Approvals 11/3 ▼
Valay (4) - 4625d ago Cancel
Godmars290 (2) - 4625d ago Cancel
Mike Bell (2) - 4625d ago Cancel
C_Menz (1) - 4625d ago Cancel
JorisvZoest (1) - 4625d ago Cancel
JuanraUP (1) - 4625d ago Cancel
510°

Is Square Enix Killing Final Fantasy?

DeltaGamer takes a look at some of Square Enix's recent Final Fantasy announcements to see if fans should be overjoyed, or deathly afraid for their favorite RPG series.

Read Full Story >>
deltagamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4625d ago
WhiteLightning4625d ago (Edited 4625d ago )

Yeah they are

FF13-2 says it all really

Whas started out as an interesting idea (Fabula Nova Crystallis series) has turned to crap over the years and it's become "crystal" clear (good one right) that their little plan hasn't worked. As soon as FF13 got negative to mixed reviews Square have been changing tatics, I mean why do you think Final Fantasy Agito 13 has distanced it's self from the series even by going far enough by giving it a name change to Type-0.

"Type-0 is a great example of the lengths Square has gone to in order to further develop the universe introduced in Final Fantasy XIII, insisting on keeping the game’s ties to Gran Pulse and the l’Cie despite removing the XIII from the game’s title."

I highly doubt it will relate to FF13's universe, they're will probably be bits and bobs here and there but nothing that huge.....you know Sqaure over exaggerate and overhype things to make it look like there working their arses off.

I hope to god that if they go full retarded and make FF13-3 they will class those three games (FF13 trilogy) as the "Fabula Nova Crystallis series" and make FF13 Versus into Final Fantasy 15 which will give the game more attention, put it back in the spotlight and make it so it has a better chance of giving us a good main title FF game this gen. I mean despite all this "all three games are linked" talk with the whole l’Cie crap I think FF13 Versus looks like a differen't world and time period to exsist in FF13's universe. Why didn't they release FF13 Versus as a main FF title first and release FF13 as the side game...least then people wouldn't complain how crap and differen't it is, we could of just let is pass and use the "Well it was only a side game" excuse to ignore it.

4625d ago Replies(5)
4625d ago Replies(9)
4625d ago
4625d ago Replies(5)
4625d ago Replies(1)
4625d ago Replies(1)
silkrevolver4624d ago (Edited 4624d ago )

Why is it that you’re always the first person to bash XIII-2 in almost every article? Even if the article isn’t specifically XIII-2, you make an effort to connect it and bash away. Just wait until the game is out to judge it.
Love,
Silkrevolver

WhiteLightning4624d ago (Edited 4624d ago )

Hmmmm

No not I'm not, theres a lot og FF13 haters out there. I love how your over exaggerating it

By the way it's an comment section on a news website

But I know what people like you are like

Dear silkrevolver

Why is it you come to FF13 and Sqaures rescue everytime someones bashes it

Why is it you comme to Squares rescue when someone calls them

Why is it you have to point out someone who has a negative comment that goes againts what you think of the game.

.....Deal with it.

Love Whitelightning

"If you don't agree with my opinion, then your not allowed to voice it"

MrSpace4624d ago

lol Whitelightning "Dear" and "Love"

Oh silkrevolver getting owned by your own comment

Classy :)

zeddy4624d ago

if they are, they might aswell go out with a bang and do the ff7 remake, it'll sell over 10 million, its a no brainer really.

Ingram4624d ago (Edited 4624d ago )

There were lots of objective reasons to hate FFXIII, why would we have to keep on admiring square enix?

We're just stating personal preferences and disappointment.Cope with it, like have to we cope with modern FF fans.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4624d ago
bobbyluv4624d ago

ff13-2 has addressed the complaints people had with 13, why do u so called "fans" still shit on it. It's no longer linear,side quests are available from the first chapter of the game,they added towns,moogles,chocobos,a casino and you can travel in time, all this they did in a little over a year.You ff13 haters complained about hope being a whining bitch, well guess who the whining bitch is now (WHITELIGHTNING). The fact is that they've made improvements on what i believe to be an OK game 13-2 can only get better from here.

Chocoboh4624d ago

I believe an ok game to be like the same one I played 10 years ago when you were probably still a fetus. Graphics don't make a game fun. And that's about the only thing FF13 and FF13-2(a sequal in which no one asked for) will have. Keep sticking up for your shitty sequel in which is killing the jRPG genre. Keep eating up that crap, please do so we can kill it quicker so developers in the West can get more customers for making stuff worth playing.

Anderson84624d ago

you havent played it yet so you cant know if they have really addressed anything..

OT..i dunno if they are killing the series but they are having a bad gen compared to last, i'm sure they will turn it round eventually

bobbyluv4624d ago

as far as linearity goes ive seen the maps of bresha ruins and its clearly not a straight line,ive also seen towns, chocobos, moogles, time travel. the only think i havent seen is the casino.

dragonknight44624d ago

FFXIII had a lot of problems that were so obvious that they shouldn't have existed in the first place. For example, a lack of towns, no respite, poor pacing, bad lines like "moms are tough", a combat system for noobs where you only needed to keep hitting the X button, extremely linear gameplay where you feel like running through a tube, summons that behave like Transformers, and characters who I did not care for at all. FFXIII is the only game in my collection that has made me feel anger, something that not even Demon's Souls was able to do.

Shojin14624d ago

WTH has FF14 online been cancelled? Besides that I can respect the girl angle on 13. 2 titles in the 13 saga is a little redundant... The HD remakes look hot so... I cant complain being a FF fan...

WhiteLightning4624d ago (Edited 4624d ago )

@bobbyluv

Shut up...

You call me a whinner because I, LIKE MANY OTHERS, hate FF13 when it was in fact a crap FF game and then people like you whine on about the people hating on FF13.....basicaly making YOU the whiner. At least the majority of people who hate the game have a reason to hate it but you whining about someone who hates a game (where it deserves it) is worse.

Cry me a river pal

Again another person who thinks

"If you don't agree with my opinion, then your not allowed to voice it"

@dragonknight4

See that sums it up perfectly.....

Biggest4624d ago

I like how bobbyluv makes a completely valid and important point, but no one cares. Every person that complained about XIII said the same things. Now that they're releasing XIII-2 with all of those complaints addressed, the complainers have changed to "So what. We never asked for it!" First of all, who asked you to ask for it? Secondly, they gave you what you asked for anyway! They supposedly added towns, a more open world, sidequests, and traveling. What more do you want? If you want FFVII it costs $5.00-$10.00 on PSN.

HINDERIZATION4624d ago (Edited 4624d ago )

of course they fixed the issues. it's to compensate for the fans who disliked it for of all of the extras they took out because of the 360's limited disc capacity. and of course they did it in less than a year. whatever they had to take out of XIII to fit in the 360 was probably left over and NOW they're putting it into this game. i'm not surprised they did this in such a short time. they probably had the files and everything already waiting to be written into the game. i just hope that it gets better reviews.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4624d ago
gman_moose4624d ago

Since Square (formerly Squaresoft) merged with Enix, they have gone in a downward spiral.

When was the last time they released a mainstream game without any controversy? FFX? I can remember the outrage when FFXI was included in the main series, as most FF fans weren't interested in MMORPG's. When FFXII came out, many were turned off because it seemed like S-E were trying to simply formulate a single player MMO. A lot of the game mechanics were the same as FFXI. FFXIII was supposed to be the game that got them back on track. Then we get this linear, boring, confusing mess of a game that disappointed far more fans than it pleased. I played it and enjoyed it enough I guess, but it was not in the same league as those before it.

In the meantime, they have a game in development that actually looks to have a ton of potential in FFv13. What new information do we have on this after 5 years since it was announced? Basically nothing. We know about as much now as we new 4 years ago.

Then you have FFXVI. An MMO that was supposed to come out on PC and PS3 at the same time. Then they pushed back the PS3 version about 7 months. Then they delayed it indefinitely while they fix the PC version (Last Remnant anyone). Again, SE tried to do something innovative but again failed to get it right. Now they are spending millions to go back and fix it.

So they have an opportunity to right the ship. All companies do when they have such a loyal, nostalgia based following. They can release some remastered games for some quick cash while they work on new projects. What do the fans want? FFVII, and Kingdom Hearts 3. This is all I've seen on wish lists for 3+ years now. So what does SE do? They announce a remastered version of FFX. WTF? Why bother remastering a game no one has asked for? It's like they are intentionally trying to piss off their fans. Why work on FFXIII-2 when versus isn't finished and we've been waiting 5 years? Because they seem to be trying to piss off their fans. Why not announce a non-DS KH game? Because they are the dumbest f***ing company on earth.

Who really has the patience for them anymore? I've long since given up. Recipe for money - give people what they want. They just don't get it.

thesummerofgeorge4624d ago

Totally agree. I feel like I'm actually being trolled by a game developer. I honestly have no idea why they make the decisions they make anymore.

It's not even as if they're making decisions that, although they piss us off, are smart business decisions. No. The decisions they're making are mutually detrimental to them and the fans.

There are simple, easy and obvious solutions to SE's problems. I can't understand why they ignore them. Although it seems ridiculous to even say, it really does feel like there's no other conceivable reason to do what they're doing, other than to piss off their fans.

