I mean part of the issue is that things transpired outside of work....
There was no fucking censorship. Censorship would have been changing all the outfits. The Devs have Ben clear that a version of the outfit that was not the final version was on 1.00 of the game by mistake and the pre launch patch corrected that, that one skin then covered up slightly more of the main character. Plenty more revealing costumes are there untouched.
Except you know the trailers 6 months before launch and the steam page that all stated it was a requirement to play the game and the Devs saying in multiple posts it would be returning as a requirement.
It was listed on the game as a requirement and it was a decision by arrowhead so that people could get into the game. In future companies won't be able to make such decisions and you will simply be left unable to play the game.
The government id is only in certain countries and it's not Sony's decision. It's laws your governmwnt like mine here in UK made that means they require that.
The lack of support is mostly down to legal reasons. There are only 197 countries on earth, no way 170 countries lack support.
There are only 197 countries in the world. I keep seeing different figures including the claim that 200 countries have had it removed. So which fucking is it?
I mean realistically how many copies did they sell in those countries? There's a reason psn doesn't support those countries and if the markets there were significant they'd have found a way to support those countries.
It was required upfront tech issues meant it was disabled.
Were it on ps vr2 aswell or other headsets too then I might have been. But it isn't so I'm not because most of us can't play it.
Yeah but it's comparison isn't really reasonable. Remake came out during the first lockdown, to an install base of over 100 million ps4's.
Cool so I bet the PS5 version with all the updates and the expansion etc releases early next year then. I'm not particularly fussed or looking to buy it given my time with the game on pc was very "meh" but importantly it will help prove a point to all those in denial claiming the reports about a starfield port were wrong.
Literally the point of down voting is to down vote takes you don't agree with. So if most people think the game is mediocre at best then yeah praising it will get down voted.
This is insane people. The explanation that it was the unfinished model of that costume and they updated to correct that is plausible and that it makes no sense to censor this outfit and not all the more revealing ones. The patches were even issued before the game launched.
Oh wear to start, firstly I think it entirely plausible that this particular costume had the unfinished model in the game accidentally and this is the finished version. It would be censorship if they were censoring the more revealing costumes as well if makes 0 sense to censor this one costume and no others.
Now onto the flip side: I can see why if you perceived this as censorship you would be annoyed given the promises not to censor stuff.
Now for some ...
What a nonsense bit of clickbait. They know nothing about if it is or isn't included (it is) ramble on instead of just getting to the point. Really quite irritating tbh.
Lol I'll agree the character doesn't look like the person she was supposedly modeled upon but idk why that is. I don't like all of Ubisofts business practices but this nonsense about the crew is getting redicilous. They only removed it from people's libraries because you literally can't play it anymore. That is the sole reason . You only need an online connection to install this game because presumably it doesn't all fit on one disc and they didn't want to use two ...
It was a good remake that improved on the original and was a fun game. What more do you want. Also the stuff in the comments suggesting that they made this because calisto protocol was announced is some serious fucking nonsense. Do you know how long it takes to develop a video game these days. This was done from ground up. It took longer than 2 years.
You know how long it will have taken to make this game, this is some rediciulous logic.
I mean the fact stuff happened outside of work puts EA in quite a difficult position legally. These women don't seem to have reported the matter to the police which kinda ties EA's hands on what they can do. If they don't file reports of the crimes then yeah from EA's perspective it is stuff that happened outside of work. The only exception is the guy that apparently referenced things in the slack channel for work, spending on what he said proving it may be very hard and he ma...