It is bad phrasing and this is from Bloomberlaw ha ha. Sony might convince the court, Sony might show merit for the court to decide, but stating they 'get' the court carries unwarranted overtones of some sort of non-judicial or improper influence. It is just bad journalism, but typical for anything remotely disseminated by bloomberg.
It is Orchard's trademark modus operandi. Even more it is their nature. Often they are the first one into some negative Sony article to comment. I would say 'borderline Sony hate obsession' but the evidence says they are way past that point. People can say what they want but the evidence is there in their post history.
Sony gets the court to toss the suit? So the court did not independently arrive at a decision to toss the suit and instead Sony somehow manipulated or pressured them to do so? Sounds like the judicial process and the presiding judge should be investigated /s.
No, give me two links from Dualslackers and I'll defend this review.
1 - A detailed set of grading standards (that they followed).
2 - Their editorial policy (that was implemented).
Otherwise, good or bad, praise or damning, it is a trash opinion that unfairly (for good or ill) alters the review score of a game. Such an affect impacts possible sequels, DLC and/or similar titles. It is in such a case unjustified and unfair influence.
Sony's 1st party titles are unbeatable.
Something that would be diminished by Day One on the service so thanks, but no thanks. I want individual games that I remember always and they stand the test of time. Not a blur of second hand offerings that are poorly developed, sparsely available, and ill supported.
It doesn't subvert the genre. It avoids a trope, but science fiction does not have an embedded or core characteristic of the positives of space travel. Or the negatives for that matter. Neither do the stories, in whatever form they are presented, always focus or see as necessary travelling to the stars. The category doesn't by it's nature deem the human race better for reaching to the heavens.
You can subvert a convention of a genre, but not the genre itself. Th...
All of those moments of discovery in a HALO game, coming out of a Forerunner structure onto a causeway and seeing what was below you and in the distance, entering a facility and taking an elevator to where you do not know but when you arrive it is another marvel. All of that is missing in Infinite. It feels cheap, like they just pushed out a big map then followed the Ubisoft design of sprinkling the same missions everywhere. Oh look, rescuing Marines. Don't worry, as soon as there are onl...
Darth I don't think you understand that you get disagrees for hate. People dislike your demonstrated bias, Yeah, its real, so people don't care what you say, they just don't like you.
Imma just leave this here: https://www.nme.com/news/ga...
Stray is not a First Party title. It is a game from Annapurna Interactive. Also landing on PC day 1.
"If some phony says Ratchet SSD LoAdInG!!! say Portal a 2007 game."
Not even remotely the same. Leaping through a portal into the same map which you already have loaded versus instantly loading an entire world that is slammed directly from the SSD through the I/O and into video memory. Apples to watermelons.
"Who said we won't? People said we'd never see GoW or Uncharted on PC."
That wasn't me or anyone that understands how the PS5's data transfer system operates.
"It's not even a custom engine, it's Unreal Engine,"
Ha ha ha my goodness, where did you go to school. The engine has very little to do with matters. Some, but not a great deal. It has more to do with mechanics/level design. Unreal 5 cou...
I believe it.
Loading is a different animal. Your comment shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the PS5's technical structure. This isn't just about the SSD on the PS5, which is far faster than that in the Xbox. This is also about the supporting architecture, specifically the I/O. Know why you won't see Ratchet and Clank on PC? Yeah, that's why.
And this is for the angry disagree:
First of all, MS can't direct Activision studios or Id to do anything right now. Tough fact. Then there is this:
https://www.gamespot.com/ar...
That is true and I was quoting the article not he tweet. But speaking of the tweets, he also said this:
"Still targeting this week, but it's day by day as work continues."
That is not a 'this week' guarantee sounding comment. And the fact remains, co-op should have been in since day one and the sheer mess of a development is inexcusable. The unforgivable nature is only surpassed by the people that continue to defend them at all cost...
Well they can't get Id or COD studios yet unless they contract them. If you want something done now then it has to be The Coalition, except they are likely engaged on two projects already.
The article says "or next week."
What was that somebody said about "nothing is delayed until it is"?