690°

Ninja Theory’s Antoniades: Xbox One is “completely the wrong direction”, mobile is the future

Speaking at the Slush business conference in Helsinki last week, Ninja Theory’s design chief Tameem Antoniades was less than complimentary about the current state of console gaming. He said that Ninja Theory is heading entirely for mobile, because the AAA console model is broken and the consoles themselves have at most ten years of life left. He also urged creatives to change the form of all media, to break the constraints of the clichéd forms that movies, music and games come in.

Read Full Story >>
edge-online.com
GarrusVakarian3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

"mobile is the future"

For casuals maybe......

Consoles will be here long after toilet break mobile games have been forgotten about.

Yi-Long3827d ago

I disagree that 'mobile' is the future.

However, ANDROID will be the future, seeing as how fast the power of these phones is developing (first 8-core came out today, Zopo), and specs are increasing at a very rapid rate.

Imagine a few years from now, with hundreds of millions carrying around a device in their pocket with the same power as a PS4 or XBO, which they can easily hook up to a TV and controller. It's a portable console! And developers and publishers will absolutely want to tap into that market!

jimbobwahey3827d ago

This guy's just bitter because every game he's made sucks and after they ruined Devil May Cry no publisher will touch them. They're running to mobile development because they can't compete in the console industry.

Mystogan3827d ago

The portable console with the power of an X1 or PS4 is a pipe-dream. It won't happen anytime soon. Smartphones are not even close to being as powerful as a Wii.

kingdip903827d ago

I don't get the dissagrees here... I have a galaxy s3, I can mirror the image on my screen to my tv through a cable and play emulators and game roms with my wii mote and classic controller because if bluetooth NOW.

Imagine if phones could do this with modern looking games...

Zichu3827d ago

By the time a phone reaches that amount of power, won't consoles and PC's be even further than that??

OrangePowerz3827d ago

Mobile phones are hitting the area where they have diminishing returns because of the limits mobile phones have to work with such as battery life and size.

firefly693827d ago

That is going to be impossible!To have graphic power it will be need more power consumption,and power generates heat.Mobile are small machines that have low power batteries,not to mention that they are call mobile for one reason...there are so many things preventing that mobile phones will never reach the power of this new console machines that thinking this will be possible in a foresen future or ever is just a bold statement without any fundation.

Yi-Long3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

@Zichu: No they won't. Just look at how fast the specs of phones and tablets has increased. Just 2 years orso ago, 512RAM was the standard, last year 1GB, now we have the first phones popping up with 3GB RAM. Processors keep getting faster and faster as well. 8-core is already out now. They've got built-in cameras, NFC, everything. ALl the possibilities are endless.

And this is all moving at an extremely fast pace.

If you expect the PS4 and XBO to last 5+ years, which I do, then I'm convinced phones and tablets will overlap them in power in 3-4 years. 100$ certainty.

Add to that the fact that Android will have a target-audience of hundreds of millions of users, of which tens of millions will have a powerful device able to run new spec-heavy games, and OF COURSE developers and publishers are going to push their games to that market.

And we'll see people hooking up their phone/Android to their flatscreen, switching on their wireless controller, and they'll have a console-like experience, exactly the same as we are used to on Consoles as we now them now.

In fact, with Valve already pushing towards Linux with Steambox, it's completely logical that many of these games will already be able to be played on Android, considering Linux = (pretty much) Android.

You can disagree with me all you want, but when the power in the devices is there (and it WILL be), and the market is there (it WILL be), then devs and publishers are absolutely going to go after that market. Big Time.

And there is nothing wrong with that. Quite the opposite. This is a good thing.

Those thinking we'll just get Angry Birds games are crazy btw. We'll be getting the same kind of games we're already getting for consoles, and more. Much much more.

frostypants3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

Yes, let's do as you say and imagine in a few years having a phone as powerful as a PS4 in our pockets...meanwhile newer consoles will be 5-10 times more powerful than that. So what? The phone in your pocket now is at least as powerful as a PS2, but that doesn't matter because that is no longer impressive horsepower. The whole "gaming is going mobile" theory is completely ignorant of the fact that the hardware that can be fit into a console will always be better than what can be squeezed into a mobile device at any given time. Mobile will ALWAYS be years behind the curve.

