CRank: 5Score: 3710
6105d ago

guess what gamepro is sh!t. ign isn't that great either, but more credible than gamepro.

6105d ago 3 agree10 disagreeView comment

no one likes your additional comments. just give us news without spinning it.

6106d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

it's hard to catch subtle sarcasm like that on n4g

6108d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

it's threespeech dude

6108d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

wow the person holding that camera is an idiot

6108d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment
6110d ago

They're not telling you this information. They're telling investors, journalists, creditors, and suppliers about this information.

Business people don't have 12 hrs a day to sit in of gaming websites and wait for information to come into their lives.

6112d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

This doesn't have much to do with quality. Just because you don't like it doesn't make them any less the most popular gaming magazine out there. it's about costs, expenses, growth, and profitability. Obviously ZD saw something that was favorable

Not everything is about gamers sh*t views about console biases.

6113d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Wow you are so hateful of them you actually went as far as to call it karma.

Congrats, you're one of the many idiots of the web, welcome to my ignore list.

6113d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

20 hrs is quite long for a fps.

and in comparison to many (not all) of the action rpgs coming out to day it's almost 5-10 hours longer

6114d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think reviews are varying depending on what audience they reviewed it for.

I read the ign review. And they made some really good points. But they harped on the fact that it was a really kiddy game. And it obviously was, but whehter that is a bad thing remains to be seen.

6115d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

yes ubi is like that, they're a business but...

this is free radical saying it. not ubisoft. yes ubisoft is the publisher but that quote didn't come from them. fyi

6115d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

correction, theres no stopping idiots and ignorance.

6115d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

you make baseless arguments bud.

Gears at least the guys can take cover, flank, run when they see a grenade.

Halo3 is flaunting some of the best AI's we've seen yet. Even the Brutes know how to throw down equipment and counter.

Mass Effect has average AI. But certainly nothing bad.

Stop being such an idiot. And open your eyes a little man. Heavenly Sword AI just isn't that good.

6115d ago 5 agree9 disagreeView comment

completely agree.

As one gamer speaking to another. You guys have to open your eyes and concede --even a little-- to the idea that Heavenly sword AI is kind of rigid and has room for lots of improvement.

6115d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Dude wtf are you talking about HS has crappy AI. MGS4 has linear AI (in MGS4 style). Resistance had okay AI. Killzone2 we haven't seen enough to understand how the AI works. And Warhawk is a damn multiplayer game. I haven't seen much nextgen AI from the system yet.

So what exactly are you basing this on?

6115d ago 22 agree28 disagreeView comment

Or the video of Kai shooting arrows.

6 minutes of AI coming out one by one to kill his father. Each one runs past their dead comrades like nothing happened. Each one comes out in a 10 second interval

6115d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

Too bad the AI sucks in Heavenly sword. The only different there are dozens of stupid AI characters on screen at once.

HS looks good, but damn that was VERY unclassy on Sony's part to be all defensive against Ubisoft and bring HS into the argument.

6115d ago 1 agree11 disagreeView comment

let's be honest here. if you're getting an MMO, the chances are you're nerdy enough to know you should have a premium.

6116d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment