910°

The Coalition Showcases Gears of War 4 in True 4K on Xbox One X – and it looks incredible

Microsoft has announced that several titles from its recent first-party portfolio will receive enhancement patches for Xbox One X. These include Halo Wars 2, Forza Horizon 3, and of course, Gears of War 4. In this article, we’ll be focusing on the upgrades being introduced to the latter of these titles, which are coming to the game for free this fall when Xbox One X launches globally on November 7th.

Read Full Story >>
ar12gaming.com
KingKionic 2529d ago

The screenshot in the article

http://i.imgur.com/l3N3yap....

The coalition has done it again.

Lawd hath mercy.

LordoftheCritics2529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

Stellar.

The game already looked great. Don't mind the upgrade at all.

UltraNova2529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

From the article: "On Xbox One X, Gears of War 4 will be running at 4K/30fps for Campaign and Horde, while Versus will be in 4K/60fps with “adaptive scaling to ensure a rock-solid framerate.”

So even Gears cant run at 60fps on xb1x, plus it has adaptive scaling in multiplayer? But but the Beast...? This must be Sony's doing!

DARK_WOLF2529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

Every time you muppets talk shit about xb1x like its weak.

Just remember ps4p is 40-50% weaker LOL.

2529d ago
ULTp0ltergeist2529d ago

The fact that some are complaing about achieve anything above 1080p and at 30fps is just ridiculous. ENJOY THE GAMES PEOPLE!

UltraNova2529d ago

Truth hurts I guess, just as fake promises.

LexHazard792529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

@UltraNova,

I read that and just had to Lol...
I mean why else would you write that if not feeling a bit salty. I dont see anything on your preferred console getting close to 4K/30 with same graphic settings, let alone doing 4K/60 in mp.

You're right the truth does hurt. That despite all that negativity you guys always bring to the thread. Xbox X is still a better product than PS4 Pro.

Kiwi662529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

@Ultra even in your comment it says Versus, which is a part of the game will be 60fps, so guess that makes your claim that it can't do it not completely accurate as part of it can do 60fps

2529d ago
UltraNova2528d ago

Wake up guys you've been taken for a spin since June 2016, now that the ride's over you refuse to get off. Suit yourselves.

donthate2528d ago (Edited 2528d ago )

Ultra:

I'm sorry you can't enjoy your device because of the power of Xbox One X. The fear is very real for you, but the fear is all in your mind. However, the power in Xbox One X is real. Very real for everyone.

super_bruno2528d ago

@ultranova Lets talk about the PS4P and how weak it is....

BiggerBoss2528d ago

Xbox fans flipflop more than anyone. Early this gen, they said that resolution doesn't matter and the human eye can't tell a difference between 900p and 1080p. Now, literally the ONLY thing they're hyped for is 4K resolution.

UnHoly_One2528d ago (Edited 2528d ago )

I love these PS fanboys attacking the 1X for not being equal to a 3000 dollar computer or whatever they think.

They have nothing real to criticize, so they make up promises that Microsoft never made, then criticize them for not keeping their made up promises. It's a hilariously inventive, albeit pathetic, way to attack something.

The best part of it is that like mmmmmmmmmyummy said, their PS4Pro is weaker, so it makes no sense at all for them to do this in the first place.

I said this in a comment a few days ago. They are making fun of it for only being "much better" than their console. "You guys suck, your console is only 'Way Better' than ours!"

It's all just so stupid.

4Sh0w2528d ago

Dang, Nova you sound mighty salty.

Gears 4 is already a graphics showcase, the fact that they are making it in native 4K for X1X is great news, -I don't understand why all this good news for the X makes you guy so angry???

jrshankill2528d ago

@UltraNova

More of a beast than the pointless PS4 Pro

JasonKCK2528d ago

Funny how the Sony fanboys are saying "it's not 4k 60fps" as if they had the upper hand.

