Judgment felt more like an expansion than an actually game. To me, I was fatigued from the series at that point. The story was ok, over all it wasn’t bad.
No it’s not, the mission of MS with Xbox is to deliver the same experience on all platforms. This can be achieved from streaming the game, which is a reason they are pushing game pass. Prime example, I was playing Gears Hive busters on my tablet IPad Pro and it ran it just as good as the S/x consoles
Exactly my take. I have a quest two, and 85 percent of the VR games in Sony’s store can be played on quest. It’s a great piece of hardware, but not enough to justify the price tag
To be clear, to relations to the article; If you have a quest 1 or Quest 2 then there is really no reason to buy the PSVR2 right now (unless you’re the “The Jones” type of buyer.which I am.) the majority of those games are available on the meta. To top it off games like horizon, a beautiful game, but limited in its approach along with GT for 69.99 doesn’t justify the purchase right now (again that’s if you already have a VR headset). If you’re new to the experience then it might be worth it. ...
This is exactly what I said above. Man, you have to hear some of the reasoning Sony used to try to block the deal you’d think Sony was the minority market share holders. The reaching was insane
How is it terrible for the industry and consumers? Please explain?
Truth be told, Sony is afraid of losing that number one spot. All because they are ill equipped to compete in an all digital market. This is why they are making the deals they’re making. The Sony Loyalists can say what they want, but it’s the truth. Why else would they be paying companies to keep games off game pass, because it’s a threat to Sony’s position, plus they’ll be forced to compete. If you look at the documents submitted by Sony in reference to why they want it blocked it’s specula...
But this is not a monopoly, so I don’t understand what you’re saying.
Which doesn’t apply to this purchase
It can surpass the first just off band recognition.there are other things I’m more concerned about, but different question for different day
Just off brand recognition, sure it can. I own it, and it’s a great piece of hardware. I’ve only played Horizon, which is a great starter but repetitive.
Naw, it would have to be the industry norm and a company is stubborn to adapt in order for it to be too late.
Interesting… can you explain how they are taking games from the competition please?
I mean, that’s evident. It’s too many variables to consider at this point. Hell, who’s to say the same ceo, president, representatives will be calling the shots in ten years. Who’s to say call of duty will even be relevant?
@settrip see it would be logic if what you said were fact. In reality everything you stated is hearsay and based upon personal preference and bias. Those 30 million can still play Activision games some will be locked to Xbox some will not and also be available via gamepass on all tablets, PC, and the most affordable Xbox. It’s also not poor form or desperation it’s business. See Sony has made companies sign contracts to totally lock games from Xbox to include making sure they don’t release o...
So if someone, in a court of law accused you of something, you wouldn’t ask for evidence, you’re just gonna take their word for it? Sony has pushed some strong allegations, and asking them to prove it is desperation?
Factual, I come to read comments and I just SMH at some of the things thrown around from both sides.
Does anyone of you have access to Microsoft’s figures, contracts with developers, and can take me through a step by step process of how game pass is handled from a business prospective? It’s the same rhetoric day in and day out. I understand a lot of people here hate Microsoft, and it’s understandable, but how can we have a clear understanding of sustainability if no one truly knows how it all works, and we get bits, pieces, and opinionated prejudices about the subject?
Did anyone read the entire document MS released ( treat that question as rhetorical)? It’s too much emotional reactions relative to partial statements being shared. Not only is the information incomplete, it’s being interpreted by people, who are admittedly bias and uneducated to Microsoft’s process, compensations, and contractual agreements with developers. Then try to pass it along like they’re experts in the subject at hand. I wish we focused more on facts instead of these optioned emoti...
Actually that would be kind of fly if they made it a turn base RTS.