940°

Aaron Greenberg: "Does the price of a game even matter, if it's in Game Pass?"

Xbox games marketing GM responds to question over whether Microsoft will raise game prices

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
ziggurcat1315d ago (Edited 1315d ago )

"Does the price of a game even matter, if it's in Game Pass?"

Well, yes it does because people might actually buy games on Xbox, and there are people that don't do digital distribution?

RpgSama1314d ago

F****!!!!! I HATE this dude so much, POS Aaron Greenberg, then there comes the Xbot brigade to defend Xbox saying that MS doesn't want a service only future, AG himself is saying, "who cares about buying games, when we have gamepass".

If MS gets their way we're going to be left just like with the music industry, with the occasional Collector's Vinyl

DEEHULK881314d ago

Dumbest thing I've ever heard

leejohnson2221314d ago

Just looking at him makes me feel slightly ill

FanboySpotter1314d ago

@rpgsama you hate anything ms/xbox has to say even if it's positive. Hate them so much you probably didn't even know gamepass gives you discounts which is good for those hoping there isn't a $70 price tag

RpgSama1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

@FanboySpotter

Where is the positive in this? Taking the words of Aaron Greenberg "Does the discount in the price of a game even matter, if it's in Game Pass?"

darthv721314d ago

I tend to buy games that i have played in GP and I get them for a discount even. So no... the price of the game doesnt really matter to me when it comes to game pass.

Babadook71314d ago

How many game of the year contenders came to gamepass day one? None?

-Foxtrot1314d ago

RpgSama has a point

I mean...it just feels like they want to implement their plans they revealed for the original Xbox One in 2013 but they are instead slowly, surgically dishing it out...drip by drip so they don't get shit on all over again.

If they got enough support, subscribers and even more positive cover from the press with GamePass then they could do anything, they could start to do "internet needed" for games X, Y and Z, raise their prices and so on.

Just like how Netflix keeps raising its prices despite going downhill a little, people usually complain and stay or complain, leave then come back eventually.

blacktiger1314d ago

If you can't sell your ownership then you lost everything!!!! This is like Rental vs Owner

bouzebbal1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

There you have it folks.. Xbox don't care if they sell games now 🤣this guy is an absolute disaster

What this clown just said is a big misstep..unless publishers charge xbox for every copy downloaded through gamepass, which makes xbox biggest pigeon ever

Noskypeno1314d ago

We already have evil Amazon taking over the world, now that everything that's not walmart is turning into a generic Amazon warehouse. Microsoft doesn't look that bad in comparison

Sophisticated_Chap1314d ago

That's why Sony is coming out with an All Digital console, because if Microsoft gets their way.......

HASHTAGSMITTY1314d ago

Going to be left just like the music industry as in listening to more music than ever before for less $$$ than ever before? Sounds terrible.

Army_of_Darkness1314d ago

@fanboyspotter

So you... Actually think what AG said is good news?? Wow.... So what if games were $90 and a few games that you wanted were NOT on game pass? What will your response be? You gonna cry then?
You all do realize that not all new games will be going to GP right? Unless it's from MS themselves.

Sirk7x1314d ago

That's technology for you. I'm a musician, I listen to music constantly, it is one of my passions. Why would I want to pay for thousands of albums when I can have Spotify Premium on my phone and have it all available to my instantly? It's convenient and saves me LOTS of money. I don't miss spending half my paycheck on CDs every week like when I did when I was 18 lol. Many people are going to feel the same way about gaming streaming services.

Rhythmattic1313d ago

Sirk7x
Well, As a musician myself, I refuse to use streaming services like Spotify...
Its not viable to the hard working , creative musician.

Theres the fact of manipulating plays, the cost percentage top the artist... All those blaming Apple for 30% cut, well I give you Spoofitlie....

Ive got Albums worth on my multiple SC pages... for FREE...
WHY? Because music IS my life.,

Only time I make money is doing Film Scores or Audio Post...

Why should I let a company thats just a database, (sure back end servers) make money and pay my SFA for my creative art... Without music and musicians, where would they be?
Nowhere,,,,, Its like a Large Company asking you to do a gig, unpaid because it will give you exposure ,....
The problem is , it literally is the wrong way around...

So. I buy the Albums too support the Acts I like... Sure, Vinyl, CD.. But if I can when I can, The HQ uncompressed version, also.
Different stroke for different folks...

But dont underestimate how your choice effects the Artists you like.

