Approvals 14/3 ▼
Silver360 (1) - 3844d ago Cancel
VaNdAl (1) - 3844d ago Cancel
DA_SHREDDER (1) - 3844d ago Cancel
NYC_Gamer (4) - 3844d ago Cancel
Fireseed (1) - 3844d ago Cancel
Cloudberry (3) - 3844d ago Cancel
TIER1xWOLFPACKx (1) - 3844d ago Cancel
DarkLordMalik (2) - 3844d ago Cancel
690°

Ninja Theory’s Antoniades: Xbox One is “completely the wrong direction”, mobile is the future

Speaking at the Slush business conference in Helsinki last week, Ninja Theory’s design chief Tameem Antoniades was less than complimentary about the current state of console gaming. He said that Ninja Theory is heading entirely for mobile, because the AAA console model is broken and the consoles themselves have at most ten years of life left. He also urged creatives to change the form of all media, to break the constraints of the clichéd forms that movies, music and games come in.

Read Full Story >>
edge-online.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3844d ago
GarrusVakarian3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

"mobile is the future"

For casuals maybe......

Consoles will be here long after toilet break mobile games have been forgotten about.

Yi-Long3844d ago

I disagree that 'mobile' is the future.

However, ANDROID will be the future, seeing as how fast the power of these phones is developing (first 8-core came out today, Zopo), and specs are increasing at a very rapid rate.

Imagine a few years from now, with hundreds of millions carrying around a device in their pocket with the same power as a PS4 or XBO, which they can easily hook up to a TV and controller. It's a portable console! And developers and publishers will absolutely want to tap into that market!

jimbobwahey3844d ago

This guy's just bitter because every game he's made sucks and after they ruined Devil May Cry no publisher will touch them. They're running to mobile development because they can't compete in the console industry.

Mystogan3844d ago

The portable console with the power of an X1 or PS4 is a pipe-dream. It won't happen anytime soon. Smartphones are not even close to being as powerful as a Wii.

kingdip903844d ago

I don't get the dissagrees here... I have a galaxy s3, I can mirror the image on my screen to my tv through a cable and play emulators and game roms with my wii mote and classic controller because if bluetooth NOW.

Imagine if phones could do this with modern looking games...

Zichu3844d ago

By the time a phone reaches that amount of power, won't consoles and PC's be even further than that??

OrangePowerz3844d ago

Mobile phones are hitting the area where they have diminishing returns because of the limits mobile phones have to work with such as battery life and size.

firefly693844d ago

That is going to be impossible!To have graphic power it will be need more power consumption,and power generates heat.Mobile are small machines that have low power batteries,not to mention that they are call mobile for one reason...there are so many things preventing that mobile phones will never reach the power of this new console machines that thinking this will be possible in a foresen future or ever is just a bold statement without any fundation.

Yi-Long3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

@Zichu: No they won't. Just look at how fast the specs of phones and tablets has increased. Just 2 years orso ago, 512RAM was the standard, last year 1GB, now we have the first phones popping up with 3GB RAM. Processors keep getting faster and faster as well. 8-core is already out now. They've got built-in cameras, NFC, everything. ALl the possibilities are endless.

And this is all moving at an extremely fast pace.

If you expect the PS4 and XBO to last 5+ years, which I do, then I'm convinced phones and tablets will overlap them in power in 3-4 years. 100$ certainty.

Add to that the fact that Android will have a target-audience of hundreds of millions of users, of which tens of millions will have a powerful device able to run new spec-heavy games, and OF COURSE developers and publishers are going to push their games to that market.

And we'll see people hooking up their phone/Android to their flatscreen, switching on their wireless controller, and they'll have a console-like experience, exactly the same as we are used to on Consoles as we now them now.

In fact, with Valve already pushing towards Linux with Steambox, it's completely logical that many of these games will already be able to be played on Android, considering Linux = (pretty much) Android.

You can disagree with me all you want, but when the power in the devices is there (and it WILL be), and the market is there (it WILL be), then devs and publishers are absolutely going to go after that market. Big Time.

And there is nothing wrong with that. Quite the opposite. This is a good thing.

Those thinking we'll just get Angry Birds games are crazy btw. We'll be getting the same kind of games we're already getting for consoles, and more. Much much more.

frostypants3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

Yes, let's do as you say and imagine in a few years having a phone as powerful as a PS4 in our pockets...meanwhile newer consoles will be 5-10 times more powerful than that. So what? The phone in your pocket now is at least as powerful as a PS2, but that doesn't matter because that is no longer impressive horsepower. The whole "gaming is going mobile" theory is completely ignorant of the fact that the hardware that can be fit into a console will always be better than what can be squeezed into a mobile device at any given time. Mobile will ALWAYS be years behind the curve.

