@xtaz, you're mad about somebody's opinion on Minecraft and Mojang. Relax.
Kiwi it's a generalization. It's not literal man.
The headline is for post launch heroes.
Just played 2 different maps at PAX, we really enjoyed it. Reminded me of svencoop if you know what that is.
PC Master race are supposed to be able to read....
Could not agree more. That series and the two KOTORs are tied for my top spot.
@cfc83
Your statement is idiotic. PCs will always be capable of doing more than consoles. Get over it? But hey, consoles get HDR and that's not really a good option on PC yet so there you go. How about, be happy with what you have or are going to have instead of worrying about PC people?
Cloudgine just made the destruction engine. Their goal is obviously to license it to other studios as a tool. It's no really own engine in the same way UE4 is. My best guess is they want to demonstrate as much of the engine themselves without relying on a third party to put their best foot forward.
I don't disagree with any of your points about the quality of the game or story. Side note, I like the concept of the story. I think it's very unique, but very poorly executed.
However, I don't think just because the game is bad means the review should be. I'm actually completely fine with the score, my problem is the content.
Basically it reads like this:
Game is different from predecessors
Story Sucks
Gameplay...
This game is not a good game, but this review is so poorly done. I also don't know how you can condemn the story so much if you're skipping major parts. I get that the VO isn't great and the writing is sometimes corny, but that's presentation criticisms, not story. I also get the sense from the review that the reviewer did not complete the game.
I don't know if I've ever seen you post a comment where you weren't complaining or just being negative.
Actually, the main reason that's been pointed out for it making people sick is the controls, not the framerate so maybe the jump to conclusion is what's disrespectful to the readership especially since the control problem isn't listed in the article.
I don't even understand their logic for Infamous 4, Bloodborne 2, or Alan Wake 2.
The time between Infamous 1 and 2 was two years, and 2 and 3 was three years, if it's announced this E3 and released next year that would also be three years..... The better logic would have been that it could be a spiderman game.
For Bloodborne 2, From software has a crazy quick turnaround between titles. They've released a game every year for the past three yea...
I really don't think he cares what other people want. He's trying to challenge himself. The article also says this is a side project and he's keeping his normal job at Take-Two..
@Rookie
Dude I can't even take you seriously when you call MS published titles indies. Look up the definition of indie please.
Project Spark came out two years ago in retail. You, a "real" xbox fan didn't realize because you weren't an Xbox fan back then. You were a PS4 fanboy, and suddenly switched from being a terrible PS4 fanboy, to an Xbox fanboy. Either way, it's just bad.
@ThePope
Actually no,...
@Rookie
Damage control. A lot of people had good things to say about Fable Legends and with it going into open beta THIS SPRING, there's no reason not to give it a little more time, especially since it was going to be PC/X1 cross play.
Press Play was working on a title people were excited about, Team Spark had a lot of talented people.
You also don't know the definition of indie titles. MS doesn't make indie titles BY definition. ...
Rumor is the American way of spelling it, Rumour is the English way of spelling it.
@griever
While I agree with you sega Saturn is way out of line, you seem to be off point as well. You're comparing a religion to western laws. People don't all believe the same thing, so while you can say getting a lap dance is immoral and having sex outside of marriage and being gay is immoral, you're comparing religious standards to laws that are providing freedoms for people to decide what is right for them. Pretty sure most religions don't "upgrade" thei...
That's only digital sales.
Nah, the person suing for defamation has to prove the statement is false, not the other way around. Much harder to prove something didn't happen than something did happen.