Babadook72528d ago

This footage looks very jerky.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Can anyone link to a better version?

UltraNova2528d ago

Guys I dont do salty sorry...

As for promises...lets just say Sony never promised " true 4K - uncompressed pixels- higher framerates (implying 60fps since 30 was the std)" for the Ps4 pro. And those are just xb1x related fake promises...

Now to be brutally honest with you guys I do like the xb1x its a true upgrade over the OG xbox 1 but its not powerful enough to deliver what MS has promised. I expect to see the same difference between xb1x vs Pro as we did with the OG consoles, i.e. Marginal differences between framerate stability and minor quality setting tweeks.

Its shame really because if MS had taken their head out of their arse and made some 1st party exclusive games (sans the usual Forza) they would have shown us what the xb1x was really capable of. I guess we will have to see if they will release anything worthwhile before the PS5 comes out.

No hard (or salty) feelings guys just cold hard truths, take it as tough love ;-)

dilbig52528d ago (Edited 2528d ago )

I wonder if you guys are saying that it's a beast and much better than the "useless" Pro because it's so much better than the original Xbox One. Remember, you gotta think about what it's an upgrade from. Around 40% stronger than the Pro; okay, but it's 5x stronger than the original One but still no original games. And also twice as expensive as an already tweaked Slim just to have 4K in some games.

XanderZane2527d ago

@UltraNova
The PS4 Pro couldn't run this game in Native 4K at 30fps. You know that right? Also, who said that every game on the XBox One X would run at native 4K 60fps? Microsoft never said that. Neither did the 3rd party developers. Only ones who were claiming this is biased trolling fanboys like yourself. The average PC can barely run games at native 4K / 30fps. You need a beast of a GPU & CPU for PCs to run games smoothly at native 4K / 60fps. Costing gamers over $1000 to do so.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 2527d ago
BeOpenMinded2529d ago

The story below it describes a cool true horror story lol

2528d ago
JHippy50002528d ago

Ok that crispy screenshot is f*****g amazing

mark_parch2528d ago (Edited 2528d ago )

so it's native 4k with a mix of ultra and high settings. that's pretty impressive for a £450 console. it was actually a very good looking game already on base xbox one so am looking forward to playing this again. on a side note has anybody completed this on the hardest difficulty on co-op it's probably one of the hardest games ive played and ive played a lot.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2527d ago
SpaceRanger2529d ago

Looks good in 4k. Now, does it improve the story?

Jon_Targaryen2529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

I wish... I got bored an hour in fighting all those damned androids, and that was just the first chapter!

conanlifts2529d ago

You should go back and push on. It is a great blend of old and new as the game progresses.

2529d ago
LexHazard792529d ago

Wow took you an hour to get through first chapter? hmmmm

KillBill2528d ago

I had zero issue with the android fighting. It told a story and the enemy was actually a challenging added character in game.

Arnon2528d ago

The androids were neat, but I wish they would have had more variety in their models. You have rolling droid, small droid, big droid and flying droid. I found myself having trouble motivating myself to get to the Swarm because it just felt like the android bit never ended.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2528d ago
Gazondaily2529d ago

Why would the res improve the story?

2529d ago
Gunstar752528d ago Show
Jon_Targaryen2528d ago (Edited 2528d ago )

It was supposed to be a joke and sarcasm... *facepalm*

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2528d ago
Gunstar752528d ago

Read a f**king book!

Since when did videogames have to have good stories?

Ju2528d ago (Edited 2528d ago )

The first gears was fun, the rest was just a rehash of the same old, maybe horde mode was new. 4 was the same in a fresh coat and the weird idea of alternatively shooting robots vs monsters vs robots vs monster over and over again. I never liked the shooting mechanics, opponents are just bullet sponges. They never differ in challenges but how many you can pump into them. The wind in 4 is a cool feature but yet has minor impact in most situation, and that was that. It has no impact on how you run or shoot. And now doing that in 4K won't really change much.