Also, your comment that Steambox games will be Android-capable because Android is like Linux is insane. Hardware matters. No, an Android phone won't be able to handle a high-end Steambox game...similar OS be damned. HARDWARE.

ABizzel13844d ago

Mobile isn't the future of core gaming. The closet thing to mobile taking over core gaming right now is Remote Play between PS4 and Vita, since you're taking your "core" gaming with you.

That being said mobile devices will be a possible source for core gaming. In 2014 Tegra 5 will be on par with the PS3 in processing (doesn't mean it will produce games on par), and come 2015 Tegra 6 will exceed the Wii U, and be running at 50% of the power of the XBO.

That being said those devices will likely power netbooks, and gaming tablets considering the power draw, and will retail for $400+ range.

Zichu3844d ago

Just because phone tech is advancing, doesn't mean it's stopped for other devices.

If you really think phones and tablets are going to give you same experience as a console, you are quite wrong. Just take a look at the OUYA and Gamestick. I don't hear about those two devices anymore, does it even have support by top developers at all?

I'm not saying phones and tablets won't reach the the same level as consoles and PC's, it will happen. I mean who would of thought you could do all you can on a really small device. Just look back at the retro consoles that couldn't output 3D, or even enough colors in 2D.

PC hardware is moving way too fast for even phones to catch up. They might be adding more RAM, but they need to work on the CPU and GPU a bit more because RAM isn't going to improve a game.

minimur123844d ago

I don't want to loose ninja theory to mobiles :( stay on consoles!

sprinterboy3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

Good luck with battery life. Battery life is crap now in phones, they keep updating the phones each year but battery life technology never makes the leaps it needs too, a gaming phone plus using GPS on a long journey with phone calls and internet searches would not last you 24 hrs which is where it needs to be

Yi-Long3844d ago

@Sprinterboy: You're looking at it from the wrong angle.

You think we'll be doing hardcore gaming while on the go.

I'm saying we will come home, plug our phone into the dock-station next to the plasma, which hooks it up to the power and the plasma, we go sit on the couch, pick up the wireless controller, and start playing the games we want, or we'll use it as a mediaplayer, or we'll use the camera in the phone for video-chat, or whatever.

You will have a dock next to your TV. One dock next to your PC-monitor and keyboard/mouse, etc etc. It will be a mobile 'do-it-all'.

And those naysayers: Did you think 5 years ago that we would be walking around with phones in our pockets with 2 cameras, 32-64GB(!) of ROM for all our mediaentertainment, with octo-core processors and 2GB of RAM!? No. You. Didn't.

Yet here we are, already walking around with devices more powerful and much more flexible than PC's from only 10 years orso ago. With scratchfree FullHD screens, with NFC, etc etc.

Again, hundreds of millions of people will walk around with an incredibly powerful Android phone in 5 years orso. That's a HUGE market.

kreate3844d ago

U heard the man. Ninja theory is all about mobile. Not for consoles.

so stop defending them.

DragonKnight3844d ago

LMAO! Tameem Antoniades putting his foot in his mouth again.

So because you can't cut it even with ideas handed to you (DmC) you ran to mobile and have joined the countless others that think mobile gaming is the future, parroting what has been said for YEARS and hasn't happened.

Welcome to the "Has-been" club Tameem, though I suppose in Ninja Theory's case it's the "Never-was" club.

Mobile gaming will never be the future, it has far too many physical barriers that can't be passed yet such as battery life and heat dissipation to match PCs or consoles.

N4g_null3844d ago

Lets say mobile chips are a possible future, lets claim they are cheap also. Let put all the new tech on the table and apply it appropriately.

We have wifi direct, wiiu wireless gamepad tech, bluetooth everything and a big push for online unified everything. Tegra chips catching up with the wiiu?

Ok lets go one step further. Tesla like consoles with 3000 cores just for gaming. That is possible now. Local cloud offloaded gpgpu gaming is ready now.... it does not fit in your pocket. Your phone becomes another output device or a possible computing node.

there is a design limit to what can fit into a phone. There is the thermal problem. Yet a cheap fx like arm chip array would bring back carts for gaming again. Nolonger would you have to upgrade you could possibly just set the cart beside the console and play it wirelessly.

it would be quite grand possibly expensive but would the game quality rise that is the real question, also would this tech offer any real innovation.?

