Approvals 10/3 ▼
Rowland (4) - 5197d ago Cancel
THC CELL (2) - 5197d ago Cancel
Hellsvacancy (2) - 5197d ago Cancel
Gamedot (2) - 5197d ago Cancel
1030°

Final Fantasy XIII Slightly Worse On Xbox 360

NowGamer: The final retail Xbox code is in the door and comes off comparatively worse for wear...

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

5197d ago Replies(7)
Hellsvacancy5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

Ouch - but it was expected

But teh blu-ray is not needed

I still aint buyin it/rentin it/borrowin it

Vincent VII5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

The final retail Xbox 360 code is in the door and comes off comparatively the poorer

PS3 version for the win Pre-order here boys

http://www.amazon.com/Final...

THC CELL5197d ago

Ohhhhhhh man cant say what i am thinking in this zone

good news tho xbox players get to enjoy ff13
shame not vs tho

MasFlowKiller5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

SE i still dont F****** get it

So its been proven that the final version of the games was dumb down, Dont believe me go buy FF7 Advent Children. That unarguable.

I thought the reason the game got dumb down was to make both versions equal?

Let me get this straight, u guys want me to buy a JRPG with no towns, no NPCs and based on the JP reviews, a mediocre story. A game that has a more then one year old demo that looks better then the final product. A game that has been almost cut in haft, which will probably come out as DLC.

No thank you

guys if u want to buy a extremely good and different JRPG just buy Valkyria Chronicles its only $20 nows.

And if ur too much of a Final Fantasy fan like me, just buy it used. As much as i hate gamestop i guess ill buy it used just to show SE how incredibly irritated i am with the way this tittle came out.
That the only way we gamer can truly influence future tittles.

gaffyh5197d ago

The title was actually:

"FF13 Significantly poorer on Xbox"

But it seems like they changed it, so it wasn't as flamebait-y. These are the actual problems:

- While facial detail appears largely unchanged, the characters' clothes appear at first glance to be lacking finer details, with notably lower resolution textures.
- Incidental environmental objects and enemies appear less detailed, both in texture and geometry.
- The game's CG is extremely compressed and pales alongside the stunning HD goodness which blu-ray offers.

raztad5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

So there go the dreams for a superior xbox version.

Even if both version were exactly the same gameplay wise, the PS3 version is still the way to go with uncompressed 1080p cinematics and uncompressed audio. No to mention one single disk instead of scratching prone dvds.

BTW, english is not my first language but this strikes me as common sense:

"Slightly Worse" means the other version is bad as well but this just worse, right?

BeaArthur5197d ago

raztad...hit the nail on the head. Given the option I think most of us would prefer to not have to swap discs, so I will be getting the PS3 version just for that reason.

ssipmraw5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

its not like people were going to buy it on that system anyways

hopefully square will learn a lesson from all this one day

anyways what did people expect? SE has developed on the 360, at least outsourced projects, over longer periods of time (2-3 years) only to put out utter garbage games. FFXIII was ported for about a year...which would really say something about the final products quality

Shadow Flare5197d ago

I'm relieved that squareenix didn't sell out to the extent of trying to make both versions identical. And by that, I mean lowering the ps3 version to 360 standards. Try and learn from this next time square; the 360 does nothing but hold back games. Stop porting ps3 exclusives to that thing.

MasFlowKiller5197d ago

But they did.
All you have to do is play the Advent Children demo and compare it to the final product to know.

Perjoss5197d ago

ff13 got its work cut out for it, with the amazing mass effect 2 released this year already.

zoks3105197d ago

Like Sony have been saying for years, if you want the best then you get Playstation. Hopefully whatever version you buy you enjoy it, hell it's your money.

coolfool5197d ago

No, "slightly worse" doesn't mean that the first thing was bad, and nor the second thing for that matter. Just that the second thing is not quite as good as the first.

So a game with 9.9 is "slightly worse" than a 10 game.

Yarite5197d ago

You sir are an idiot.

The game has 3 cities.
The game has NPC's which are all fully voiced. I have the Japanese version so I know this.

I cant believe you said the final version looks worse then the demo.

Final PS3 build looks better and has better performance then the PS3 demo from ages ago.

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

The 360 version will probably looks worse then the PS3 demo.

Danteh5197d ago

as expected, the most important multiplat of this year is vastly inferior in the 360... how ironic ;)

At least now we know that the PS3 version (at least graphically) takes advantge of most of the power

PS: also ROFL at squeenix's "we don't need to show that the two versions are equal" in the photoshopped screens fiasco.... this pretty much proves it WAS intentional

Noct5197d ago

eeeerrr dude...

