Approvals 7/3 ▼
postnick (2) - 2134d ago Cancel
Katsa9 (2) - 2135d ago Cancel
TheGadgetGod (3) - 2135d ago Cancel
970°

The Deafening Silence In Camp Sony Should Be Frightening For Its Competitors

GameRVW takes a look at the other side of the coin, and what the future may hold for Sony and its flagship PlayStation console.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2134d ago
Changed: title
GameRVW2135d ago
Eonjay2135d ago

There are many layers to this. First the PS4 is so successful that Microsoft probably wants nothing more than for the PS4 gen to end. Second, as Drake mentioned "a wise man once said nothing at all". The Xbox One X was featured last E3 and this E3 Microsoft is already talking about a successor? The announcement of new hardware isn't gonna help sales of older hardware. Microsoft is so scared of having inferior hardware that they are already trying to set expectations this far in advance.

And with the rumors of Navi being made for the PS5 maybe they should be scared.

The truth is they haven't been silent at all. They just aren't as heavy to the PR constant spin, headline grabbing, twitter persona fest as the main competitor.

Srhalo2135d ago (Edited 2135d ago )

I feel like Microsoft has given up on growth and is just focusing on the core. it's the only explanation for why they keep talking about future devices so early. The non-core who hears a new console is right around the corner is just going to wait.

I feel like the X for example is mostly being bought by people who previously had an One versus new owners.

Obscure_Observer2134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

@Srhalo

"I feel like the X for example is mostly being bought by people who previously had an One versus new owners."

I agree. but there´s a lot of Playstation and Nintendo console owners that never ever had an Xbox console before. IMO, the X is far more appealing to non Xbox gamers than the OG Xbox One ever was.

Phil Spencer´s Xbox One consoles are far better than Mattrick´s OG Xbox One console.

Goldby2134d ago

@obsure

I'd have to disagree on the one x statement.

The s would be far more appealing than the one x for non xbox players, at least Imo.

Why spend 500$+ for a console you would only be playing a handful of games on. No one would start their collection over just to brag about 4k on exclusives and 3rd party titles they already own on playstation.

If I were to buy one. I'm not going anywhere near the x. Waste of money when I can get the same thing out of the one s.

Aenea2134d ago

@obscure

Ehh, no, don't think the One X is more appealing if you've never owned an X1 before. If people buy an X1 now and already own a PS4, it's because they want to play exclusives and let's face it there aren't enough to warrant the price of the One X when a One S is more than sufficient for that. Someone heavily invested in PS4 isn't suddenly going to change preferred platforms, their friends won't go with and their trophies and all their bought games aren't being transfered automatically either so the PS4 will still be their main console.

If you only own the Switch, hmm, well, then there are quite a few games on X1 that aren't on the Switch and then suddenly a One X might be more appealing to some, then again if you only own a Switch at this moment in time you probably don't care all that much about power and resolution.

So no, the One S is still the most appealing Xbox for non Xbox gamers...

Obscure_Observer2134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

@Goldby @Aenea

"The s would be far more appealing than the one x for non xbox players, at least Imo."

Fair point. But notice that i said that (imo) the X is far more appealing for non Xbox players when in comparission with the OG Xbox One back in the day. Obviously because it was underpowered and overpriced at launch thanks to mandatory Kinect. I wasn´t talking about the S, which is also a "Phil Spencer´s console".

"If I were to buy one. I'm not going anywhere near the x. Waste of money when I can get the same thing out of the one s."

I disagree. You can´t get the same out of the S. If you buy an Xbox console because of exclusives, one would guess that you want the best from those games. Both visually and performance.

In the end all comes down to personal preference. But for what i understand, you can´t have native 4K Games on the S for your brand new 4K tv. You´ll not be able to play Forza Horizon 4 at 60fps or even Gears 5 on SP mode at 60fps either just to name a few. Now, if you are a console only gamer, whose neither more games at 60fps whose also has way higher resolutions aren´t your thing, then yes, the S would be the perfect choice for you. :)

Edited - @Aenea

"Someone heavily invested in PS4 isn't suddenly going to change preferred platforms, their friends won't go with and their trophies and all their bought games aren't being transfered automatically either so the PS4 will still be their main console."