1313d ago
+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 1313d ago
Godmars2901314d ago

There are some who can't do online, but that hasn't stopped it from becoming the prevailing method for gaming.

Noz1314d ago

There are people who cant afford a blu ray player, should we start selling vhs again because of them? Progress dont stop because a hand full of people wont or cant adapt! Get used to it, digital is the future and that is good!

Shikoku1314d ago

Baseless assertion with no evidence to back it up. The prevail way a large portion of the gaming public play games is physical media. Steam and PC aren't the only gaming platforms🙄, thank God, and digital only out paced physical sales this year and it was still only 50% and that's because it had help from the pandemic. https://www.google.com/amp/...

roadkillers1314d ago

@Noz

I'm not against you,but bluray players are under $50.... probably less expensive because a lot of tv's do not support vhs inputs anymore.

nickanasty2061314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

I am a collector, so yes, price does matter to me. But as with most of the collecting i do, i wait until the games are dirt cheap, then buy them, unless for some reason the game is a must have on day one which is the only time i will be willing to pay full price. Cyberpunk for instance, day one purchase. Also to clarify, by collector, i mean i only buy physical copies of games, because i still am one of the older sad folks who prefers physically having something in my hand when i pay 60 dollars for a game. The game goes into a huge 350 sleeve CD wallet i have. If the game is worth it I will pay full price because I do like to support the production and development teams. Another reason i will buy things on day one, for instance games like Tony Hawk Pro Skater 1+2 remake, where we haven't received a decent skateboarding game on any console for a long time. I like to support those types of games day one because it shows developers as well as financial analysts that there are still major amounts of interest in those games, and hopefully triggers them to realize the demand is there, therefore we get sequels.

FanboySpotter1314d ago

"Yes it does because people might actually buy games" then buy them this aint psnow, gamepass gives you discounts on games that's why he said does it matter? So no $70 tag. And also about there being people that don't do digital distribution.. maybe on other platforms but not on xbox. Gamepass is only growing and growing is subs. All fake concerns.

ziggurcat1314d ago

"... then buy them..."

Price matters if I am buying them.

"... maybe on other platforms but not on xbox."

Not one person on Xbox buys physical discs?

Christopher1314d ago

I hope he asks that question of people developing games for his console. Pretty sure it does. But, you know, if everything is on GamePass, everyone is obviously making money off of it. Right?

Petebloodyonion1314d ago

Then you should be happy to know (if you read the article) that all games with Smart delivery will still cost you 60$ vs 70$ on Xbox
So at least you know that you can save 10$ if the Playstation5 costs 70$.

ziggurcat1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

If your response to the question whether games will be $70 on Xbox is "does price really matter if it's on GamePass?", then you know they're going to be raising prices to $70.

Also there are $70 games on Xbox: "Earlier this year, Take-Two revealed it would charge $10 more for NBA 2K21 on PS5 and Xbox Series X"

Petebloodyonion1314d ago

Is take-two an MS studio?
"Xbox games marketing GM was asked if Microsoft would adopt the $10 price increase that publishers including Take-Two, Sony, and Activision have recently introduced for a small handful of next-generation titles."

And the only thing they confirm was that Gear would cost 60$ and that smart delivery games would not suffer from a price hike.

ziggurcat1314d ago

"Is take-two an MS studio?"

You're talking about saving $10 by buying Xbox Series X titles - that example is the same price on both next-gen systems, so where's the $10 savings? Is Gears Tactics going to be on PS5 for $70?

"... smart delivery games would not suffer from a price hike."

Same is true on PS, so...

Petebloodyonion1314d ago

@ Zigurat
The point of the article is: Will Ms go with a 70$ price tag for a next-gen game like others do including Sony
What price is Demon's soul Destruction All-stars again?
And how many MS games are gonna be sold at 70$ this winter?

ziggurcat1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

"The point of the article is: Will Ms go with a 70$ price tag for a next-gen game like others do including Sony"

Based on his response, they probably will. I'm sure they'll hold off for as long as they can, but they will no doubt raise prices for their 1st party titles to $70.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1314d ago
TheProblem1314d ago

Ugh. Aaron Greenberg

If it looks like a troll
Acts like a troll
.......,..,,

ChasterMies1314d ago

And GamePass isn’t free.
And third party games are not a part of GamePass forever.

umair_s511314d ago

To me it doesn't. It is obviously the best deal in gaming. The only reason I am even considering a ps5 this holiday is because I love dualshock controller and demons souls. I am not currently a game pass subscriber but I definitely will sometime this gen. The best part is you don't even need an Xbox to enjoy game pass. Soon xcloud streaming will roll out on more devices. I look forward to using xcloud on my chromecast.

ziggurcat1314d ago

So how are you going to play a game on GamePass if it's not actually available on GamePass? Wouldn't price matter to you in that case?

