Call of Duty: World at War Video Comparison - 720p

See how the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions of Treyarch's WWII FPS compare.

[Mr_Bun]

A lot of people are quick to say the wii is winning this generation, yet I don't see many wii vs PS3 or wii vs. 360 posts...why is that?

[Gun_Senshi]

Fanboy wars.

We don't see PC VS PS3 and X360. We all know PC blows them away graphic wise.

[sunnygrg]

The 360 version does look a bit sharper and I bought the PS3 version.

Kudos to Infinity Ward for making Call of Duty 4 a perfectly identical game across both platforms. I dont give a sh!t about Treyarch.

[CEO OF N4G]

This is just LAME....
Is it just me or are people not tired of this videos every time a new game comes out :/

[madestar]

360 looks sharp.. but it's a bad sharp... not the one i wanna look at.. this video comparison is stupid.. i'm running COD WAW on my ps3 at 1080p... so.. fuk what you think

[Sony Rep]

Looks the same across both platforms...

Nothing to see here...just the world in constant rotation.

[Sony Rep]

I see this trend of multiplatform games looking equal or slightly better on the PS3 to continue throughout next year and beyond.

But, you can only play next generation games on the PS3...

[Bitter Tears]

"360 looks sharp.. but it's a bad sharp... not the one i wanna look at.. this video comparison is stupid.. i'm running COD WAW on my ps3 at 1080p... so.. fuk what you think"

Dude, are you crying or something? How is being sharp bad? There's oversharpening your TV but you know, that's a TV setting. There's no such thing as "Bad sharp" in a game. It has AA, it has cleaner textures, and that's bad? OK.

I love how all of you are brushing aside this comparison for the PS3 over 360 Fallout 3 comparison. It's not lame when the PS3 is winning but it is when the 360 is winning? OK.

Disagrees are everywhere, looks like everyone here is crying. :'(

On another note, anyone notice the achievement on the 360 version when the Japanese soldier on fire jumps on Pvt. Ryan? This quite obvious to people who have the 360 version but it's Saving Private Ryan 10G. :D

[SeNiLe911]

but not from this site, the video just says BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING,BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING, then plays a little, then BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING,BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING, then plays a little, then BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING,BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING, then plays a little, then BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING,BUFFERING, BUFFERING, BUFFERING, then plays a little

The worst site I have ever seen to watch a video on, anyone else have this buffering problem? I have a 10 MB connection!

[Danja]

Both games look identical to me......and plays identical...and thats what matter that no-one on either side is getting shafted...

[vhero]

OMG are people not sick of these videos already do people HAVE to compare every multiplatform release??? its a god damn joke!

[Snyph3r]

You can also get a trophy in PS3 for saving Private Ryan from the flaming Jap

[sirbigam]

It's just kinda messed up when any multiplatform isn't on the same level for the systems they come out on, the 360 version looks sharper with better tones , and effects by a bit. When he cut the guys neck the amount blood that went on the wall is more & looks better compared to ps3.

Reveiws lik this are good because gamers can catch the companies in their act bfore buying the game, instead of buying the game and seeing if they get skrewed over or not.

P.S. Nobody is tired of these vidoes if yu are why are yu here dip sh!ts.

[Jamegohanssj5]

Both versions look bad. My bad, all of them do especially the last gen including Wii lmao!

TGSI

[Beast_Master]

The 360 version looks slightly sharper on this comparison video. Which is good since you have to pay more to enjoy the game on the 360!!

[MNicholas]

but the 360 version is less gimped, probably because the hardware is much simpler to work with. Cutscene animations are good.

[FrankenLife]

People seem to forget that no matter what system a game is developed on the goal of the developer is to make them look and play the same. Only when a developer totally fails with one system does it really matter. When you have to split hairs as to which is better than the other, then you are taking it too far. Perhaps if the goal with multiplat games was to optimize it completely for each system independently, then there would be reason to compare like this.

I am getting Fallout 3 for 360 because of the DLC not the graphics. I've seen it and it looks just fine. I'm getting this for PS3, because the people I want to play this with are on my PSN friends list. Graphic differences like this are a non issue.

[Sarcasm]

I'm gonna agree with most people that the 360 version is just a tiny micron of a pixel hair sharper.

But if there wasn't this side by side comparison, I wouldn't be able to tell a difference.

[poopface1]

at the beginning, when the guy is gettin beaten you can see a guy standing in the background. On 360 that guy has a backpack and other crap on, in the ps3 it is just a flat texture on the guy. mabe they ran outa time and didnt put that in.

Other than that they are pretty similar.

[Bodhi]

Casually looking: Identical
Looking hard: Gun textures and rock textures on the 360 are sharper, seems like AA on the 360 version.

Neither version looks that great anyways.

[Eidolon]

Actually.. the PC has that potential, but not ALL PC's can run these games better than the next generation consoles.

[Gun_Senshi]

CODs always had low requirements compared to other PC games.

[bviperz]

I play CoD 4 with 3 year old tech with highest settings at 1920 x 1200 and average 85 fps (using Fraps). Only desktops still running Pentium 2's would have a hard time running the game.

[DevastationEve]

Hard to believe that ^^^^^

Intel Core 2 Duo t5250 1.5Ghz
nVidia GeForce 8600m GS 256MB
2 GB DDR2-667 PC2-5300
Windows Vista Home Premium 32bit SP1

i get 20-60FPS when i use 1024x768 and settings at default averaging about 30FPS

and this is a laptop about 1.5 years old

[belal]

except in some areas where the ps3 is a bit sharper ;)

[Sir_Ken_Kutaragi]

Call of Duty:World at War(xBox 360) Vs KillZone 2 = KillZone 2 WINS!!!

Gears of Wa*k 2:So Macho(xBox 360) Vs KillZone 2 = KillZone 2 WINS!!!

Halo 3(xBox 360) Vs KillZone 2 = KillZone 2 WINS!!!

So the...
.____....____....____
|.......|...|................ .|
|____|...|____....____|
|...................|........ .|
|............____|...____| WINS!!! ;)

+
Oh Dear, POOR Micro$oft's cheaper xBox 360 still can't beat the more expensive Wii in the U.S.of.A!!!(2 Months in a row now!!!) ;-D ;-D ;-D
WTF are they going to do now???

[JasonPC360PS3Wii]

With your track record of denial, I don't even need to watch it to know the 360 won.

[SaberEdge]

It's obvious the 360 version looks better. PS3 fanboy denial notwithstanding.

[Maxned]

Everyone look at these time frames.

00:24-00:27

Look at the Prisoner of War's head.

Which look blurrier?

