Please dont make yourselves look stupid, its quite embarrassing. Saying the PS3 doesn't have AAA games, well, enough said. Dont be jealous, yous still have Halo, Gears and Fable. Enjoy them and let PS3 owners enjoy some multi platform love.
@LightSaber, just like how Square watered down FF13 so 360 owners can run it on their system? Dont be so butt hurt
Ruby Weapon was harder than the Emerald Weapon. And there were far more difficult bosses than these 2.
I think any game that is remade should have extra content thrown in not as a bonus but as a prerequisite to it being released.
If so then its a definite purchase.
I would have added "Choco", a female Street Fighter 4 player. She single handedly handed Mago, who at the time was considered one of the baddest ever players in Japan, his ass to himself on a silver platter. And what she did to beat him was absolutely insane.
Fail, EVO was played on the PS3, which is the highest level of competition. If that was the case they would have used the 360
Solid Snake. The greatest ever
And Kinect doesn't need a board. Your Shape pwns all!!
Funny the author of the article is also named "Pramath."
Coincidence?
EDIT: Nothing will ever stop fanboys incessant bragging. Not your article, nothing.
They are talking about 360 not PC, duh of course PC will blow consoles out of the water in terms of graphics, but your notion that graphics equal better game is foolish. 1998, Metal Gear Solid dropped on the PS1, and blew everyones mind. Wasn't the graphics, but the experience that was fresh. A talented developer doesn't need to rely on graphics cards and over clocked CPUs to make a good game, that's whats actually holding games back to begin with. Art for example, with simple can...
M.Bison
Balrog
T.Hawk
Blanka
Gouken
Dude, relax. Your a fanboy too. If you and your precious bunch of Xbox fanboys didn't talk smack about PS3 back in 2007 PS3 fanboys wouldn't be so bad. They started the war, so don't have a cry because people retaliate.
Sorry, you are both wrong. The final game was far better than the 2005 video. That being said it should look better, it was released 4 years after the video.
Killzone 2, still the best looking FPS on consoles
If that was the case then why didn't Dragon Age and Final Fantasy 13 receive better scores? Your whole argument fails. Developers arent the ones who receive blow back mate, its the reviewers
Disagrees? hahaha thank you :)
Its a matter of choice, graphics or content? What do you pick? As good as this game might be it aint gunna win any best graphics awards, ME2, GOW3, and Crysis 2 will be duking it out for that
EDIT: I forgot GT5 will be up there too
Have to be a member to see?
Of course it can't produce graphics like that! A little bit like Metro 2033 on the 360 right?
Awesome point. Bottom line is it wasn't just characters they changed, and the fact that its cheap as chips means it is quite possibly the best value for money game that will come out this year
And it has more content than SF4, anyone who complains is asking a lot
Virtua Fighter and Tekken took it in a new direction. SF4 bought the series back, as good as SFIII was it didn't appeal to people other than hardcore SF fans.
Tekken needs a mention, it was amazing in its time.
But SF is my favorite ever
If you were a real gamer you wouldn't care whos at the bottom. Nintendo finished last in the previous generation, owned by both Sony and Microsoft. If we traveled back in time and told gamers that Nintendo would sell more consoles than both Sony and Microsoft we would have been laughed at. Doesn't matter how it plays out, neither of these giants will die off anytime soon.
And your excuse of "No hardcore games" fails miserably. You attack the developers for ...