1314d ago Replies(1)
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1313d ago
Hakuoro1315d ago

Ask Steam, where all your games seem to be ending up these days.

CaptainHenry9161315d ago

I was just thinking about that lol

1314d ago
Tech51315d ago

except for forza on steam. it would be great but they keep on rejecting it.

DevilOgreFish1315d ago (Edited 1315d ago )

it's too complicated with Forza. you need xbox/windows account to access 50% of Forza's features.
driveatars and events are tided to it. which steam has no version for this to port over. that's why it's been stuck on windows.

jeromeface1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

@devilogrefish so complicated that they put sea of thieves on there no problem?

1314d ago
Atom6661314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

What should they ask Steam exactly?

Should they ask:

"Hey Steam, why are "next gen" versions of console games being upcharged to $70 when the same game is still $60 on Steam?"

"Why did these Xbox games sell so well in your store when everyone could have just played them for $1 on GP?"

Like those type of questions?

1314d ago
Vega751314d ago

@ zeroBlue2

What's stopping people from buy the game from gamepass at a discount? You can still own the game without paying the 70 dollars

DEEHULK881314d ago

@Zeroblue2 WTF will be stopping you if you want to buy the game? They still sale any game on Gamepass. There are no games on Xbox that are exclusive to Gamepass for the umpteenth time.

Atom6661314d ago

@ZeroBlue2

Why would they ask Steam that? Does Steam own games? You seem confused.

Steam is a digital storefront that sells game licenses.

Xbox Store is a digital storefront that sells game licenses.

They also have a rental service called Gamepass where you can rent some of their games.

So, no, I don't think they'd ask Steam that question.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1314d ago
Shikoku1314d ago

My games end up on my bookshelf because I don't use steam play games on a PC.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1314d ago
Games1st1315d ago (Edited 1315d ago )

Does the quality of a game even matter, if it's going to Game Pass?

iplay1up21315d ago

Seriously? You need to check the Game Pass lineup. Plus November 10th EA Play, will have all of its games available to Game Pass subscribers. That is an additional 50 + games, making Game Pass library well over 200 games!

Doom Eternal, was released for Game Pass this week, as will every new Bethesda game going forward. That sealed the deal for me. Yes Sony won me over this past year, but Microsoft offers such a deal with Game Pass. Sony is going to take you $$ for games. Games that are 'free' with Game Pass.

Also Microsoft didn't acquire all of those new game studios without a plan. Next gen BOTH consoles will be amazing!

ApocalypseShadow1315d ago

It's not **free** and without a consequence. You're going to pay for it eventually. Just like paying for online. It's now REQUIRED to play with others.

Soon, those games you cherish will have an online requirement where you're connected at all times to this service. Just like their failed attempt with DRM 2013. They are just waiting and biding their time while grooming you to accept what they tried before.

Hakuoro1314d ago

Gamepass might have good games but none of them were made by Microsoft.

Saigon1314d ago

Wow never thought about that GP can be DRM 2.0.

arkard1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

If you can't seed how game quality will diminish once the source of income is reduced to only gamepass (that is the end goal) instead of also disc sales. If a company gets a flat fee regardless of what game they put out what is the incentive?

343_Guilty_Spark1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

Hakuro

Whether they are made by MSFT or not is irrelevant...they have good games perid.

1314d ago
No Way1314d ago

Zacfoldor - Which you can then buy if you like the game. Idk why everyone ignores the fact that you can buy GamePass games directly from GamePass, (usually, if not always) with a discount.

Or you 'rent' it then buy the physical copy if you like it enough to do so.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1314d ago
1314d ago
343_Guilty_Spark1314d ago

False narrative that no quality games exist on GamePass.

I got DOOM, Doom Eternal and Indivisible on my list of games currently being played.

1Victor1314d ago

@343 Doom isn’t a example of quality game 😂🤦🏿

yomfweeee1314d ago

But you can't deny the quality of the first party titles have gone down since GP. I think that's the point here.

ginsunuva1313d ago

You just false narrative'd that he false narrative'd.

King_Noctis1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

I can’t believe we still have comments like. Seriously, do you play game only on one platform? You never bother to check what’s on Gamepass at all? Or you just pretend to be ignorant?