[darkequitus]

there are silly things like the backpack is missing from the PS3 version on the guy outside giving someone a beating for some reason
Big deal

darkequitus:PSN/XBL

[InMyOpinion]

Watch the lighting on the ceiling at the beginning. It's better on the 360. Also, there are more particle effects in the 360 version (like when the soldier gets his throat slit and the blood sprays on the wall). It also looks sharper than the PS3 version and has less jaggies.

Other than that they are identical.

[shine1396]

I looked at the same scenes and thought that the ps3 version looked better. Go figure...

This game is near identical, move along people, nothing to see here.

[Fishy Fingers]

Dont panic. I have figured this all out.

To see the difference you first need to set your monitor to "fanboy", should all be clear then.

[Rich1631]

Cheers mate, Bubbles for you. That was clever and very funny.

[bunbun777]

Well unless me and Jenzo need to get our eyes fixed, I think he is right in saying their is a slight slight edge to the 360, the blood on the wall was more evident, there seems to be less blur on the 360, they look very similar but that's what I see.

Wanna give me 6 disagrees now?

[robotnik]

I'll give you another one for shts and giggles.

[bviperz]

Early morning here and I'm already laughing! Thanks mate!

[GrammarPolice]

I tried it and it works!

Great comment, still laughing!

Cheers.

[joydestroy]

yup, bubbles Fishy, hahahaha

[Oner]

Chuckles...you got me fishy ~ bubbles

[Ju]

I agree with Jenzo on this one. But I think not a significant difference to make a decision which to buy (for people who need that). PS3 is still good, though, but 360 is sharper.

[Sarcasm]

@Jenzo

The blood squirting is due to COD4's dynamic character engine. It's going to be different again and again and again.

Look at the character models of the older soldiers that get's stabbed by the U.S. marines. They are different from the 360 version to the PS3 version. But in actuality, they will be different again when you reload the same level.

Just like COD4, people used to compare "why is the soldier's hand in the helicopter different?"

This is no different.

But by all means if your happy about the 360 version being "superior" then you need to re-think the next 30-40 years of your life.

[ultimolu]

Awesome Fishy. xD

They look the same to me.

[OGharryjoysticks]

What's the point of comparing turds?

[outlawlife]

agreed the game doesn't really have a good look to it, not sure if it is the environments or what but things just don't look right

[NickIni]

My turd has a higher sweetcorn content than yours.

There's virtually no difference, and who's going to play them side by side to notice the differences anyway?

[Fishy Fingers]

Videogamer are quick with their comparisons these days, used to always be GT first, guess they want the hits.

Regarding the video, yeah, both are COD-WaW.

[Ju]

That's all right. I want to see how the games compare. Videogamer doesn't judge. They just put the videos up. No need to flame, that's just for the people on N4G. Others might be able to just watch the video and make up their own mind for what ever reason.

[Harry190]

what the Jap commander used to burn this guy's face? Was it his face, his eyes or his ears?

[Rich1631]

He burns the soldier's eye with a cigar.

[Harry190]

for no real reason it seems. At least some of the disagreers could make an effort to say what they saw and why they disagree with you.

[Radiodread]

I think the game is crap compared to COD: 4. That's the last time I buy a game from Treyarch. IW is the only one I trust now for the COD franchise.

[MetalProxy]

I thought Treyarch did a better job. Oh well what ever people just like to be difficult I guess.
You dont buy games for me and I dont buy games for you, thank god.

[Polluted]

What's with the hate for Treyarch, man? COD3 was the worst COD so far, but it was far from terrible and they did throw it together in well under a year thanks to pressure from their publisher.

Other than that they seem like a solid enough dev house. Their Spiderman games were about as good as movie license games can get and their new COD game is a huge improvement over COD3.

In Treyarch I see a dev house with a bad rep because of some bad luck they had with licensing issues and publisher woes, trying to redeem themselves in the eyes of gamers and become a legitimate dev house. Give them a chance.

It is Call of Duty after all. They could have put out any old piece of crap and made millions, but they actually put in a good effort.

[NickIni]

The thing is, it's virtually CoD4 with new skins, and there taking the credit. I can see why IW are angry to be honest.

[GarandShooter]

IW is pissed at Activision, over a comment made by one of the publisher's employees about both games, not at Treyarch.

[Scotracer]

Xbox 360 version is sharper but textures look pretty much the same resolution.

[SaberEdge]

The 360 vesion is much sharper and clearer, and for that reason detail is more apparent. Anyone who tries to deny that is either blind or they are just denying it because they are fans of the PS3 and can't stomach the truth.

[Magic_The_Celt]

here we go again.. hold on lemme watch ¬_¬

[Stryfeno2]

Do not forget to put on your bifocal glasses please.

[Magic_The_Celt]

i only watched a minute or two since i dont wanna ruin it (dont have it yet) but they both looked identical

[Stryfeno2]

The 360 is sharper than the competition...

[Magic_The_Celt]

^ sigh no it isnt man you know it isnt they look the same

[SaberEdge]

If you think that looked the same, you're blind.

[peeps]

to be honest unless you're doing a comparison like this there is no way you would pick up on these monor differences (and that only if u look hard). the main thing is that the game runs well which it does on both but i guess if people wish to debate which is better then fair enough cus its always gonna be like this lol

[solsub]

Game looks ok across both platforms. Nothing mind-boggling.

[Qdog]

By the way, that is one spiffy avatar! LOL

[solsub]

;)

[beans]

Screw the comparison crap they both look close enough. What got me about this video was the sheer violence and in some ways disrespect to true fallen soliders. I don't want my kids ever seeing anything like this in a game even though I'm sure they will one way or another.Looks good though but a little to realistic and disturbing. I wonder whats going to happen when somebody makes a game about a serial killer sicko, or a molester. Games might not be able to scare us yet but soon I fear some stories that will mess up some people.

[kevnb]

serial killer stuff has already been done though.

[beans]

Not sure who but I could imagine one day developers making very realistic stories about real life sick people. Eerie times are ahead of us and it's only natural for somebody to take it there.

[mattius1989]

Games are exactly that, games. Not reality. I have been playing games all my life and have not been affected. I am 19, not violent, have a girlfriend, driving license and steady job (as a butcher mind, lol). Games should only be played by people who perceive them as games, there are far worse websites and films out there.

[beans]

Yeah and I've been gaming for 30 years and see things the way you do but as visuals, story, and AI improve so will emotion. You can't tell me that the day when truly violent games arrive that they won't affect certain people in some way. In ten years I guarantee you that we start to see some crazy stuff and kids playing these games are the only ones going to be affected. My question to any body is "would you let your child play COD5 after seeing that intro" if so then please explain why?

