The only one that has developed less games is the Gran Turismo series. If you think otherwise, I suggest some fact checking.
What the HELL did your little rant have to do with Microsoft's Avatars? Did you realize that you posted in the Gamer Zone? I can understand if you want to level criticism at Microsoft, but you just went ballistic against Microsoft. You could have just at least said why you hate the Avatars and backed it up with some facts.
I encourage everyone to report the rant as either Off-Topic or Spam.
If my memory serves me correct, Halo was an RTS in it's development stage at first. It had changed from an RTS to a shooter before it was ever even announced to the public. Since it was still in it's development stage, Bungie could change it into whatever they wanted without the public's knowledge. Then after they announced it, they switched it back and forth from a 3rd-Person view, to a First-Person view.
Fact Check:
Godliness----------Somewhat right---------|-Complete BS
You're just lying out of your ass kid.
I think the difference between Halo: Reach and Agent is that gamers already know what to expect with Halo: Reach. People aren't so sure exactly what Agent is going to be precisely. The Halo series is a popular, pretty decent shooter, thus everyone already expects it to be decent too.
Personally I am more pumped to see what Agent holds than Halo: Reach. And this is coming from a Halo fan.
Hmm...You've used your second and last bubble. Wonder why?? Oh that's right you're a troll who has nothing better to do with their life than to troll in an article about an Xbox 360 game of which you probably don't even own the console for. Even though I prefer my Xbox slightly, you aren't seeing me troll in PS3 or Wii articles.
Open Zone is --> this way.
Seriously, some of you need to leave this site. Jamie Foxx and Hydrolex, it is people like you that are running N4G into the ground. If you don't already realize, N4G is the laughing-stock of the gaming world because of blind-fanatics like you.
If GT5 had been demoed at E3, I guarantee it would have won, as it should. It's like running for President. If you don't run, you can't win. Polyphony Digital and Sony did not demo or let the press have hands-on, thus they can't win a...
If someone told you 8 years ago that in order to play the next Nintendo console, you would have to flail your arms around or stand on a "balance board", you would have the same reaction. Look at it nowadays. Microsoft isn't making this for the hardcore gamers that can sit and play games for 12 hours straight without moving. I think Project Natal is designed (just like the Wii was) to introduce a different form of interaction.
FYI - Splinter Cell Conviction does have multiplayer.
http://www.n4g.com/xbox360/...
It's also not entirely accurate to compare a game that is still partially in development, to a game (Uncharted) that is finishing up post-production. ...At least info-wise.
I have to admit, I was really skeptical about UC2 at the beginning. Seeing that this year is like sequelmania and all, I was expecting it to be a half-hearted job. I'm glad I'm wrong. Personally I would choose Uncharted 2 as Best of show, with a VERY close runner-up of Splinter Cell: Conviction. I'm happy they are taking it back to the classic roots.
I'd say the Project Natal is closer to the head tracking than what Sony was showing. I've attached a video of something that is more in-line of what I expect for the "hardcore" crowd from Microsoft with Natal.
What Sony showed, you have to have a customized controller to play with. With the Natal, you can still play with the normal 360 controller, but the extra "motion sensing" can also still be in play.
Your kind are not welcome here. If you don't have anything useful to say, then get out of here. Troll elsewhere.
The videos of flower turned me off at first, but then I tried it over at a buddy's house. I whole-heartedly agree that it should be experienced by every gamer at least once.
I won't give you just one, I'll give you 3.
1. Call of Duty 2
2. Project Gotham Racing 3
3. Condemned: Criminal Origins.
These are three titles that the Xbox 360 launched with that are generally well received and praised. It's unfortunate that the Playstation 3 did not have as good of a launch, otherwise the race would be even closer.
Precisely, it's all about each individual meaning and value.
Personally I use both my 360 and PS3 to play online. But for certain games such as Call of Duty 4, I primarily use my 360 to play. It's not just because I feel a responsibility to use the service I have paid for, but it's the experience I receive while on XBL. I do not have a single friend from high school, work, or college that has a PS3. Even though PSN is a superb service and even better that it is free, I wouldn...
It's one thing to buy a Mac if you are in a special field (sound, video...), but to buy one for everyday internet usage is ridiculous.
I don't have a problem with Macs if I need it in order to work on some high-definition video editing, but the teenagers that buy one and just use them to surf Facebook and Youtube, well...hope they looked cool while doing it. ;-)
Wired internet is possible. He's graduating in a few days and is going to college. I told him to at least wait and see what goes on at E3.
It is a hard predicament because he want to play hi-def, but he has some medical problem where he starts having seizure if he stares at them to long. It sucks. So he's stuck in standard definition for a while.
I'm NOT talking from experience (I own a PS3 and X360), but merely a hypothetical question. What if someone didn't have the high-definition TV or wireless internet? What should they do?
I have a good friend in that position. He doesn't have all the amenities and is deciding to buy either console. Most of my friends are on the 360 though. What enticements are there in the PS3 for him over the 360? (Other than the first-party lineup.)
Take a look at this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
Continue scrolling down, including PSP releases and remakes...