Miss, nobody said anything about PS4 owners leaving Playstation for Xbox. Please, don´t turn this conversation into some fanboy bs argument.

Godmars2902134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

" IMO, the X is far more appealing to non Xbox gamers than the OG Xbox One ever was."

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Try, more expensive. It's accurate.

jaydiggler2134d ago

Probably mostly true, I had the One and the S and I upgraded to the X. But I personally have 3 friends that never owned a microsoft console before and they purchased the X, so there is some appeal to non xbox owners.

Jinger2134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

"Mostly" may be true, but a couple of my friends and my brother in law bought the X without having a One. The 4k games and 4k player was a big factor in their decision

Goldby2134d ago

Obscure

And that's the issue I have with ms.

If they are only able to hit the 60 fps on their most recent overpriced 3rd console for their racing games, than that's an issue I have with how they develop their games.

I could care less about 4k. Resolution doesn't make a bad game good or a good game great.

Tetris is still Tetris even if it's 4k or even 8k.

For me, only one that would be worth it is the one s cuz the one isn't available any more

kevnb2134d ago

I feel like the x is mostly just sitting on shelves...

slavish02134d ago

People bought xbox s even though they announced x was coming in a year. People still buy xbox when all games are on pc. So no people aren't going to wait because they are working on future hardware. People buy iPhone x knowing there will be a better one next year. There are so many examples of y u dont know what you are talking about

FinalFantasyFanatic2133d ago

@Obscure_Observer,

Yeah, nah, there's almost nothing a Xonex can offer me this gen that I can't get out of my 360 (I'd probably prefer the og xbox over it too). If what little games I do want come to PC then I can safely ignore the Xone all together and invest more heavily into a Switch (I already plan to anyway).

Even 4k is not a compelling argument, I bought a very good 4k TV which has one of the best upscalers, not ideal but very playable. And since I can get almost every game it has on pc, I still win because I can play them in 1440p or 4k.

NeoGamer2322133d ago

That is not true. We see articles quite often on N4G about "Why should Microsoft continue with consoles?" and "Microsoft isn't going to build another console because they want you on PC".

By stating they have another console coming, they are creating certainty for people that buy and XB that there will be another device. And if they can ship their console with a bunch of great games a year earlier than PS they can may be able to return to the success that the 360 had by shipping a year earlier than PS3.

Microsoft is catering to its core and loyal customers. That is definitely important to keep the market share they do have. But, by going and buying those five studios they are also looking forward in building new games and that has been the biggest complaint about XB is the lack of its own exclusives. So they are addressing the issue.

FinalFantasyFanatic2133d ago

@NeoGamer232,

They could get out first, but the first year for most consoles is generally barren game-wise or it's full of games that release on both new and previous gens. Hopefully those new studios do bring some worthwhile exclusives to the table to make the next xbox relevant.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 2133d ago
Obscure_Observer2134d ago

@Eonjay

"The Xbox One X was featured last E3 and this E3 Microsoft is already talking about a successor?"

Why are you acting to be so surprised? How many idiots said that Xbox was dead and that Xbox One X would be Microsoft´s last console? Phil Spencer has a clear roadmap and defined plan for X´s successor even before the X got released.

FYI, Phil Spencer talked about the X´s successor way before this year´s E3! 4 months before the X even hit your local store´s shelves!

But hey, guess what? Fanboys thought that he was lying! And here we are.

Now you´re informed ;)

gangsta_red2134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

Agreed, Phil addressed the biggest concerns fans, critics and fanboys had of Xbox and that did include addressing the rumors Xbox going "third party" or getting out of the console business.

He confirmed it was false by saying that they are working on another console.

Would people rather have Phil say nothing then possibly announce and debut the new console next year only so we can come back and complain that MS didn't say anything and forced users to buy an X? Because we all know that's exactly what the narrative would have been if that would happen.

As for the silence from the Sony camp, they've always been this way and maybe it has something to do with just how the Japanese operate. Western devs/publishers are more social media conscience from what I noticed they always like to keep fans/users engaged through some type of interaction online.

Goldby2134d ago

If that was the case, ans he was actually talk g about the new console even before the x was out, he should stop being the head of the division.

The second you start talking about what is coming next, people begin yo hold off buying what's out now for what's coming.