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

The PS3 retail release looks slightly better and has better framerate then the PS3 demo.

Man N4G really does have some turd members. Elpresador must have been talking about people like you in his latest vid haha.

FanOfGaming5197d ago

The answer is simple, Final Fantasy was meant for the PlayStation 3 I don't know why Microsoft even bothered, they have tons of other games releasing this year. Paying for a watered down version of a blockbuster title = FAILURE

JokesOnYou5197d ago

"To our purely subjective eyes, we have noted" -NowGamer

I'll wait for Lens of Truth

JOY

JasonPC360PS3Wii5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

This game shouldn't even be on the Xbox... but here it is :)

AAACE55197d ago

I don't care about all this stuff people are saying about the game. As long as it looks like the videos I downloaded, i'm ok with it. I know the Ps3 version will look better, especially if they use the 50 Gb disc and not the 25 Gb.

Don't rule it out, if you look at the setup, you might be surprised. MS is a sneaky company as you might have learned.

The setup... If FFXIII has good sales for the 360, they will announce Versus for the 360 at E3. MS want this to happen which is why they are advertising so much. SE haven't shown alot of Versus because their direction with it isn't set in stone. If sales of the 360 version work out well, they will be working on a port by May, which would leave them the 6 month timeframe to port it if they wanted to release for the holiday 2010 period.

Don't hate me, just look at the set up! SE have let you down before, so it is a possibility.

commodore645197d ago

Did I call this, or what?
http://www.n4g.com/Redirect...

With regard to this particular article, Nowgamer officially stated that their view was a 'subjective view', thus certainly not reliable.

In any case, we should wait for the definitive reputable apples-to-apples comparisons from Eurogamer and Lensoftruth,before we shoot our mouths off.

I'd hate to be right twice in a row on this topic...

Harry_Manback5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

Joy has "read" things that contribute to his delusional, irrational thought processes.

Well, I've "read" a lot of things as well but at least I have the common sense to decipher FACT from BS.

Danteh5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

ummm.... subjetive means that they personally think that the 360 version looks inferior, and yea it's an opinion, just like my opinion is that Nintendo 64 games subjectively look worse than PS3 ones... oh wait

In before Sh!tstorm reaching 1000 degrees

raztad5197d ago

@coolfool

Thanks bro. I appreciate it.

@those waiting for LensofTru or whatever else

What is the point? first when the differences are noticeable to the naked eye a deeper analysis will make them more evident, and second the PS3 version is the superior one by default even if gameplay is identical.

If you are a mulconsole owner this is a no brainer, there is no such thing like multiplayer, online friends that can push you to get the xbox version.

If you only own a xbox, why does it matter which version is superior? are you gonna buy a PS3 just for this? or is just fanboyism?

LONEWOLF2315197d ago

Yep PS3 for me!
As stated before multidisk is scratch prone indeed!
That is the main reason why ill be getting the PS3 version.

MasFlowKiller5197d ago

Yes the final build is more stable i agree with that but the demo has better textures. The character and the environment are more detailed in the demo.

lets get back to this argument from i dont know how many month ago.
U say u have an import version u probably have the demo too, SO go ahead and capture images from both and get back to me.

k

SL1M DADDY5197d ago

It is proof that they had to try and make them as close to one another as possible and if they had only the PS3 to work with the game would look even better. The proof is read between the lines here. Too bad too, it would have been nice to see the game reach its full potential.

awesomesauce215197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

No wonder MS is spending all that marketing money.

No one is going to buy it on an xbox now.

N4Flamers5197d ago

on the side by side the ps3 version looked like it had better textures and lighting than the demo as well as running at a better frame rate, but for most of that they seemed identical.

I cant believe people think this game has no npc's when you play the game with 2 of them in your team. Wow and i bet you wont talk to anyone in the game either.

The towns argument is a moot point to me. I dont care about towns or anything like that I just want a good story.

OT
I think the ps3 will be better just based on the 1080p cutscenes. I have a great led tv and I all ways throw on advent children to show off the quality.

doG_beLIEfs5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

NOTE: to really see what I am talking about make sure to click the HD link.

Ok, so maybe the frame-rate is slightly better but there is a big drop in quality of lighting and to a lesser extent textures.

Look at 3:23 you can clearly see in the demo version the lightsource behind the fro reflects off of his face when in the final version it does not. His clothes have a noticable drop in texture detail as well.

AT 2:41 the texture detail is again easily not as good in the final version the metal looks much less believable and the model itself appears to be a bit blurry.

1:38 again less texture and lighting detail.

I saw these on just 1 viewing.

