Principle of Falsifiability. Look it up.

lawgone

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 17320

“Sony decides to give its fans no info about upcoming PS5 and games.”

Sony fanboys: “Yay Sony! You are so smart to save your money! MS stupid and evil!”

Me: 🤦🏻‍♂️

1582d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

The comments to this misleadingly titled article are so predictable. I will tell you what Sony is good at and that is propaganda. And they don’t even have to pay for it! Their user base does it for them!

1582d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sony gives no info.
Fanboys: Yay Sony! You’re playing us, uh, I mean, your cards so well!

Seriously, how in the world are you celebrating lack of info? That’s literally celebrating ignorance.

1582d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

If you’re saying this is a good thing for Sony and consumers then you really need to step back and reevaluate the depths of your fanboyism. Sony is being a bit arrogant again. They’ve also given next to zero info on the PS5 to date. Lack of info to your consumers is not a good thing.

1582d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

These comments from a bunch of PS fanboys are hilarious. You don't even realize the media & apps portion sounds like an Xbox One win but then it says tie, which makes not sense. AND that's with them completely ignoring 4k Blu Ray on XB1X. They should just change the name of N4G to PSG and be done with it with this joke of a community.

1967d ago 2 agree17 disagreeView comment

This almost makes me want to buy it...grrr.....

1969d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I just watched the video and thought it looked really good. And yes, in reality the Tiger was that good. Allied tanks avoided them if possible but didn't always see them or have cover. They'd get their shots in hoping to immobilize it and then run. It's also not as though you can stay in cover forever.

1969d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

They've been stubborn for awhile but have never had to literally pay for it. Hopefully investors will now force a change.

1969d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

When your customers remind you that you're making a game you are marketing as being a WWII game and that blue face painted women with cybernetic arms did not have any role in the war and their reply is "then don't buy it" you are disrespecting your customers. Look, if they want to make a WWII game with an alternate history then market it as such. If they want to make it a fantasy game then market it as such. But don't say it focuses on the most studied war in history a...

1969d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

But the Nazi's were a very diverse and inclusive people! Oh wait, we can't say Nazi, facts could offend someone.

1971d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I hope EA and other developers learned something...probably not.

1971d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

StormSnooper, having read through all the comments it seems the only one fanboying and being overly political is you. No one has said they don't like gay people, they just don't like it forced down our throats. Don't tell me you're also for the cybernetic woman featured in Battlefield 5's promos. And as for this particular thumbnail you cannot deny it is an odd choice unless this relationship is the key theme of the game.

1971d ago 6 agree7 disagreeView comment

It's an agenda when there is a disproportionate number of that group portrayed in media. If an alien visited our planet they'd think half the population is gay.

1971d ago 9 agree11 disagreeView comment

Then you're doing your friend a favor by assuming he has the same preferences as you. The "best games" is subjective. If you want to say it has more exclusives, fine...but those exclusives have to matter to that person you're advising more than the additional power the XB1X has, the 4k blu ray player, etc. There are many other things to consider as well...too many to list.

2003d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Maybe I’m old but I hate battle royale. Nothing is fun about never seeing anyone then suddenly getting shot and having to go through the while staging area again.

2034d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That’s a rather naive assumption.

2034d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

To be fair, they’ve both lost their way and both suck.

2034d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

They’d be appealing if they just made a good and REALISTIC game.

2034d ago 3 agree7 disagreeView comment

Developer: But! But! We can’t show the characters being 90% white men! That might offend some people!
Normal Person: But that’s just the facts of the time and that war. And dont’t people have plenty to be offended by with the atrocities committed by Hitler? The Holocaust, corrupting a nation for his own ego, the millions that died needlessly?
Developer: The Holocaust! That’s right! We could have our characters discovering a camp filled with women of color!
Nor...

2034d ago 20 agree3 disagreeView comment

Yep. The SJWs say it’s just a game but its their attempt to rewrite history. They minimize what men did (and yes, the majority were white so definitely don’t want to show them too much) and create false stories for women to make them look like the heroes. No doubt, there are some heroic things women did in the resistance and elsewhere but they were NOT on the front. These inaccuracies draw you out of the game.

Bottom line, if you want to make a fantasy game then make o...

2034d ago 15 agree6 disagreeView comment