Eonjay2134d ago

The only reason why anyone would think that there would be no new Xbox systems is because no one is really buying it and if Microsoft was really interested in anything besides selling services, it would be putting out content on the level of Sony which doesn't even has as much capital as Microsoft.

IamTylerDurden12134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

Let's be honest, MS has been doing this all gen. Don't act like Phil needed to clear things up with the opposing fanboys so that is the reason he talked about Scarlet so early.

MS did the same thing with Cloud, DX12, "Scorpio", and now the next Xbox. They hyped each of these things incredibly early before they were actually viable and they did in order to garner hype in the brand. Xbox has been trailing the entire generation and overall it has been extremely lackluster.

People were disappointed when the XB1 came out running games at 720p with a $500 price tag. MS needed to sell people on the promise that their 1.3tf XB1 would magically become more powerful. So they hyped Cloud and DX12 in an unrealistic way and long before they would add any real benefit.

With the disappointment in power and rumors of a more powerful PS4 on the way MS needed something to counter that. They needed excitement and positive brand PR so they announced project Scorpio 18 months before it even released. This also helped kill the hype and sales of PS4 Pro.

trooper_2133d ago

What clear roadmap?

They can't even get new, successful games out of the gate, lol.

FinalFantasyFanatic2133d ago (Edited 2133d ago )

@gangsta_red,

Considering the cultural trends over there, I would believe they don't put too much into having a presence with their users, but with their stellar performance this gen they don't really need to.

As for Microsoft debuting a new console, it's a case of "dammed if you do, dammed if you don't", people would be annoyed or upset either way.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2133d ago
Tross2134d ago

@Eonjay Yeah, sometimes I wish MS's PR department would STFU, especially since it hasn't actually done them as many favours as they think. Ending the current gen won't be an automatic turnaround for them either, as Sony is definitely planning for the future too. They need to figure out where they went wrong this gen so they don't make the same mistakes, or Sony will trounce them again. I mean, gamers already know where MS went wrong, and here's hoping their latest E3 conference is a sign that they're starting to get it, but I'm not counting on it.

rainslacker2134d ago

Biggest thing is is that Sony has enough to show off and market for the near future, that they don't need to lay out their long term plans to keep people excited for what may come. They can keep people.excited for what were getting soon, and they've set a good expectation that they'll keep delivering. If ms had a decent line up to really be excited for, they wouldn't be talking about 3-4 years from now, or how they may have this great potential if people just give them a chance.

DarkZane2134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

"First the PS4 is so successful that Microsoft probably wants nothing more than for the PS4 gen to end"

I have no idea why they'd want that, they're just gonna get beaten as badly next-gen. You'd have to be a fool to be in a hurry to get beaten and humiliated again so quickly.

jwillj2k42133d ago

Microsoft is definitely that kid who thinks people are laughing with him...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2133d ago
UCForce2135d ago (Edited 2135d ago )

Sony doesn’t need to talk. They only talk when it’s necessary. Most of time, they will do more action.

2134d ago Replies(2)
2134d ago
trooper_2133d ago

Agreed.

They let the games do the talking.

-Foxtrot2135d ago

They usually make their mouths go nearer or after an event like E3 or Gamescom...they don't make their mouths go 24/7 like some. Maybe they know actions are louder then words.

UCForce2135d ago

Like I said before, they only talk when it’s necessary.

2133d ago
Obscure_Observer2134d ago

@-Foxtrot

"Maybe they know actions are louder then words."

Or maybe they´re waiting to know more about Microsoft´s next gen plans so they can react accordingly? You can say that Phil Spencer is running his mouth again as you usually do on Xbox articles, which actualy maybe be true, don´t get me wrong.

But i like how Phil Spencer is comming foward telling Xbox fans what to expect from Xbox in the future because i think it shows confidence and send a clear message that Microsoft will follow their own path (whatever it might be) instead of copying what Sony might do or what Nintendo is doing (Hybrid Console concept).

2134d ago
Godmars2902134d ago

"Or maybe they´re waiting to know more about Microsoft´s next gen plans so they can react accordingly?"

Isn't MS the ones who "borrowed" tech from Sony for the 360? What have they done this gen that Sony needs to seriously be worried about?

