What I played of the Xbla trial, was that the game is terrible. Don't let the rose tinted glasses fool you; this game is not worth 5c
Couldn't agree more. It looks like shit. Won't be buying it. There's enough fast paced shooters out there, we don't need another. We certainly don't need one with terrible animations.
Bullshit article. You can quite clearly see that he is trying to squeeze blood from a stone; or in this case bullshit from facts.
Minus point for having to click R3 to go into first person. Says it all really.
How in the hell can you score anything out of 4. Are you saying there's only 4 levels of quality?
Ridiculous scoring system and gives no indication as to the quality of the game.
Ironically, if you could tap the power of two 3DSs and combine them, the Vita would probably still be more powerful.
Also article is insanely childish and irrelevant; and raises the question as to why anyone would have a vested in either console in "winning"
They're no loss. It took them 6 years to make a decent resistance game. They're better off multiplatform.
MW3 deserves a 7 or an 8 at most. It's the same shit again. While changes were made to the multiplayer, it's essentially the same thing again. It certainly doesn't feel as polished as the MW2 and the game felt more like a james bond movie than a COD. In any case, i'm finished with the series. There is so only so many hours you can spend playing COD. And its time has most definitely run out for me.
It has been mentioned several times that the console's power will be comaprable to that of the PS3 and 360.
Unfortunately I don't keep this information at hand, but if you bother doing some research; you'll find what I'm talking about.
Also, why would nintendo keep the console's power a secret if it was vastly superior to the existing HD consoles.
I'm only going by the info we have. If you think anything of what I posted is far off, please provide me with your own specualtion.
Or are you basing the console's success on fanboy dreams?
You are contradicting yourself. You say I don't know what the online specs are and then you try to counter it by throwing out your own rumours.
Are your rumours better than mine?!
It is their online network, but they can't ban you for no reason. If you get a game early, there is nothing in their terms and conditions to authorise them to ban you.
If it was the case, microsoft could get your yearly sub and then ban you making easy money.
-Graphically the console is way underpowered.
-its online service will barely be on par with PSN, never mind Live.
-it will be more expensive than the ps3 and the Xbox 360 when it launches.
- it is launching 3 years too late. Screen isn't enough to justify the console.
-very small internal storage. I'm talking 32gb or thereabouts.
- will launch at the same time 720/PS4 get announced, making the machine redundant and more like a toy made by fishe...
They won't be banning anyone if your copy is legit. They have no right to.
If you have a legit/legal copy, there is nothing they can do.
This improved it somewhat, but it was still sluggish. But it also raises the question as to why we had to increase to the max in the first place. Any other game, and the aiming would be uncontrollable at such a high sensitivity setting.
Listen you moron. He has compared U2 and U3 on the same tv. There is a difference in lag of at least 100ms. Use your fucking brain before posting bullshit.
Demo is embarrassing to say the least.
Sleeper hit?! Not a hope in hell. They should put te game to sleep
IT'S A FUCKING GAME. WHO CARES!!!!!
GTA has been doing it for years with absolutely no context and now suddenly its a problem. Unbelievable!
The game looks terrible. I won't be buying. Might have done when they announced the game 20 years ago
The game is awful. Just because similar games around the same period played the same, it doesn't make the game any less shit. 3/10 is generous.