[cactuschef]

You think a real developer is going to create a game in which you play a molester? I could imagine some disturbed kid making a mod about some sick stuff, but never a real respected developer.

Also, I was wondering, how do you know that "Eerie times are ahead of us"? You're scaring me beans!

[dale1]

i got both versions ps3 for me and 360 for mate,ps3 is much better how do i know ,my sony bravia has 50000.1 contrast ratio full 1080p 40 inch screen,my mate has a samsung 16000.1 1080i screen 42 inch it looks sh*t compared to mine.is it the tv or the console you decide

[Stryfeno2]

Why would you buy both versions? I smell BS.

EDIT: contradicted his comment...First he said he have both, then he said his mate. Finally, he is not even running both version on the same TV. HE FAILED!!!

[Magic_The_Celt]

^^ read it again

he bought himself the ps3 version

and his friend the 360 version

[Sony Rep]

I have both and they look the same.

Looks like the x-BUTZ were hoping that this trend of superior ports would continue throughout 09, seeing as they have nothing else to brag about...games wise. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I see this trend of multiplatform games looking equal or superior on the PS3 to continue throughout 09 and beyond. Fact!

[SaberEdge]

You guys are liars. Not a single review has said the PS3 version is better. In fact, IGN said that the PS3 version has more aliasing.
http://ps3.ign.com/articles...
"Given that it uses the Modern Warfare engine, World at War looks every bit as good on both the PC and the Xbox 360. The PlayStation 3 version suffers a bit more from aliasing, but that's mainly it."

Moreover, it's obvious from the comparison video that the 360 version is a lot clearer, has sharper details, and is noticeably more three-dimensional.

Your fanboy denial and spinning is ridiculous.

[Maxned]

Oh man..
I would like you to name 2 ps3 multi-platform games that look better than they do on the ps3 than the 360.

[kevnb]

looks pretty good on both.

[Cynical-Gamerzus]

True Get PC version more = more visuals

[devilhunterx]

and more costly. no thanks.

[Frulond]

sucks to use the keyboard sitting on a chair when i can use a gamepad and sit on the couch and play the game on a big screen

I was in the beta for this game and I suck/hate playing this on PC

[kevnb]

and hook a pc up to a tv if you want.

[divideby0]

you have to stare to notice a diff...there is not diff...when the game is in motion you will not be able to pick which one is which in a blind test.
but the game is meh so who really cares

[Ngai]

Can we stop these comparisons? It's not like one or other console will magically make the game better.. geez. It's the same fuking game. The only difference in quality is in exclusives, for ex. look at KZ2. Compare that to this.

[Radiodread]

its COD: 3 with jungles and japanese. I tried hard to like it but I really can't. COD: 4 has more tight online experience and a more visceral campaign. And COD: 4 still looks better.

[OC_MurphysLaw]

There are a few slight differences but nothing worth talking about. Both look great. Treyarch did a good job with both versions.

Alot of people said they would screw it up, I think those people should be eating crow right about now.

[pansenbaer]

Well my computer froze and had to buffer and it stood still for a second before it told me which version was which. I decided not to be blinded by my own fanyboism. I said 'the right one looks sharper'. Low and behold the 360 version. Oh well, I'm still gonna rent it for trophies.

[titntin]

Mh - as per usual the differences are negligable, you buy it on the platform you prefer.

Yes, there are exremely subtle differences: At the beggining the dynamic pulsing light that affects the ceiling is a lot more pronounced on the 360 version - but it actually makes it look wrong as the lighting on the adjacent wall is almost static. The fade on PS3 smoke particle effects lasts slightly longer in some of the scenes. The blood particles on the 360 are differenty and produce a bigger wall 'splat'. There are subtle colour variations.

The only people noticing these slight differences and declaring one version superior would be fanboys. Most of N4G then! :)

[Bladestar]

This game is great. Obviously the game is being hated among the Sony fans demographics for obvious reasons... it's better on the xbox 360... you can't blame the developers for that. Blame the tools and resources given to them.

Considering the fact as Sony says the PS3 is many years ahead of the xbox 360 no game should look better or perform better on the xbox 360... Developers should be able to poop on the PS3 and it should turn into gold.

I don't remember once instance where a 3rd party game on the PS2 looked better than on the original xbox. The original xbox had more ran and processing power and it was easily shown on the 3rd party games... developers didn't even try hard to show that.

Can you name a wii game that look better than a PS3 or xbox 360 game? or a DS game that look better than a PSP game?

And don't mention 1st party games.. because if the game was made on the xbox 360 it would probably be the same case. You can't prove that it can't be done on the xbox 360.

The difference between the xbox 360 and the PS3 should be like comparing the wii and the xbox 360... never.. never should a game look or perform better on the xbox 360 based on the so superiority that Sony and their fans keep talking about...

Also don't mention that developers need time... the original xbox was able to produce more superior 3rd party games on day one... and no wii game no matter how many years they get will be able to produce a game like COD4.

[DiabloRising]

Metal Gear Solid 2; Substance ran worse on the Xbox than it did on the PS2.

[titntin]

You must know you are joke, right?:)

Or do you really take all this seriously?
If you actually fully believe everything you write, then you are funny for all the wrong reasons...

[NickIni]

"This game is great. Obviously the game is being hated among the Sony fans demographics for obvious reasons... it's better on the xbox 360... you can't blame the developers for that. Blame the tools and resources given to them."

Even when the fact that there is virtually no difference stares you in the face, you still claim the 360 has the better version. Stupidity to very high levels there.

[KA-BAR]

I'm not even going to look at the comparison. I don't care for fanboy wars.
I'm not even going to say what platform I have.
I bought it, it's a good game, and I think it looks just great.

How many ppl are going to buy a copy for both the PS3 and 360, play them side by side on 2 high def TV's, and complain because one is slightly better.

ZERO!!! that's how many.

So if you have this game, just log off the puter now, and go enjoy it.

[titntin]

Absolutely agree!
But it has to be noted that any real gamers on here (and I know there are still a few) will likely have both machines and will often download the demo's on both platforms before making a purchase. I know I do.
So real comparisons in peoples homes DO happen - at least for titles with demo's on both platforms!

[likedamaster]

"13 - Don't care
I'm not even going to look at the comparison. I don't care for fanboy wars.
I'm not even going to say what platform I have."

So why bother posting? They make these comparisons all the time, G4, gametrailers, etc. Next time, don't be such a D:bag with your comment and click elsewhere.