They're sitting on a veritable gold mine, and all they have to do is listen to the fans to access it. Even just a little. You don't have to give us everything we want, just show that you hear us in some way.

What do you have to gain by releasing games few want, as opposed to games the entire gaming community have been foaming at the mouth for years for?? WHAT SE??? WHAT!!!???

I don't think I'm being harsh nor hyperbolic in saying the executive decision makers at Square Enix are inept, oblivious morons.

It's kinda like SE is George Lucas, and the Final Fantasy series is their Star Wars. They'll give us everything but what we want.

boommuffin4624d ago

the reason their doing a HD port(not a full on remaster) of FFX instead of VII is because it will just be overall easier for them because if they did it for VII people would pobly expect them 2 completely remake the game btw they already released VII on PSN. if they were going to take the time to remake a FF on current gen console id prefer FFVI, FFVII=overated

gman_moose4624d ago

@boommuffin
FFVII may be overrated, but it's overrated by enough people to make it a worthwhile investment. SE is simply making too many mistakes. Anyone who can't see this is a blind Square fanboy. I used to worship them back in the FFIII/Chrono Trigger/FFVII days. They continued to produce quality tile after quality title.... we got FFVIII, Parasite Eve, Vagrant Story, FF Tactics, Chrono Cross, Xenogears, the list goes on and on and on. What the hell happened to that company? I guess losing guys like Sakaguchi didn't help, but they have other talent as well... anyway, the article asks if SE is killing Final Fantasy, and the answer is yes they are. Slowly but surely, they are killing it.... such a shame.

guitarded774624d ago

Well, FFX kinda helps since XIII sucked.

Seeing all the SPAM comments above reminds me of this...

princejb1344624d ago

in my opinion square has been killing their own company this gen
i still haven't been impressed with any of their titles except for world ends with you for ds
I really hope versus 13 is good cause I'm buying day 1

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4624d ago
NukaCola4625d ago

Square has a lot of issues. They aren't necessarily killing FF, but they are destroying gamers hope and faith in their ability to continue to create the experiences they once had. The PSP titles have been great, but their console titles have been really poor. And this may be a sign...I can't say for sure...but Square Enix is the offically puplisher of COD in Japan, so...That just tells me their priorities are not order. And like Nintendo(is no Xenoblade or LAst Story), when you let the Western departments take over your company, you get bad ideas, bad marketing, and your product doesn't hold that JP feeling it once had. I think westernizing JP titles is killing JP titles in general.

4625d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2904625d ago

They've put the franchise name above putting out a good game with a good story or honestly interesting characters.

They've basically gone from getting you involved and invested, to requiring investment. 20-25 hour tutorials?

-Mika-4625d ago

I hate articles like this. First FF13 wasn't a bad game. It had great characters and a beautiful story. Yes it was lacking towns and side quest from a story standpoint. It makes sense. They are being hunted so them not walking accepting quest made sense.

FF13 had a great universe and im happy it getting a sequel. It fixing the complaints of the first game and adding more. This is shaping up to be a true FF game.

I also don't mind them releasing FF10 by it self. Square is a business. It needs to make money. If they did bundle ff10.X2, and 12 together. You would be looking at over a 100 hours of gameplay. 40 or 60 isn't a fair price for all three games together. So i don't mind them releasing each game for $40.

The reason they haven't made a ff7 remake yet is because they don't have the man power. Alot of people are working on 13-2. Some people are working on versus. Square has it hands full. Remaking 10 is easier since they are just adding hd textures. If they remade 7. It would be a whole new game which would require alot more people to work on it. So shut up about the ff7 remake.

Stop hating on square. They are a great company that makes great JRPG.

yojimbo_slice4625d ago

Square/Squaresoft was an amazing company who made some of the most critically acclaimed JRPGs of our time.

Square Enix hasn't made a decent JRPG. EVER.

They need to take a look at everything they've changed since the 03 merger because none of it has been for the better.

dragonknight44624d ago

Don't forget that Enix was also an amazing company for releasing the Valkyrie Profiles, Star Oceans, and Dragon Quests.

Now, Square Enix is an abomination.

RedDead4625d ago

Being hunted in most FF7 too. The Turks want Aerith. That's a shi**y excuse really. The story was told poorly(read this to understand), it was way over dramatic, the training wheels were on for too long. And finally the characters were generally mediocre and the cheesy side was way to much(Snow and Nora were unbearable).

Now, I agree on some things, the Universe was great and had alot of potential, the linearity is gone so you don't have to just do nothing but battles for the entire game. Leader change 1-up. Hopefully the battle system will open up at the start of the game.