Also, your comment that Steambox games will be Android-capable because Android is like Linux is insane. Hardware matters. No, an Android phone won't be able to handle a high-end Steambox game...similar OS be damned. HARDWARE.

ABizzel13827d ago

Mobile isn't the future of core gaming. The closet thing to mobile taking over core gaming right now is Remote Play between PS4 and Vita, since you're taking your "core" gaming with you.

That being said mobile devices will be a possible source for core gaming. In 2014 Tegra 5 will be on par with the PS3 in processing (doesn't mean it will produce games on par), and come 2015 Tegra 6 will exceed the Wii U, and be running at 50% of the power of the XBO.

That being said those devices will likely power netbooks, and gaming tablets considering the power draw, and will retail for $400+ range.

Zichu3827d ago

Just because phone tech is advancing, doesn't mean it's stopped for other devices.

If you really think phones and tablets are going to give you same experience as a console, you are quite wrong. Just take a look at the OUYA and Gamestick. I don't hear about those two devices anymore, does it even have support by top developers at all?

I'm not saying phones and tablets won't reach the the same level as consoles and PC's, it will happen. I mean who would of thought you could do all you can on a really small device. Just look back at the retro consoles that couldn't output 3D, or even enough colors in 2D.

PC hardware is moving way too fast for even phones to catch up. They might be adding more RAM, but they need to work on the CPU and GPU a bit more because RAM isn't going to improve a game.

minimur123827d ago

I don't want to loose ninja theory to mobiles :( stay on consoles!

sprinterboy3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

Good luck with battery life. Battery life is crap now in phones, they keep updating the phones each year but battery life technology never makes the leaps it needs too, a gaming phone plus using GPS on a long journey with phone calls and internet searches would not last you 24 hrs which is where it needs to be

Yi-Long3827d ago

@Sprinterboy: You're looking at it from the wrong angle.

You think we'll be doing hardcore gaming while on the go.

I'm saying we will come home, plug our phone into the dock-station next to the plasma, which hooks it up to the power and the plasma, we go sit on the couch, pick up the wireless controller, and start playing the games we want, or we'll use it as a mediaplayer, or we'll use the camera in the phone for video-chat, or whatever.

You will have a dock next to your TV. One dock next to your PC-monitor and keyboard/mouse, etc etc. It will be a mobile 'do-it-all'.

And those naysayers: Did you think 5 years ago that we would be walking around with phones in our pockets with 2 cameras, 32-64GB(!) of ROM for all our mediaentertainment, with octo-core processors and 2GB of RAM!? No. You. Didn't.

Yet here we are, already walking around with devices more powerful and much more flexible than PC's from only 10 years orso ago. With scratchfree FullHD screens, with NFC, etc etc.

Again, hundreds of millions of people will walk around with an incredibly powerful Android phone in 5 years orso. That's a HUGE market.

kreate3827d ago

U heard the man. Ninja theory is all about mobile. Not for consoles.

so stop defending them.

DragonKnight3827d ago

LMAO! Tameem Antoniades putting his foot in his mouth again.

So because you can't cut it even with ideas handed to you (DmC) you ran to mobile and have joined the countless others that think mobile gaming is the future, parroting what has been said for YEARS and hasn't happened.

Welcome to the "Has-been" club Tameem, though I suppose in Ninja Theory's case it's the "Never-was" club.

Mobile gaming will never be the future, it has far too many physical barriers that can't be passed yet such as battery life and heat dissipation to match PCs or consoles.

N4g_null3827d ago

Lets say mobile chips are a possible future, lets claim they are cheap also. Let put all the new tech on the table and apply it appropriately.

We have wifi direct, wiiu wireless gamepad tech, bluetooth everything and a big push for online unified everything. Tegra chips catching up with the wiiu?