[Rich1631]

@ 4:22!!!!! Look at the massive blood fountain. I had no idea it was this bloody! It gives Fallout 3 and Gears of War 2 a run for their money.

[TheMART]

So the 360 wins again.

Two years after the 'mighty' PS3 launched, obviously teh teh Cell! isn't figured out yet? How long will it take? 10 years?

really it pretty sad that POS3 costing so much (400 Euro machine) does less then a 149 Euro 360 Arcade (here in The Netherlands)

PS3, Sony overpromising & underdelivering over and over again.

[she00win99]

i have one question for you, are you mentally challenged?

[Magic_The_Celt]

the sad thing is even he knows they look identical but he's too far in now to back out so he posts the same crap over and over

[Sony Rep]

You know what's sadder? The 360 is on its 4th year and still doesn't have a game that looks better than Killzone 2.

I guess your investment in a next generation console back fired.

FAIL

[lloyd_wonder]

"Looks like the x-BUTZ were hoping that this trend of superior ports would continue throughout 09, seeing as they have nothing else to brag about...games wise. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I see this trend of multiplatform games looking equal or superior on the PS3 to continue throughout 09 and beyond. Fact! "

lol. True...

[lloyd_wonder]

"You know what's sadder? The 360 is on its 4th year and still doesn't have a game that looks better than Killzone 2.

I guess your investment in a next generation console back fired.

FAIL"

The fact he believes the PS3 isn't better than the 360 proves his biasness.

[TheMART]

Ali the brit aka magic the celt

DO YOU NEED FREAKING GLASSES???

The 360 version is sharper, the PS3 version is blurry like so many games are on the PS3. Seems the GPU can't match the 360's performance. Which is pretty funny.

Even worse you droids want to believe the versions are the same while they really aren't. Anyone looking at the graphics can see the 360 version is sharper. Sad sad Poostation 3

[Kleptic]

The mart proves over and over again why 360 fanatics are generally regarded as the dumbest people on the internet...

[SaberEdge]

Except TheMART is right--the 360 version does look better. It's not a night and day difference, but it is significant and noticeable. Anybody with eyes can see that. PS3 fanboys live in denial. And you say that "360 fanatics are generally regarded as the dumbest people on the internet..."? I disagree. I think that award goes to the PS3 fanboys.

[Man_of_the_year]

Sorry dude the MART is right and that there are some areas that are as clear as day that look much better on the 360 - such as the rock comparison, the guy on fire and even the beginning you can see the PS3 is more blurry. It appears that the Sony fanboys are the only ones that can't see the difference and proclaim that they are the same when graphically they are not....the 360 wins again in this graphical comparison.

[ForROME]

Well, I noticed the fire shadowing and the lushness is better on the 360, but over all if your not looking for that, you wont notice it. All in All I give Kudos to Infinity yet again they pretty much get the job done bar none others should take a look.

[Killjoy3000]

You know what I'd like to see? A comparison video of Call of Duty 4 to WaW.

[Magic_The_Celt]

yeah man same here

[sak500]

@ali_the_dick

Do you have any other thing to do besides making new accounts and self bubbling yourself?

what happend to your gamertag and score of 700? WHy not put those in your profile as well.

[GiantEnemyCrab]

sak500: Proof that the bubble system on N4G is a joke. This is like the third time he has done this. He is a PS3 fanboy so cheating the system comes as no surprise at all.

[Ballistic Jay]

Well i don't own a 360, so I'll be getting it for the PS3. Having said that, i think 360 looks barely better... @ 720p. But my COD WaW will be running at 1080p!

[Socomer 1979]

you mentioned Sony & related products 9 times in your post.
You sure you dont really love Sony & its fans?
from you're post I would say you're obsessed.

Ya see Adam sessler, its not all fanboys fault. People like bladestar need
aprooval & to be babied. Doesnt he sound brainwashed looking at video
comparisons instead of his own television set?

Bladestar, get a life dude. Its very unhealty to obsess over
comparisons. One you pay to play online & the other is free online.
Shouldn't you be talking about it cross game private chat with your
xbox only friends?

Other people, have multiple friends list with gamers from all over the world on both
consoles. Ps3 has separate user profiles with several different friends list for free. I have over 500
friends on 5 different profiles.

So let's brag about that instead : )

[Bladestar]

lol! as I stated many times I wouldn't play console games unless they offer me an improved experience over my Alien Ware PC... you see I am a PC gamer... and "playing" online is nothing new... how does the PS3 differentiate itself from PC online gaming? what features does it provide?

Just like some idiot may say, "I would never pay for cable because I can grab an Antenna and capture 3-4 channels" and "watch TV"... well I pay over $200/month for 2 TV boxes because I want to have all my premium and On demand channels...

Many of you do not find value on paying as much as I do for cable.. but I do... same goes with the xbox 360... I know that the PS3 can do what the PC can do and allow people to "play online"...

I pay for xbox live $4/month for "how I play online" not that "I play online"...

I pay because I want these features across all my games an experience that the PC nor the PS3 offer:

* Single unified login for all my games. (why the hell would I want 5 login; this is exactly what I wouldn't want to do). Do not want developers like Konami to implement their own logins and make me register.

* Ability to join my friends game session without asking for invites.

* Ability to send game invites to my friends; even when they are not playing the same game I am. My friend can be watching a movie or playing another game? Why should I have to pickup my phone and call him to play a game.

* ability to voice chat with my friends even if they are playing a game I do not own or are simply watching another movie.

* ability to organize party of 8 people and be able to bring those 8 people to any game I am playing so we can be more effecting when playing against other people.

* ability to read voice/text messages without having to exit my game.

* I want all that functionality accessible from any where.. weather I am playing a game or movie...

Those features my friends are worth the miserable $4/month that you xbox 360 haters seem to be suffering so much... damn get a job!

[ud]

you pay pay over $200/month for 2 TV boxes ??? holy sh*t

[Man_of_the_year]

Don't forget that you can check your friends list on your Blackberry, text them while they are playing, and receive messages from them on your phone while they are playing.

Also with the new dashboard you will be able to DL a HD or SD movie and watch it with 7 other of your friends online together...and each one of them could be located anywhere in the world.

[holocaust]

It's quite normal the differences, PS3 uses Quincunx that as less memory usage but blurred image and the 360 uses or MSAA which is sharper and is "automatically" used by the GPU.
despite the ceiling scene that doesn't react very well whit light on PS3, the game is identical.
Neither way I would chose the PS3 version, free online!!!!.....

[MaximusPrime]

another comparison video?

[N7360]

Don't play many games these days. Still been checking this site since it first came online two years ago. All I see recently is these bloody 360 vs PS3 comparisons! Does anyone give a sh*t or is it just me?