At this point MS have really only made services rather than delivered games. Done damage control. So again, why should Sony state their plans when the competition only talks up what they've yet to do instead of the here and now?

rainslacker2134d ago

They didn't wait for ms to announce it's plans for this gen. In fact, they caught ms off guard, to which ms actually delayed it's reveal conference after Sony had theirs. The ps3 reveal was a bit of an oddity because ms was forced to release the 360 early, but nothing in the ps3 seemed reactionary to the 360. The ps2 reveal wasn't reactionary. The ps1 reveal was a bit, but if stories are to be believed, it played out how they hoped, with Segas price being the only thing they were concerned about.

So.im not sure at this point what Sony would do other than what they already have planned, assuming those plans are complete, just because ms may throw them for a loop. This is especially true because ms seems.pretty predictable to me, and as of late, they haven't exactly been quiet about their future plans.

Obscure_Observer2134d ago

@rainslacker

"This is especially true because ms seems.pretty predictable to me"

Yes.
Like Xbox One X "slighty" more powerful than PS4 Pro.
Like Xbox One X DOA
Like Game Pass as a free to play playground.
Like Game Pass not delivering AAA games like Forza Horizon 4 Day One.
Like Sea of Thieves DOA without Game Pass
Like SoD 2 DOA without Game Pass
Like Halo Infinite as a MP only game

You´re so EPIC. You´re so right. So on point. Your Crystal Ball is worth Trillions! /S

rainslacker2133d ago

MS has been telling people all gen what to expect for the future. Even before the console launched. While that's not really that out of the ordinary during a console launch, , MS has now moved things moved the future of the Xbox One, to the next gen.

Anyhow.

-Like Xbox One X "slighty" more powerful than PS4 Pro.

Slight or extremes are a matter of interpretation. However, based on everything I've seen so far, the actual perceptible differences between the PS4P and X1X are pretty slight. When the specs were known, I never said the power difference was slight, just that the perceptible difference wasn't going to be that much, nor that apparent to the average gamer. I was right.

-Like Xbox One X DOA

Is the X1X a raging success? What are the numbers? Its not dead, nor did I say it'd be DOA. All we know is that X1 in general isn't doing that well compared to PS4/PS4P. I said it'd be a niche console for a niche market within the general console market. I don't know if I was right or not, because again, MS doesn't release numbers.

-Like Game Pass as a free to play playground.

That's vastly spinning what I said in a generalization about MS own content offerings. SoT is pretty much a F2P game without the MT right now, but they don't really need it with a $10 month sub service, and a $60 price tag for the game outside that. Beyond that, hard to say what will become of the service. Its still in its early stages.

-Like Game Pass not delivering AAA games like Forza Horizon 4 Day One.

Never said it wouldn't. but FH4 will likely have MT, and I could easily see it structured more like a GaaS....although not exactly a F2P game. If it doesn't, then great, maybe Game Pass is doing enough to support a title like this. Long term though, still no way that Game Pass can support multiple $50-100 million dollar budget games per year, while still offering up the mid-tier titles, plus the other 95% of games that will continuously be offered on the service. The only way it can support that is if their subs are very high, and so far, we don't know those numbers. but GP is in it's early stages, so MS will lose money in the interim with the hope of making a lot more later.

-Like Sea of Thieves DOA without Game Pass

Again, we don't know the actual sales of the game outside game pass, so who's to say that GP didn't keep it from being DOA? In any case, I never said the game would be DOA, I said that it had potential, although not for me, and that MS would have to do pretty much what they're doing now to make sure people stay engaged.

rainslacker2133d ago

-Like SoD 2 DOA without Game Pass

Did anyone ever say this would be the case? I know I didn't. I knew the game had a cult following, and the last game did well enough.

-Like Halo Infinite as a MP only game

Its a proposition I made on nothing more than the trailer given MS penchant for moving towards GaaS, and the implication of the term infinite. Game may have a SP mode, but the way it was announced....."Play ALONG SIDE Master Chief", instead of "Play AS Master Chief", coupled with what Activision tried to do with COD:I which was supposed to be an endless MP experience for the long term, made me make a prediction. The current rumors suggest it'll be SP only, with the MP to follow later....but that's still a rumor. I may have been wrong, in which case, so what? It happens. You don't get a cookie when I'm wrong, nor when you point it out.