Simon_Brezhnev4625d ago

Yeah i liked FF13 universe but hated the cheesy story and characters. The only one with common sense was Sazh

4625d ago
4625d ago
bobbyluv4624d ago

in ff13 they were not just being hunted by soldiers the towns people were also against them, there's actually a cut-scene were they walk into a town and everyone goes into a panic, actually i think there's 2

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4624d ago
4625d ago
zero_gamer4625d ago

"Stop hating on square. They are a great company that makes great JRPG."

I don't hate Square but ever since the PS2 era they've been decent at best. The merge with Enix made things even worse. Their best effort this entire generation of gaming is remakes. Seriously, how many remakes of FFIV have they released within the past 5-6 years?

4625d ago
Elda4624d ago

@ Mika,Great comment,but the haters will keep on hating!!

Anderson84624d ago

if u like something your a fanboy if u dislike it your hating...

*sigh*.. just because ppl didnt like a title and u did doesn't mean they are hating it may just mean that they have higher standards than you and they wont accept being shovelled cub par games for £40

GarandShooter4624d ago

Gonna sigh at your own comment?

Aren't you doing the same thing, jumping to a conclusion based on his tastes?

gman_moose4624d ago

You make no sense. FFVII wouldn't be a whole new game. It would need a new game engine, which would take some time, but the investment would be worth it for the number of copies it would sell. I'll be shocked if FFX sells 100k units.

You are obviously a fanboy, so there's probably not much sense arguing with you. S-E has been making poor business decisions for years now. Recent events are not out of the ordinary for them. Yes, they are a business, so it's frustrating that they make so many stupid decisions. See: fixing FFXVI.

DragonKnight4624d ago

@Mika: Considering that your name is shared with a character from a superior game, I'm surprised by your post. But, let's address it anyway.

FFXIII most certainly was a bad game. It was a game that lacked focus and tried too hard to appeal to every denominator, and failed at it completely.

"It had great characters"

Like who? The only character that seemed real was Sazh. The rest suck. The only good thing about the characters was Snow's theme. He definitely has the most badass theme ever. Vanille was a more annoying attempt at Aeris, but she lived. Hope was so damn awful Vivi would kick his ass. Lightning was a robot. Fang was pointless. Snow was cliche. Awful characters.

"beautiful story"

Nah. The story had far too many holes and required too much explanation via the logs. The underlying theme was supposed to be Snow rescuing Lightning's sister. Instead you spend most of the time just going in a straight line while being pursued and hearing everyone but Sazh and Vanille b*tch about their problems or about how mad Lightning is. They had so much mythos they could have focused on with the Fal'Cie but they didn't.

"Yes it was lacking towns and side quest from a story standpoint. It makes sense. They are being hunted so them not walking accepting quest made sense."

Weakest argument ever used to prop up a game's massive linearity being a fail. Pretty much all FF games have you being pursued by some force and yet there are still towns and mini-games to explore. Look at FFVI (hunted by the empire half of the game), FFVII (hunted by Shinra, and they are also supposed to stop Meteor but they go snowboarding), FFVIII (hunted by Galbadia), FFIX (hunted by Queen Brahne and Kuja) FFX's minigames open up when you're hunted by Yevon. There's no excuse for a lack of exploration. Stop defending SE.

"FF13 had a great universe and im happy it getting a sequel. It fixing the complaints of the first game and adding more. This is shaping up to be a true FF game."

Wrong. It had potential which was wasted. FFXIII-2 is being met with hostility because it's an insult to true FF fans who expect a great game done right the FIRST time. XIII-2 put Versus XIII on hold, which by all indications is a superior game, and that's why people are pissed. We want the great games, not the fixes for the bad ones.

"Square is a business. It needs to make money. If they did bundle ff10.X2, and 12 together. You would be looking at over a 100 hours of gameplay. 40 or 60 isn't a fair price for all three games together. So i don't mind them releasing each game for $40."

See, you're what's called an enabler. You praise SE for poor decisions and poor pricing. If you look at other HD remaster collections, you'd see that the price you deem unfair is deemed fair by better devs and gets them great sales. Considering FFX is 10 years old, FFX-2 is about 8 or 9, and FFXII is about 6, $60 is pretty much dead on what they are worth now altogether.

"The reason they haven't made a ff7 remake yet is because they don't have the man power. Square has it hands full. Remaking 10 is easier since they are just adding hd textures. If they remade 7. It would be a whole new game which would require alot more people to work on it."