[DiabloRising]

Gaming is no longer about fun. It's no longer about discussing the pros and cons of a game, or reflecting on what you just played, or discussing the greatness of a title and hopes for what to see in a sequel.

No... this new generation of "gamer" is all about numbers, ratios, sell thru, texture resolutions, install bases, YTD sales, SKUs, and all other manner of useless fanboy E-penis pissing matches. It's rather pathetic.

[beans]

this is a sad time yes indeed. The next comparision's will be targeted at Mortal Kombat which I can't wait to play. I just wish they used Mattel instead of DC because HEMan would of kicked some booty.

[Socomer 1979]

I got 5 different profiles & 100 friends in each one.
all with separate message boxes & everything.

Ahhh, feels good to live in freedom. You're obsessed with my
ps3 dude. Your jocking it so hard I could swear you really want one.
360 wins? Wins what? More reason to pay for a hardrive & pay to go online?

Did something ever made you feel like xbox360 was crap?
Did you get your feelings hurt? You should get a real social life & expand your friends list
. your world is pretty small from where I'm sitting. I look down to you.

[MerkinMax]

Don't tell him to get a life. I doubt you know enough people to fill over 500 spaces. And I seriously think that having that many friends makes you feel more secure because you're the one with no friends in "REALITY'

[funkysolo]

I can tell you the PS3 version is definitely darker. I have both systems and you probably wont notice anything because both version run smooth. I played the 360 beta and it ran good and I own the full PS3 version and it looks and plays awesome, so I guess we all win because I'm happy with the ps3 version and I pretty sure everyone is happy with the 360 version..

[Hixxy22]

The 360 version looks miles better! and sharper!
The guard outside the cave at beginning has a back pack on 360 but on PS3 he has no back pack to cut down on polygons??
Blood splatter looks better on walls on 360 and overall textures look better on 360.

[thematrix1298]

both of them look sh\t...COD5<COD4<R2<K Z2

[Socomer 1979]

I stopped playing games for long hours because I'm constantly checking all the crap that comes thru the wire about consoles. I would have ranked up by now in resistance 2 by now but I stop to defend it on the Internet. Its not the fanboys that bother me. Its the professional journalist who really piss me off.

You would think they wanted all consoles to be extremely succesful as its good business for the entire industry but they dont. They just can't accept that nintendo & Sony are for other people who need & really enjoy thier products.
So in retaliation, we strike back at xbox360 for being First & it seems like its thier fault for the medias behavior but its not. Its the media thats needs to label everything & segregate gamers. People like bladestar are victims of the free press abuse of media.

All the consoles follow through with thier plans. Its evident that they aren't going anywhere but just when everybody starts to get along perfectly & respects others game preference. The media throws a monkey wrench in thier & creates a civil war.

I feel like I'm talking about communist & racism. Its just videogames.

[FantasyStar]

good boy, you figured it all out. Now you must die for it.

/lol.

[beans]

I almost dropped a tear after reading that. Good stuff and oh so true even though some will disagree for whatever odd reason. This has nothing to do with any of us and like you said all boils down to what type of image the media leaves. Heck if it were not for the media then the Wii would have had a terrible life just like if it were not for them 360 and ps3 would possibly be sitting neck and neck at 30 something million consoles. You just really opened up my view on this console war crap and every fanboy on this site. The good news for us is the fact that even though the economy seems to be doing so bad, video games companies are still making money. Hopefully this gives them even more reason to give us another next gen PS4 and xbox3.

[DiabloRising]

Don't EVER let talking about games take away from PLAYING the games man. The people you are attempting to defend can handle themselves, and the idiots attacking them are just that, idiots. Why waste your time when you could be enjoying awesome games? They won't listen anyways!

As for game journalist... they get so many incentives and are just as biased as normal people. I don't know why ANYONE would EVER put their reviews ahead of your own, or your friends.

[ultimolu]

Well said.

[FantasyStar]

Is something wrong with me? I have been playing the PC Version instead so I should be able to see something, but I don't. Weird.

[Nikkelz]

they slice the guy's neck in the begining there was more blood on the wall in the xbox 360 version,and this is the first time im seeing comparison videos for this game,it might not be anything but do you think they did that because they had to cut corners so that it could run decent on both systems?
to get in to look more like the p.c version?
was the p.c version the lead platform?
just thought i'd ask,besides they did a hell of a job on this game,i will be buying this today for my ps3.

anyway,peace and game on

[mettalhead70]

Why the hell do they keep doing these stupid comparisons?Is it to get people to start a flame war?Is it to get hits?I don't know,It sure seems like it but it needs to stop.This is just getting stupid now, the only way to tell which one looks better is to squint your eyes and look for s while.I did get one thing out of the video though.How brutal and mature the game can be and you don't see that in that many games and if is has a good storyline that makes it unique compared to other WW2 games then I might have to check this game out.

[Bazookajoe_83]

Ps3 is a little brighter, but with tv adjustment they would look identical...

[BenderDGreat82]

They both look identical! The 360 version looks a bit sharper but I find it odd b/c I own the PS3 version and it doesn't look like it does on video. It looks much sharper...much clearer.

[funkysolo]

I played the 360 beta and it looked good, I played the PS3 version and it has more color but that could be because the 360 version was a beta. I'm playing the PS3 version and I'm very pleased the way it looks and runs. You could never tell the power of a console based on a multiplatform if the game is design to be the same, What you need to do is compare exclusives like Gears2 and Uncharted because Uncharted to me still looks better. Gears2 looks good but there is little difference graphic wise from gears1... Let's not even bring up Killzone2, which is in another level, which it's not even worth comparing. Waw It's a multiplatform game that we all can enjoy,so is a couple of pixel going to change which console you buy based on a multiplatform

[Lord Xire]

Its just a lil sharper and has deeper contrast on the 360.

I'm gonna get both versions because I like seeing the difference between PsN and XBL and then criticizing...yeah I'm a bad person.

so yeah...

PsN ID: Lord_Xire
Gamertag: Sky Zero 666 (cannot get on until the 19th)

[cloud9wpi07]

This streamed videos are never accurate. All one has to do is change the sharpness on the screen to get the washed textures. I just purchased this game and it looks amazing allot better than the craip they are showing her.

[kornbeaner]

The video is subjective because, they used Component cables instead of HDMI. The 360 by far has better video quality when using Component cables, thats the reason you see some of the fuzz around certain areas on the PS3.

But when using HDMI the PS3 has a sharpness to it that is very noticeable. In that sense if you were to plug in both the 360 and PS3 via HDMI on the same TV with the same settings, outside of the button prompts you will not be able to tell the difference.

[PS360PCROCKS]

Why is everyone saying it looks good on both? I hardly ever say anything against either version, but the PS3 is noticeably blurry on textures, on faces, in backgrounds. I don't know about you, but Treyarch doesn't seem to know what they're doing with the PS3.

[mrkeith]

im a ps3 owner but i got to say that the xbox360 version is sharper. lucky xbox360 owners.

[crystallakekiller]

like it or not,the 360 version looks better,the resolution is MUCH better,the ps3 version looks blur!

[megatron78]

they made a mistake in the intro right when it starts the xbox version is really the ps3 i just started playing it on the ps3 and if anyone notices the guy in the back has a backpack and the "ps3"version dosnt any one got a ps3 check it out he actual does have a back pack havent seen the 360 in person so i cant say but the version they r saying is ps3 isnt i wonder what everyone thinks about that honest mistake ?check it out if u can u will see sorry 4 spelling

[Jamaicangmr]

You're right i just went an checked the Xbox360 review on GT and the guy doesnt have on a back pack in the that version. However farther down in the video you see each side having the correct button icons. So am not sure what to make of this back pack thing. Anyway whatever they both look good, no feeling it anyway am playing it on my PC and it's ok but not as good as COD4. GUNS SUCK!!!

[elorm9]

From what I can see, it's sharper but w/e.

[THC CELL]

Call of duty 5 is a rip off really
I got it for the trophys
No way this game beats the online of Call of duty 4 and R2

Is almost call of duty 4 with a new skin and old weapons that are upgraded to Bs really

This game will not Last as long as COD 4 and when Killzone hits and R2 hits well this game is Game over

[ElementX]

I like comparison videos. I bought this for PS3 though, but haven't opened it. Still playing Fallout 3 on 360. I also have Resistance 2, Gears 2, LBP, Fable 2, and Far Cry 2 (ps3) yet to play. They're all sitting around collecting dust because I love Bethesda RPGs. Too many games!

[Ldubbz]

The games usually look 99% the same when they do this crap.

[StephanieBBB]

I would never ever, ever buy the PS3 version of this game and I would never ever, ever buy a game made by Treyarch.

Here's hoping that Infinity ward brings the REAL goods with Call of duty 5.

[majorsuave]

I bought the pc version :)

he he, no horrible control scheme for me

[Dr_Nefarious]

360 does look sharper, but then again it will translate into a more unrealistic game on my t.v. It is a fact that games look more cartoony on the 360 than the ps3. I have both and I hate these comparisons because I went to buy the so called superior version and guess what, because of the sharper image I noticed a bunch of flaws in the graphics than what I would normally notice.

When I finally got both consoles I would buy one version and rent another to see if the sites were lying and setting up these comparisons like this on purpose. No they aren't for those who would like to know. Give this one to the 360 ps3 fans. The game sucks anyway and the graphics suck compared to cod4. I know I played the time limited version multiplayer and it really sucks in the graphics department.

[xg-ei8ht]

That's the trouble with vids. 360 does look sharper.

But put it on your tv, both look the same.

Either way, it's a decent port.

[SaberEdge]

That hasn't been my experience. If you can see a difference in a video there will be significant differences when you play the game at full resolution on a HDTV.

[Egzekutor]

It looks sharper
It looks better than the sh1t PS3
PS3 cant keep up

Its only the fault of those developer from Treyarch, tell my why COD4 looks the same on both consoles without major differences ???

Infinity Ward even said that they put their best developers on the PS3 version so that it works on PS3.. But when I look at this video, its true XBOX 360 looks better, maybe the RGB wasnt truned on to FULL, Super White off etc..
I wont be getting this game anyway, its a rip off from COD4 which is the best FPS so far..

You talk about how PS3 cant keep up with XBOX 360 ??
XBOX 360 is similar to a computer, 3 core processor. All developers around the world are more comfortable with the 360..

If XBOX 360 was soo good, Microsoft would certainly release something like Heavy Rain or Killzone 2 on their console ;].

But from what i can see, it cant handle better games..
Dont be surprised, its a 8 Core processor (each core 3,2ghz) vs 3 Core processor. Dont forget about the XDR RAM (clocked at 3,2ghz) amazing bandwidth.

[pshizle]

looks better

[samoice]

is it me or is there higher compression on the video on the ps3 hense its not as sharp?
because other ps3 gameplay videos (ign etc) looks just as sharp asthat xbox 360 version!

[ZombieNinjaPanda]

I was too engrossed in the violence/swearing/gore and chaos of some of the battles to notice any visual differences.

[fredrikpedersen]

Make the versions look the same, or make it exclusive to the console it looks best on. Lazydevs.

[killerb2333]

Wow im trying to figure out, how hard some of yall are lookin at this? This game has some flaws on the ps3 version, but nothin to make one choose one over the other.. To me they almost look the same, nothin to get worried about.

[Rob0g0rilla]

It looks like these guys ported it from the 360 to the PS3 instead of doing what Infinity Ward did and had separate teams get the game running on each platform.

But graphically

COD4 > COD5

COD4 having better graphics then COD5 says a lot but I seen this coming from the beginning. The beta seriously felt like a huge expansion and has worse graphics. I think it's worth 30 dollars. The reviews are even saying it's overpriced.

[psthreee]

this is not ps3s fault letters on ps3 looks blurier the guys who made this video is fault

[fufotrufo]

saying they look identical is stupid! * cough* ali the blind fanboy *cough*

The 360 version looks a lot sharper than the ps3 blurryness

just look at the rocks comparison!

stupid droids can't accept the fukin truth!

[GameDev]

does the 360 look sharper or have better AA??

can't have it both ways fanboys

[Xbots are pathetic]

they look the same get over it

btw cod4 blows ass
this game owns it so hard

[psman012]

I think they both look identical.

[Xbots are pathetic]

ppl only like it because its EASY. COd5 took cod4s engine, and did it right, and slapped cod4 in the face. Cod4 i can f*cking snipe somwone with a pistol, are you serious? The p90 with double tap and matrydom are so great for campers. Also the level designs are garbage. You can can get sniped, shot, or blown up through every corner. Lets be serious most of the ppl who say cod5 is the same, havent played it. ITs much more refined

4 player coop > Crappy SP
Great balanced map > ppl camping in vacant
No pistol sniping > getting owned by a asshole with a m9 from 50 yards away

its to bad ill get 50 million disgrees. Oh well i bought the better game

[CrippleH]

The problem is COD4 there is no regard for balance. The maps weren't even made for multi player. It was made for single player. That's a cop out to me. The way the map was designed of course it will encourage so many campers.