Ju2529d ago

Well, and then there is...this was already 90GB on the XO, how much is it with 4K textures?

spicelicka2529d ago

4k or not, the gameplay is still the best of any TPS in existence so story is negligible.

spicelicka2528d ago

@MegamanXXX

Stale to you maybe, doesn't change the fact that no other TPS comes close in MP.

4Sh0w2528d ago

Well of course we'd expect a ps fanboy to say that, 'meh in other shocking news a Ford salesmen says Chevrolet trucks arent as good as Ford trucks.

-Dang the trolls seem extra jelly today, these guys are in all the good Xbox news thread foaming at the mouth. Let it go....breathe.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2528d ago
Condemnedman2529d ago

the game looked great on my 4k tv anyway 'im done with the single player but I still use the multiplayer daily so I will look forward to that

windblowsagain2529d ago

@Mmmmmmmmmmyummy

4.2tf

vs

6tf.

That's only one side of the story, CPU 2.1GHZ VS 2.3GHZ.

Not enough for constant 60fps.

MS did the wrong thing, they should have been working on a totally new system, With a completely new processor.

DARK_WOLF2529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

Um did u really think a game would get upgraded to 4k and go from 30 to 60 as well?????

Mike yarbba already confirmed before xb1x reveal that games bumped to 4k would keep same frame rate so 1080p30 becomes 4k/30 not 4k/60.

Also

8gb ram vs 12gb ram

218gb vs 326gb memory bandwidth

Cpu cores are fully customized in all areas where there were bottlenecks.

A new cpu wouldve been nice sure but MS arent even making money on this so if they put a ryzen cpu in there it wouldve been even more expensive. People are already complaining about price....

Phil said they are already working on the next console after scorpio aka xb1x... which is normal. Sony will be working on ps5 as well.

conanlifts2529d ago

Sony are in a tough position with ps5. It would need to be both cheaper and a lot more powerful. I think that we will be at least 3 years away from a ps5 in order to achieve both of those. Of course if they opted for a $499 price 2 years is possible, but it would be a similiar jump in power from ps4 pro to xbox x, except with a new cpu.

windblowsagain2529d ago

That's the point. Should not have been so quick to push a new console out.

Should have waited to start a new gen.

DarkZane2529d ago

@sd11

In 2019, a 12TFLOPS PS5 for $399 is definitely possible.

A GTX 1080 ti at the moment has 12 tflops already and a new series of card come out this year, followed by another one each year. At the end of 2019, 3 new series of cards will have come out and a gtx 1080 ti will be ancient technology by then and much cheaper.

conanlifts2529d ago

@darkzane. I seriously do not believe you could put a newer cpu , 12tflop gpu and more ram in a console for less money by 2019. It is almost certainly not going to happen. 3 years minimum is my prediction, 4 years max.
MS are selling the X pretty much at cost and make no profit day 1 with the tech inside.

Ju2529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

Sony will yet again go for price over performance. Unless a $500 XoX is a landslide success. But then again, I mean the Pro could be down to below $300 by then and the low end 4K segment will be satisfied. At the same time, ya, a 8-12Tf GPU should be available by then. And so the race is on. AMDs ~12TF gpu also has FP16 modes, which pushes that pipeline quite a bit. Question is if one could really built something like that into a small cheap package in 2 years. 500 is actually a good price for the XoX, just makes me wonder how they can even make any money off of it. At the same time power will just sell so much, if people have a cheap alternative available.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2529d ago
conanlifts2529d ago (Edited 2529d ago )

Yes but you are criticising it's power when it is almost 1.5x stronger than the current most powerful console is just random. Had ms upgraded the cpu as well we probably would have ended up with a $599 console. That definitely would be too expensive for a console.

xsta1ker2529d ago

ms did the wrong thing lol why is that... Microsoft said it was building the most powerful console
and they have done that.

it's unbelievable the haters on n4g need to try and pic apart everything xbox to make them self's feel better.
it doesn't work like that if your unhappy with the product sony provided you with the pro
go pic them apart for the 4.2 gpu and the same jag cpu.

your not going to make your system out perform x1x buy picking it apart every chance you get.
face facial evidence the x1x can and will out perform the pro in every game made for both consoles.

and get used to it for the next 2 yrs at the very least.

Ju2529d ago

Nobody is saying it'll outperform it. But what people are saying at $400 (or even less by end of the year) it's a good enough alternative.

itsmebryan2529d ago

@JU
No it's not good enough. The Pro is not even close. Dev are already getting much better performance out of X1X in this short period of time over the pro. Just wait till launch and beyond when they get more familiar the hardware.

Just think if you are a already an Xbox one owner how cheap the X1X really is. Think about it. You don't have to buy new launch games because if you are like me you have a backlog of games you can still play that will be improved and you don't need new accessories like controllers and charging stands(another good thing about having removable batteries). With all of that stuff always spend at least a $1000 Everytime I get a new console.

Also why is Sony is still saying it's"the best place to play games" when it's not anymore? And so far none of their exclusives have appealed to me except "Horizon" .

Ju2528d ago (Edited 2528d ago )

"Much better"...true, for people playing at 900p for the most time and haven't seen any 4K titles yet. For the rest price will matter. I also think the Pro can be sold for $349 today, and if it would ever drop to $299 the XX will have a hard time. No matter how powerful it is. Sure there is some hate, because of the double standards and the MS marketing hype train, indeed. I have nothing against the XX, but get real. We are playing in 4k for over 6 months already and not since MS "said so". In two years (or even less) Sony will most likely have an answer for the power deficit. But yet, I think it would make sense to introduce a new machine which can have PS4 titles but also allows exclusive new titles with additional features.

Prince_TFK2529d ago

It still is more powerful than the Pro. Had they gone the route you wanted them to, the console would have cost up to $599, which is DOA as far as the price goes.

As for now, it is a perfect balance between price and power. We had seem a couple of games that run at 4K60FPS during E3, which more than I can say for the Pro. And who to say that they aren't working on another next gen console?

conanlifts2529d ago

"That's the point. Should not have been so quick to push a new console out. 

Should have waited to start a new gen."

To be fair they are responding to the competition. Also its an option. A new gen always brings exclusuve that do not work with the current gen. This a great alternative "option".

itsmebryan2528d ago

Why are so many Sony fans trying so hard to downplay the X1X? It's like they can't take having the weaker console after crowing about it this generation. This show Sony made a mistake with the underpowered Pro. It's about gaming not brand loyalty. You guys really need to stop acting silly. You can get whatever console you like but, you don't have to attack the other. Chill out. Smh

Allsystemgamer2528d ago

From what I'm seeing it's the Xbox fanboys that are pissing everyone off.
They're going around everywhere calling it the second coming. Going around claiming it's stronger than a $1500 pc (lel not even close) then crying when some games can't hit 60fps and some for some reason are blaming Sony.

Meanwhile all it ha is a resolution bump. That's pretty much it. The reason Xbox one got so much heat for not hitting 1080p is because....it's 1080p. It's been a standard for over a decade. There shouldn't have been any excuse in 2013. I mean...phones were hitting 1080p with their shitty games. PS4 got flak for it too.

It would be like pointing and laughing at someone who has a 1440p monitor and you have a 4k monitor. Going from 1440p to 4k isn't really that much of a jump. It's a little more crisp. Objects are sharper and the aliasing is fixed for the most part. But that doesn't change what you're playing.

It's resolution. Ps gamers want games. Xbox showed games...that are available on other platforms. They can't win over pc gamers with this thing because it doesn't have any actual exclusives so Pc players can just play Ms games on pc which will look and run better.

