I really don't think they can use that as an excuse. It's only on Xbox and there's no reason they couldn't run it at lower settings in order to get 60fps for the Series S. There is something wrong going on at Bethesda. Even Todd Howard seems to think resolution is better than performance so I'm wondering if that whole ideology is a corporate wide feeling now as well. I have major concerns for Starfield as well now.
I was pretty excited to play this but I'm not going back to 30fps on a first person shooter in 2023.
Man this is a bad look... I'm worried it's going to be the same with Starfield now.
No one has to buy this. It's just there if you want to speed up the grind. Not everyone is a neckbeard with nothing better to do than replay this game a hundred times to unlock everything.
I always laugh when "Gamers" bitch about the Series S thinking it'll ever mean anything. Even if that machine had the graphics of a PS2 it wouldn't matter. When Fifa, NFL or CoD casuals see a console that's only $300 or less that can play the only few titles they care about and are also included in a Game Pass subscription that also allows them to play with friends or random people online, IT WONT MATTER. All the Series S has to do is cater to the casual market and that ...
Wow... Wtf?!
Why? We're already getting that Captain America and Black Panther game...
@IamTyler I don't remember them ever claiming it was identical to Series X in every way other than GPU/Res. They always stated it would have worse performance than it's big brother in most instances other than fps which it usually excels at. However it was always sold as the budget machine. I have one and it is great and more often than not it does perform identically if not better than my Series X because it's not streaming 4k visuals. At best it's just pumping in 2k which ta...
I think most people are looking at the Series S the wrong way. It is not meant to compete in the gaming space like the Series X and PS5 do. I think Microsoft was hoping it could fill the same type of target audience that once bought PS2s for the sole reason of needing a cheap DVD player. The Series S is meant to be a portable Blockbuster (old rental store) machine not a serious contender for top dog in just games. However it seems to be working as most people are buying the Series S for just ...
I see a lot of people saying online, "What about Nintendo?!" The FTC made it a new rule that Nintendo is no longer considered comparable in the ring with PS5 and Series X because they claim those two are "High Performance Consoles" and Nintendo isn't high performance. So in layman's terms, Nintendo isn't taken into account with the FTC and I believe that mentality has also been adopted by the EU and CMA.
@TriniOutsider, nope you're correct. Microsoft is too busy putting all their time, funding, and resources into their cloud streaming and leaving everything else behind. I'm not too impressed with the way they've handled this gen overall. I think they have the more powerful machine but what the hell am I supposed to play on it? They got a few titles but Sonys wiping the floor with them by playing hard while Phil Spencer is terrified to play hardball with them and risk looking like ...
It's a part of Sonys marketing contracts that Xbox has to be ignored. However this site is widely known as a headquarters for Sony fanboys who worship Jim Ryan...
Oh man ... I can't wait to see just how woke they make it.
Starfield wasnt exclusive. The issue is that before the deal it had never been officially stated what platforms it would actually be on. Everyone just assumed it was multiplatform but that had never been made to be official in anyway before the deal.
No, the information I gave has been made public by the EU and CMA and other parties officially involved. All I'm stating is that Sony is pretending it doesn't exist in order to try and make a point that is already null and void.
Except Microsoft already offered not only a 10 year contract to keep CoD on Playstation, but also let them put it on PS+ as well. Sony is really reaching for whatever they can lately... This is comedic
This is just sad now... Even the CMA said the FTC was wrong about it's claim to Star Field exclusivity. Sony is making the same argument the FTC did which was already proven false months ago. This deal is going to pass and Sony is freaking out.
You're getting down voted to hell even though you speak the truth. This site has become such a shithole. It's nothing but Sony zealots thinking Jim Ryan is the messiah.
Bullshit. They did it to maximize profit by releasing it along with the TV show. Otherwise IF they're really telling the truth then they're going to end up remaking Part 1 yet again as well as remaking Part 2 so those both look "contiguous" next to Part 3 whenever that comes out!
But SONY loves us and cares about us more than money! They would never do something for profit like this! *Massive Sarcasm*