Thanks again MS and Square for dumbing down a potentially great game into just a good game.

Just imagine a demo from a year before release, just imagine if Square spent that time refining and polishing this version instead of wasting time on weaker hardware AND lowering the quality of the PS3 version so that they are closer in appearance.

So, who wants to tell me that the PS3 version was NOT affected negatively by the 360 version?

Her hair has more strands in the final code but that was the only "improvement" that I saw.

jack_burt0n5197d ago

Dont worry u guys can wait for LOT to get a copy from their local 7/11 or u can wait for EDGE I mean eurogamer to write up their bias sh*te.

LOL

lelo2play5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

With so many multiplatform releases, it's about time the PS3 got the better version instead of the X360. Sooner or later is was bound to happened.

To bad the game is not that great.

5197d ago
andron5197d ago

Lens of truth are a bit shallow when it comes to analysis. DF on the other hand have no guessing or subjective opinions. Only verifiable facts and analysis.

Some people might not like what DF discover about games performances, but that's their problem.

Digital Foundry's FFXIII analysis isn't out yet, but many sources have pointed out that the 360 port seems to be slightly inferior. It' doesn't' seem to affect gameplay to much, only the graphics and sound, so 360 owners will get a good game to play too...

harrisk9545197d ago

"Ultimately, no matter what you're playing it on and we would discourage anyone from deciding not to buy it if they're already planning to. However, if you have a choice, the PS3 version has the edge."

It sounds like they tempered their comments a bit by saying "slightly worse" because reading between the lines, this statement seems to indicate that there is a huge difference between the 2 versions and they can't come out and say it explicitly.

"...we would discourage anyone from deciding not to buy it if they're already planning to...":

Translation: If you don't have a PS3, we don't recommend you buy it. The xbox version is so much worse than the PS3 version that unless you are a FF fan and have already decided to purchase it for the xbox, it is not worth it.

EVILDEAD3605197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

This is classic..NOWGAMER (who has been suspect in the past) has clearly not even played the 360 version of the game and has rushed out this 'news' for one reason only. in fact, do a search on how many games NOWGAMER have done comparisons on and passed it as 'news' on their site...

But the funny part is they ended up validated what square said all along..the gaming experience is EXACTLY the same on both systems..

This would have been tragic if they came with..360 has horrible framerate and slowdown issues..the graphics are horrible..the sound is muted..massive bugs etc..

How about ANYTHING that would have made gamers wary of the game..I own both systems and these are the ONLY kinds of issuers that would have made me get the PS3 version. There is a zero percent cance I would play a multi-plat Final Fantasy for 20 hours and not get achievements unless it was absolutely horrible.

But this is ALL you could find wrong with the game???

Umm..this is umm subjective to our eyes...

1. Face details umm 'appear unchanged at 'first glance'..bu-bu-but the characters' clothes lack 'finer details' and have 'notable' lower resolution.

LMAO..so did they pause the game 2 minutes in and notice a button on a sleeve missing? It appears?? At First glance?? 'Notable' lower resolution? Reeeeeeach...

2. Incidental environmental objects and enemies 'appear' less detailed, both in texture and geometry.

Incidental object? Wait a minute..that leaf doesnt look as detailed..did you see see the 'geometry' of that cloud? What on earth was Square Enix thinking..they should have scrapped the 360 version.

3. The game's CG is extremely compressed and pales alongside the stunning HD goodness which blu-ray offers.

LMAO..CG is CG..does it look good or not..we have SEEN what the cutscenes look like on the 360 version and NEVER on earth will you ever see someone look at ONE clip and say..you know what? This look compressed..in fact it looks extremely compressed..

I own 2 Blu-Ray players and if the difference is Blu Ray vs. DVD quality on the cutscenes..then that is absolutely fine..because guess what? There are ZERO games on the 360 that have Blu Ray cut scenes and they look amazing.

So if less detailed clothes and geometry on incidental environmental items and classic Blu-ray vs DVD argument is the difference between versions then 360 owners that are Final fantasy can rest assured that the game is still worth their $60.

Evil

Hoggy19835197d ago

Stop comparing versions and actually start talking about whether or not this game will be good. Initial opinions have been lukewarm so all this "my version is better than your version" nonsense is redundant if the game itself is average. The PS3 version is by all accounts better than the 360 version. The only real reason I'd be "green eyed" is if it turns out to be "the best rpg this generation". If that was the case I'd want to be playing the definitive version on the PS3.

sikbeta5197d ago

So Obvious, we all know this was going to happen and is Not M$ Fault, is SE and Specially Wada aka The W#ores and their greediness, they obviously couldn't match the PS3 version and start with lies and fake pics...

