In theory, if one thirsts for the genre, one could play Uncharted; so...
...it doesn't matter of Tomb Raider is timed or not: they're good, really.
I really think when people were hearing about the xbox being discontinued early this gen, that might have killed a lot of their potential sales; that was a deal-killer for me because I didn't want to potentially have an Atari Jaguar incident, if you follow me.
For those who don't remember:
http://www.ibtimes.com/elim...
My first game was peek-a-boo with my parents; where did they go, man?
I think that's why I love games like Gears of War and Uncharted, because of the cove system I was introduced to as a baby.
It kind of reminds me of the game Loaded, except in a middle-class setting and a slight tilt of the viewing angle.
lol I know, right?
It's not the size of the boat, it's the 1080p, 60fps definition of it in the ocean.
The Wii U is already a decent console; they just screwed their new fanbase by replacing a simple, fun controller with a unwieldy controller.
They would be in first or second right now if they just stuck to what worked.
A perfect circle..
...for me to p00p on!
*Puts razor on lap... just in case*
@ Beef Curtains:
Because up until this gen = no one cared, ever.
I'm glad you noticed: most people pass it off as melancholy. :)
@ someOneCalled:
Because every PC player on Earth has a graphics card that can do "up to 4k60fps+ max gfx, ssaa, better shadow, draw distance, texture, and physx, the list goes on"
I actually agree with you that console players don't give PC graphics it's just due: PC graphics on the best cards will probably never be trumphed, I'm not disagreeing with that; but dude, even if your PC's graphics card can do a jillion things, PCs get, o...
Well, I keep on saying this, but;
if you can't tell the difference on youtube, and you're only going to see a comparison on youtube, then who cares what one or the others look like because you'll never see the others in real life?
- If you're happy with what you see on your console or PC, then forget the others: even on PCs there are different graphics cards, and a number of them can't pull off what the best can do any different than what ...
I just hope "voodoo shamans" translate into "competent", I'll be happy with that. :)
It would be a VERY BAD thing to do because most people don't have the guts to do the motion, and once they are acclimatized to doing so because it wasn't that bad when they did it in the game, doing something balls to the wall crazy and ending yourself will be that much easier because they've practiced it.
So would be the ability to rape various segments of the populous (whatever you can [or can't] imagine), to kill animals at will, to take drugs (and see simulated "highs" and the effect of being drunk), become a serial killer, to choke random people at will, and to pleasure yourself in the presence of clergy, but as a killzone developer said (I'm paraphrasing): "realism in a game doesn't mean a better or more fun game".
Mayweather beats Pacman!
Yep, too true.
I already set aside a sum of money to upgrade my PC to a top of the line gaming PC (I'm getting a new Nvidia card to replace my old one; I'm debating between the 980, 970, and the 960), I already got a PC monitor as big as a decent-sized 1080p television and a surround sound system for my PC, so that's why I'm in no rush to get my PS4, but I do want to play the exclusives (especially Bloodborne).
Considering the history and scope of both games in respect of personal and tournament usage, I'd think the SF deal was based upon the formidable fan base of SF rather than the existence/exclusivity of KI.