They aren't making FFVII because they don't know how to organize their teams. They are constantly announcing too many mediocre projects that take time away from the good stuff fans want. If other devs can make games as large as FFVII in HD, why can't SE? They just don't want to, not until they have to. Stop confusing Square Enix with Squaresoft.

boommuffin4624d ago

if they were to remake a FF id pefer FFVI, im sure by now we have experienced all FFVII has to offer with its 4 or so games,cg movies & anime specials

DragonKnight4624d ago

I'd prefer FFVII or IX myself, but FFVI would also be better than FFVII. I have VII ranked as 3 worst in the series, not counting spin-offs or sequels.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4624d ago
laaakokaracha4624d ago

No!

SE is NOT killing final fantasy!

They already Killed it!

Show all comments (154)
140°

Square Enix Is Going Multiplatform; The Layoffs & Its Past Don't Inspire Confidence

After its latest games didn't meet sales targets, Square Enix is going multiplatform but the company's track record isn't convincing.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community18h ago
Scissorman18h ago

Square Enix been multiplatform for decades, a few exclusively-deals doesn't make them any less multiplatform.

fr0sty18h ago

Nor is selling their games on a console with only 25 million install base going to bring their sales to where they hope they will be... Unless they somehow manage to dumb down FF7 trilogy to work on switch, they aren't going to have much luck. They already released it on PC, after all.

anast6h ago

Where are you getting that number?

SegaSaturn66918h ago

It kind of does, giving preference to a certain platform by timed exclusivity. Console ports generally feel superior. Legend of mana PC port extremely broken

neutralgamer199217h ago

Sega

It doesn’t when square themselves didn’t want to fund the development of remake. It’s only after the success of the 1st they realized their mistake but now contract is signed. If it wasn’t for Sony there would be no FF7 remakes. Same goes for silent hill 2 with Konami. They don’t want to fund AAA budget. Companies like PlayStation and Nintendo get blamed when in reality they are saving some of these franchises

Remember sega didn’t want to fund bayonetta and epic games didn’t want to fund another gears of war. It’s easy to blame console makers but they are the ones taking the risk and paying huge upfront costs without seeing the final product. FF7 remake trilogy won’t be coming to Xbox now or in the future. PlayStation and PC is what square signed up for. Sony paid them more than they would make from Xbox sales.

ravens5217h ago

I just wonder when everyone is going to demand that the Square Enix exclusives with Nintendo come to PS and Xbox. Or it's just the PS exclusives that matter lol

phoenixwing17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

I'd love for the nintendo exclusives to come to pc or ps5. They'd actually be playable then.

neutralgamer199217h ago

Raven

Exactly and that’s where square enix does more exclusive than any other platform. Gaming is square has always been very unrealistic with their sales expectations. Remember when tomb raider reboot sold 7.5 million and square said it wasn’t enough. They need to spend less on development and have more realistic expectations from sales.

And those thinking games being not on Xbox makes a difference don’t understand we have a decade plus of data showing square enix games having less than 20% of their multiplatform sales on Xbox (final fantasy series) and Nintendo consoles aren’t strong enough to run any current games. Nintendo switch should be as strong as Xbox one x atleast but we all know that’s most likely won’t happen

RoadRacer16h ago

@raven

thing is, as neutral said in their comm, the switch isn't strong enough to run flagship SE games
i think what SE does is, it makes unique games for switch only so that it has something for that console too. Thats where all the "underlined sans" rpgs go to mostly

maybe things will change when Swtich 2 drops cuz that's gonna be as strong as ps4 afaik from the rumors flying around

TheGamingHounds17h ago

@Scissorman

Your point is valid enough but when the icon of this company is limited to one console in timed-exclusivity, it means the company has crossed the line. By some degree at least

All things aside, Square itself stated "aggressive multiplatform strategies" so we all know what it's talking about

Scissorman14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Then the headline should read "Square To Drop Exclusively Deals in Pursuit of A Sweeping Multiplatform Strategy". I don't recall this argument when Square Enix released Bravely Default, Octopath Traveler, and Triangle Strategy on one platform. And even if FF is the icon, not all of its titles have gone to one platform. We're talking about three games, one of which is already on PC. Did Square suddenly go 'multiplatform' after it released subsequent Tomb Raider sequels on more than just the Xbox? It's just a silly way of putting it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6h ago
TheGamingHounds17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

SE needs to go all in optimization. Broken PC ports won't help its case, especially with big releases like mainline Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix16h ago

It's actually simple. What doesn't inspire confidence is Square allocating their budgets on the wrong projects such as Forspoken, Avengers, Babylons Fall and Foamstars.

Square has always been multiplatform since PS3/360 days which 80 % of their games are. People kick up a fuss over PS exclusivity but not Nintendo which has more exclusive projects console exclusive from Square.

FF16 has done ok but not enough to fix the blunders that the past mistakes Square has made with some of their projects. FF7 Rebirth is unclear we'll see a PC release for sure so it's hard to say so far not as good as they would of liked.