Consoldtobots5197d ago

I think this fiasco will be rememebered as "the "coup" that blew up in MS and their fanboys faces".

Anon19745197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

We know the PS3 is the superior hardware. It's got game after game that the 360 hasn't been able to touch (and before you start yelling "Halo Reach" I'm talking games that have actually been released, not theoretical games almost a year away that we really have no idea how they'll play).

That being said, the differences between most versions of multiplat games are minuscule. The very rare game will have differences worth noting, but for the most part it boils down to a few dropped frames here, a few blurred textures you'll never notice there. It's much ado about nothing. 360 fans love to cling to their precious "comparisons" as some kind of proof that their system isn't lagging behind, but the rest of the world has played Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, is getting geared up for Heavy Rain and God of War 3. We know the 360 is lagging. Just because some developers don't have the time or resources to get their games running the same or better on the PS3 isn't about the hardware, it's about the developers. We've got example after example that shows the 360 is being left behind and why wouldn't this happen? It's the older system. Of course it would start to show it's age eventually. 360 fans denying this inevitability are like sad guys in their mid 40's, buying that sports car trying to cling to their youth. It's denial, plain and simple.

The 360 isn't capable of the types of games the PS3 is and we know this because if it was capable we would have seen it by now. The 360's 5 years old and the tech inside is even older. It's just wasn't designed to outlast. That isn't anything to be threatened by. No one is going to knock down your door and say you can't enjoy your 360 anymore. It's a good system that will still be supported for years. Enjoy the hell out of it. Just stop pretending that it's the end all, be all of gaming consoles. It's not. Get over it and enjoy some games. I don't let the fact that my 360's falling behind keep me awake at night.

IaMs125197d ago

I agree common sense if you have a PS3 get it for PS3, 360 only well you have no choice really. But why is it always bring the PS3 down to the 360 level, freaking devs make the 360 the PS3 level lol. Ya ya disagree but honestly....

bpac1234567895197d ago

Even if the 360 vrsion was (is?) inferior to the ps3 version in every way it doesn't matter. The average consumer isn't going to know about this. They arn't going to understand that the ps3 version is on one disc, or that it has superior cgi, or even better ingame textures. There going to see all the microsoft adds that make it look exclusive and buy it for the 360.
Microsoft's marketing campaign is so aggressive and Sony's is so lackluster that people are also going to buy it for the 360 when they decide to make the jump to next gen consoles. Brand loyalty/familiarity only gets you so far. Take a look at all the other games that use to be sony exclusives like GTAIV. Look what version sold more. Microsoft knows what they are doing. Their silencing the Sony brand and making every major multiplatform their own.

Syronicus5197d ago

"Why don't fanboys shut the fcuk up about the XBox 360 "gimping" Final Fantasy XIII's development!?! Mass Effect 2 has more content, looks better and doesn't need 3 fcuking discs. Let's face facts..."

Yes, let's face the facts. Starting with the question of, how do you know that ME2 has more to it than FFXII? I am in no way defending the game but have to ask, how do you come to the conclusion of the comment you made?

EVILDEAD3605197d ago

LOL @ taking a bubble because I called it like it is...(but you are not allowed to say that you are going to purchase the 360 version on N4G.com for obvious reasons)

Once again..

- Blog from a small gaming site treated as 100% fact

- Blogger admits that it is subjective to his eyes

- Blogger proves that he did'nt even play the review version at any length..instead resorts to 'At first glance' and it 'appears' to back up theory

- Blogger cannot come up with ANY significant reason why the 360 version is not on par with the PS3.

- There are zero graphic issues, zero framerate issues, zero slow down issues, and zero bugs..issues that plague lesser multi-plats during console comparisons

- Instead you have 'Incidental objects' that only 'appear' to have less detail in 'texture and geometry'

- Instead you have Blu Ray vs. DVD video and one disc vs. Multi. This is what we knew from day one.

Bottomline: Both systems are finally blessed with the Mecca RPG series of this generation. And just like other major Multi-platform franchises (Resident Evil 5, Grand Theft auto 4)..Final Fantasy will be succeessful on both consoles.

Evil

JokesOnYou5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

@Harry_Manback you say:
"Well, I've "read" a lot of things as well but at least I have the common sense to decipher FACT from BS."