I dont see the toolsets yet for lots of this to happen. Yet im liking where nvidia is going with their maximus setup, ive had that setup for a number of years yet 4k requires a bit more ram, then we have to get all our tools up to par with the tech.

Darrius Cole3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

@Yi-Long

If most gamers come home and plug our system into a docking station attached to our television set, then consoles will be ahead of mobile gaming.

The whole point of mobile gaming is that we can do it when we are not at home. Once we actually decide to game at home, consoles will always have an advantage. it is just a question of space. No matter how powerful and small we can make chips, we will always be able to put more of them into a square-foot than we can fit into a square-inch. If we are going to be chained to a central location (like a television set) then it will always be better to have the extra power when we get there.

P.S.

If Antoniades is the reason that Ninja Theory won't do Heavenly Sword 2 then the rest of Ninja Theory should mutiny against him and do it. If he owns the studio then the rest of them should try to form their own studio and do it in spite of him.

Antoniades is leading them completely out of the console gaming industry and into the mobile market. Why should they think he will be any more competent in the mobile market than he is in the console market. When he fails in the mobile market I guess he will have them making web browsers next.

Kennytaur3844d ago

It's hopefully not Android unless they make a new build from scratch. It's such an unoptimised OS.

Ninjatogo3844d ago

I'm pretty sure the first 8-core Android device came out quite some time ago. It was the Exynos Galaxy S4.

Also, mobile devices are getting faster sure, but they are not pushing games tech like consoles/PC. They are not running games anywhere near the visual fidelity of what we've seen on the PS3/360.
Don't even get me started on the poor control mechanics.

I bought a decent Android device recently (HTC One). Before I got it, I thought, "Oh boy, I can't wait to play some of those great games on here!" Then I got the device and wondered where that thought even came from. I've tried dozens of games and many look bad and feel bad.
I would say this is the best example today that specs don't make a good game.

HighResHero3844d ago

Phones haven't even caught up with 8 year old consoles due to thermal and battery limitations.

Phones are advancing but consoles, PCs, and laptops can advance much faster because they don't have these(and other) limitations.

So the whole "mobiles are advancing fast" is not rational.

Tameem I'm sure has plenty of reasons to be looking for avenues of escape.

Information Minister3844d ago

The only reason why this guy thinks mobile is the future is because if he and his team produce another flop, at least it won't stand out so much in that sea of casual shovelware.

He's basically admitting he's not up to the high standards of console/PC gaming

SecondSon3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

This whole thread is a simple case of...

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”

― Henry Ford

I don't see consoles being around when my TV can stream any game down my 1 Gigabit connection.

I don't see mobiles needing faster hardware when my phones and tablets have a strong 5G connection.

But most of all, I do not see myself in the future getting up to plug in my phone into a dock because my HTC One can wirelessly send a movie to my TV while I text.

Yi-Long3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

@secondson: the hook-up between phone and tv can of course be done wireless, but the primary reason for people to dock it in next to their TV would be of course to avoid draining the battery when it's not necessary.

Secondary reason would be that double function of connecting to your TV (saved settings and all, which might differ per phone), double-funtion as a camera for video-chat and motion-detection games for your games, etc etc etc.

fredrikpedersen3843d ago

@jimbob Enslaved was a great game.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 3843d ago
Magicite3844d ago

consoles, pc, mobile, tablets, laptops, they all have great future!

wolfsaviorzx3844d ago

Laptops and Tablets will become one. Surface Pro is pretty much already set the new standard for both.

SecondSon3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

No they all have one future.

A mobile device in your pocket that links any screen into the cloud. It acts as your Desktop, Phone, Cable box, Router, Console, Navigator etc and it runs a cloud service such as Chrome OS.

With a flick you bring any screen nearby to life by getting your devise to stream content to it.

You access the Sony, Steam and Windows Games app on it which sends you through to the corresponding cloud based services.

Any heavy processing gets streamed as video down your 5G network from a shared processing server.

That is a more efficient way for technology to spread in a world where distance is just a ping of 20

Sharing a pool of processing power is obviously the way to go, instead of buying individual processing units that are only used by one person and remain on standby 16 hours a day.

You will pick the cloud, because you will get more processing power for your buck.

Mystogan3844d ago

The portable console(smartphone) with the power of an X1 or PS4 is a pipe-dream. It won't happen anytime soon. Smartphones are not even close to being as powerful as a Wii.

VENOMACR12273844d ago

Angry birds or BF4? Candy crush or Titanfall?

