The Game Boy had a bit of a celebrity role in the recent Tetris movie. Which was pretty awesome.
I don't remember the Game Boy ever being hailed as hopeless. They set up kiosks in public places and it drew plenty of attention with Tetris being instantly understandable by all ages.
Huh?
Yup.
There's no way anyone can even believe them at this point.
Yes. But I think it would be a good guess this will be VR again.
I thought it sold nearly as well as the phenomenal FF16 and FF7R. So very well. And it’s selling better than 16 after the initial release.
Here's one reason you might not be excited. It's Meta exclusive.
@Jeb
Hasn't FF7R2 outsold Helldivers II though? So that's plenty of impact to helldivers 2. And on top of that you'd expect big games to reduce each others totals simultaneously.
In other news FF7R2 is continuing to sell well.
https://n4g.com/news/259753...
-
It’s a part of it maybe. PS players had other (bigger) choices IE FF7R
@Crimson
Ok. I asked a pretty basic question. Had you had a good answer, I’d expect a clear, non rambling response. Nope. Nothing clear about it and you’re just kind of monologging again.
Where is the evidence that Nikke was not toned down by the studio? Where’s the evidence it was forced on them by another organization? They wanted the game to be under a 12+. There’s your answer. How is that being forced on them? They chose the demographic and could ha...
"If there's none, It would mean that devs truly believe that PSVR2 is dead."
Not really. It would mean Meta pad for exclusivity.
Regarding PSVR2 dying don't believe the FUD, it's healthy, has a lot of great things coming, and won't die for many years.
But that being said it looks like a great game.
When were Shift up forced to censor their game? Is there proof they were forced in the past?
This is what I knew would happen. FF7R2 will have legs. It’s phenomenal and PS players will jump in when they have time.
@Crimson.
You don’t have cookie crumbs on Sonys face though. You’ve got the other guy saying he ate it.
None of your crack pot sleuthing adds up to evidence that out weighs that admission by the dev.
And again if Sony was guilty why not remove the more egregious skin suit outright?
You can live without meeting your burden I guess. What choice do you have? There’s no proof of anything you’ve claimed.
@Crimson
The big difference you need to bear in mind is you’re the one making the claim (accusation) and have the burden of proof therefore. I don’t.
“If you think Shift Up is going to say, “Sony made us do it,” then you’re incredibly naive.”
@Crimson
Why? Where’s the proof? You bring up the issue of other platforms. Was there proof of it there? In Stellar there are more revealing pieces of clothing left untouched. Which makes it seem the devs reason is correct.
“They are the distributor and have now established a business relationship. It’s not far fetched to believe Sony wanted to save face ...
@Crimsonwings
I wasn’t asking for detective work. So I see no evidence it was Sony. Just wanted to check if there was any. The dev did claim responsibility. Maybe they were forced, maybe not. Let’s not claim it was Sony without evidence to back it up. All evidence as of now is to the contrary. IE the developer claims they did this internally and are looking into a resolution internally.
Was there any evidence that Sony censored the product as opposed to Shift Up? I thought the director said it was his decision.
They shut down tango? Didn’t they make Hifi Rush? That doesn’t make any sense.