410°
3.0

Gamereactor reviews Alone In The Dark

Gamereactor Norway reviews Alone In The Dark

Graphics: 4
Gameplay: 3
Lyd: Audio: 4
Durability: 3

Pluss:
The summary when you load a saved game.

Minus:
Poor controls, slow, feels old, bad voice acting, frustrating gaming mechanics

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
Closing5798d ago (Edited 5798d ago )

Whoa now, seems wayyy harsh from what I've seen, but I'll wait, and see how the rest of the reviews go from sites I've actually heard of. Either way I was only expecting this to be a rental, but I still hope it turned out good just because some of the promises the devs made were quite ambitious.

nemey5798d ago

is that 3 or my eyes is hurt.
this game was good on trailers.
why 3...

nemey5798d ago (Edited 5798d ago )

fk 2 post

InMyOpinion5798d ago (Edited 5798d ago )

I've played it and from what I've read in previous reviews I expected it to be crap really. At worst it's definately a 7-8. The graphics are a solid 8-9, it looks fantastic. Controls are a bit awkward at first(kinda like Silent Hill) but they don't ruin the game in any sense.

I really can't see how they can say that it feels old. That's what amazed me, how many parts of the game that feel fresh. The intro of the game is one of the coolest I've ever seen. It keeps on impressing you. What they pull off graphically is hard to believe. The settings you find yourself in are unlike what I've seen in any other game. It captured me instantly.

I could go on and on. All I have to say is that if you are a fan of horror/adventure games you would not want to miss out on this.

I used to follow the swedish Gamereactor site and they have a tendency to give games weird scores sometimes. But I really can't see how you can award this game a 3.

Btw, I played the 360 version.

ChrisGTR15798d ago

thanks jenzo for the first hand review. i was beginning to get worried that this game was gonna suck and end up canceling my order. when you complete it if possible please let us know how many hours it takes to complete it.

InMyOpinion5798d ago

Will do.

I could have written a much longer review but I think it's better that people try it for themselves so they can see how full of sh!t some of these reviewers are =)

Fototherapist5797d ago

they actually scored this lower than Haze (which is not that bad of a game)!

Milky5797d ago

Playr tv gave it an 8, this seems way way too low.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5797d ago
jedistev5798d ago

Hey..please dont to that to me, cos i hope next review is good...maybe the critics is cold heart bitter,

hope it damed good games that what i need !!!

resistance1005798d ago

Ouch, i was wanting this to do well.

Ri0tSquad5798d ago (Edited 5798d ago )

This is insane. I really thought this game was going to do good. Oh well, not good news. What version did they review?

jollygoodchap85798d ago

All the snapshots and boxart are 360.

You can tell from the buttons and whatnot...I don't see why they'd review the Wii, PS2, PC version and show 360 shots.

I don't think they can review the PS3 version either, because it's like way behind and isn't finished.

Man, I had high hopes for this game :(

I think I'll wait for more reviews.

SickNick855798d ago

one 7.5 and one 3...i read more review before buy....if it isn't so bad i don't buy it...

Show all comments (66)
140°

Alone in the Dark Developer Has Been Hit With Layoffs

Alone in the Dark developer Pieces Interactive has been hit with layoffs a month after its release, as per the latest information.

Read Full Story >>
nintendopal.com
coolbeans8d ago

That genuinely, genuinely sucks. The reboot has clear flaws, but it really felt like a solid first step for this team to receive *greater* investment.

XiNatsuDragnel8d ago

Alone in the dark is a fun game so that's unfortunate

CrimsonWing697d ago

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t that the norm after a project is done?

Terry_B7d ago

That's standard. Teams are together for a Project, after its done some..and sometimes most devs are fired until the next Project is in the works and people are needed again. Only the core members stay in the time between the hot phase of the game development.

CrimsonWing697d ago

What’s annoying is people don’t understand how contractors work, either. All of this is uninformed knee-jerk reactions without any understanding of how employment works in this industry. There are key developers and staff that stay with a studio/publisher, but often times it’s a hire per project and then seeking new employment for a project. That’s how it’s always been…

coolbeans7d ago

That's a fair point too. I would say that in light of its tepid critical/commercial response and ongoing mass layoffs across the industry I think it's understandable for fans to worry about the longer-term implications. We'll see how it plays out in the future.

60°
6.5

Alone in the Dark (XS) Review | VGChartz

VGChartz's Lee Mehr: "In one sense, it feels strange to even think Pieces Interactive had big shoes to fill with this series' legacy. Given what's come before, did it really? And yet, even when considering the last two flops over a two-decade span, there's still something about Alone in the Dark emblazoned on a title screen that carries a sense of revered history. In that respect, perhaps this reboot's best accomplishment is in honoring that spirit through its inventive world. It's also fair to emphasize knocks against its survival-horror design, some puzzle-solving, and so on; it certainly won't be considered a trendsetter like the 1992 classic. Still, the amount of goodwill wedded to its brighter qualities makes for something that dawdles the line between unfortunately-flawed and impressively-enticing."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
50°

Alone in the Dark review [SideQuesting]

The new Alone in the Dark remake doesn't do anything especially noteworthy, but that doesn't mean it's bad. It's just... cromulent.

Read Full Story >>
sidequesting.com