I see a lot of people complaining about infiltrators. The tactician class is a direct counter to infiltrators. You can also just pay attention to your mini-map. If you see an ally, but don't see them on the mini-map, then shoot them.
Sure I would. I would jump at the chance to get remastered games like Okami, Odin Sphere, Rogue Galaxy, Tenchu: Wrath of Heaven, etc.
"Microsoft is also known to announce big titles just months before release, unlike Sony who always seems to have their whole lineup announced far in advance."
Why do people still think that?
Halo 3
Announced 5/9/2006
Released 9/22/2007
Fable 3
Announced 8/19/2009
Released 10/26/2010
Halo Reach
Announced 6/1/2009
Released 9/14/2010
Gears...
Not having an R18+ classification is absolutely stupid.
@below
So you are one of those who subscribes to the theory that video games influence behavior. Why is it then that millions of people play video games every day and have a firm grasp on reality?
You want to know what really influences behavior? Poor or nonexistent parenting. Gaming is just a convenient scapegoat.
There are laws that regulate what you can and cannot do to your car.
I never went to medical school of course, but I bet there are a dozen other medical explanations for those conditions. My point is that there should not be an article proclaiming a cause of death until the cause of death is official.
@Pozzle
That is a fair point, and I do not mean to suggest that the parents have no fault, because clearly they do. I just have an issue with the title of the article. It is irresponsible to make an article like that when the ca...
According to the article the official cause of death is still unknown.
Well with all the customization options I could see reviewers docking points for "too much variety". Also, since the enemies and objectives are randomly placed that totally opens the door for "inconsistent online experience".
That is probably the line of reasoning that the insurance company is using. A reasonable person would keep the gold in a secure location.
He would only be humiliated if he allowed himself to feel humiliated. Discovering that other people cannot influence your feelings or self opinion without your consent is very liberating. I recommend it to everyone.
Sell the in game gold for money, buy real gold with the money. It is not really a tough concept to grasp.
I doubt that. Microsoft is a publicly traded company, and would be responsible for providing proof of that transaction if shareholders requested it. I can't imagine the shareholders would be terribly pleased to learn of it.
George Hotz is not even a valid charity, so the donation could not be written off as a tax exemption. What would Microsoft have to gain?
Bluedevil18 is right though. Whether or not he liked the game, shredding the disc was not a smart thing to do. He could have recouped some of his money had he sold it instead.
You didn't actually read the article did you? It has nothing to do with EA having a revelation. Crytek was given the choice because they are in the EA partner program. They chose not to use the Online Pass system because the system is still relatively new and they didn't want to be a test bed. Furthermore, they did not want to alienate the console user base because they figure that most console owners have never experienced a Crisis game before.
Bah, can't edit. I meant to type judgment, but my fingers got away from me.
People are donating to him now because they want him to win the case. If he loses it will no longer be about supporting their point of view. It will just be about helping a loser pay his debt. He won't get much support if he loses this case.
If he loses this case the judgement against him could be seven figures. I doubt he could raise that amount of money even through donations. In fact if he loses I suspect no one will give him donations.
Are you sure that is accurate? As far as I know the wireless standard in PlayStation 3 consoles is 802.11g, not N.
There will be a metric butt ton of vengeance delivered on this site the day that happens. I will not personally be partaking in it mind you, but you know it will happen.
He said most, not all. As much as I hate baseless generalizations, he is probably not far off the mark.
The 2012 issue is blown out of proportion. 12/21/2012 merely marks the end of the Mayan solar calendar cycle, at which point another cycle will begin.
On 12/22/2012 the date will be about as important as Y2K.