Approvals 11/3 ▼
freemmogamer (3) - 284d ago Cancel
autobotdan (2) - 284d ago Cancel
matthook (4) - 284d ago Cancel
TheBrainZ (2) - 284d ago Cancel
470°

Microsoft confirms Final Fantasy 7 Remake post was a mistake, not a tease

Eurogamer writes: "Xbox has confirmed that a Father's Day post from its Brazilian social media account which included Final Fantasy 7 Remake was posted in error, and "included a title not available on Xbox".

Microsoft's Xbox Brazil account on X, formerly Twitter, yesterday posted a Father's Day message featuring celebrated dads in gaming from various Xbox titles - and also one other: Barrett from Final Fantasy 7 Remake."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community284d ago
Snookies12284d ago

This is hilarious, like what the hell... Let's get some facts straight before actually posting... Might as well have thrown in Kratos and Atreus lol.

__SteakDeck__284d ago

What’s sad is that, this isn’t the first time they made a mistake like this.

Flakegriffin284d ago

What’s even more sad is that, Xbox fans are going to run with this for years until it comes. IF it comes.

S2Killinit283d ago

The first time I got a bad feeling about MS was back in the day when xbox magazine was a thing, and I noticed that their articles implied that games I knew were on other platforms, were xbox only games.

gold_drake284d ago (Edited 284d ago )

a mistake is a mistake

but they could have done more research before actually posting haha.

__SteakDeck__284d ago

They’ve made mistakes like this before.

shinoff2183284d ago

He'll maybe they know something we don't and word isn't suppose to be out yet.

Tacoboto284d ago

MS Brazil knows the Xbox Series sales numbers... word definitely wasn't supposed to be out for that

Vits284d ago

Likely the media dude didn't know there was a difference between this Barrett and the one from the original title that is available on Xbox. And also did not know the whole can of worms that is the subject itself given Sony reportedly blocking it from release on Xbox.

AmUnRa284d ago (Edited 284d ago )

Here whe go again...but but Sony blocked it....Sony blocked nothing, SE and Sony got the deal, heck even Sony assisted SE in making the game, and paid for advertising....the guy was lying, end of story.

Vits283d ago

There is literally no judgment of value on that comment. Is just literally what was reported previously. If that hurts your feelings because you see yourself enamoured by the multibillion-dollar company at the very least avoid projecting that onto normal people.

Christopher284d ago

Can we stop acting like companies don't block games as a business model? Everyone does it. Some people spend $68b to do it, some make deals with a third-party deals (which, by the way, mean that both parties have to agree on it). Let's stop cherry-picking when and how games are blocked like it's something unusual or dramatic. It's normal business.

The3faces284d ago

'Some people spend $68b to do it '
What a hilarious back handed shot at MS while trying to defend Sony.

Vits283d ago

I like how you read way past what I actually have written.

"And also did not know the whole can of worms that is the subject itself given Sony reportedly blocking it from release on Xbox."

There is no judgement of value here. I literally only said what was reported. But I understand that for some, it might be hard to see stuff without the fanboy glasses.

MrBaskerville283d ago

They do, but we should also stop pretending that MS isnt doing the same thing. They make time exclusive deals constantly. Probably had more these last two years than Sony and Nintendo combined. Though I do think Sony is spending more money on this praxis than MS, because the deals seem bigger. High on Lifes 6 month deal couldn't have been the most expensive.

Christopher283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

*** What a hilarious back handed shot at MS while trying to defend Sony. ***

Glad you also called out Vits for his backhanded shot at Sony then? Oh, wait, you didn't.

***I literally only said what was reported. But I understand that for some, it might be hard to see stuff without the fanboy glasses. ***

It's the words you use and the fact it actually has nothing to do with the topic at hand. FF7r is a third-party exclusive, and still is. But what did you say? "Can of worms." Oh, that's just simple facts. "Sony reported blocking it from release on Xbox." Oh, that's just simple facts, not at all a direct attribution specific to Xbox. They totally didn't block it from Switch either? Just Xbox?

C'mon, words matter, and you made it dramatic and 'wrong' in your word choices when the whole thing wasn't about the Sony deal, which you ascribe as being a "can of worms" when it's just "regular business," but about misleading with an image thinking that the game would go to Xbox. Nothing else. It wasn't about the deal, it was about Xbox misleading through image use. But, yeah, "can of worms" on Sony's part.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 283d ago
MrNinosan283d ago

Blocked for 6 months, then SE chose not to release it anyways due to Xbox gamers and their cheap gaming habits.

mrcatastropheAF284d ago

I love MS but they just keep taking Ls lol they need that Starfield W baddd

Show all comments (31)
80°

Final Fantasy VII Remake Trilogy vs Final Fantasy VII Original Story Comparison: Which Is Better?

Twisted Voxel: "We compare the story in the original Final Fantasy VII and the new Final Fantasy VII Remake trilogy."

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community53d ago
80°

The creation of a real-life Final Fantasy VII Buster Sword

PlayStation Japan: “A great sword that has been passed down from generation to generation and carries the thoughts of those who fight.”

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community75d ago
Changed: title, embed code
Nyxus77d ago
Changed: embed code
Nyxus77d ago
450°

Final Fantasy VII Remake Cutscenes Changed With New Patch, Comparison Inside

A new patch for Square Enix's action role-playing game, Final Fantasy VII Remake, has brought changes to certain cutscenes.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community87d ago
Sgt_Slaughter87d ago

If you can't go without breasts in a cutscene, you need help

Rebel_Scum87d ago

Should’ve ended that sentence with either “you maggot” or “you puke” Sarge

Barlos87d ago

Well bloody hell, I guess I need committing then. Stick me in a padded cell

Eonjay87d ago

People need serious help if you 'need' to stare at a minors breasts. And some of you admitted that so at least we have acknowledgement. Can we not sexualize children? It shouldn't be considered progressive. I think the mass majority of people regardless of political view aren't into to kiddie boobs.