Yea, I'd pick mobile too lol

greedybear883842d ago

Mobile gaming isn't just Angry Birds. There's console quality titles out therefor Android and IOS devices. Try searching for 'Modern Combat 5' or 'Asphalt 8' and you'll see what I mean

feedurhabit3844d ago

He's only angry because nobody'll let him develop for consoles after DmC

Heartnet3843d ago

or that the profit margin for mobile phone games is alot higher than console games?

mobiles are more popular etc etc....

And ninja theory has made solid game after solid game... they just dont sell well cuz they aint a shooter or the fifth game in X franchise....

feedurhabit3842d ago

Except DmC WAS the 5th game in its franchise. And while it's not as bad as a lot of people say it is, it was mediocre at best.

Enslaved I can't comment on but Heavenly Sword was one of the worst action games I've ever played. It was like they saw God of War and thought "hey, you know what this game needs less of? Fun!"

pkb793844d ago

I just switch over to my Vita and stream my ps4 game when going to the toilet. Works very well.

UncleGermrod3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

let's be fair, the majority of us might play mobile while crapping or stuck in a Dr. office, at best. i do not even know who these guys are. sick of these devs taking jabs at the industry and its fans, simply because they can not make high quality products that stand up to gamers' expectations. good luck selling crap to obnoxious iphone moms, ninja theory.

wonderfulmonkeyman3844d ago

Pfft, not me.
If I'm stuck in an office or on a crapper, I bust out my 3DS, not my phone, if I'm gonna play a game.

-Foxtrot3844d ago (Edited 3844d ago )

He's only saying this because after the crappy games they've made (except for Heavenly Sword...they could of had something there), they've been made to do Mobile games now.

Saying something like this helps him sleep at night

lpgs50003844d ago

Thank you. I have my own reasons for not wanting an x1 but I would take an Xbox one over mobile gaming anyday. The only games I have ever enjoyed on my phone are emulators.

Murad3844d ago

Agree with you totally. I personally myself prefer PC, aside from the delicious console exclusive goodness, however, I can say for certain that mobile games are not the future. I would understand if he was talking about Phoenix Wright titles for the DS as they are THE BOMB, but games like templar run or something along those lines are games you would give to casual players. You cannot put Civ 5 into a small device and keep all the features,it's a game that should be played on a TV or a monitor.

malokevi3844d ago

"He said that Ninja Theory is heading entirely for mobile"

" Xbox One is “completely the wrong direction”, mobile is the future"

hmmmm...!!!

Nodoze3844d ago

Ewww I cannot wait to see the steaming pile that ninja theory make for consoles this go round. They were 1 for 3 last gen.

ChickeyCantor3844d ago

"For casuals maybe...... "

I really don't think you understand the financial potential mobile gaming has. It is already proven to be a major viable platform.

Regardless of what you deem hardcore or casual. That's business for ya.

Demster3843d ago

just because your mom and her friends from book club would buy silly games on the AppStore or PlayStore, doesn't mean all the devs of our favorite games are gonna start making games for mobile only, because of "financial potential" lol.
mobile gaming is an industry to itself.

ChickeyCantor3842d ago

@Demster,

And what did I say?
Mobile platforms can be more viable. That's why a lot of companies, whether they be game developers or not, are moving to the mobile platform. The market is far more bigger.

" because of "financial potential" lol. "
You clearly don't understand how hard money talks. The higher ups in these companies make the decision and if they think that their company interest can benefit more from mobiles they will shift.

I never mentioned an exclusivity. Most game developers already create for mobile platforms.

7uff13844d ago

But I play 3DS on the toilet LOL mobile is dead to me, except when my 3DS battery dies and i'm not at home, then I play any mobile puzzle

Soc53844d ago

Yeah, all these mobile is the future guys don't get it. There will always be people who want cutting edge experiences that mobile is far from being able to handle. When mobile comes close to levels of pcs nowadays it still won't matter because there will always be people who want to enjoy it on a large screen at home. Yes mobile is definitely a profitable new niche that is here to stay but, consoles going away, I don't think so. Maybe they want it to be that way because mobile is an easy way to make tons of cash.

greedybear883842d ago

Mobile games can be played on a HDTVs and that technology exists in the marketplace today. You can connect your smartphone to a TV via an MHL cable and then if you all you need is a decent controller like a Moga Pro and there you have it... Playing console quality games like Modern Combat 5, Dead Trigger 2 or Asphalt 8 on your big screen with a console style bluetooth controller. That's a console experience right there.

