack' and 'be attacked by' the player. In the original Crysis, I felt the AI was lacking in its behaviors...I didn't find it fun to interact with.
This revised smaller version is worth the $300 buy if you don't already own the previous Xbox 360 models.
I bought an Xbox 360 Elite early this year, and it's serving me proper...I'll not be replacing it with this new version. I'm a single-player only gamer and I use my consoles strictly for GAMING. So between the previous model and this new build, it don't matter to me because it's still the same DNA running through the hardware playing the games.
I liked the first Cole
Being a fan of the series, I have to say that watching that short leaked demo has gotten my excitement to HIGH ALERT
I highly recommend anyone who is keeping an eye out for Deus Ex 3 and has not played the first one game to give it a go.
The failure rate doesn't make the Xbox 360 the bad buy, it's Microsoft who are guilty...they are the bad buy since they rushed the system out early to gain a lead in the market.
Gears of War 3 and Halo Reach, games being produced by the same publishing house (Microsoft Games Studio) and being the Xbox 360's big guns releasing within the same year would put them in direct competition against each other. The two titles would be gunning for the same audience and dominance on Xbox LIVE.
Gears of War 3 launching, probably mid or fourth quarter 2011 makes perfect sense.
There is definitely no Gears of War 3 in 2010. In this generation, Halo and Gears of War have been the drivers for Xbox 360 and LIVE. Now, Halo is a Microsoft IP whilst Gears of War is Epic Games, but they are both under one publishing house, which is Microsoft Games Studios. Being under one publishing company, it does not make good business sense to have the machine's biggest guns out the same time...this would put the two titles in competition battling for the same customers and Xbox LIVE. ...
If Epic Games were to be bought by Microsoft, it's good-bye to Unreal Engine licensing. The Unreal Technology would be Microsoft owned and used to power their first-party (internal) games.
Currently, a buyout of Epic Games for Microsoft may not be a wise move. Epic Games is most profitable being independent due to their licensing business and the successful Gears of War on the side to showcase their Unreal Technology. The money Microsoft can use to buy Epic Games should rather ...
At the end of the day, they are both games. These graphics comparisons should not be happening. What is happening here is trying to prove one game is better than the other judging just by the visuals.
Every game that is out there and in development is UNIQUE. Unique in its story, design, presentation, gameplay, visuals and other elements it is built on. Each game is different; therefore its experiences will differ from other games. For example, Gears of War provides an experience...
It comes down to price, marketing, and the games to complement and compliment these devices.
I have both a PS3 and X360, and I don't intend to invest in either motion device...I prefer my standard PS3 and X360 controllers. But that doesn't mean I'm ignorant of motion devices...though I'm not sold on Project Natal, I look forward to what developers will do with it since it's an interesting concept.
What was seen in Russia is similar to what you can see in 2007's Halo 3 game. In the game, a ring cloud is above an artifact the Covenant is unearthing...the ring cloud is seen in the third mission Tsavo Highway.
At $60, it's worth the buy for PS3; besides, it's a first newly release on the system.
The $60 price can further be justified that Mass Effect 2 comes in three segments: (1) the interactive comic; (2) the main game; (3) the X360/PC DLC...all on 1 disc.