I don’t think people don’t understand that, and I think you might be missing the point. Microsoft set a bad precedent and now competitors have to do the same to stay afloat.
Yup this device not having modular joysticks is a deal breaker for me, I go through too many sense controllers and know better
I just have one problem that can be summed up with one word: drift
Russians /s
Meh. Critical acclaim does not necessarily translate to big sales numbers, and vice versa. Some of the most popular movies and shows on Netflix have absolute dog shit review scores and are garbage. People love garbage. This game always seemed like it was targeting a certain crowd, maybe younger, casual, and/or inexperienced gamers. Maybe it's not for you or me but it can still potentially do well. Though Harry Potter may steal its thunder.
Sony wouldn’t try to buy activision duh
Wow it’s like gamers only read the snippet from the article and thought it was praising the game industry or something….. telling.
How about a mod to remove the cringe voice acting from ff7r(and most other modern games if I’m being honest), am I right?
Yeah seems to be the consensus for a lot of long-time souls fans. I think the overall aesthetic and world building / level design was not on par with most of their previous games, but I somehow managed to sink a million more hours into ER. Mechanically, it is very good and this fact is probably what got me into PVP for the first time. It changed how I play these games and made ER extremely replay-able.
Hmmm, I actually quit mid-Horizon to play ER and never went back to it. I was too busy with ER all year. There are so many ways to approach this game and tailor your experience. Multiplayer is the most fun I've had with a game in a decade. The world is not empty relative to the majority of other open world games. Being that it is their first foray in open world, its shortcomings are forgivable. There's enough on offer that if you got stuck on a details like these, you clearly didn'...
I think the ship has sailed for Demon's Souls. It's a 13 year old game that never got DLC in its first run. Non-FROM DLC is potentially garbage. The problem with Sekiro is that multiplayer isn't really feasible in that engine, and the story is pretty self-contained. It already got a free DLC with boss rush mode.
I don't get it. Your statement is a contradiction. /s?
Microsoft is basically trying to monopolize on an entire genre with COD exclusivity, and by buying the publisher, not timed exclusivity which is very different obviously.
Bloodborne, a Sony published & owned exclusive IP from last gen that only sold 2 million copies and still hasn't been ported to PC probably because sales isn't coming to xbox? Man Microsoft is really reaching aren't they? The others, IDK I can't help but imagine these decisions might be retaliation, and wonder what would happen if Microsoft showed some good faith instead of projecting onto Sony.
Except it’s not good
n4g members
If true doesn’t help their optics. it’s corporate slimeball tactics.
It’s fine. You aren’t forced to get hit, you just didn’t learn good timing.
100% extra. Fix the drift issues, give edge a decent battery. You know, real quality of life improvements.