The issue is you don't even need an Xbox. You can buy a pc (get access to all MS exclusives AND thousands more) and PS4. There. That's it.

JasonKCK2528d ago

But I guess to you Sony did the right thing making a weaker mid gen system?

iNcRiMiNaTi2528d ago

It's not bad for a $500 console. I did a 4k gears 4 benchmark to see how my system held up and it averaged at about 60fps with a 1080ti. https://www.dropbox.com/s/2...

2528d ago
+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2528d ago
Show all comments (144)
130°

5 Video Games That Should Have Been Shorter, and 5 That Should Have Been Longer

GB: "Nailing an experience's length is easier said and done, and one way or another, these games left a little to be desired on that front."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Petebloodyonion475d ago

I always have a problem with games that should have been longer when lasting 8-10 hours.
Here's a question I ask all the time when ppl say that.
How many times have you replayed the story of a great game like Tlou2, GOW, Final Fantasy remake, GTA, Zelda, or any other 20 hours plus game? and usually, the answer varies between 0 and rarely 1.

So what's the point of having great 30 hours plus games if you will never replay them because of level, section, grinding dragging too long?

Lifexline475d ago (Edited 475d ago )

I agree I’m not sure how people find the time to play all these games. 20 plus hour games are great but for me 8 to 10 is the sweet spot. Those games take to long to finish specially when you have a backlog of games waiting to be played. Plus 20 plus hour games always have downtime and unnecessary side quests that can be boring too much fodder imo.

Being on your phone is one thing you can access websites like this everywhere on your phone or mobile gaming. But games you have to find the time to play them. Which is why I don’t understand why so many people want like ten games it seems In a month.

LucasRuinedChildhood475d ago (Edited 475d ago )

I think you're missing the point a bit.

A game can be 8-10 hours long and use that time really well, but it can also only start to get good far into the playthrough and leave the player feeling short-changed.

Hotline Miami is only 4-5 hours long but it's extremely well paced and time well spent. But if only got really good towards the end, I'd want it to be longer.

Stanjara475d ago

You just look at trophies and se that around 20% or less actually finish their games.

CrimsonWing69475d ago

I've replayed all those games except GTA and Breath of Wild because I can never finish them.

The Last of Us 2 i've replayed 4 times. God of War (2018) 2 times, Final Fantasy Remake 3 time (technically Intergrade twice since went on Steam and I wanted 100% achievements), and if we do want to bring in Zelda I've played Ocarina of Time probably 4 to 6 times a few times on N64, another time on 3DS, and twice on virtual console Wii and Wii U.

I am sure I'm not alone in replaying long games and honestly it's like I'm finished within a week or two and that with balancing responsibilities and a social life. Shorter games take even less time.

BrainSyphoned475d ago

Without mentioning Skyrim.. I've got two platinum trophies for Persona 5 and am playing it on game pass right now. Beat FF7R on normal twice and hard once and will play it again before the next one. Non story games- MHW I've made characters on PC/Xbox/PS with at least 600 hours on each platform. I don't care to play a mediocre games that are 8 hours long. The reason my backlog is so long isn't because that many good games are released each year it is because I replay the best ones over and over. Same deal with audio books. I've gone through book series multiple times every time a new one is coming out.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 475d ago
Soy475d ago

Disagree with Days Gone - yeah it took a while to really get going, but I appreciated it when I was done. Jumping right in at 4-5 hrs or whatever would've made the rest feel less impactful. RDR2 and Mankind Divided felt just right too, I wouldn't change them at all.

What needed less time was AC Valhalla. I was more than ready to be done with that by the time it was 2/3 over. Just too much useless stuff, and I hated the Asgard sections.

190°

Ranking The Gears Of War Games From Worst To Best

The Gears of War series has been a consistent deliverer of quality for Xbox, but which games are the best?

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
KicksnSnares701d ago

Gears of War is my favorite video game franchise, and the Locust is my all-time favorite faction.

