You're talking about Silent Hill: The Short Message, which is a different title.
This is the remake of Silent Hill 2, it will be sold at full price.
@Tedakin
That shouldn't be the norm.
Games should release in a finished state, how someone can accept that a game comes out buggy and barely playable is beyond me.
I bought it two years ago for 80€... and I returned it after three days.
It's cool looking, but it's not a fridge. It's just a very small and weak air conditioner that keeps the inside cool. The drinks must already be really cold, and it doesn't keep the temperature for a long time. Completely useless.
MGS and Mario are popular, but they weren't upgraded... MGS collection actually runs even worse than the trilogy released by Bluepoint on PS3. And the Mario games on Switch were just emulated.
I really don't see the scandal about this remaster. Yes, it will probably be 70$ for the physical version, but that's just the usual price for the "director's cut" edition of other PS5 games. Also, you can just buy the cheap PS4 version and upgrade it, so... ...
MGS Collection was a cash grab.
Super Mario 3D all-stars and every other Switch re-release of older games is a cash grab.
This is just a 10$ upgrade for a very popular game, that also includes some DLC. And, quite frankly, I would pay even more if Naughty Dog continues to pull out games like this in return.
Get over it.
I'm a Harry Potter fan, but the game was nothing special... just an average ubisoft open world. I couldn't finish it, I got really bored after less than 20 hours.
It may deserve a nomination for "best licensed game", but nothing else.
@franwex
I disagree with your sentiment, I think Alan Wake 1 was great and memorable, and Control was not perfect but very enjoyable, especially the DLCs. Quantum Break was the black sheep, it was an okay game, and it's reflected in the mixed metascore.
@BanginTunes
That's your opinion and that's fair. I think FF XVI was an 8 at least, it had very simplistic mechanics but the story was awesome.
Still, we're not ...
@BanginTunes
They also gave Final Fantasy XVI a 6. Which is way under the metascore.
They're contrarians, not an absolute joke like Tom Chick, but they sure give low scores to a lot of well received games.
I didn't find a single bug in 10 hours.
I forced myself to play it for 36 hours to finish the main quest since I have to write a review, but I'm glad I can ditch it now.
It has some nice moments, but it gets old very quickly. I'll never understand the people that play those games for hundreds, or even thousands of hours. And I'm the kind of guy that plays Monster Hunter for years.
The game is very poorly optimized for nVidia GPUs and intel CPUs. There's nothing the end user can do about.
https://youtu.be/ciOFwUBTs5... Here's the full comparison by Digital Foundry.
I have a 6950 XT so no problem by my side either, but I played the game on a 2080 and the performance were awful... leagues behind every other demanding game with the same card.
What about fixing performance issues on nVidia GPUs before even planning to add anything?
We're talking about announcements, not releases.
I can hear dunkey laughing from here...
Even Assassin's Creed launchers are bugged.
The Last of Us Part II's controversy was one of the biggest in recent gaming history, the articles were all over the place. This is nothing compared to that...
Meanwhile, PS5 is being discounted 150€ here in Italy. lol
I didn't know that. Thanks for clarifying
B-b-but this time it's for real!!!
1. That's not true, multiplatform games have reviews on both consoles even when they launch simultaneously. The platform of choice depends from the reviewer.
2. When a game is ported to another platform afterwards, it could perform differently or contain different content, so it makes sense to review it a second time.
3. Playstation is the more popular console, so game journalists are interested in writing reviews for more clicks.