Saigon1314d ago

I have GP, its ok; not OMG awesome like most make it out to be.

CaptainObvious8781313d ago

I think it's very ignorant to pretend MS is going to continue to keep paying publishers large sums of money to get half decent 3rd party games on there.

And if you think MS aren't going to rush out their own 1st games, half finished and riddled with MTs, well that's just more ignorance.

King_Noctis1313d ago

“ And if you think MS aren't going to rush out their own 1st games, half finished and riddled with MTs, well that's just more ignorance.”

Were games like Gears Tactics, Ori 2, and Flight Simulator “half finished” ?

DEEHULK881314d ago

THE GAMES AREN'T EXCLUSIVE TO GAMEPASS. YOU CAN BUY THE DMN GAME IF YOU WANT TO. IF YOU HAVE NEVER USED GAMEPASS PLEASE STOP SPEAKING ON IT BECAUSE IT SOUNDS SILLY.

Phoenix761314d ago

WHY BOTHER BUYING GAMES AT ALL IF THEY ARE ON GAMEPASS!
Stop saying you can buy them to "support the devs" if you want. Because only fools pay for the same product twice. Especially when first time round your paying penny's to MS first. Let's at least be real about this eh?

DEEHULK881314d ago

Every game released doesn't come to Gamepass idt. The third-party games don't stay on there and you can get the games on there for a 20 percent discount if you choose to buy them. I have to to quit responding to nonsensical post from people that have never used Gamepass anywhere, It just getting ridiculous

Hakuoro1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

The irony of the fact they you needed to say this in all caps and don't understand that it's Greenberg who is the one who is saying that buying games doesn't matter if they are on gamepass isn't lost on me...

It's Greenberg who is downplaying buying games...

DEEHULK881314d ago

Hakuro
Of course he is trying to sale a service, so that's nothing unusual, but it doesn't change the fact that any game on Gamepass can be bought if you choose to do so.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1314d ago
MadLad1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

Gears 4/5/tactics, Halo: MCC, Forza, Outer Worlds, Wasteland 3, Ori, Plague Tale, and many other games say yes.

RgR1314d ago

How's wasteland 3 on a controller? I can't stand controls on rpg top downs for console

MadLad1313d ago (Edited 1313d ago )

@rgr

Only have gamepass for PC.
Never really play with controller.

1314d ago
1314d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1313d ago
Blastoise1315d ago

I'd be surprised if this doesn't translate to "Yes we're raising our next gen prices like everyone else"

ziggurcat1315d ago

That's likely what that means, yes.

phoenixwing1315d ago

pretty much what you're saying is true blastoise. It also translates to "buy game pass if you don't like our prices"

Popsicle1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

“We have a product for people who aren’t able to get some form of connectivity.” “It’s called the Xbox 360.”

crazyCoconuts1314d ago

to me it just seems like more aggressive Game Pass marketing - Implying that everything you could ever want to play will be on Game Pass, which is of course not true for many if not all of us.

CrimsonWing691314d ago

You know Xbox will be doing $70 it’s an industry standard. They didn’t stop when games jumped from $50 to $60.

1314d ago
1314d ago
Sirk7x1314d ago (Edited 1314d ago )

Part of the strategy in raising prices is to convince people to move to said service platforms instead.

badz1491314d ago

Yes and I hope there will be no hypocrites here willing to defend MS while crucifying Sony for the $70 price tag

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1314d ago
Silly gameAr1315d ago

I'm sure it matters to the people making the game, unless they've been money hatted properly, or have a bare bones game full of MT's.

Aaron acting like the pro consumer good guy so he can promote "smart delivery", game pass, and last gen and AA games. I hope people see through it.

Show all comments (234)
290°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake1d 18h ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing1d 14h ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake1d 14h ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

JackBNimble17h ago

MS has educated financial advisers, they knew there was little chance to recoup the 70billion just to break even on the Activision deal let alone whatever other nonsense is going on in MS.
This whole thing was to corner the market for leverage.

thesoftware7301d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman1d 14h ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake1d 14h ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus231d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

BehindTheRows1d 13h ago

Has nothing to do with Sony. Stay on topic.

notachance1d 13h ago

once in a while you see someone too invested in their make-believe console war that everything happened has to be connected to said war…

a bit of banter between fans is normal, this crusade you’re doing now isn’t.

