Every time anyone clicks an Evony advert it costs Evony money.
Too late, the lawyers have copies of the original!
1) That was not Wikipedia. It was the official Evony Wiki.
2) They have now deleted the entry saying they are Chinese. This is typical of them trying to change the truth, which is why they are sueing me.
3) The original page still exists on the Google cache. But for insurance I have copied it here: http://bruceongames.blogspo...
Evony pants on fire!!
Evony email sent out by Evony widely on the interweb thing: http://www.examiner.com/x-6...
"5. Evony is in no way a Chinese based company. Evony is a registered corporation in the United States with millions of active players in dozens of countries around the globe."
Evony official Wiki:
In the interests of free speech feel free to copy and paste my Evony articles and the comments anywhere you want on the internet.
The problem here is that to defend a libel case in the UK costs a minimum of £100,000.
Taking wintnesses etc to Australia would more than double that.
And Australia has the same old archaic law as the UK where the onus is on me to prove that every single word is the absolute truth.
What I have written is the truth as anybody who follows the links can see, likewise the Guardian.
What Evony are doing here is carpetbombing the web to remove all criticis...
But none of this is a one stop shop for everything. Games, utilities, whatever. Some free.
A place for PC users to go and browse. A place for software authors to publish.
Which makes you a thief.
lol
Watch the video at the top of the article.
Just for the Sony fanboys:
http://www.bruceongames.com...
That article lists 2 real positives for the 360
And 1 real positive for the PS3
But the Sony fanboys only see the 360 points.
If and when Sony do good stuff I write about it:
http://www.bruceongames.com...
and
http://www.bruceongam...
It is an absolute fact that the 360 is a far more elegant design than the PS3. Ask any game developer who has worked on both or any electronics engineer who has examined both.
I have done this and you have not.
The problem is that Sony corporate forced their gaming division to use the PS3 as a trojan horse for two pieces of emergent technology, the Cell and BluRay. This massively increased costs, delayed the whole project and added layers of complexity.
Microso...
They are spamming with Google adwords/adsense too: http://www.google.com/suppo...
Beware, they have iEvony, which looks like a scam to get hold of your friends details.
What about Runescape? http://www.runescape.com/
According to Metacritic there are 344 games for the PS3, 413 for the Nintendo Wii and 637 for the Xbox 360.
You don't have to stand up to use Natal, as you would know were you sufficiently informed to make a valid opinion.
And it has everything to do with games because it will make the playing experience more immersive.
Is $90 expensive for an add on?
Because Nintendo have sold 10 million balance boards.
You don't need buttons. Humans aren't fitted with buttons in the real world.
When you have a whole body, face and voice interface like Natal there are literally thousands of different input cues that can be used instead of buttons. Not only that, these input cues can be made far more intuitive.
Controllers and buttons are one of the very worst things about gaming. Getting rid of them is brilliant and revolutionary.
The Wiimote is fairly primitive compared with ...
I don't think so.
Sure, the EyeToy was a camera, but it was pretty primitive.
Natal is a whole body 3D interface. It recognises depth as well as the vertical plane. It also has face recognition, voice input and voice recognition.
So if Natal is a Ferrari then EyeToy was a skateboard.
A great Kingory article: http://www.nfopocalypse.com...