[SaberEdge]

I hate all the whiners that complain about these multi-platform comparisons. I like these comparisons and face-offs because I own the PS3 and the 360 and I want to know which version of a multi-platform game is better. People always try to minimize the differences we often see in multi-platform games, but these differences aren't minor at all. If one version has anti-aliasing and the other doesn't, that is an important difference that I want to know about. If one version looks really blurry, like COD4 does on the PS3, I want to know about it.

Why is it that most of the people that complain about these comparisons are PS3 fanboys or people that lean towards the PS3 in their preference?

Anyway, it's obvious from the video that the 360 version is a lot clearer, sharper, and more three-dimensional. The PS3 version looks flatter and blurrier. The 360 version also seems to have better lighting in some places(such as in the beginning in the hut). IGN also reported that the the PS3 has more aliasing:
"Given that it uses the Modern Warfare engine, World at War looks every bit as good on both the PC and the Xbox 360. The PlayStation 3 version suffers a bit more from aliasing, but that's mainly it. I've always been impressed with the level of detail on everything; walk up to a fellow soldier and you can see the seams in their clothing. The most memorable visual in the game for me has to be the arterial blood spray that happens when a human body gets torn apart by explosions and gunfire."
http://ps3.ign.com/articles...

[DaChinPin]

It looks like the only game that won't have any comparison videos seems to be Killzone 2...And even then I'm doubtful about whether or not people will compare it to Crysis...

[Traveler]

Oh get real, it doesn't look that good.

If you think killzone 2 looks as good as crysis, you are fanboy to the max. To the guy below me, I am not saying COD5 looks better than Killzone 2, i am just saying that KZ2 does not look anywhere near as good as crysis. KZ2 looks about as good as Gears 2...each game has their own strengths and weaknesses.

[CrippleH]

Oh please if you think this game looks better then KZ2.

Then I laugh in your face. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

[CrippleH]

360 wins by little differences.

It's a bit brighter and a bit sharper that's all I've noticed so far.
I already got COD4 so I won't make the same mistake buying this game because the PS3 version get the short end of the stick in COD4.

They hardly fixed any problems. Host disconnections still happen and no don't bring that bs about my connection I got 5 mbps connection even a 512 kb connection can handle this game well. 1 lagger in game can ruin the game for everyone, dam p2p.

[Traveler]

Actually I'm loving COD WaW, and yes it definitely does look better on the 360. my friend brought over his PS3 copy and we compared both versions and the 360 looks sharper and has better antialiasing and better lighting in parts. All you have to do is look at the first part of the video when they're in the hut and you can see the reflecting and flickering lighting on the ceiling that is completely absent on the PS3 version. The 360 version also has more blood splash onto the wall when the Japanese guy slits the POW's throat. In some parts of the full game you will see that the PS3 version has fewer trees and shrubs than the 360 version. The PS3 version is stripped down in certain ways to help it run better.

It's not the "Xbots" that are lying, it is the PS3 fanboys that are denying the obvious.

[Bebedora]

I must say it's a great game if you are not afflicted by ethnicity
Otherwise, it rocks

[Traveler]

anybody can see that the 360 version is much clearer and more detailed. you can see the details more in the 360 version because they are not blurred out like they are on the ps3 version. i am not sayin that the PS3 version is bad it just doesn't look as good as the 360 version.

[DFresh]

It looks exactly the same I don't see any difference.
Ya'll can say 360 is superior because of the exclusive DLC is gets but without the graphics just look the same.

[cmrbe]

The site that score both gears a 10 while LBP and MGS4 a 9 each?. Sorry but i don't believe any video comparison from this site even if they say the PS3 version looks better. They obviously are biased towards the x360. I only trust G.I. and IGN.

[ZILLA]

cause when K I L L Z O N E 2 come to town it will make all COD games look like halo,you have no idea the storm that is coming...haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaa!PLAY B3YOND waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay B3YOND!!

[MerkinMax]

The only arguments you droids ever come up with is "Your system RROD or KILLZONE 2 are best" Think of something else before you try to come up with a reason that the PS3 is better.

[Nicolator]

enough with the comparism i think ppl just wanna play games bloody hell...

[na2ru1]

Does it run 60 fps?

[na2ru1]

360 looks better so that must mean Killzone 2 is doooomed.

Anyway, whats the native res this time and does it run at 60fps?

[Aidsanchez]

I know this video would be equal. The ps3 video of this split screen has a lesser resolution than the 360 version. watch the video in HD and stop it at about 1'39. Then CHECK THE WORDS that say switch weapons. OOPS. F that site this Crap is busted wide open.

[Traveler]

That's because the PS3 version is blurrier in general. I have seen a lot of PS3 games like this.

[Aidsanchez]

Check this at 1'39. Look at the switch weapon words. Oops unequal resolution

[M3 Superhero]

ill be keep it real, but doesnt the 360 graphics look better than the PS3's? thas not right.. -_- *sigh*

[karlostomy]

the 360 version wins. It is sharper, has slightly more and better effects and doesn't suffer from the dreaded 'ps3-vaseline-effect'.

Makes me wonder why anyone would pay $400-$500 for a ps3 to play the (slightly) inferior version, when the superior version can be had on a $199 arcade 360.

In terms of multiplats, the ps3, unfortunately doesn't make any sense.

Let's hope KZ2 gives us all reason to celebrate.

[titntin]

Ahh karlostomy - there really is no help for you, you and your attitude is quite pathetic. You try sometimes to appear to be unbiased or even resonable, but anyone seeing your history of posts can see straight through you.
You are a corporate cheerleader through and through. Your interest is not in games in the slightest, and I don't think I've EVER seen a comment from you that shows you actually play them or care for them at all. The very definition of a sad fanboy.

[karlostomy]

What gives titntin?

You sound VERY angry.
You clearly have a need to vent right now.

I know you are a proud ps3 user, so I'll let your childish personal attack slide for now, as a personal inconsistency on your behalf.

However, just to be clear, I have to say that the only thing 'sad' here is YOUR comment.
Your comment contained NOTHING of value to the thread, or the story or even as a reply to the gist of my post.
The only message in your post was one of personal frustration and playground slander.

I am confused by the fact that you took the time to read my entire comment history (an impressive achievement), then took the time to post your subjective personal disapproval of what I say and offer.
If my comments really upset you so, then just put me on ignore. I won't mind. Perhaps it will ease your stress levels. I suppose that would defeat the purpose of venting?

Indeed, my bio and personal comment history is quite transparent.
I like the 360 over the ps3 and most of my comments reflect this.
I ain't pretending nuthin', friend.
Anyone can see, if they care to look.