Ok lets go one step further. Tesla like consoles with 3000 cores just for gaming. That is possible now. Local cloud offloaded gpgpu gaming is ready now.... it does not fit in your pocket. Your phone becomes another output device or a possible computing node.

there is a design limit to what can fit into a phone. There is the thermal problem. Yet a cheap fx like arm chip array would bring back carts for gaming again. Nolonger would you have to upgrade you could possibly just set the cart beside the console and play it wirelessly.

it would be quite grand possibly expensive but would the game quality rise that is the real question, also would this tech offer any real innovation.?

I dont see the toolsets yet for lots of this to happen. Yet im liking where nvidia is going with their maximus setup, ive had that setup for a number of years yet 4k requires a bit more ram, then we have to get all our tools up to par with the tech.

Darrius Cole3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

@Yi-Long

If most gamers come home and plug our system into a docking station attached to our television set, then consoles will be ahead of mobile gaming.

The whole point of mobile gaming is that we can do it when we are not at home. Once we actually decide to game at home, consoles will always have an advantage. it is just a question of space. No matter how powerful and small we can make chips, we will always be able to put more of them into a square-foot than we can fit into a square-inch. If we are going to be chained to a central location (like a television set) then it will always be better to have the extra power when we get there.

P.S.

If Antoniades is the reason that Ninja Theory won't do Heavenly Sword 2 then the rest of Ninja Theory should mutiny against him and do it. If he owns the studio then the rest of them should try to form their own studio and do it in spite of him.

Antoniades is leading them completely out of the console gaming industry and into the mobile market. Why should they think he will be any more competent in the mobile market than he is in the console market. When he fails in the mobile market I guess he will have them making web browsers next.

Kennytaur3827d ago

It's hopefully not Android unless they make a new build from scratch. It's such an unoptimised OS.

Ninjatogo3827d ago

I'm pretty sure the first 8-core Android device came out quite some time ago. It was the Exynos Galaxy S4.

Also, mobile devices are getting faster sure, but they are not pushing games tech like consoles/PC. They are not running games anywhere near the visual fidelity of what we've seen on the PS3/360.
Don't even get me started on the poor control mechanics.

I bought a decent Android device recently (HTC One). Before I got it, I thought, "Oh boy, I can't wait to play some of those great games on here!" Then I got the device and wondered where that thought even came from. I've tried dozens of games and many look bad and feel bad.
I would say this is the best example today that specs don't make a good game.

HighResHero3827d ago

Phones haven't even caught up with 8 year old consoles due to thermal and battery limitations.

Phones are advancing but consoles, PCs, and laptops can advance much faster because they don't have these(and other) limitations.

So the whole "mobiles are advancing fast" is not rational.

Tameem I'm sure has plenty of reasons to be looking for avenues of escape.

Information Minister3827d ago

The only reason why this guy thinks mobile is the future is because if he and his team produce another flop, at least it won't stand out so much in that sea of casual shovelware.

He's basically admitting he's not up to the high standards of console/PC gaming

SecondSon3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

This whole thread is a simple case of...

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”

― Henry Ford

I don't see consoles being around when my TV can stream any game down my 1 Gigabit connection.

I don't see mobiles needing faster hardware when my phones and tablets have a strong 5G connection.

But most of all, I do not see myself in the future getting up to plug in my phone into a dock because my HTC One can wirelessly send a movie to my TV while I text.

Yi-Long3826d ago (Edited 3826d ago )

@secondson: the hook-up between phone and tv can of course be done wireless, but the primary reason for people to dock it in next to their TV would be of course to avoid draining the battery when it's not necessary.

Secondary reason would be that double function of connecting to your TV (saved settings and all, which might differ per phone), double-funtion as a camera for video-chat and motion-detection games for your games, etc etc etc.

fredrikpedersen3826d ago

@jimbob Enslaved was a great game.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 3826d ago
Magicite3827d ago

consoles, pc, mobile, tablets, laptops, they all have great future!

wolfsaviorzx3827d ago

Laptops and Tablets will become one. Surface Pro is pretty much already set the new standard for both.

SecondSon3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

No they all have one future.

A mobile device in your pocket that links any screen into the cloud. It acts as your Desktop, Phone, Cable box, Router, Console, Navigator etc and it runs a cloud service such as Chrome OS.

