gamer2010

Member
CRank: 5Score: 9890

The site has crashed or something. I can no longer access the site.

That video is breathtaking though. I am still picking my jaw off the floor.

4858d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

True. This is on another level above anything we have ever seen before.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

And that guy's kit really isn't that great.

Old beta build + low settings DX9 + average hardware = it still looks that amazing!

4858d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm buying my copy without a doubt. Crytek deserve to be paid for all their hard work.

4858d ago 12 agree4 disagreeView comment

You PS3 fanboys need to cut it with your biased commentary.

Watch this http://www.youtube.com/watc... and if you can't see how utterly amazing that is then you are hopelessly deluded and in denial.

4858d ago 6 agree3 disagreeView comment

That is incredible. I'm sorry, I love Killzone 3 beta, but this blows it away in the scale, the quality of the effects, the lighting, the detail in the modelling of the objects, etc.

4858d ago 16 agree3 disagreeView comment

Mass Effect 2 is not better on the PS3. According to Digital Foundry the 360 version still has the technical edge.

I do agree with you, though, that there are a lot of great games coming for the PS3 this year. I'll be playing Killzone 3 next week along with you.

I just feel sorry for people that only own one console and become rabid fanboys in the process.

4858d ago 2 agree17 disagreeView comment

You guys are funny. This article is stupid, but it is filled with comments by mostly PS3 fanboys, not 360 fanboys. Your view would only have some merit if this article was filled with "Xbots" praising it. But that isn't the case.

And you are fanboys not because you said something about this specific article, but because most of you have a consistent history of bashing the 360 and hyping the PS3.

4858d ago 2 agree13 disagreeView comment

I basically agree, but in reality there isn't much fighting going on. As always the comments section is filled with disgruntled PS3 fanboys.

4858d ago 1 agree19 disagreeView comment

No, it does look good, they both look good. It doesn't matter, both will be mine.

4858d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

No, they don't. They just say they do.

4859d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Hands down? They look nearly identical in the screenshots and when you play both games. I think some of you are just trying to convince yourselves that Killzone 3 looks better.

On the other hand, where Killzone 3 surpasses Killzone 2 is in the size of the levels.

4859d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't know what kind of anti-aliasing it is using, but meetajhu is right, the anti-aliasing was better in Killzone 2. There are a lot more jaggies in Killzone 3.

4859d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

@DualConsoleOwner

This is a comparison between Killzone 2 and Killzone 3 out of curiosity to see what improvements were made.

But I have to ask, do you really think Killzone 2 looks better in those videos you posted?

4859d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Microsoft have a track record only in the minds of Sony fanboys. Every mistake or poor decision by Sony, on the other hand, is simply ignored.

4859d ago 11 agree6 disagreeView comment

Waaahhh! lol

4859d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Some people's double standards are truly ridiculous.

4859d ago 11 agree4 disagreeView comment

At least Bulletstorm offers some fairly fresh takes on the genre.

4859d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

Ok and what amazing shooter were PS3 owners playing when Halo Reach came out?

You guys don't even make sense a lot of the time.

4859d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Nonsense. I love the Killzone 3 beta because it is fun and looks good, but it doesn't blow away Gears of War, especially Gears 3. That's just fanboy dribble.

4859d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

I detect a heavy dose of sarcasm.

4861d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment