The game doesn't really look impressive. So... comparisons are irrelevant at this point. I'm playing this on PC on high settings. Not impressed at all by what DICE did. The death animations are lacking. They just fall on the ground like a sack of potatoes. The gameplay is also boring as well... at least on PC. PC = prone, shoot, prone, shoot. My experience on the 360 version was mostly run and gun and actually going for the objective. Don't see the point of playing on PC when the ...
Just 1080p? Get a better monitor pl0x. 2560 x 1440.
Always thought the PS3 needed more RAM, not just for cross-game chat, but rather for overall performance. It runs like crap in game. I hate waiting for the XMB to load up while I'm in the game to check 1 message. Runs horribly.
Yeah, it's sad that you called BF3 the "Justin Bieber" of gaming. But you're right, it is like Justin Bieber. Most kids pay attention to it, some adults will pay attention to it... but in the end it gets ignored anyway.
I agree with you raWfodog. People brag about this and that in BF3... I just saw alpha footage of BF3 and the game looks boring, nothing really new there. Oh wait, yeah there is. You can now go prone! Woohoo! BF3 > MW3. People on this site have silly reasons to diss CoD.
I'm not kidding you. BF3 is overrated on this site. It actually does looking boring from all the Alpha footage I saw. Most consumers don't care about the tech, they want to have fun. The gameplay is lacking.
I would chose MW3 because Battlefield 3 looks like poop.
Treyarch started the whole complex map design back in WaW. Verticality and hiding spots are in all Black Ops maps, which is why it's so slow paced. Verticality causes camping which means people often go to the same spot on the second or third floor just to get killstreaks. It's boring, this is why Black Ops is boring. People want to hide in their little corners and play slowly. IW and Treyarch's goal is to create a fast paced shooter. If they add anything to the game that will slo...
This would be a good deal if Bad Company 2 was a good game. But at $6, you're basically robbing kids of their lunch money.
#1 reason why you would: PSP is useless. PS Vita saves Sony in portable gaming.
You HEARD Treyarch was helping with MW3? Oh God people will believe anything.
Not surprised that MW3 won. It's clearly the better game.
More DLC = more achievements. Call of Duty is the best. :)
Na, PC gaming is killing itself.
Yup. I never liked using an LMG, but I always liked to support the team with the med kit. This now gives me the best of both worlds. I get the mobility with an AR and a chance to heal teammates.
Don't be a prick.
At least MW3 will have these animations. BF3 lost 10 points for me. They're digging themselves a hole every announcement,
How's it a twisted view of reality? I wrote EXACTLY how things are. Activision = publisher of big name games. They're making the most bank of their IPs. So what? What are we going to do about it? Nothing. If anything your view of reality is twisted by actually thinking that you're going to hurt them by not buying their products. For every person that stops buying their products, 2 more will buy it. Whether their "evil" or not is irrelevant. Like many people around here s...
I guess being a business and making money is evil? I guess everyone wants everyone else to be broke. :)
Every publisher is trying to make money off their games... how is Activision any different? How is EA any different? How is THQ any different? The point of a business is to exchange a product or service for money. Activision happens to publish games that appeals to the masses and sell the most games.
It's much easier for you guys to b*tch and moan thoug...
"...where the developers don't give a crap about the game..."
That's just an ignorant statement. Would you like it if someone came up at your job and said "you're a lazy piece of crap" while you're busting your a**?
You don't know the life of a developer. Do you know that they often go days with little to no sleep just to meet the dead lines of the publisher?