With a flick you bring any screen nearby to life by getting your devise to stream content to it.

You access the Sony, Steam and Windows Games app on it which sends you through to the corresponding cloud based services.

Any heavy processing gets streamed as video down your 5G network from a shared processing server.

That is a more efficient way for technology to spread in a world where distance is just a ping of 20

Sharing a pool of processing power is obviously the way to go, instead of buying individual processing units that are only used by one person and remain on standby 16 hours a day.

You will pick the cloud, because you will get more processing power for your buck.

Mystogan3827d ago

The portable console(smartphone) with the power of an X1 or PS4 is a pipe-dream. It won't happen anytime soon. Smartphones are not even close to being as powerful as a Wii.

VENOMACR12273827d ago

Angry birds or BF4? Candy crush or Titanfall?

Yea, I'd pick mobile too lol

greedybear883825d ago

Mobile gaming isn't just Angry Birds. There's console quality titles out therefor Android and IOS devices. Try searching for 'Modern Combat 5' or 'Asphalt 8' and you'll see what I mean

feedurhabit3827d ago

He's only angry because nobody'll let him develop for consoles after DmC

Heartnet3826d ago

or that the profit margin for mobile phone games is alot higher than console games?

mobiles are more popular etc etc....

And ninja theory has made solid game after solid game... they just dont sell well cuz they aint a shooter or the fifth game in X franchise....

feedurhabit3825d ago

Except DmC WAS the 5th game in its franchise. And while it's not as bad as a lot of people say it is, it was mediocre at best.

Enslaved I can't comment on but Heavenly Sword was one of the worst action games I've ever played. It was like they saw God of War and thought "hey, you know what this game needs less of? Fun!"

pkb793827d ago

I just switch over to my Vita and stream my ps4 game when going to the toilet. Works very well.

UncleGermrod3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

let's be fair, the majority of us might play mobile while crapping or stuck in a Dr. office, at best. i do not even know who these guys are. sick of these devs taking jabs at the industry and its fans, simply because they can not make high quality products that stand up to gamers' expectations. good luck selling crap to obnoxious iphone moms, ninja theory.

wonderfulmonkeyman3827d ago

Pfft, not me.
If I'm stuck in an office or on a crapper, I bust out my 3DS, not my phone, if I'm gonna play a game.

-Foxtrot3827d ago (Edited 3827d ago )

He's only saying this because after the crappy games they've made (except for Heavenly Sword...they could of had something there), they've been made to do Mobile games now.

Saying something like this helps him sleep at night

lpgs50003827d ago

Thank you. I have my own reasons for not wanting an x1 but I would take an Xbox one over mobile gaming anyday. The only games I have ever enjoyed on my phone are emulators.

Murad3827d ago

Agree with you totally. I personally myself prefer PC, aside from the delicious console exclusive goodness, however, I can say for certain that mobile games are not the future. I would understand if he was talking about Phoenix Wright titles for the DS as they are THE BOMB, but games like templar run or something along those lines are games you would give to casual players. You cannot put Civ 5 into a small device and keep all the features,it's a game that should be played on a TV or a monitor.

malokevi3827d ago

"He said that Ninja Theory is heading entirely for mobile"

" Xbox One is “completely the wrong direction”, mobile is the future"

hmmmm...!!!

Nodoze3826d ago

Ewww I cannot wait to see the steaming pile that ninja theory make for consoles this go round. They were 1 for 3 last gen.

ChickeyCantor3827d ago

"For casuals maybe...... "

I really don't think you understand the financial potential mobile gaming has. It is already proven to be a major viable platform.

Regardless of what you deem hardcore or casual. That's business for ya.

Demster3826d ago

just because your mom and her friends from book club would buy silly games on the AppStore or PlayStore, doesn't mean all the devs of our favorite games are gonna start making games for mobile only, because of "financial potential" lol.
mobile gaming is an industry to itself.

ChickeyCantor3825d ago

@Demster,

And what did I say?
Mobile platforms can be more viable. That's why a lot of companies, whether they be game developers or not, are moving to the mobile platform. The market is far more bigger.