Then again unrealistic expectations. If it weren't for Sony these games would at least had another 2 years development time. So some people need to be realistic in that regard.

Scissorman14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

It's the blunders that set those expectations so high. If you remove those from the equation, I bet the sales numbers would be more than stellar. Square believes it's okay to release a pile of risky, middling, garbage because the big boys will ultimately subsidize the cost. Don't worry if Forspoken sells poorly, FF16 will surely sell 10 million copies to balance that right out. Oh wait, it only sold like 4 million. Well that's a disaster. Meanwhile games that sell 2 million units with comparable budgets are deemed successful.

thorstein8h ago

I would also add that FFXVI, which I loved has a hint to one of their biggest problems: the number 16.

It's a great franchise, but that's all they've become known for. Dragon Quest is my favorite all time series but it's like they don't know what to do outside of those two IPs.

Valve never makes trilogies. The idea is that they don't want to become stagnant. Gabe Newell hates the number 3.

I can't imagine their talent wouldn't want to try a new RPG.

RoadRacer16h ago

Square Enix just really need to revise its expectations. Maybe consider a change in strategy on dev end as well. Multiplat will help for sure but only good games that are marketed well will sell

Show all comments (18)
350°

Square Enix Preparing for Layoffs in U.S. and Europe Amid Heavy Restructuring

In a town hall that took place on Monday, Square Enix president Takashi Kiryu reportedly confirmed imminent layoffs in the U.S. and Europe.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago
4d ago
lelo2play3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Square should ask Sony for more money...

Outside_ofthe_Box3d ago

Square should ask Microsoft to buy them out...

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box,
So that Microsoft can close down the studio after doing nothing with them? Right...

Outside_ofthe_Box3d ago

@FinalFantasyFanatic

That's exactly my point...

gleepot3d ago

Sad but true. It's the consequence of a shift in player habits, massive overhead, and out of control budgets across the industry.

blackblades4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

What did NA and EU did anyways? Just translate or something? I would say it might help them get back to there roots but DK.

Hofstaderman3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Actually, you are correct they play a hand in localization especially in Europe with the many languages. That and marketing.

nommers3d ago

Marketing for SE has been poor lately so these layoffs make sense if true.

Profchaos3d ago

Yup videogame crash 2024 edition

_Decadent_Descent3d ago

Hope so. Industry needs a good crash to shake it up again.

Show all comments (64)
460°

Square Is Shifting Strategy To Aggressively Pursue Multiplat Releases,Focus On Quality Over Quantity

Square Enix is shifting its strategy to aggressively pursue multiplatform releases and focus on quality over quantity.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago
CantThinkOfAUsername4d ago

Yup, it's official. FFXVI and FFVII Rebirth didn't sell as much as they expected.

gold_drake4d ago

read the report, where exactly does it say what u just said ? lol

TheEroica3d ago

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt for some gamers.... 🤣

Barlos4d ago

It's your interpretation. That doesn't make it 'official'.

CantThinkOfAUsername3d ago

- 1% increase in net sales compared to a year with Forspoken and Octopath Traveller II, which didn't sell more than 3 millions combined (and I'm being generous).

- A 38.3% decrease in operating income despite the release of 'High-Definition' titles namely FFXVI, FF Pixels Remaster, Dragon Quest Monsters, and FFVII Rebirth.

- Aggressive multiplatform strategy one year after saying that exclusivity with PlayStation was mutually desired.

Sure, it's all in my head.

Sonic18814d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Probably for PC and the upcoming Nintendo Switch 2. Square Enix games doesn't sell to well on Xbox

Extermin8or3_4d ago

Nothing sells well on Xbox that's precisely Microsoft's problem

The3faces4d ago

Apparently they don't sell well on PlayStation either.

Lightning774d ago

Square named Drops Xbox as part of their multiplatform approach in their quarterly reports.

Like it matters MS will probably find away to close them down to.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

I can see them going for PS5/Switch/PC for the most part, it'll mostly likely be the Switch 2 by the time their next game enters development, which is probably a good thing since the Switch is struggling with 3rd party games. If they're hurting for money/sales, I don't see them bothering with Xbox, that's just wasted time/money for them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
DarXyde4d ago

I mean, maybe? They'll want as much as possible and I figure they could have been hoping for greater impact on PlayStation, but that's good reason to reflect and realize the resources and development cycle of these games aren't very sustainable. The solution is to make more affordable games with shorter dev cycles, then once in a while bring out the big guns.