Chevalier1d 13h ago

Wow idiotic. You bring up very old closures not that there haven't been recent ones from Playstations, but, seriously stop deflecting. This has NOTHING to do with Playstation.

Does Playstation got $3 trillion behind them and daddies wallet? No they don't so stop making a fool of yourself.

Xbox has never been profitable really and they just keep losing money so between their worst hardware sales, terrible 3rd party sales and now terrible 1st party sales.

Gamepass numbers that are no longer being announced shows their numbers after 3 years of missed targets has flatlined. Plus their recent gains up to 34 million were ONLY because they folded Gold members in too. Absolutely take your idiotic rhetoric out of here. Keep on topic without deflecting.

S2Killinit1d 13h ago

Ayayayay with these xbox/MS excuses.

Reaper22_1d 8h ago

How dare you mention Sony! Everyone here knows when Sony closes a studio and lay off workers it was the right thing to do. Even when they bought Gaikai and fired almost everyone it was the right thing to do.

Gamers can be such hypocrites sometimes.

andy851d 7h ago

Is it? That's revenue not profit. Completely different.

fr0sty21h ago

The earnings call only showcased how dire the situation is... Even with ABK and Bethesda, they still couldn't make enough to keep investors happy, gamepass subs are stagnant, and hardware sales are tanking.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 21h ago
thesoftware7301d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

Drake,

"this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt."

You are correct that it's not an MS Vs Sony Topic, but when exaggeration and imagination mix from a one-sided social group, similar examples are needed to ground radical thoughts; in this instance, the example was that shutting down 3,4,5, even 6 studios during a restructure/ buyout/acquisition is not some anomaly(it can suck) that has to be dissected or spell doom and gloom.

"But I'm pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. They didn't, and they closed off some studios."

But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue.

"its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case."

The fact that they did make money, kinda throws this out the window, and besides, you don't wake up and say, hey let's close a studio, you look at the output, you look at the dev as a whole, the long term and short term, you weigh it against all other studios and goals, you keep key members, ect..then you close if they are the weakest links...which by MS analysis they were.

Again, I will make a small Sony comparison, just so some of you can understand and see past the bias; Insomniac, ND, and Bungie have made some of the best games ever created, yet Sony saw fit to cut jobs in every of these studios, even tho Insomniac & ND are the biggest producers of PS games, leagues ahead better than Tango and Arkane, yet, they saw cuts, mind you, while being the TOP produces of PS first party. They were told to cut costs, and more jobs may be on the line, and Bungie is being threatened by a hostile Sony takeover. Put that in perspective, as I know that layoffs and dev closures are different, but if the best of the best is getting cut off, it is less than surprising, that lesser studios are closing.

@Cheva,
My response fits well with your comments as well. You even went on to prove that the dev closures are not just due to A/B acquisition. Then you point out Sony has less money than MS, inferring that MS should keep devs open that they see as lesser earners, while Sony having less money makes it okay to close them. lol...it doesn't work that way.

gold_drake1d 11h ago

im not reading all of that. u have ur opinion, i have mine.

thats rly it.

but this aint sony vs ms.

ApocalypseShadow1d 11h ago

You're trying to compare a 100 billion company to a company that has 3 TRILLION worth. SIE has to live or die on their own. And in turn, PlayStation has helped the main company again and again. Sony has to balance out what is working and not working in the company.

While Xbox has Daddy Warbucks footing the bill to keep the platform afloat. They have been bleeding money from Nvidia hardware in the OG Xbox, the RROD fiasco, the attempted 2013 DRM nonsense and the lies about being the most powerful console in the world and the losses of paying out millions to prop up a service hoping it catches on with enough subscribers to justify its existence.

They're not comparable if Xbox isn't allowed to live or die by its actions. It's subsidized. Revenue isn't profit. And if they were profiting on their own, they wouldn't be closing developers. If they were profiting, they wouldn't need Daddy Warbucks spending 80 to 100 billion buying up 3rd party publishers to sustain a loss leading platform.

They stopped announcing game sales, stopped announcing hardware sales, stopped announcing game pass subscribers, they are putting games on their competitors platforms but you're telling us that they are doing great even after killing jobs and closing developers at Xbox.

Stop drinking the Kool aid. You're drunk.

Chevalier1d 1h ago

Again at which point did Playstation have a $3 trillion company shift the market with a giant purchase?

"But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue."

Lol. No they didn't. Increased revenue was ONLY due to adding Activision Blizzard revenue in. Growth was only 1 percent. It's idiots like you that have no idea what they're talking about is why Xbox isn't better than it is. You guys just make excuses continually.