-So just because I don't take NowGamer's word as gospel, (no comparison pics, no comparison vids) you call me delusional for wanting to see LOT analysis or hell Digital Foundry I don't care which one I'd just like to see for myself, hell I'd even be willing to believe it as long as most of the sites I read say the same thing... since I just read yesterday a site(can't remember which it was on n4g though) saying 360 was crisper so I'd like to see just out of curiuosity, I doubt I'll buy this game unless its scores very well because I don't like jrpg's much anyway. If I did buy the game it would be for 360 unless there are some major differences because if nothing else I'd like to get the Achievements since I game predominantly on my 360, I haven't even tried to collect Trophies, since I don't have the time to build both really. If ps3 version is shown to be much better then so be it, but I'm certainly not going to take a bunch of fanboys on n4g word for it.= lol YOU FAIL AT LOGIC.

@commodore64, Yes you were right but its a no brainer anything any site says in favor of ps3 is taken as gospel.

@darkride66, you say:
"It's got game after game that the 360 hasn't been able to touch (and before you start yelling "Halo Reach" I'm talking games that have actually been released, not theoretical games almost a year away that we really have no idea how they'll play)."

-Nothing but BS there man, KZ2 is graphically the best game on ps3, UC2 looks almost just as good, but they are so different either way YES we can yell "Halo Reach", why because we've seen screens and gameplay, and it looks amazing NOW, it certainly won't look any worse with about 8 months or so before release, and here's a news flash= It will play like Halo. You say don't mention it but even you like all the other ps3 extremists bring up GOW3(GT5) and so many other games long before they were due to release. As far as this comparison goes it will be interesting to see how the games stack up since its been dev'd from the ground up on the ps3, but even if we believe this site it doesn't sound like theres much desparity like the Bayonetta comparison or Ghostbusters etc. Yeah so beat your chest all you like but ps3 isn't proving any superiority over 360 games like ME2 look amazing compared to UC2, Alan Wake looks superb, both have graphical powerhouses, but people see what they want to see just like many here try to downplay Reach's visuals compared to KZ2=

http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...
http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...
http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...
http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

http://www.n4g.com/NewsCom-...

-Yeah, KZ2 is a year old game, but its still ps3 best looking game, no matter how loudly ps3 extremists yell no other game beats it in terms of graphics on the ps3=fact, also Reach isn't finished but it already measures up very well, and imo looks better in charachter models for sure than KZ2.

JOY

The Maxx5197d ago

Great comment.

I think that ME2 is the best looking game on any console this Gen. Prove me wrong anyone that doesn't think that. I have played and finished KZ2 and UC2 and KZ2 is still better looking than UC2. And I have played and finished ME2 and I think ME2 looks better than KZ2.

Graphics these days for big budget games are so close to each other that anyone could argue any point which and why certain aspects of each game like UC2, KZ2, ME2, GT5, GoW3, Gears2, Halo Reach etc stand out more in 1 game than the graphics do in another.

It's lost conversation. There are no absolutes. There is no formula.

IT'S ALL SUBJECTIVE!!!!!

Harry_Manback5197d ago

I've read enough of your garbage over the years to call you delusional with confidence.

So let me get this "logic" of yours straight.

You're going to wait for lens of truth comparison...even though you don't like jrpg's/Final Fantasy.

You're not going to get this game unless it scores very well...even though you don't like jrpg's/Final Fantasy.

If you did get it, it'd be for "achievments"..even though you don't like jrpg's/Final Fantasy.

You're in a FF13 article stirring up a storm and ranting nonsense...even though you don't like jrpg's/Final Fantasy.

And you're trying to tell me about LOGIC?

;)

Consoldtobots5197d ago

@ Darkride

I remember roughly 2-3 years ago (more specifically after having played both LAIR and Heavenly Sword) I took sometime to reflect on the future potential and present quality of what I had just experienced. I then came on this or another forum (don't remember) and tried to be as diplomatic as possible when I said this "MS is fooling themselves with this strategy of trying to outdo Sony, they need to focus on bringing UNIQUE fun experiences to the 360 and stop worrying about what Sony and the PS3 is doing. This strategy will start to show the 360s age in about 2-3 years and will ultimately cost them the console war".

and here we are now.

FamilyGuy5197d ago

I'm glad the PS3 version is noticeably better. Not only is the 360 the rushed port this time but the game has been in development for the PS3 for a veeeery long time. PS3 owning fans, like myself, would be extremely upset if the 360 version came out on top.

I doubt the differences are noticeable enough to change someones mind about purchasing it so at least it isn't a crappy port, just better looking on the PS3 if seen side-by-side.

Anon19745197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

You're exactly the type of fan I'm talking about. You downplay amazing graphical achievements like Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 among others, yet you can't point to anything better. You say nothing's topped Killzone 2 and yet Uncharted 2/Heavy Rain/GOW 3/GT5 running in 3D all beg to differ. These games are graphically the best console games ever released. Period. This is fact.