I think Final Fantasy VII Re make and Rebirth would do really well if it was multiplatform. Specifically, if Nintendo gets their hardware up to snuff, and the rumors are promising. I don't really have much faith in its performance on Xbox, but Nintendo gamers really commit to buying their games. At one point, Breath of the Wild for Switch outsold the Switch itself.

Granted, Zelda always solos everything except GTA, but Nintendo folk are avid Final Fantasy fans. I think it would do exceptionally. Nintendo just needs to make porting easy and inexpensive and they'll get more games.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

I don't think the exclusivity hurts them as badly as they think, I think it's a range of factors, like the quality of the games, high sales expectations, ESG/DEI, censorship, development costs/time... I also suspect that Square-Enix is extremely inefficient with their resources, they struggled/avoided towns in the FF13 trilogy, and FF14 was mostly wilderness with little to do apart from derp about in the wild (they also avoid towns and making a lot of characters there too). But FF14 also went through development hell, I think Square-Enix just needs to overall how they do everything, because the way they manage that studio just isn't working.

Christopher4d ago

The two most profitable games for them didn't sell as much as expected. Yes. Make it make sense.

MrCrimson3d ago

I interpret it as - they want to be multiplatform, as they will sell more copies.

EternalTitan3d ago

16 isnt even a JRPG let alone a final fantasy game.
So glad that it bombed.

itsmebryan3d ago

Square finally realized what Sony figured out recently, their installed base is not enough. We are going to see a lot less exclusives from everyone moving forward.

MajorLazer3d ago

PS5 is nearly at 60 million only half-way through its life-cycle, but sure, the install base is not enough.

EternalTitan2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Good exclusives always sell despite install base. Look at Nintendo's recent Zelda.
Its just 16 was awful.

itsmebryan1d 20h ago

@major
It is not enough if it was Sony's operating income wouldn't be down 26% and the company would not have lost $10 billion of value after they missed their sales target .

Christopher1d 20h ago

Looks to me more like they need multiplatform because they've been failing completely everywhere else. Honestly, Square needs to rethink it's non-FF games. They've been failing hard over there in that regard.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1d 20h ago
CrashMania4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Hopefully the next Nintendo system isn't a potato and it can contribute to FF sales in future as well, in addition to PC releases. If this ensures the long term health for SE and franchises than like FF and KH then I'm all for it.

NotoriousWhiz4d ago

Adding Nintendo and PC customers is the best way to increase sales and long term success. Not going to get that from Xbox.

shinoff21834d ago

Hopefully square brings all the lose switch exclusives over to.

Hofstaderman4d ago

Will there be a XBOX for Square to release games on? Or a MS Games service?

thesoftware7304d ago

Hof,

You must not have heard they are launching new hardware and have already committed to a Next-Gen Xbox.

But, for some reason, I think you already knew that and wanted to spin a silly narrative; besides, why wouldn't they release games on the SX/SS? You do know these consoles will still be here, right?

Hofstaderman4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Optics. They have a STATED plan to do so. Thats not commitment. The shareholders and board are calling the shots now. Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already. Investment in hardware, R and D and marketing is how much again? That cost with the history of their hardware performance....at most maybe a handheld. What I am certain of XBOX is finished, the writing has been on the wall before the studio closures. Its MS Games and they are not hardware. They are software because MS is a software company. Expect them to be folded in the Surface team.

DarXyde4d ago

*hardware

I believe they committed to hardware.

I hate to nitpick, but that's kind of the company they are. You have to.

4d ago
Michiel19893d ago

@hofstaderman the board and shareholders have always called the shots or had a huge impact on decisions.

Xbox finished lmao, the writing has been on the wall? mate they just spend 70 BILLION dollars, and you see the writing is on the wall that they're done. 0 idea what you're talking about. They grafiti'd on the wall and you still can't see it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Aloymetal4d ago

No to both, not worth the effort, money and time on an already dying brand.

4d ago
thesoftware7304d ago

"They have a STATED plan to do so. That's not commitment."

Huh? What are you talking about? They announced they would be unveiling new Hardware this holiday season; how else are they supposed to commit to it?

" Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already"

What a silly statement, you think this deal was approved so they could make 80 billion in less than a year? This is a long-term commitment, a future-proofing of profit.

"What I am certain of XBOX is finished,"

No, you are not certain of this lol; as you stated, if they make even a Handheld in the form of a Steam-Deck that can dock to a TV/monitor, wouldn't that be just changing the form factor but still XBOX?

Closing these studios has really got you guys delusional; that is what happens in companies, in a changing market: you acquire, and you trim; like it or not, that is the way things are done. Lets look.

Where is the new Psygnosis with a new wipeout?
What happened to Japan Studio? Pixl Opus? London Studio?
Where is Zipper Interactive?

I can list more, but you see, closing devs doesn't mean your company is finished, especially when you have like 30+ dev teams.