Gamer19823843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

Just proves how stupid these guys are. A couple of years ago they came out blaming Sony for there failures with Broken Sword not recognizing the reason it didn't sell well is because it was a launch title. So went multiplatform and starting praising MS to take a pot shot at Sony. They made a terrible game in enslaved and DMC got negative feedback for a whole host of valid reasons so now they are blaming both MS and Sony for bad sales. To be honest the console world will be better off without them, they don't make great games and it will open up a gap in the market for a truly talented developer.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3842d ago
3844d ago Replies(2)
Sarcasm3844d ago

Honestly this is because his company has had mostly "ok" games that weren't big successes.

frostypants3844d ago

Yep...easier to impress people with little phone games for casuals.

MysticStrummer3844d ago

Going from Heavenly Sword to Enslaved was the wrong direction.

McScroggz3844d ago

Enslaved is one of the most underrated games this generation, in my opinion.

JCOLE131953844d ago

Yeah I enjoyed Ensalved honestly.

MysticStrummer3844d ago

I enjoyed it too, but still thought it was several steps backwards from Heavenly Sword.

akaFullMetal3844d ago

These guys really do like to intimidate their fan base a lot.

Roccetarius3844d ago

What fan base? The one they constantly kick out of their way?

Show all comments (141)
340°

Unfortunately, Ninja Theory Isn't Actually Safe From Microsoft

Ninja Theory might have games in the pipeline, but that doesn't mean Xbox won't close it for no reason

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community9d ago
rlow19d ago

Alot of speculation on their part. Ninja Theory has two games that have been green lighted and are in the works. Yes it’s always a possibility they could be closed but no matter how you feel about the Senua games. They do make a quality game. I personally think MS is going lay low for a bit, after the firestorm they experienced last week.

darthv729d ago

I really hope one of them is a long awaited sequel of heavenly sword or enslaved. Both are good games that deserve a 2nd chance... or at least a reboot.

blackblades9d ago

I'm 100% doubt its heavenly sword for obvious reason and Enslave 99% doubt it.

romulus239d ago

"Sony Computer Entertainment retains the intellectual property of Heavenly Sword", so that's not happening. Sony should let Santa Monica Studios make a Heavenly Sword sequel.

Rynxie9d ago

Santa Monica is a great studio, but I would rather the minds behind the original make it (ninja theory). I never liked sequels that were done by someone else, they are usually never as good as the original.

rlow19d ago

Enslaved would be awesome. If they did a remaster, then the next game in the series…..one can hope.

Yui_Suzumiya9d ago

Hopefully they'd get Evan Wells back for a sequel to Enslaved. After the original Enslaved he went on to Naughty Dog and did The Last of Us.

neutralgamer19928d ago

darth

HS IP is owned by sony and enslaved sold so poorly that you want a sequel now? let's say a sequel is made and sells like the first than this studio is for sure shut down. Their next game needs to be a big hit(if there is a next game)

rlow1

that's not how business works, if a studio needs to go it will go whether ot not that will come with negative PR. They just spent 100 billion and now they are in the phase to find out which studios will survive and which needs to go to cut costs. NT let a huge opportunity slip away, they had the backing of MS and the sequel has even less gameplay, that makes zero sense

Chevalier8d ago

How?! Sony owns one IP and Bandai owns the other one

Plague-Doctor278d ago

Heavenly Sword IP is owned by Sony and Enslaved IP is owned by Namco Bandai

Hellblade was the only IP that Ninja Theory themselves owned when MS acquired them

Sonic18818d ago

Heavenly Sword or Enslaved didn't sell that well

Cacabunga8d ago

NT completely lost it since dmc, their
last good game to date! And has been a long time since.
An average studio at best, got lured by MS money and forgot to improve

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 8d ago
Rynxie9d ago

They make quality games, but they're usually hit or miss. Either they are average, or they are awesome. However, besides heavenly sword and DMC, they aren't big sellers either. Ms is as big of a corporation as it gets. If ninja theory isn't making them money, they will shut them down. Simple as that.

MrDead9d ago

Studio survival no matter who is reliant on MS's quarterly reports, if MS is looking to save money then studios like Ninja Theory are gone as we've seen with Tango and others. MS has their IP's, the devs mean nothing to them but a handy tool to balance the books with layoffs.

DarXyde9d ago

Eh, maybe. Microsoft seems like a phenomenally wealthy company that's (generally) wise with how they handle their finances. What they're not wise with is how they spend social capital. As soon as they get it, they spend it by doing something nefarious. Can't say they're the only ones of course.