Now that I've cleared all that up, I will point out that when I said MS was predictable, I meant in the fact that they will make a lot of grand promises, talk about the future, then pretty much ignore the present and their current situation by posturing itself for long term good will they hope to gain by playing the good guy now.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2133d ago
OB1Biker2134d ago

That makes me think of how Ms talked for months prior E3 about it being different from anything they did before?
Result was a very typical E3 presentation.

IamTylerDurden12134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

Sony needs to be a bit louder in certain cases though. MS is far better with their PR, even if it's bs most of the time it still makes them money. Sony is terrible at explaining things and selling themselves. Sony makes incredible products but they often bumble the messaging. MS generally makes inferior products but they do a marvelous job at selling them.

This gen could've easily been worse for Xbox. It could've been closer to Wii U status than people think. For 4 years MS was selling a weaker, more expensive console with no games yet they have managed decent numbers. The PS4 has more than doubled the XB1, but XB1 hasn't sold terribly. MS has done a miraculous job of keeping it afloat through pipe dreams, spin, and PR nonsense. MS knows how to sell, and it would be nice to see Sony take a little bit of that and inject it into their excellent product line.

The reason MS always talks about the future is because that's what they need to sell people on because they know the present is mediocre. They need to sell people on pipe dreams because they have nothing right now. It's just the truth. The entire gen has been like this.

PowerOfTheCloud2134d ago

MS Pr may work on their fans but everyone else with a little bit of common sense can see through their constant hyperboling, twisting and smearing.

So no sony should keep on going on with not constantly making themselves look like completely incompetent douches.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2133d ago
AspiringProGenji2135d ago (Edited 2135d ago )

Did you really have to mark my comment when I was asking for help? Really?

Oh well, I hope someone sees it and sends me a message. I would appreciate it

I apologize Mods.

TheVigilanteCode2134d ago (Edited 2134d ago )

Rule no.1 of GPU OC: When you get a green screen, it's the equivalent of a blue screen during a CPU OC. i.e. an unstable OC.

Wither 3 is both, a CPU and a GPU intensive game. It was pushing your card to it's limits, i.e. load, and that's what we need. So, don't worry there.

Always push the core clock by +10 MHz and memory clock by +50 MHz (save the settings > exit afterburner) and check for stability i.e. run Witcher 3. See if you get a green screen again. If not, push another +10 MHz to the Core Clock and +50MHz memory clock and repeat the same.

Eventually you will get a green screen. This is where you need to increase the power limit slider +5. Now check the green screen again. If it does green screen again, push another +5 on the power limit until it doesn't green screen while you run a game on load. Play around a little more with the core clock + memory clock + power limit until you hit a sweet spot and save the settings, and of course, run Witcher 3 again to test green screen. Once everything is stable, save the settings to a profile and run it when you run a game (I recommend this), not while normal computing tasks.

If your Core Voltage is grey'ed out then it's a factory binned card, so leave it as it is and don't worry about it.

Note: Most stable GPU OC's are around the 10% mark, so beware of pushing anything beyond this (core clock, memory clock and power).

AspiringProGenji2132d ago

Thanks you very much! I'l try this

FGHFGHFGH2133d ago

you can unlock voltage control in settings, but if you're not sure what you are doing, don't mess with it. You can also set afterburner to start with windows, so you don't have to mess with it every time. I also recommend setting up custom auto fan control. You really don't need to overclock a 1080 though, are you trying to play at 4k?

AspiringProGenji2132d ago

You are right! I don't have to overclock it as it is a beast. i was just curious about how much further OC could push it

Show all comments (100)
170°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4h ago
Obscure_Observer8h ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning776h ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv726h ago(Edited 5h ago)

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning771h ago(Edited 1h ago)

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

-Foxtrot8h ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv725h ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC4h ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno3h ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier29m ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

Sciurus_vulgaris5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier26m ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

Elda32m ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

180°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community12h ago
mandf11h ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic11h ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv7211h ago(Edited 10h ago)

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop7h ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv726h ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander19725h ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5h ago
shinoff218310h ago(Edited 10h ago)

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv729h ago(Edited 9h ago)

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje9h ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils3h ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick7h ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz29m ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community19h ago
thorstein1d 9h ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff218314h ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear2114h ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

Goodguy0118h ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing6915h ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing6912h ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (13)