My rank list:
1. Gears of War 2
2. Gears of War 3
3. Gears of War 1
4. Gears of War 4
5. Gears of War 5
6. Gears of War Judgment (No Locust in multiplayer was a disgrace)

ChasterMies699d ago

Agree 100% with this ranking. The campaign in Gears of War 2 is among the most fun campaigns ever made. It’s been downhill from there.

Zombieburger638699d ago

I’d say gears 2 and 3 are pretty even. I absolutely loved both of them.

darthv72700d ago

2 is still my favorite but 5 is also up there (for me). Then I'd say 1, 3, 4 and Judgement. Tactics isnt the same type of game, so it seems odd to rank it among TPS when its a strategy game. So I make that one all its own. Pretty fun game too.

Jericho1337700d ago

The first is and has always been the best one imo - the story, the levels, the set pieces, the soundtrack - as close to perfect as a campaign can get.

I’d say the series had been on a continual downhill slide until 5.

Om4ever700d ago

Naaaan ... 2 is the best by far

MadLad700d ago

3
5
2
1
4
Judgement

I love the series as a whole, but 4 was pretty by the numbers, and Judgement was just ok.

LoveSpuds700d ago

I played them all since picking up a Series X about 7 months ago. Personally, I don't think time has been kind to the earlier games and they feel very slow and repetitive to play. Whilst the newer games may be prettier, they stick with the original gameplay mechanics too much in my view so as a whole series of titles, I think they are pretty average games.

Not to say they weren't fun and I have a lot of nostalgia for 1 and 2, I just think there are far better action games out there.

Show all comments (14)
140°

Gears Of War: The Franchise For You

What's the best Gears of War game for players? Where to start? This guide should easily lend a hand.

Read Full Story >>
vibethenook.com
Old McGroin834d ago (Edited 834d ago )

It's brilliant but personally liked part one more. It's the only one that had a near horror movie vibe to it in parts, the atmosphere was amazing.

Also, the commercial for it was 🔥🔥🔥

https://youtu.be/wy8LRlS1SC...

Neonridr833d ago

Mad World was such a perfect song for that trailer. I loved part 1 too just because it was so fresh at the time. The series has been solid, but experiencing everything for the first time was pretty awesome.

ChasterMies833d ago

Gears of War 2 has one of the greatest campaigns of all time. Carmine, all that juice, fighting inside a giant worm, and riding monsters.

Knightofelemia834d ago

Gears 1 and 2 will always be my favorite Gears titles. The scene where Dom find his wife and then has to shoot her was an epic scene.

monkey602834d ago

I always found that scene laughably bad myself. Fantastic game though.

1 will always be my favourite. Most were great with the exception of 4 being okay and judgement being terrible.

They still have the most satisfying headshots from any multiplayer game around.

lucian229834d ago

Nah I laughed, the acting was soooooooooo bad

KicksnSnares834d ago

My favorite Gears game list
1. Gears 2
2. Gears 3
3. Gears 1
4. Gears 4
5. Gears 5
6. Gears Judgement

Gears Of War is my favorite video game franchise. I can’t imagine how Gears 6 will look in UE5 after watching Hellblade 2 gameplay trailer

RetroCaptainSteve834d ago

Or if they remake 2 and 3 with that engine.

KicksnSnares834d ago

There is a rumored Marcus Fenix collection (Gears 2 & 3 remake) in the works at the Coalition. Hopefully, it’s true, but I doubt it.

Profchaos834d ago

For me you can't beat gears 1 the original was so fresh and revolutionary at the time.
Then basically I'd rank it 2,3,5,4 and judgement

Viljong834d ago (Edited 834d ago )

One of the reasons why i got the series x. Been fan since the first game.

myfathersbastard834d ago

Played them all recently on gamepass. Great games. But my favorites gotta be gears tactics. Don’t know why. I just had a blast with it lol

Show all comments (27)