Linking to conceptual art from a game that's just shy of a year away from release does nothing to negate my point. And that's my point. The 360 diehards are always pointing to something that hasn't been released yet, and then when the game releases and doesn't live up to the hype, they just point to some other game that hasn't been released yet.

The rest of the gaming world knows what the score is. We've seen the evidence, accepted it and moved on. The 360 is a nice system with some amazing games. The fact that it's games have plateaued doesn't change that fact, but if you're going to call yourself a gamer you shouldn't bury your head in the sand. All systems eventually get old and kicking and screaming that it's not happening is just sad. It'll happen to the PS3 too one day, but you won't see me stubbornly insisting that it isn't happening or saying "Oh yeah! Just wait till such and such a game is released. You'll see! You'll all see!" Gears set the benchmark for the 360 back in 2006. Hundreds of games came and nothing topped it until Gears 2, and then only slightly. Meanwhile PS3 games keep improving by leaps and bounds. What more evidence do you need. The 360 is at it's ceiling. It's done. Even if they milk a bit more performance with Halo Reach, it's one game out of hundreds. Pull your head out of the sand and look around. The gaming world's always changing.

And again, I'm not saying anything's wrong with the 360, and it's not going to go away overnight but let's be realistic here. It was only a matter of time.

MGSR THE HD VERSION5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

Bs, just a guy trying hard to effect sales. there hasn't even been a official word of the xbox copy going gold yet, not a single review has even been published yet, yet this guy appears to be already done with it.

and where is the comparison? is it beyond his religion to take pictures?

"Incidental environmental objects and enemies appear less detailed, both in texture and geometry."

that better be true, cause that's exactly what i'm going to be looking for....to the likeness of my knowledge there hasn't yet been any reports of "missing" geometry of any game in this generation. (not even crysis or badcompany2 reports that.)

i expected ff13 to look worse than mass effect2 (after seeing even the best of the best shots/gameplay hand picked myself)......but anything but this. http://i46.tinypic.com/dlp3...
http://i49.tinypic.com/rmvc...

...if that were true then bayonetta would actually be setting a better example, that's not how it should be i hope.

i mean what about lost odyssey?
http://i45.tinypic.com/lxrt...

that game has proven it's self for 2 years, so ff13 should look better than that....or at least on par with it for SE's sake that's all i'm saying.

Captain Obvious5197d ago

This game will be better on Playstation 3.

Glasscocked5197d ago

It should be expected that N4G, the preeminent PS3 fanboy site on the net, would have this article leading things off. Seriously, the news is great here, the users not so much.

Pika-pie5197d ago

Just be glad its only slightly better.

Ive said before, its always the same where a console is given the lead platform. They program for one and then get it on to the other as an after thought.

PS3 version has been in development for a lot longer than the 360 version, SE have the hardware down to a tee.

Really really looking forward to release, have been anticipating this game since it was first announced 4 years ago. Really want it to be my GOTY!!! Hope it doesnt disappoint.

ShadowCK5197d ago

I'll just played Mass Effect 2 then.

Saaking5197d ago

I don't really care, the fact remains that the game was gimped. Just look at PS3 exclusives in comparison. FFXIII could have been MUCH more than it is right now.

starvinbull5197d ago

I just don't see how anyone could have ever argued that this wouldn't be the case, especially SE.

It may or may not be convenient to admit it, but the fact is that the PS3 version suffered because of the multiplatform release and the 360 version suffered from lack of storage space. Surprised? Nobody should be.

JokesOnYou5197d ago

@ Harry Manback, I guess you dont read much, I said; "I dont like jrpg's MUCH anyway" which means they are my least favorite genre of games, that does NOT mean I NEVER play them, it means I only will bother trying a jrpg if its considered very good or the best, nowhere did I imply I hate or say "I dont play jrpg's" as you suggest, I just rarely play them, and quite frankly I never enjoyed them much, but Im a gamer so I dont rule any genre out totally if it looks like their is some potential there for me to have fun. Thus your entire post makes no sense, so just stop pretending you know anything about me because clearly you dont and your reading comprhension skills are seriously lacking, along with all the ps3 fanboys who agreed with you.