Extermin8or3_4d ago

They won't be unveiling the hardware this holiday season it will be like the series x and s they got a tease at the game awards 2018. But no details until year of their release in 2020 lol

Relientk774d ago

Please tell me the Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake is still coming. I feel like I've been waiting forever for that game.

gold_drake4d ago

i think the juggernauts kingdom hearts (disney provides the money for that one) final fantasy and dragon quest are fine, the rest not as much

Michiel19893d ago

I'm kinda worried about the future of DQ though, Toriyama and the composer both passed away. Huge blow to the franchise.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

@Michiel1989,
Akira Toriyama had an understudy though, he emulates his style, so maybe he'll do the art for Dragon Quest games, I would love to see Nobue Uematsu do music for the series though, that could be fun if they could convince him.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

I'll be so p*ssed if that doesn't go ahead, also, where's DQ12 at? They've been silent on that for so long, and it was announced years ago.

@gold_Drake,
I'm pretty sure they can siphon some profit from A Realm Reborn to keep FF and Dragon Quest going too. I think the company would have gone bankrupt if it wasn't for that cash cow.

gold_drake3d ago

14 is definitely brings in the a consistant cashflow

Charal4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Another sign that dedicated consoles market is in trouble, while PC seems more and more attractive to big publishers.

Having a good gaming PC and a PS5 myself, given current trend form both Sony and MS I am less and less playing on PS5, waiting for exclusives to release on PC, so I understand the logic behind the new strategy.

anast4d ago

Post those numbers. Then your comment might make sense.

thesoftware7304d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Ants,

I get that we don't know exactly without numbers, but come on, man, we can clearly see what's happening.

The console market has not grown much, the highest-selling console in history is still the PS2. You can play the " prove it" game all you want, but Sony's more aggressive PC push, SE completely rebooting their company/business, after being mainly exclusive to one console and showing a sizeable profit loss is telling.

PC is a high seller, and your doubtful PS5 dominant stance does not change the clear writing on the wall, straight from Sony's mouth, that they need to be, and will be more aggressive in the very lucrative PC market.

So, in other words, PC market is indeed looking more and more attractive to Pubs.

anast4d ago

@730

Numbers?

I'm willing to bet the farm that ¨PC gamers are not the dominate number compared to console, but I don't know because I don't have numbers. However, the price point of entry can allow us to infer what I had just stated.

anast4d ago

I don't click on links on forums. Tell me why that .com source is legit.

Tacoboto3d ago

What an ironic thing to say on a link-agreggate site like N4G. Explains your comment history perfectly.

Michiel19893d ago

asks for numbers. receives numbers and then continues to say I don't wanna click a website (because it might shatter my illusion)

anast3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

@All the people with that good 'ol folk wisdom

It's ironic how I clearly asked for the site and people still can't even answer this simple question.

Tell me how many people click on random links on forums?

Tell me the site and I will look. I don't mind being wrong and I'm barely intelligent enough to change my mind with something substantial.

All the numbers I have seen is that PC doesn't even come close console gaming in revenue, and nothing touches mobile gaming. More people touching something doesn't mean anything. It just means more people own PC for work and touch Steam every now and again, those numbers mean even less.

Charal3d ago

Anast I wasn’t expecting more from you and I haven’t be disappointed.

Don’t believe any number if you want, but things cannot be more evident that most of games companies are pushing to get the most they can from PC market.

Hell, we have both MS and Sony that are releasing their biggest franchise on PC with no or less and less delay vs console release, that is never seen before in the industry.

What is surprising me is that PC is not cheap in term of hardware cost, a rig close to PS5/XBX perfs may be close to double the price I guess, and close to 4x for a good gaming PC.
Plus, PC gaming does not have physical release anymore.

So a lot of supposed advantages from console market are not there but PC market is successful anyway, it would be very interesting to understand it.
Maybe one big argument is that we are more likely to need a PC at home, were we can work with, browse, and game, than a dedicated gaming machine. That why handled console market have been crushed by smartphones, we could see a repeating pattern here.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
Babadook73d ago

From what I can ascertain PC is a smaller market than PS. There are occasionally times when PC looks to be stronger but overall it's still behind.

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

PC also has a lot more competition, especially when people can easily buy and play older games from 20 or so years ago on it.

anast1d 7h ago

PC has the potential to be a bigger player, but the market is smaller in terms of revenue nonetheless. People conflate sign up numbers with money spent on a product.

anast3d ago

You probably need to worry about yourself and your own expectations.

You still haven't even complete the simplest task in telling me the name of the website. Let that sink in. I asked for the name of the website so I can look at it and you couldn't even complete that task.

Show all comments (112)