Just a thought:
Perhaps, if you are looking for a pretender, think about what you might be projecting onto me? Often we see in others what we don't like about ourselves.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Next time you want to vent your (repressed) frustrations on me, try and use your intellect before you post.

your good old pal, Karl.
:)

[titntin]

What gives is my utter disdain for you and everything you stand for, I had thought I'd made it quite plain? I didn't claim to making a relevant post about the subject, I simply wanted to say how much people like you and all the other irrational bigoted trolls on this site ruin the entire site.

Whats perhaps even funnier, is that unlike many of your half-deformed counterparts (Mart, POG etc), you have the nerve to try and claim some intellectual high ground whilst indulging in a phony war that only the terminally childish could possibly take seriously. But take it seriously you do, to the extent that you and others like you from both sides of the pathetic camps ruin any possibility of real gamers genuinely exchanging ideas and thoughts.

Indeed its quite telling through your sneering response that you never disputed that you simply don't play games. I've certainly never seen you make a comment that shows you have any interest in gaming at all. You are simply a boy taking childish pleasure perpetuating a pathetic allegiance to a piece of plastic, and as such I despise you and all your ilk.

Is that a vent? Of course it is! I'm certainly not going to take any tips from a person of your mentality as to what is intellectual or not, and my frustrations are certainly not repressed. Your pathetic comments, as always, annoyed me, and I felt perfectly liberated to say so immediately. Maybe you should look up the meaning of the word 'repressed' before you start falsely using it? Just a suggestion so you don't look silly...

...and one last thing. I AM a proud PS3 user. AND a proud 360 user. Indeed, I own every single machine. I'm a proud gamer. Because I enjoy games, I get to play them on all platforms and am currently enjoying LBP AND GEARS2. Only the terminally immature allow a phony allegiance to stop them from experiencing great game experiences.

[karlostomy]

Every now and then, you lose the plot a bit don't you?
...am just trying to work out what your major malfunction is...
In between contracts again?
Sleeping on the couch tonight?

May I suggest therapy for you?

Btw....
I am a gamer. On PC and 360. Before that xbox. Before that Commodore Amiga. Before that Commodore 64. I love gaming. I also love to play music and debate stuff just for the hell of it.

Don't let it upset you too much.
I know blood pressure becomes an issue when one gets older.... ;)

Just be happy that we live in a society where both of us can do and say as we please... without fear of the thought police dictating how we are to conduct ourselves.

oh wait.

wasn't that what you were doing?
tut-tut, titntin!

:)

[titntin]

Not losing it at all! Calling it exactly as I see it, and you know deep down inside I'm calling right. You take great delight in winding people up and causing strife - its your modus operandi and your only 'contribution' to this site. Which is simply why I despise you.

Spleen vented. I don't expect you to change in the slightest, you'll continue to be as unbalanced and annoying as always - and when it P=sses me off, I'll continue to say as much.

[ProjectArsenal]

To be honest, they look almost identical and anyone who complains otherwise is a complete fanboy!

[jay17pro]

Treyarch made it for the 360 1st then it was ported over to the PS3 that why the 360 version looks sharper for the 360 than the PS3. PS3 Fan boy. PSN:Jay17pro

[Elven6]

Err the 360 was the lead platform so it's not suprising the 360 version of the game would have the "advantage" so to say. But usually these advantages on multi platform games are so small it's not worth a damn!

No matter what platform you have it on, it's a great game, lets all hold hands and enjoy it! :)

[gnothe1]

you can tell when a 360 version of a game looks better because the Sony only guys always say the game looks THE SAME, but you can bet you a55 that if the PS3 version TRULY looked better they wouldn't stop talking about it!! anybody without any bias towards either system can CLEARLY see that the 360 version is sporting better colors,textures an detail regardless how small it may be, the 360 still holds the multi platform graphical edge AGAIN!!

[karlostomy]

The ultimate test of multiplat comparisons is when Juuken says they look the same.

As soon as you hear that, you know the 360 version is better.

[Cra1g]

I honestly cannot tell a difference between the two...

[Traveler]

If you can't see that the PS3 version is much blurrier and less detailed, you need to get your eyes checked.

I don't mean to sound rude, it's just that the blurriness is *very* apparent to me and if you can't even see it at all there is something wrong.

[Traveler]

Yeah, it's obvious when dual-console owners (like myself) and Xbox 360 owners say the 360 version looks better, but PS3 owners say "they look the same" that the 360 version is indeed the better looking version. If it truly did look equal you would have PS3 owners claiming that it looked better on the PS3.

Anyway, yeah, the 360 version does look better without a doubt.

[likedamaster]

Why does the 360 version always looks clearer? I don't get it. It's supposed to be the same or better on the PS3 (well according to fanboys) why isn't it? Nonetheless, it is game news...gametrailers.com always has these comparisons. The game is great regardless, and look almost identical.

[power of Green]

Funny excuses...

[hulud86]

I agree with Radiodread. COD4 is so much better than WaW. Solo, multplayer, everything about it is better.

[Ryangp]

Ha ha ha ha ha... Trumpets!

[Hixxy22]

I feel sorry for PS3 owners they claim to have a more powerful console than the 360 yet the 360 keeps on out doing it on every port! (Bioshock, Cod 4,5, Soul Calibur,Oblivion it goes on..)
My advise sell your PS3 and get a 360 with Gears Of War 1 + 2, Bioshock,Fable 2,GTA iV (with downloadable content),Lost Planet.

[mushroomwig]

Personally the only difference I could see was the blood splatter on the wall, not sure why that was any different though =/

[Knightofelemia]

I rented the PS3 version of the game i must say it is clean with the graphics I have yet to try the 360 version. I mean when you look at the video the 360 version has extra blood on the wall all in all both vids look the same.

[eliasg]

360 wins again. PS3 GPU cant afford 360s graphics...

[Itrguy001]

Treyarch are Xbox fans thats why they focused on the 360 more than the PS3. anyways not that i care I LIKE RESISTANCE 2 BETTER!

[pete2711]

Lol in real life there identicle, I dont know why the ps3 looks blurrier in the video but it does, But in real life there exactly the same, No lag so far on the ps3 version though. At least its something to play on the x-box all next year, They'll have nothing else.

[MerkinMax]

I'll have fun playing Halo Wars until Halo 3 Recon comes out.

[Blaze929]

You dont even have to watch the video! Just look at the Treyarch logo and realize:

1. It was lead developed on the xbox 360 - fact
2. Treyarch cant develop for crap for the PS3 - fact