I'd not mind paying $60 for a hard copy and maybe $50 for a digital. IF the games are good then cost is not that big of deal. Games like UC3 I'd pay more then what they are asking, same with Skyrim. So it all depends on the quality of the game and if that quality justifies the price.
<3
Why can't we all just be friends?
That is the issue with betas, there should be issues lots of them in fact, the point of them is to find and fix as many of them before the game launches. Betas are not for us, they are a tool developers can use to fine tune there product and get feedback.
Not sure what looks bad about it, the aircraft models are very well done and the destruction for them is also top notch. I plan to get it day one the game play was great, that and the music for it has been some of the best I heard in a long time.
More or less, I mean you can just adjust your TV's brightness and contrast to make one look like the other. I did notice that on the face mask the PS3 version had better AA. You could see the jagged lines on the 360 version. But you would never know it was there unless you looked at it with a microscope.
Really hope it is some kind of new game plus. Not sure why they did not add that in the first place.
Ya I am not too worried. Looking at how good just the first wave of games are for the PSV just wait to see them a year or two from now. One question though is how much will games cost? I'd expect them to be a little higher then the PSP games.
Naw I been playing this since it was called Air Combat on the PS1, I been waiting for a new AC game for years, they are doing some sick things with this game and it has me even more excited then Uncharted 3. About time we get a good flying game again. HAWX just did not cut it.
Ya MGS2's port was done by SK and also MGS3 is on the 3DS or soon will be, don't forget Metal Gear started on the old Nentendo systems. Never got why people thought it was exclusive.
Sony has said that they like to show games at E3, FW updates they can talk about when they like for MS it is different since they are a Software not an entertainment company. At the same time Sony must know the main reason people stick to the Xbox is XBL. I don't see why they would not want to challenge MS on that front. I personal expect to see some decent updates of PSN this year.
Well for them to win E3 they need to focus on where they are the most weak which is still the PSN and its overall robustness. They got games down and hardware and there marketing has greatly improved. This goes for MS as well there weakness is games. Big N's is a focus on the hardcore. So they can all win E3 if they just put a focus on where they need to improve.
Odd....
They also have amazing user-generated content and tools with the Forge system
we’ll be launching a new feature called Uncharted TV that will showcase some of the best user-generated content and videos from You Tube, viewable directly in-game
Is it just me or did he just out that U3 will have some kind of forge system. the way he divides Videos and UGC is very interesting.
Nice thing about this I bet it works on your Laptop and PC as well so if you watch videos on that you can do so with out pissing off others around you.
@Super M
That is not how it works, Graphics come mostly from good texturing and the art skills of the Devs. Lighting and Rendering are mostly handled by the GPU where AI and other things by the CPU. Ram is used mostly to store textures and help do more things at once. The difference lets say between a game like Killzone and Gears VS something like Alpha Protocol is the time and $$ put in to the game and the talent in the studio.
Well its not so much about that. The Android OS takes up much more system RAM then the NPG will on top of that you have all that stuff in the background running. That and the CPU and GPU are much more powerful then the ones on cell phones. I'd not worry to much the Xbox and PS3 have very limited RAM and look at the kind of games we get on it.
True but Cellphones cost Upwards of $600 They are not very cheep devices. I don't think Gamers would let Sony get away with a price point above $400 even though it would very much be worth it. If it is true then the reaction of gamer's to the speculated price is really only to blame.
These guys have really out done them self on this game.
I'm kind of pissed I wanted Google to win the bid.
I think it is a good idea. Rewards people who do buy games new, every company right now is trying to fight used game sales in any way they can. I know many people like used games because of the lower price but remember the guys that made the game get no $$ from that. Then people complain when a studio goes under or a game they like does not get a second in the series. With how much it cost to make games and how competitive the market is they really do need every dollar they can to grow and ex...