@darkride, its clear that Im waisting my breath as well as you're waisting yours responding to me, but whatever its the internet. This suppose superiority does not exist except for the fanboys on n4g who favor ps3, KZ2 is ps3 best looking game and looks better overall than any game on both consoles, UC2 didnt change that although it looks amazing, but so does ME2, and games like Alan Wake and Reach look to be setting the bar a bit higher, ps3 has some games coming out that look amazing also, thats it, thats what the gaming world knows, they dont see superiority from the ps3, most gamers dont care about the desparity between Bayonetta, if its not evident without "pixel counting" its meaningless, just like ps3's suppose superiority only claimed by ps3 leaning sites and their fanboys. You say I offer "conceptual art" as if I'm the first to use actual screenshots and vids as a indicator of what to expect on 360....that right ther tells me you are in full defense mode and will say anything to downplay what 360 has to offer. Well the pics are there, the vids are available, you can say it doesnt measure up to KZ2, you can say Reach doesnt look great, or whatever makes you feel better, UNbiased gamers can judge for themselves, you and I wont get anywhere becuase you already had your mind made up about the 360 long ago.

JOY

MNicholas5196d ago (Edited 5196d ago )

The game looks fine one either platform and doesn't look to be taking full advantage of either one, particularly the PS3. Don't expect to see animation, lighting, post-processing, physics or AI on the level of Killzone 2 and certainly not textures and models like Uncharted 2.

But 3 discs?

That's just silly.

I still remember swapping out floppy discs on my old Apple. lol

Who'd have thought that in 2010 some people will still be swapping discs!

7ero H3LL5196d ago

what credibility do these guys have at their disposal? is it just their word?

Rampant5196d ago

This is the game I would have bought a ps3 for... But minor changes in detail can't justify the purchase. I mean, it's not like Bayonetta....

FACTUAL evidence5196d ago

DURRRRR...blu-ray>dvd. What did you expect?

Anon19745196d ago (Edited 5196d ago )

First off, I didn't downplay Halo Reach. I saw those concept screens and first screenshots from Bungie as well but that's not the game. What they're doing with their new engine is cool but that's not the game we're seeing, that's testing and concept footage. Bungie even said so. We have no idea how this will stack up to the final version when it's released at the end of the year. It's like me reading two pages from a novel and saying that, when the whole novel comes out in a year that it'll be the best novel ever. That's just plain dishonest. We can't base the finished product based on a handful of screenshots, or even from a 30 second clip of the game in action.

You say the PS3's superiority is only imagined but I ask you this? What console has the games that push the most polygons at the most stable frame rate? What console has proven time and time again it's processing clout? You might think a game like Gears 2 might be a great looking game, and you'd be right, but how complex are those character models and environments compared to a game like Uncharted 2 or Killzone 2 or even the first Uncharted? They aren't even comparable.

Forza 3 is a nice looking game, but how do those car models compare to what we've seen from GT5? The answer is these 360 games, the top 360 games don't even come close to what's up on the screen and available for purchase on the PS3. It's not opinion. It's fact.
And if the 360 was capable of games like Killzone 2 or Uncharted 2, wouldn't we have seen something close by now?

That's why it still boggles my mind when fans choose to ignore these examples that are staring them in the faces and instead focus on this port, or that port - pretending that games like Killzone2/Uncharted/Heavy Rain/MGS4/GT5 etc don't exist. Face facts. People who still deny the mountain of evidence to the PS3's superiority are like those who deny the earth is round, or think that dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time as man, or think the moon landing was faked. Sure, they can cherry pick their info to try to back up their claims but the rest of us rightly view them as the nuts they are.

+ Show (60) more repliesLast reply 5196d ago
THC CELL5197d ago

Ha ha xbox fans

i love ps3 *kiss kiss kiss* *ouch ps3 shocked me*

cant wait to play ff13 vs

stonecold15197d ago

the bot think there console was more powerful than ps3 keep dreaming dweebs the bot hasnt got anything on ps3 thats a fact end of statement

WhiteKnight19835197d ago

put ur wally away cell ur scaring the customers lol

chidori6665197d ago

Final Fantasy XIII much more Worse On Xbox 360

/fixed.

Show all comments (324)
70°

The 7 Best Final Fantasy Characters: Unveiling the Legends

While FFVII ranks highly, there's more to the series than one game. Here's Chit Hot's picks for the seven best Final Fantasy characters.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community77d ago
220°

The older it gets, the more I respect Final Fantasy XIII

Alex Donaldson: "Hindsight is a hell of a thing, however, and in the years since Final Fantasy XIII, my respect for the decisions its developers made has skyrocketed. In the two Final Fantasy titles since we see both the brilliance and the folly in alternative approaches - and in Final Fantasy VII Remake, we get a more nuanced understanding of what FF13 was trying to accomplish from many of the same development leads."

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community138d ago
Einhander1972140d ago

FFXIII is actually one of the best Final Fantasy games.

