cgi like ps3 and (prove me wrong if they can) but to bad you cant
guess some perks dont make a difference vs ps3
which pc doesnt next gen starts when we say it does
guess pc fans will have to wait til 2012 to get what ps3 has now, next gen pc stands for reverse leap year graphics leaps that older machines already have
HUGE difference, meaning the ps3 development kit was used to achieve the visuals not the pcs that they "designed" the games on
the draw the line somewhere thereafter and say oh no it doesnt look better than that, since the games ive named along with other ps3 games have reached the cgi level of visuals ingame so that IS pc fans logic
like i said uncharted 2 and killzone 2 are so much more impressive visually than any settings of crysis and warhead that the ingame engines of the two could be the opening scene of crysis and warhead ya heard
that equals pc fan logic
the game with zero art and all real world enviornments is the game pc fans hail as best looking game of the generation how sad, i have never once seen anything in that game that looks like "theres no way thats realtime" but plenty of ps3 games have done that to me
pc just cant do ps3 graphics just that simple
second the only way uncharted 2 is overrated in any way is if you compare it with wall e and thats not by a whole lot and dont confuse my opening header, what i mean is its "limited" if you consider its power by ram which is not how ps3 works with pc you have ram and that determines its power but with ps3 it has 512 mb rambus but on that same gpu it has 1.8tflops processing power and then you have the ever expansive cell that really is a second gpu that stretches out rsx to endless ...
im playing uncharted 2 on a 480p normal tv and still 98% of the game i am still in doubt that im actually playing it, are pc fans serious uncharted 2s ingame engine could be crysis's opening cutscene and commenter number 1 its obvious that ps3 is the better graphics maker over pc, ps3 is the only PLATFORM this gen pushing cgi level visuals in realtime this gen and has 5 or 6 cgi developers working on it, pc none i honestly believe if you no matter how much a pc fanboy you are say a pc game in...
ALL of sonys hype was right get ready
are ones that aim for photorealism no platform other than ps3 has games that have ingame engines that look like cgi
according to sony it will take 4 years for a dev to tap ps3s hardware its only been 3 get out and graphically ps3 IS delivering what sony promised before then get out
guaranteed looking forward to gowIII most though
far as killzone 2 or uncharted 2 let alone any of the upcoming ps3 exclusives, i cant find one and crysis pushed no boundaries its only the best looking in pc fans minds size is the only area it pushed a boundary in as far as what looks like cgi and realtime crysis is most likely to be realtime uncharted 2 and killzone 2 both look like cgi, they raised far more bars than generic real life wanna be crysis, by the way you got all those agrees from pc fans
yes ANY and more to come
im almost in wonder of awe at thinking do you really believe what you just asked? you must really not have been around for the last 2 years of ps3 exclusives let alone the coming exclusives for ps3, as far as im concerned the game can look better than that on ps3, all in all ps3 could get to the level of visuals in realtime as arnon posted in his first screenshots ps3 is the only platform this gen delivering all sony promised and delivering cgi level visuals ingame so in all ps3 is the most ...
doesnt matter which platform
ps3 is the only platform pushing ingame cgi thats an advancement and thats NEXT GEN pc sucks ps3s d1ck