Will they get rid of Ninja Theory? No earthly idea. Honestly, I have a hard time even speculating about it because we don't have any details on performance metrics. If I had to guess... And really, this is is a guess... It's just about engagement. It's the only thing that makes sense to me. If you've got a popular mobile game or MTX-heavy multiplayer game, you're safe. King and Activision aren't going anywhere. Even if player count tapers off, MTX keep them in the game as a form of engagement.

But then you've got single player games. I suspect that's a losing battle because single player games, unfortunately don't get long term engagement broadly. So games launching half baked is perhaps a strategy for the studios themselves to get people coming back to their games? It would make some sense, but it doesn't match with studios being surprised at the closures.

All of this to say, we'll just have to wait and see. The simplest explanation with the most streamlined thinking on the matter is just that they're getting rid of studios they see as dead weight in the long run. HFR was quite well received, but I guess it doesn't translate into happy investors because it's critical acclaim and not commercial success exactly. Bethesda isn't going anywhere. Making very long RPGs kind of saves you automatically in terms of engagement.

But on the other side of this, while studios don't close per se, nothing stops them or any other company from just cutting the work force within each studio.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8d ago
Einhander19729d ago

It's not for no reason.

The reason is they made two games that were underwhelming (Bleeding Edge) and didn't/aren't going to grow the user base for game pass.

They spent 5-7 years and this was what they produced, it's easy to see how they would be on the short list for termination at this point.

Sciurus_vulgaris9d ago

One thing to point out was that all the recently closed studios were under Bethesda. Before being purchased by MS, Bethesda had a slew of poor or under performing titles (Evil Within 2, Prey (2017), Wolfenstein: The New Colossus, Young Blood, and initially Fallout 76 ). I don’t think, Ghost Wire Tokyo, Deathloop, Redfall and sadly even High-Fi: Rush performed well after the buyout.

Einhander19729d ago (Edited 9d ago )

I bet this game with a 5-7 year dev cycle being launched directly onto game pass is going to generate less tangible cash profit than any of those games.

I'm sure Microsoft will brag about players or sword swings or some other pointless statistic, but those don't make cash money.

Chevalier8d ago

You do realize it took 3 platforms and like 2 years to sell 1 million for Hellblade 1 right? Added in 3 more platforms and it didn't move much.

Now cut our 4 platforms. How many copies do you think this will sell?! Not just played on Gamepass

Lightning779d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Apparently Ninja Theory is safe From being closed down https://www.gamespot.com/ar...

Already working on a new game. They are a 80 person team and relatively inexpensive I suppose to any other publisher

Buuuuut.

Yeaah sorry this is MS, I don't believe anything MS says. They have to be joking if they think anyone will believe them besides gullible Xbox fanboys. Once again MS needs to earn my trust back. Just when they earn some trust back, they always seem to destroy it and have to work to get it back. I still think they're getting shut down and canceling whatever game they're making because the game won't sell, again MS fault for not advertising it.. This company man...

FPSRUSSIA9d ago

the article talks about that to i recommend checking it out when you get a chance.

romulus239d ago

Tango was probably working on something new as well.

outsider16249d ago

The problem with this game probably not selling will be because of Gamepass. Every comment i see from xbox players are "dude, no need to buy this amazing game, just get it on gamepass"

Will it sell well based on word of mouth? Will they release it on ps5? Will ps players buy this game vs free on gamepass? Time will tell.

JBlaze2269d ago

Look at what happened to Hi Fi Rush.The game was sold on PS5 and didn't sell well.

JBlaze2269d ago

I mean Sony has done worst and no one speaks up about it.

outsider16249d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Well i dont know about hi fi rush..as i didnt buy it. I mean others are getting it on gamepass..so ill just wait it for psplus. Im guessing others are doing the same..soo..

Sure Sony has done it too..and people are vocal about it. Look at the helldivers fiasco for example..they got called out.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
Knightofelemia9d ago

I don't see Microsoft shutting off the lights to Ninja Theory. As a studio they actually have talent and have released some decent games. I love Enslaved maybe a sleeper hit but it's one of my favorites. Only way I see Microsoft shutting off the lights is if Ninja Theory releases games that sink faster then a lead weight. And there are fans of Ninja Theory one thing I would hate to see is Ninja Theory ending up like Bioware. Loosing all their talent and being a former shell of what they use to be.

Elda9d ago

Never say never. Tango Gameswork were just as talented as Ninja Theory & they were shut down.

darthv728d ago

And they were also under Bethesda... Ninja Theory is not.

Profchaos8d ago

I honestly blame starfeild and Microsoft for the closure of arkane and tango it didn't turn a profit like other huge Bethesda games. If it .are fallout 4 money Bethesda would have had the capital to share among the other studios. Microsoft should of also had the ability to step in and save the studio but decided to kill them instead likely because of Bethesda's financial failure with starfield and Microsoft's stupid goal of turning gaming into a subscription that everyone and their grandmas subscribe to

shaenoide9d ago

To be honest for Microsoft (not Microsoft gaming) it's all about making for the 70 billion purchase of AKB. No matter how good the games are. If they don't generate sales or new gamepass subs the studios can be shutted down.

Rynxie9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Yes, they make decent games, but do they sell? Unfortunately, no. Heavenly sword sold 1.5 million, even when the ps3 had a much lower install base than the 360. However, it's not a ninja theory ip. Enslaved sold poorly. DMC, sold well, but that's also not a ninja theory ip. Hellblade was a hit, but in my opinion, barely. Hellblade 2, unfortunately, might be a flop. There's no bigger corporation than Ms, they are as corporate as they come. If ninja theory isn't making them money, they will get shut down and their ips giving to another studio.

Elda9d ago

It was just announced that MS gave NT the greenlight for its next game. I just hope it's not another Hellblade. https://www.yahoo.com/tech/...

shaenoide9d ago

Tango was working on a new game.

jznrpg9d ago

Xbox - Green light
MS - Red light

Show all comments (49)
250°

Senua's Saga: Hellblade 2 launch trailer will send shivers down your spine

Ninja Theory's latest trailer for their highly anticipated narrative action-adventure Senua's Saga: Hellblade 2 is absolute cinema.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community11d ago
Reaper22_11d ago

Like I said before, buying Ninja Theory was one of the smartest moves by Microsoft. Games looks incredible.

Rynxie10d ago

Unfortunately, their games aren't big sellers. Will MS shut them down if hellblade 2 sells below expectations?

outsider162410d ago

If it sells below expectations, then i expect it to come to PS5.

Elda10d ago

The game may be a critical hit & still can get shut down. I highly doubt most XB owners will buy this game including the fact that it's digital only at $50. Most folks that have Gamepass will play the game through the sub service. If the reviews tomorrow are just average to low then that's another problem.

Obscure_Observer10d ago

"Like I said before, buying Ninja Theory was one of the smartest moves by Microsoft. Games looks incredible."

Indeed.

Just a few hours to go

I can´t wait!

z2g11d ago

badass. already installed via gamepass. if its as great as the first one I will pay for the whole game.

glenn197910d ago

I just don't understand why all the down votes

jwillj2k410d ago

Here we go again. Is this a game or a choose your own adventure???

purple10110d ago

if you choose left, turn to page 39, if you proceed forward, turn to page 43, to turn right, page 209, you finished the book early,

no but seriously this looks like Microsofts first hit, or should I say, first game of standout quality.

jwillj2k410d ago

Never questioned the quality. Question is will there be a need for the controller.

anast10d ago

The time machine 'choose your own' were awesome.

Tedakin10d ago

If it's anything like the first game, you will spend a lot of timing walking and solving puzzles, with some fights thrown in.

Elda10d ago

LOL! Didn't send any shivers down my spine but I'll demo it after midnight tonight through Gamepass to see what it's giving.

Obscure_Observer10d ago

After the midnight? I see...

Day one as expected for another game that you said you had zero interest.

Elda10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Finally making a re-appearance. When the heat was on about XB closing studios you were crickets on all articles. Now that the heat has died down all of a sudden you're here on an XB exclusive article or should I say a timed exclusive...lol!! If you must know I can demo this game at midnight because the University I work at is closed for the summer so I can play video games until my heart's content until the end of August when I go back to work. That's what Gamepass is for, knowing I would not spend $50 on Hellblade 2 because the first one I thought was boring so I'm going to see if this one is still boring or is it interesting by demoing the game.

PhillyDonJawn10d ago

I'm surprised you're interested

Elda10d ago

Why not I have a year subscription to Gamepass, I don't have to spend $50 on a digital only game that I may not like including I'm on a lengthy vacation from work.

rlow110d ago

It looks amazing, I’m hoping the reviews are solid. You can tell the studio really poured their heart and soul into this one.

