abc1233

They're also one of the best examples of well-written, informative articles and reviews. It's just that the quality of material on there seems to be much more erratic than other places.

Can't believe I'm saying this but agreed. This whole delusion they have of being gamers fulfilling their duty of overthrowing the corrupt games journalists who have differing opinions of what constitutes newsworthy material and what doesn't is laughable. I wish you guys every success in pulling advertisers from the site and trying to make some of the genuine writers on there unemployed.

Pretty much, they are no doubt aware of people's opinion that the gameplay department seems to be lacking so you'd think the first demo they have would attempt to dispel these concerns.

What exactly do you want then? We have seen quite a bit of footage by this point, do you just want previews to not mention gameplay in any way? Aside from a massive beta like Destiny, short demoes are pretty much all they're going to have to base their opinions off of.

Seriously don't get this hostility towards Kotaku, sure they have some utterly stupid articles on there but the journalistic integrity particularly when it comes to reviews is pretty damn good, I mean what other major sites go into as much detail about the review conditions (such as hours played) as they do?

This is turning into the next McDonalds Coffee case. Misinformation spreading like wildfire until it is a common belief held by many to the point that it is joked about. The Kotaku writer literally wrote two articles briefly mentioning Depression Quest BEFORE any of this even took place.

Na, think they specifically said this was exclusive. Very, very strange, MS must have showered them with a lot of money.

Does he specifically mention that it is a game or does he just say that there will be a big announcement?

Where did I say that this becoming the standard is good for consumers? I'm saying that Sony's primary motivation in this is their own subscription service. What is good for consumers is having options, which Sony is denying. If consumers feel that this is good value then it'll succeed, if not then it'll crash and burn, as it should be.

I really hope people aren't buying into this BS of them not offering it because they have the consumer in mind. If EA offers this service and it's successful, other companies will follow along, which won't be great for Sony's own subscription services.

Haha, didn't think they could use a worse source than tidux but there we go. Welcome to games journalism, hope the clicks were worth losing what little reputation you had left.

You're definitely not the average gamer then. Check HLTB, ask others who have played the game, people are generally getting half of what they said, both completion and just campaign + a bit of exploration.

Considering their blatant lie when it came to Watch Dogs' game length, I'm more inclined to believe it's around 10 hours campaign and 50 hours total completion.

Well that comes down to whether Sony thinks that whatever price they would need to offer Activision is worth the money they would be able to make from the IP themselves. Since this hasn't already happened I'm guessing the answer is no.

Lol, you think they were ported to PC because of a petition...

No no no, facts are not allowed here.

It's just blind fanboyism. I prefer the Sony consoles myself but being ignorant of their obvious shortcomings is stupid. The OS is not the PS4's strong point at the moment, I don't see how you can argue against that.

By one step ahead do you mean still lacking some very basic features like changing background, folders, decent filters, certain media capabilities? This isn't even mentioning suspend/resume which was touted as a key feature before release then completely ignored, whilst the X1 and even the Vita have it.