" because of "financial potential" lol. "
You clearly don't understand how hard money talks. The higher ups in these companies make the decision and if they think that their company interest can benefit more from mobiles they will shift.

I never mentioned an exclusivity. Most game developers already create for mobile platforms.

7uff13827d ago

But I play 3DS on the toilet LOL mobile is dead to me, except when my 3DS battery dies and i'm not at home, then I play any mobile puzzle

Soc53827d ago

Yeah, all these mobile is the future guys don't get it. There will always be people who want cutting edge experiences that mobile is far from being able to handle. When mobile comes close to levels of pcs nowadays it still won't matter because there will always be people who want to enjoy it on a large screen at home. Yes mobile is definitely a profitable new niche that is here to stay but, consoles going away, I don't think so. Maybe they want it to be that way because mobile is an easy way to make tons of cash.

greedybear883825d ago

Mobile games can be played on a HDTVs and that technology exists in the marketplace today. You can connect your smartphone to a TV via an MHL cable and then if you all you need is a decent controller like a Moga Pro and there you have it... Playing console quality games like Modern Combat 5, Dead Trigger 2 or Asphalt 8 on your big screen with a console style bluetooth controller. That's a console experience right there.

Gamer19823826d ago (Edited 3826d ago )

Just proves how stupid these guys are. A couple of years ago they came out blaming Sony for there failures with Broken Sword not recognizing the reason it didn't sell well is because it was a launch title. So went multiplatform and starting praising MS to take a pot shot at Sony. They made a terrible game in enslaved and DMC got negative feedback for a whole host of valid reasons so now they are blaming both MS and Sony for bad sales. To be honest the console world will be better off without them, they don't make great games and it will open up a gap in the market for a truly talented developer.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3825d ago
3827d ago Replies(2)
Sarcasm3827d ago

Honestly this is because his company has had mostly "ok" games that weren't big successes.

frostypants3827d ago

Yep...easier to impress people with little phone games for casuals.

MysticStrummer3827d ago

Going from Heavenly Sword to Enslaved was the wrong direction.

McScroggz3827d ago

Enslaved is one of the most underrated games this generation, in my opinion.

JCOLE131953827d ago

Yeah I enjoyed Ensalved honestly.

MysticStrummer3827d ago

I enjoyed it too, but still thought it was several steps backwards from Heavenly Sword.

akaFullMetal3827d ago

These guys really do like to intimidate their fan base a lot.

Roccetarius3827d ago

What fan base? The one they constantly kick out of their way?

Show all comments (141)
320°

Ninja Theory trends on X as gamers fear for studio following Tango Gameworks closure

Following the closure of 4 studios, many are now worried for the future of Ninja Theory once Hellblade 2 is released.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Sonic18815d ago (Edited 5d ago )

How is it going to sell well when it's also releasing on gamepass 🤔

Sephiroushin5d ago

Meant better to sell the studio and not closing it 🤦🏻 not to sell more games….
and games are sold anyways, you can buy it on xbox (not recommended if you got gamepass) but many pc gamers prefer to buy on steam than deal with the xbox app or pc gamepass!

On a side note to OP, the sales of studios wont happen though, especially when they want to retain the IPs, and well nobody is gonna buy a studios without its IPs; the other publishers that want a certain dev from the studio that are closing on their team can try to grab them as soon as they see they notice of the studio.

RaidenBlack5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

@Sephiroushin
Well hypothetically speaking, Ninja Theory can be sold to Sony at a lower rate sans the Hellblade IP.
Sony can then welcome them to work on the Heavenly Sword IP, which they still own.
Will be a nice proposition for Sony who can continue to offer a God of War-like hack n slash in their portfolio via Heavenly Sword 2, whilst Cory Barlog & co. decides to take a break from the God of War IP & venture some other genres.
On top of that, Ninja Theory was also interested in a sequel to Enslaved: Odyssey to the West and such Sony can come to a deal with Namco Bandai regarding the Enslaved IP.

badz1494d ago

selling the studio wouldn't be an attractive offer unless they come with their IPs. MS wants to keep these IPs, so even if MS is selling just the studio, no one would wants them

Lightning776d ago

Because they're next come next year. HB2 won't hit some impossible metric within MS so they're getting axed in 2025. Leave gaming now MS.