If Xbox got so much profit then why did they stop announcing hardware numbers? Why did they stop announcing Gamepass numbers? Oh right because they're NOT profitable. Their sales in every category has dropped off the face of the planet. It's why Spencer will be closing more studios and canceling upcoming projects too.

The Wood18h ago

How can they be profitable when they're not selling enough hardware, software or subs. You need take a seat on this one my friend unless you can prove you angles

jwillj2k417h ago

Sony didnt shut down the studios you mentioned after they made last of us or ratchet and clank or destiny. Cutting jobs is not equal to closing studios. Sony cuts are a candle in the sun of Microsoft’s closures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 17h ago
WelkinCole1d 6h ago

I am pretty sure MS knew this would happen and this was part of their plan. I mean if anyone with half a brain can see this happening I am pretty sure a multi billion company like MS knew this would happen

The whole strategy in buying Beth and Acti/Blizzard is for

1. Buy established games they can have under xbox because they have done a horrible job in building their portfolio internally for the past 15 years

2. Following from 1, try and boost xbox competitivenss against a dominat PS which MS after 3 tries still can't crack

3. Follolwing from 2, try and weaken Playstation dominance by taking out these massive multiplats from the PS

4. Following from 3, try and profit off from the PS domiance with selected games they will still have on the PS to make money like COD

5. Obviously get the IP's by buying them instead of creating them which again as I mentioned in number 1 they have been woeful in doing

None of these had anyting to do with keeping all the devs they accuried. MS has always been very shitty to Devs under them. Look at what happned to Bungie for example.

I believe MS in court truely mean it when they said they had to do something because PS was just too dominant. This was their last roll of the dice.

And from the looks of things. It has not panned out as MS had hoped. PS5 is still as dominant as ever and xbox is still behind. Worse still their MP's they got is not irreplaceable as they thought. Starfield? lol!. There have not been any major shift in momentum in this console war in their favor so now its time to start cutting their loses and it starts with the most expensive cost for any company. People.

Michiel19891d 4h ago

for a comparison, sony laid of a bigger % of it's staff this year than ms, it's what companies sadly do nowadays. If you think with GP and Bethesda + acti aquisition they were looking for quick cash, you couldn't be more wrong. It hasn't even been a year, "they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen." shows you have 0 understanding of how a business operates.

thesoftware73015h ago

@ Michiel1989

Exactly this!

I'm reading these comments, and it's mesmerizing how off-base most of them are.

I posted a few comments above, and their rebuttals have nothing to do with the points that I presented; when they start doing that, I just ignore them because, at that point, they're debating all over the place.

Profchaos21h ago

30 more like 70 to 80 plus 7 for Bethesda

Tzuno16h ago

meanwhile everything turned woke an inevitably went downward, i'd say it serves them well if they promote such kind of approach, mwuahahahahahhh!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 15h ago
anast1d 14h ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor1d 14h ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows901d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

Einhander19721d 13h ago

The better question is why did Microsoft buy publishers for a service they were subsidizing they knew couldn't support.

And why are so many websites trying to make people feel sorry for Microsoft instead of truly criticizing the fact they are closing studios and killing jobs that would have been fine if Microsoft themselves hadn't gotten involved.

Quit feeling sorry for Microsoft and start feeling sorry for the industry and the all the gamers who are actually losing out.

THIS IS MICROSOFTS FAULT.

RNTody1d 13h ago

The first thing that happens after any major acquisition or merger is a consolidation of the whole new portfolio, which includes cutting any excess, bloat or portfolios that don't fit the larger MO of the big boy. So far, it's been par for the course with Microsoft and that's why gamers have been so against this acquisition. Tango Gameworks is the beginning. You think Microsoft wants to pay to keep small timers like Ninja Theory in business?

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that Microsoft will improve any of these studios, but plenty to suggest that they will get rid of what they don't need and hold onto the IP. The real agenda of the acquisition was always to acquire The Elder Scrolls, Diablo, Fallout, Call of Duty, Candy Crush etc. that will create millions in passive revenue stream for Microsoft regardless of where the games release. Microsoft simply wants their cut.

Because of Games Pass Microsoft has no interest in investing in new IP which is risky and requires creative talent they can neither nurture nor manage. Game Pass has also not grown in the way Microsoft expected it to, even post acquisitions. Therefore the logical thing to do, without serious money makers to release, is to cut as much cost as possible.

Show all comments (47)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead4d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)