Show all comments (34)
320°

Ninja Theory trends on X as gamers fear for studio following Tango Gameworks closure

Following the closure of 4 studios, many are now worried for the future of Ninja Theory once Hellblade 2 is released.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community22d ago
Sonic188122d ago (Edited 22d ago )

How is it going to sell well when it's also releasing on gamepass 🤔

Sephiroushin22d ago

Meant better to sell the studio and not closing it 🤦🏻 not to sell more games….
and games are sold anyways, you can buy it on xbox (not recommended if you got gamepass) but many pc gamers prefer to buy on steam than deal with the xbox app or pc gamepass!

On a side note to OP, the sales of studios wont happen though, especially when they want to retain the IPs, and well nobody is gonna buy a studios without its IPs; the other publishers that want a certain dev from the studio that are closing on their team can try to grab them as soon as they see they notice of the studio.

RaidenBlack22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

@Sephiroushin
Well hypothetically speaking, Ninja Theory can be sold to Sony at a lower rate sans the Hellblade IP.
Sony can then welcome them to work on the Heavenly Sword IP, which they still own.
Will be a nice proposition for Sony who can continue to offer a God of War-like hack n slash in their portfolio via Heavenly Sword 2, whilst Cory Barlog & co. decides to take a break from the God of War IP & venture some other genres.
On top of that, Ninja Theory was also interested in a sequel to Enslaved: Odyssey to the West and such Sony can come to a deal with Namco Bandai regarding the Enslaved IP.

badz14921d ago

selling the studio wouldn't be an attractive offer unless they come with their IPs. MS wants to keep these IPs, so even if MS is selling just the studio, no one would wants them

Lightning7723d ago

Because they're next come next year. HB2 won't hit some impossible metric within MS so they're getting axed in 2025. Leave gaming now MS.

XiNatsuDragnel22d ago

Ninja theory might as well be gone in 2025 at this rate

notachance22d ago

Every xbox studio is in danger now because there’s just no way they’re gonna rake in big money from game sales because of gamepass, even CoD was rumored to not come to gamepass because it would canibalize their sales number.

neutralgamer199222d ago

If they are smart they don’t put COD on GP day one. It’s one of the best selling games on yearly basis

Hofstaderman22d ago

Satya will make sure that doesnt happen. As you rightly put it; why kill the cash cow?

But then again, it is MS after all.....

thesoftware73022d ago

I agree and disagree. They should not put it on GP, but CoD makes real money from the overpriced MTX that people buy for over a year. They also have it all linked up to the Mobile CoD, which will incentivize Twitch spending from consumers.

neutralgamer199222d ago

Software

That’s true but keep in mind COD is the best selling or top 3 selling game every year. So yes micro transactions money is there but so are billions more

They should have tiers of GP subscriptions and the higher end tier received AAA games while everyone else gets them in 60 days

MontyeKristo21d ago

Wouldn't putting it on Gamepass be smarter? Cod is typically played, I believe, for far longer than 6 months.. if you get everyone playing the game for a year, on Gamepass, you've essentially doubled your profit. $10 a month for a year $120 compared to selling the game once for $60.

Not to mention MT's, on top of it. Sell on PS5, PC and Switch, keep it on Gamepass for Xbox and PC. Much smarter in my opinion..

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 21d ago
-Foxtrot22d ago

Also if you punish a studio for releasing a great critically acclaimed game which won some awards then what chance does anyone have

Elda22d ago

After this mess, I highly doubt the next installment of COD will be on Gamepass day one. It'll probably land on Gamepass 6 months after release date.

Noskypeno22d ago

Like I said earlier, I wouldn't even mind. There's a good selection of games on GP already, and it gives me time to play my backlog of games while allowing the games that need to sell millions of copies to make a profit a chance to succeed, a win win scenario.

badz14921d ago

not putting CoD on GP is sort of a violation of their own marketing though. they said ALL MS 1st party games will be on GP day 1, not some. CoD is 1st party, so to not put it on GP day 1 would be considered as false marketing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 21d ago
Rynxie22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

Ninja theory games were never big sellers. I could be wrong, but I doubt hellblade 2 will sell millions. I would rather they go independent and make heavenly sword 2.

solideagle22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

heavenly sword is Sony owned IP. this will never happen as original didn't sell enough...

Wikipedia: "In 2008, it was reported that a sequel to Heavenly Sword was in-development at SCE Studio Cambridge, but was canceled due to Sony no longer seeing it as a commercially viable product"

Flewid63822d ago (Edited 22d ago )

I remember. I feel like the amount of time & technology that has passed would make a sequel a big seller now. The game has enough legacy recognition to build hype.

Show all comments (58)