Like many of you guys already said, I'm not going to compare screenshots of these two games. We'll see how they compete against each other when they're out, but honestly, comparing a PS3 only game with a multiplatt.. well, you get the point. Even sales won't tell us the right thing, because some will buy Crysis 2 on PC and maybe KZ3 on PS3 and so long.
Talking about graphics.. well, comparing Crysis 2 on 360 with Crysis on PC.. cmon guys, this is like compari...
Awww, well, if you're not on a mistake with that one. I agree with Crysis, but as much as I heard (well, doesn't have to be true, I know) Crysis 2 could be a far better game on the gameplay side than its prequel.
a guy who worked on the n64 version should understand, that you can't make this game better. I agree with that, update the graphics, maybe think about the physics (or leave it as it is) and you have a game many gamers would buy again.
because I think MW2 was the most real shooter ever. I mean, there is no other war game that shows you that war is just for money. (Uh, somebody got offended?)
/sarcasm off
Well, its quite simple. Pics or it didn't happen. Just talking about "this and that is beyond the border, even for _mature_ gamers" (while pretending that they only wanna make a game for >18s) is so lame, that cries for a Wolfenstein: Black Ops. Pussys@Treyarch.
can I marry you?
j/k, I'm also on the AMD/Nvidia way, but we actually have hard times coming, but there is a little bit of hope called Hydra..
I have to agree with the other side. What you said with the 460SLi setup is true, they're affordable, crazy fast in SLi and they NEVER create as much heat as the 480. Buying a 480 is just wrong because the card produces too much heat and for that its pretty expensive. Also the 3-Slot-Design of the AMP! is not the thing I would pack in my case.
The only thing I wonder is your driver statement. I have to say, if that's true, you're one lucky guy ;-) Even the HC-ATI-guys I k...
But VonAlbrecht is damn right. I also love Nvidia since they have very great technologies and stuff and their cards just work. I made the mistake and tried to run with ATI but I only had probs so the "fanboy factor" is out here.
Fallout NV is never as demanding as Crysis, I think you don't even know what the CryEngine is capable of. But yea, you're right, you are able to run it with a 260, but your also able to run it on a 8800GT /w same settings.
the game performs very well on the 360 (and I think it would on the PS3, too).
BUT you will notice the fps lacks which you wouldn't have on a good rack. Still, this is a console title for sure and I would hate to play it on a computer IMO.
The essence of these comments is clear:
There are many many RPGs with much potential coming.
I wont use a list for my fav games, I think its better to have it like this:
HAVE to try: Witcher 2, Mass Effect 2 (well have it on PC, didnt play it till now), Fable 3, Fallout, SW, DA2
MAY try: Gothic 4 (damn Im not sure if its worth the money), Ninokuni&VS (lend a PS3 ;)
NO try: TW2
Is an Episode 3 or even a HL3. Or a Black Mesa sequel (well that's on the way).
But anyway, DotA2 would be nice, too and IMHO Valve it the one to do it. In the end better than ActiBlizzard For Sure!
the score that I would have given to the beta. Maybe the final game would get a 6.5 but since the beta content looked somehow very "final" I didn't have much hope for that game. IGN may be harsh but I think they're the only ones who didn't look at the name of the game first and just played it. MoH is not automatically worth an 8 because its called MoH. Feel free to buy this game, but if also IGN would have given it a 7.5+ I would have been seriously interested in the fin...
did you play? I think you're the only one on earth who would call the beta amazing. That beta was worse than the alpha version of stalker.
you'll finish it on hard in about 4-5 hours. (computerandvideogames.com)
I dont get it here.
Both computerandvideogames.com and eurogamer.net say that you should stay with bc2 or mw2 since this game isn't really that good. And still both of them give it a 8+/10. I smell a "Omg it's from the MoH series" bonus.
Thanks to you I haven't lost all my faith in gaming communities.
Only because it is a 8.5 it doesn't mean its going to be THE game of the decade.
I played the beta and it was so damn boring, a very soulless game IMHO. I don't care what they say, I think the beta was a waste of time so Ill stay with Reach, with BC2, and many other fun games out there. I don't play games only because someone told me to ;-)
Nice one @K1W1. Another one is Valve, but they're not on the same track.
And I also do not think that EA ever changed. Its all about the money and about being the boss and they try to achieve this by force. Bite me if I'm wrong, but I think gamers would be more thankful, publishers care about their customers. And thankful gamers would buy more games, at least thats what I would do. Thats one reason why I love it to put every cent into Valve every day I'm buying a ...