XiNatsuDragnel5d ago

Ninja theory might as well be gone in 2025 at this rate

notachance5d ago

Every xbox studio is in danger now because there’s just no way they’re gonna rake in big money from game sales because of gamepass, even CoD was rumored to not come to gamepass because it would canibalize their sales number.

neutralgamer19925d ago

If they are smart they don’t put COD on GP day one. It’s one of the best selling games on yearly basis

Hofstaderman5d ago

Satya will make sure that doesnt happen. As you rightly put it; why kill the cash cow?

But then again, it is MS after all.....

thesoftware7305d ago

I agree and disagree. They should not put it on GP, but CoD makes real money from the overpriced MTX that people buy for over a year. They also have it all linked up to the Mobile CoD, which will incentivize Twitch spending from consumers.

neutralgamer19925d ago

Software

That’s true but keep in mind COD is the best selling or top 3 selling game every year. So yes micro transactions money is there but so are billions more

They should have tiers of GP subscriptions and the higher end tier received AAA games while everyone else gets them in 60 days

MontyeKristo4d ago

Wouldn't putting it on Gamepass be smarter? Cod is typically played, I believe, for far longer than 6 months.. if you get everyone playing the game for a year, on Gamepass, you've essentially doubled your profit. $10 a month for a year $120 compared to selling the game once for $60.

Not to mention MT's, on top of it. Sell on PS5, PC and Switch, keep it on Gamepass for Xbox and PC. Much smarter in my opinion..

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
-Foxtrot5d ago

Also if you punish a studio for releasing a great critically acclaimed game which won some awards then what chance does anyone have

Elda5d ago

After this mess, I highly doubt the next installment of COD will be on Gamepass day one. It'll probably land on Gamepass 6 months after release date.

Noskypeno5d ago

Like I said earlier, I wouldn't even mind. There's a good selection of games on GP already, and it gives me time to play my backlog of games while allowing the games that need to sell millions of copies to make a profit a chance to succeed, a win win scenario.

badz1494d ago

not putting CoD on GP is sort of a violation of their own marketing though. they said ALL MS 1st party games will be on GP day 1, not some. CoD is 1st party, so to not put it on GP day 1 would be considered as false marketing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
Rynxie5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Ninja theory games were never big sellers. I could be wrong, but I doubt hellblade 2 will sell millions. I would rather they go independent and make heavenly sword 2.

solideagle5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

heavenly sword is Sony owned IP. this will never happen as original didn't sell enough...

Wikipedia: "In 2008, it was reported that a sequel to Heavenly Sword was in-development at SCE Studio Cambridge, but was canceled due to Sony no longer seeing it as a commercially viable product"

Flewid6385d ago (Edited 5d ago )

I remember. I feel like the amount of time & technology that has passed would make a sequel a big seller now. The game has enough legacy recognition to build hype.

Show all comments (58)
410°

Former Hellblade Director & Ninja Theory Founder Explains Why He Left The Studio

Former Hellblade director and Ninja Theory co-founder has offered an explanation regarding his departure from the now Microsoft-owned studio.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
XiNatsuDragnel37d ago

I hope he forms a new studio soon

Cacabunga36d ago

It is a good studio.. i really enjoyed their dmc game that i platinumed it.
I did not try hellblade, because it doesnt tell me much.. Enslaved was very mehhh
Heavenly Sword was good not great. Amazing graphics back in the day but so repetitive and not so engaging in the long run.

stoney10136d ago

I really enjoyed Enslaved and Heavenly Sword back in the day. Wish they'd return to that sort of game. Hellblade isn't really for me to be honest. Not saying it's not a good game, I just couldn't get into it.

Popsicle36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

That is fair. I enjoyed Hellblade but can definitely see how it isn’t for everyone.

Would like to see how Heavenly Sword would have turned out if developed today. It’s easy to forget that games like Heavenly Sword were unprecedented and in their infancy.

shinoff218335d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Enslaved has been their favorite game for me. Loved the atmosphere.

1nsomniac36d ago

Heavenly sword was a staggeringly good game!! One of the most memorable of the PS3 generation in my opinion.

Babadook736d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Heavenly sword was good. It had ambitious graphics and as a result the frame rate suffered and as a result the gameplay suffered. But the story was phenomenal. Great acting, especially Andy Serkis as the king.

Jingsing36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

"Microsoft" we all read between the lines. We have seen the exact same thing happen with many of their other acquisitions

InUrFoxHole35d ago

Jesus man! Try reading the article at least.

cthulhucultist36d ago

One thing that pleasantly surprised me, was the Switch port, as back then it was my only console. The graphics were amazing and the artistic design helped a lot to enhance the visuals.I took some really impressive screen shots while playing which I still revisit them from time to time to remind me what a capable developer (QLOC) can achieve with weaker hardware.

Show all comments (20)
400°

Xbox Acquired Hellblade Developer Ninja Theory for $117 Million

According to FTC filings, Microsoft acquired Ninja Theory for $117 million.

Obscure_Observer322d ago

Ninja Theory is made of very talented and passionate developers.

I´m glad that saw that studio´s potential and chose it to be part of the Xbox family!

Now under Xbox they´re AAA and has all the freedom and resources in the world to deliver amazing games for us!

Thank you Phil and Tameem Antoniades.

blackblades322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

Stop slurping in public

RpgSama321d ago

He is getting out of hand lately, he took it to 11 now.

Army_of_Darkness321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

"oh thank you so much Xbox! Kiss! Kiss! Kiss! I bend the knee for you my lord!" 🤣🤣

Ninja theory is okay. Not great.

Elda321d ago

LOL!! That's the behavior & words from a true fanatic.

Crows90321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

The potential??? Remind us all who they've tapped their potential? What new IP are they working on???

Oh wait...that's right. They needed a cinematic story driven IP ...hellblade was well received so they bought them for peanuts.

And let's see.. what are they currently working on and to what scope compared to before??

Basically the same game but #2
Similar situation to the tomb raider sequel except this time they made this sequel a permanent exclusive.

Knushwood Butt321d ago

Maybe Bleeding Edge was the potential.

Crows90321d ago

@knush

Oh crap you're right. Lol that thing was definitely a result of the Microsoft acquisition.

4Sh0w321d ago

Ninja Theory has alot of potential, but Hellblade 2 needs more action gameplay before I get excited. They did well with Heavenly Sword & DMC games so hopefully we'll see a full blown new action IP from them after H2.

Crows90321d ago

@4sh0W

Just imagine what they could do...people falsely claiming hellblade 2 is like god of war...Heavenly sword, which was a playstation exclusive, was more in competition with god of war.

Obscure_Observer321d ago

"Oh wait...that's right. They needed a cinematic story driven IP ...hellblade was well received so they bought them for peanuts."

MS paid $117 million for Ninja Theory which at the time was an indie studio made of only 20 people.

Sony paid $229 million for Insomniac which at the time were made of 400 employees.

That was a steal! Lol!

"And let's see.. what are they currently working on and to what scope compared to before??"

The original Hellblade was developed and produced by only 20 people (Melinda included).

As an Xbox first party studio, Ninja Theory has now 200+ employees and Hellblade II will be full AAA game powered by UE5. In term of scope, the original Hellblade only features only small areas to explore, while in Hellblade II gamers will be allowed to explore all areas of Iceland.

"Basically the same game but #2"

Lol. You´re in for a major shock! XD

Crows90320d ago

@obscure

There will be shock...but It think itll be all over you.
The same but number 2 wasnt meant as an insult. I liked the first one..so I know I'll like the second. You probably didnt care for the first one for a couple of reasons.

1. They were you referred to it as a small indie game
2. It wasnt an xbox exclusive

Youll be in shock when its pretty much the same but number 2. Number 2 of any game is ALWAYS bigger.
God of War Ragnarok is essentally God of War but number 2. Same kind of game but bigger in scope.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 320d ago
321d ago
321d ago
neutralgamer1992321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

Obscure

You really think he gives a damn about you or me thanking him? Seriously man does it not bother you at all that you are such a huge fanboy of Xbox and your comments come across like cult members

Be a gamer for gaming these corporations don’t care about any of us. We are dollar signs to them

On topic

I am glad for NT because their last game they struggled so much just to complete it and companies even provided equipment just for them to get the work done. Now they have peace of mind with resources they need. Hopefully they can naturally grow into a bigger studio and make some amazing games

Godmars290321d ago

They're mid tier devs at best. Failed to nail one of their biggest shots with Heavenly Sword, went way over their weight limit with DMC: DmC, and got lucky with apparent one-shot, B title Hellbalde. Which MS expects them to make into a franchise?

I'll just wait for the first "Hellbalde better than GOW" article. Cause that's going to be fun...

4Sh0w321d ago

Salt, Salt, Salt is basically all you said.

Vengeance1138321d ago

Mid developer remains mid lol Wake me up when they actually put out something half decent haha

porkChop321d ago

It's funny how no one called them mid tier until Xbox acquired them. People loved Heavenly Sword, Enslaved, Hellblade, etc, but now they're suddenly mid tier? Touch grass.

MadLad321d ago

@porkchop

I mean, you called it out first and you're not wrong.
DmC definitely got the shaft, yet it was successful and a good game. The closest thing they ever released to be considered "mid" was Heavenly Sword.

Lightning77321d ago

It's Bad now but great here. https://n4g.com/news/208826...

Even saying support Hell Blade because Shadow Of Wars Microtransactions.

Scroll down a little bit and you'll even see Obscures comment. He may be A hardcore Xbox fanboy but at least he's consistent here. Can't say the same in these comment sections.

321d ago
1nsomniac321d ago

While the corporate xbox ass licking is as pathetic as it gets. How is it any different to the Sony usuals in here that sprout this pathetic crap on a daily basis!

They both need to get filtered elsewhere so the grown ups can talk like adults.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 320d ago
P_Bomb321d ago

I wonder if they’ll ever reboot Enslaved?

shinoff2183321d ago

I liked enslaved I felt it was one of their better games

Sonic1881321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

Enslaved was just mediocre. So I doubt they'll bring that back. Tbh most of their games were mediocre including Hellblade. That felt like a walking simulator

Knightofelemia321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

Enslaved was a sleeper hit which it was and is still a great game to play. If a person who missed out on it I would say snag it off Ebay and play it. It's still one of my favorite games.

Melankolis321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

It was a good game, but....just good, not great nor it interesting. Maybe the background of the characters aren't well told, lack of lore, just start and play. I gave it 8. Good but easily forgettable. Yeah you may call it mediocre. NT is quite talented, but they lack something.

Sonic1881321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

@Knight

I never felt like their games were great. Just solid or mediocre but that's my opinion. I am still interested in playing Hellblade 2 on PC because of the graphics. I think this game is going to look fantastic on PC

mkis007321d ago

Damn this really puts into perspective yet again how good a deal sony got for insomniac...the workhorse of the industry at this point.

Aloymetal321d ago

That was the 1st thing that came to my mind, Sony got Insomniac for pennies and they've been pumping out great games since this gen started nonstop. Amazing.

MEGANE321d ago

Yes but any winnings there they lost on bungie, imo.

mkis007321d ago

I somewhat disagree. They bought Bungie for the expertise. The largest chunk of Bungie was for talent retention; they paid more to make sure everyone stayed at Bungie. Sony wants talent, IP's are just a bonus because they know they can and will create more.

__SteakDeck__321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

@MEGANE I know I’m going to get downvoted to hell, because this is n4g and people here hate GAAS games. But how the hell did they lose on Bungie? Do you know how much money Destiny will bring and Marathon will bring? Lol

MEGANE320d ago

I get it, but a couple Billion more and they could have bought square enix… a publisher full of IPs… I don’t disagree with acquiring bungie but 3.5 billion and sony can’t even dictated exclusivity? Please.

PhillyDonJawn321d ago

They have High potential. Add some good combat mechanics and action to go with the graphics and story telling. Ad you got a mega hit.

321d ago
Show all comments (50)