CrimsonWing6987d ago

look, man... why support censorship in any way? Forget the cleavage, it's the principle. Do you like owning the cable television edited version of a movie or do you want the original R-rated version?

I'd be just as irked by this if WB Games put out a patch that censored all the swearing and gore in an MK game. So, regardless of how you feel about boobs being covered up in the game, it's the principle of censorship that gets most people. I couldn't care less if she wore a sports bra from the beginning, what I hate is people covering my eyes and ears like I'm a 5-year old telling me, "This is too inappropriate for you."

So, yea, censorship is dumb as f*ck regardless of the content. Changing something that's already established that nobody made a big deal about, and nobody is getting their rocks off to (let's be real here), all because people get uncomfortable with boobs is dumb, plain and simple.

Like, give me a f*cking break here...

AdonisIsBeast87d ago (Edited 87d ago )

Yea, apparently you’re incapable of comprehending the point of the complaint. As another user mentioned, it’s principal. These are fictional characters in fictional worlds, it gives most people no pleasure see “the cleavage” as used in this example. The entire point is that we are all getting sick and tired of these fake and unnecessary DEI and ethics departments censoring media simply for the sake of it. Unless theres nudity, they should leave it alone.

Babadook786d ago (Edited 86d ago )

I prefer the before, but I won’t make a mountain out of a molehill. (No pun intended)

CobraKai86d ago

It’s about the needless censorship.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 86d ago
andy8587d ago

I mean she is portrayed as being 15 in the scene. I don't really consider it woke to cover up a child (begs questions why they did it in the first place though).

Rocketisleague87d ago

In the original nomura was going nuts with child panty references and such. Look it up

k2d86d ago

Devil's advocate here.. who's doing the objectification here though? How would progressives react if teenagers where asked to not show skin and cover up their feminine traits? No bare shoulders. No hair. No make-up etc.. 20-30 years ago the main stream tune was the complete opposite, and games where under attack from conservatives and we had to defend games from them. Now publishers are pre-emptively chastising and censoring to please left AND right, depending on which region of the world their trying to up ease.

dmonee85d ago

Alot of Japanese animation, cartoons, video games, are SuS, when it comes to sexual exploitation lol.

Gamingsince198186d ago

She's not anything , she's not a real person, she was never born, they could make her nude and no harm would be done to anything but the minds of people that can't tell real life from video games.

OMGitzThatGuy87d ago

Black rock is against sexualizing minors? Those demons!

AdonisIsBeast87d ago

Actually they’re FOR exploiting children and promoting puberty blockers and life altering hormone treatment for minors. Do your research

qalpha86d ago (Edited 86d ago )

BlackRock is apparently FOR sexualizing minors. They (along with Disney) were vehemently against the Florida parental rights bill (better known as the 'don't sexualize young elementary kids' bill).

banger8887d ago

"It’s unclear why Square Enix opted to make this change around 4 years after the game’s release."

Because some progressive, blue-haired freak started quivering uncontrollably and frothing at the mouth?

CrimsonWing6986d ago (Edited 86d ago )

What’s weird about it? Females wear low cut shirts all the time, do you bust a nut over it? No… well, I’d hope not.

This is a person who has breasts that wore a low cut shirt, the end. It’s not child porn and nobody in hear was fapping to it.

When you go to a mall and some 15 year old has cleavage showing do you run up and throw a bed sheet over her? I mean Geezus you see more with swimsuits…

Our culture is so weird. We have people championing women for doing OnlyFans as such a brave and empowering decision. I see celebrities barely wearing anything on the red carpet exposing their nipples and butt cheeks and everyone is gawking at how amazing the outfit is.

A freaking game has a fake character that in no way looks 15 and in no way is oversexualized, but had a shirt with cleavage in what, a 30 second scene, and suddenly that’s where we draw the line… like what world am I living in?

andy8586d ago

Just personally find it weird. But what is actually weird is the people who are complaining about it. If she was 12 is that suddenly not OK. 10? There's a reason stuff like that isn't shown in media on children. You'll obviously see it in real life but doesn't mean it's right.

gold_drake87d ago

yes and to make it more in line with Rebirth. shes wearing a black undershirt in that game. consistency.

the japanese definetly didnt care if she has one on or not ha.

Barlos87d ago

Sweet Baby Inc is probably the reason

I_am_Batman87d ago (Edited 87d ago )

Seems much more likely that the team simply wanted to prevent perverts from zooming in on the cleavage of a 15-year-old in photo mode. I'm pretty sure the Nibelheim flashbacks in Remake were only a couple seconds with a fixed cutscene camera, so that wasn't much of an issue until Rebirth where this character model is obviously used a lot more.

Maybe you guys should hold your horses until you've played the game and stop jumping to conclusions. I've already got spoiled about a scene that happens later on in the game and it certainly didn't fit your hypothesis of Square bending the knee to oversensitive "progressives" with an allergiy to attractive females.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 86d ago
franwex87d ago

They wanted to have consistency with the new character model. That basically it.

Why not make the new character model resemble the design of 4 years ago though?

gold_drake87d ago

while i want my games, especially the ff games with alot of lore, to be as accurate in their translation as possible, the english localisation took huge liberties in the first place.

the japanese and german for example are in line with one another. english is not. but yea. its a silly change, the steel sky was a great thing when she said it, but apperantly the original english lip movement was more in line with "i dont like it" than with "the steel sky, i miss it"

Show all comments (47)