I also sort of was disappointed at the time, never as much as the bandwagon. But really all the fantastic 3D rendered cutscenes and I actually liked the characters and the story though convoluted was actually fantastic and the ending was extremely emotional. So much budget and time were put into that game Square had such big plans, I actually have always felt kind of bad for how things played out.

I have been thinking for years how great it would be to get all three games on one disk for PS4 or 5.

Nyxus140d ago

I always liked this game, and I agree, a rerelease for current gen would be nice.

Shane Kim138d ago (Edited 138d ago )

Gotta take off the nostalgia glasses. It's the worst FF. Shiva as a bike, I mean come on.

Elda138d ago

Shiva as a bike is strange but saying FFXIII is the worst FF is not at all a fact, that's simply your opinion.

Terry_B138d ago

*One of the 3 equally bad FF's

DivineHand125138d ago (Edited 138d ago )

When I got my series X a year ago, I bought FF13 for nostalgia reasons but ended up being disappointed. When I first played it around the time it launched, I didn't have a lot of experience with final fantasy games, so I enjoyed it. Fast forward to when I played it again, I found that the game had many unnecessary filler moments instead of just giving us meaningful content.

The game is also very linear and a quote on the article said it best. "It is like a sewage pipe that leads to the ocean until it opens up on Grand Pulse."

The story didn't make much sense either and I believe it is my mistake as I played the FF7 remake on PS5 prior which is a night and day difference in terms of pacing, storytelling and likeable characters even though cloud is aloof.

FinalFantasyFanatic138d ago (Edited 138d ago )

Probably was a mistake to play any of the golden era FFs first (e.g. FF6 through FF10), it makes it harder to enjoy some of the FFs that aren't as good. I think FF12 was where major issues with the series started becoming apparent, and it just got worse from there.

FinalFantasyFanatic138d ago (Edited 138d ago )

I didn't really care for it that much, the only saving grace was that it had a better story than 15 (overall it was better than 15) and possibly 12, and even then, you had to read some of it through primers, like reading a book. Plus the battle system was reasonably fun for what it was, even if it was more the spectacle that was exciting for me (e.g. summoning). And to be fair, the 13 trilogy got better with every games, I still don't like Snow though.

Gamingsince1981138d ago

Ff13 is only good if you haven't played a ff before, or any other games that are decent for that matter.

-Foxtrot138d ago

It is in fact no way the best Final Fantasy game, it's one of the worst

Linear corridors, Cutscene, Fight, Cutscene...rinse and repeat

Dialogue and characters are pretty bad, especially Lightning as the main FF hero, they literally said they tried to make a "Female Cloud" and they failed.

Story was pretty awful

I could go on

I think the only alright thing that came from the game was the music.

Elda137d ago

That's not a fact that's your personal opinion. The game sold 11 million copies between its 2009 release up until 2014 including critically reviewed as an 8 out of 10 or an 80 out of 100. The game does have some issues but it's not at all a fact as one of the worst FF games.

-Foxtrot137d ago

Elda

Not just mine mate

A large majority

So….

Traecy137d ago

N4G commenters such as yourself aren't the majority. The game was well received.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 137d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 137d ago
gold_drake140d ago (Edited 140d ago )

i liked the game alot but i didnt like how they handled the terminology.

i dont mind reading data logs but it had soo many.

but i always loved the music and how it looked. the battle system wasnt too bad either.

but i like 13-2 more :)

i still dont understand why we never got a remaster of the trilogy

Eonjay138d ago

Xbox kinda did. Besides the video files of course which are still best on PS3 due to bluray.

Snookies12140d ago

XIII is a pretty solid game, but XIII-2 is WAY better. XIII-2 was one of the few games I decided to go for a Platinum trophy in, early on. Had so much fun the entire way through getting it too!

Eonjay138d ago

Totally agree. FF 13 was okay but 13-2 is my favorite FF game ever.

shinoff2183139d ago (Edited 139d ago )

I hated this to when it released. I haven't much liked a ff game since ff10 as much , aside from ff7remake. I decided to give it another shot on my series x since it's not on a current ps and was liking it quite a bit(just takes me some time to get over things ) until star ocean 2 remake came out I was all over that.

Square should definitely remaster it or something for ps4 ps5

KillerB138d ago

my favorite jrpg trilogy ever

Show all comments (44)
70°

Interview: Making music with Masashi Hamauzu

Square Enix Blog: "How do you compose iconic songs that help define a legacy? We speak to legendary composer Masashi Hamauzu about his work on Final Fantasy X, Final Fantasy XIII, and Final Fantasy VII Remake, and how to make unforgettable music."

Read Full Story >>
square-enix-games.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community173d ago
Changed: content
Nyxus175d ago