The broken record of sony fans. You guy's remind me of republicans. It's not like the site that reported this is biased or anything, huh?
Well Japan has been a closed society sense it has been around. They have an over zealous pride in home grown electronics and automobiles. Just like we used to in the U.S.A.
That's not what you said at all. Of course they are going to have positive things to say about the PS3 they work for sony. Just as you're a Sony fanboy so you'll praise their opinions. I was just pointing out how funny it is, get over it.
And yours I suppose is also very trustworthy sense your name is ps3freak18.
Wow this is a love fest in here. I have to say it's a bit early to be praising the online when you have no clue how it's going to run. Previews do not count fools, closed servers anyone? If they can pull it off, kudos to them.
@ 360hater
It's in German dumbkopf.
Is this jacka** a dev.? Oh I know the answer! No, he's not, so shouldn't he just be quiet?
You are all nuts I must say. Company's have one purpose, making money.. Duh!
What the hell is the different they're are still forking out money for exclusivity. They're saying what?? "Will pay half your cost but if you put it on Live we won't". Again what is the differance?
This buying exclusives by the way. If an indie dev. has problems raising capital for their game Sony will fit half the bill based on exclusivity. How is that not buying an exclusive? The dev. has to decide weather it's worth the loss in sales from not placing their game on Xbox Live for the development costs. It's not worth it for them if the money they would earn on Xbox Live exceeds the dev. cost. Do you really think games such as Braid and Castle Crashers would just go to PSN? I wouldn't w...
Yea? Where does it say that? Show me a quote or are you pulling this out of your arse?
If I remember correctly, WW the PS3 is about 7m behind in sales. Also the 360 has a higher attachment ratio then the PS3. So how could one think the PS3 sells more multi-plat?
Umm didn't IGN just give the PS3 the nod when they compared SF4? Due to the controller I believe. I wonder how HHG can type an article with his head up his a**?
Well I have the game and I think this guy just doesn't like RPG's. I'm 25 hours in, sure it has some down sides, bad voice acting is one of them but overall it's a fun game. It's better then 6.5, the gameplay alone merits a higher score.
I wouldn't say asking hard questions is biased. It's debating 101, state the question in a manner which causes the debater to make an articulate answer. Would you have rathered him ask "I know the PS3 is the best system, why do you think so?". Where would be the excitement in that? What kind of real answer would he have? I think he was just acting like a baby.
I remember the old days of the internet, those where happy days of no moderation! I use pirate bay and I've never dled something I would have bought. The movie and music industry wouldn't have gotten a dime from me, although I have told people what movies to see. Don't they make enough money off of us? Nine dollars to see a damn movie is crazy!
Why do you guys bother posting?
Well if your rating scale is 1-10, 1 being the worst and 10 being perfect, how can any game get either a 1 or a 10? Five would be average based on this scale. Halo Wars got a seven, which means it exceeds average by two points.
What I think is perhaps we have all been spoiled by eights, nines, and tens. Ign rates games and a game is considered bad if it gets a 6, which if they payed attention to their own rating system would mean it was above average. Is average bad? Is above average b...
I think all of you guys are far more repetitive then any video game I've ever played.
article with an opinion> bash writer> bash 360> suck sony's d***>repeat
Same goes for you Xbox tards as well.
That's not what I said, silly boy. Pots should not call kettles black is all I'm saying. I could care less about MS's advertising program in Japan, why do you care?