Approvals 10/3 ▼
Nitrowolf2 (2) - 4673d ago Cancel
DeathsAmbition (1) - 4673d ago Cancel
Rrobba (2) - 4673d ago Cancel
buckley (2) - 4673d ago Cancel
Emilio_Estevez (2) - 4673d ago Cancel
vglulz (1) - 4673d ago Cancel
300°

Why Are Films of Games So Awful?

Doom, Final Fantasy, Alone in the Dark, any BloodRayne film, hell, even Tomb Raider. The gaming world has traditionally got a rough deal from Hollywood, with very few games managing to make the transition to silver screen without mysteriously turning to crap. Of course, films rarely fare better in blatant marketing cash-ins. How often have you seen the same basic, uninspired platformers stamped with the face of whatever money/wallet separation tool is being shoved into kids’ faces this month?

Read Full Story >>
buttoncombo.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4673d ago
CrimsonEngage4673d ago

Because you have crap actors and stray away from the story of the game. I understand Movies are only 2 hours long where as games are anywhere from 6 to 100 but you could split the movie into parts ala LOTR.

ashbc4673d ago

There are other reasons aswell. Prince of Persia was on ok film, but it wasted an actor of the talent of Ben Kingsley in a small role. There is more to this than crap actors. Poor director for one.

bruddahmanmatt4673d ago

Because they do not take the source material seriously, THAT'S WHY.

Video games are often frowned upon as being inferior to the likes of books, plays or other mediums used as the basis for films. When you have what many believe to be sub-par source material, there's really only one direction you can go in if you're the studio, that of big summer blockbuster which often means weak scripts, mediocre acting and huge explosions in an attempt to pander to the masses.

Perhaps one day we'll see a major studio take a story from the video game world seriously, but until that happens, don't expect any huge changes.

kneon4673d ago

I think another reason is that movie studios still think their target audience for such films are 12 year old boys. That's not a demographic that is noted for their discerning taste so they often barely even try. As long as the movie has the right name they expect people will go and see it.

Anderson84673d ago

because the directors are never fans of or play the games they adapt...

Prototype4673d ago (Edited 4673d ago )

My biggest reason is they don't ask the fans for suggestions to consider; or they don't have directors/producers who are fans of a series to actually make a good movie - it's all Hollywood-ish and that's it. Some games you really can't make a movie unless its a "what-if" situation, or a back story, or a "this is an after story" setting.

A big example of a fan is The Dark Knight (I know its off a comic but still); that's made by a Batman fan who listened to the audience.

The only actual real good Game movie I've seen was the First Mortal Kombat.

Jacobite4673d ago

I know some folk like the Resident Evil films but I felt they were disappointing I would have them stick to the story in the games more from the Mansion to Racoon city using Leon ,Chris, Barry, Webster and Clair in the main story in the films.

billyboi1224673d ago

I enjoy the Resident Evil movies. I know they're kinda crappy but still tolerable. I like the idea of using the game plots though and expanding on what's there.

WhiteLightning4673d ago

Bad casting as well

Wentworth Miller as Chris......oh boy ¬¬

dinkeldinkse4673d ago

I should slap myself for saying that.

The RE movies aren't bad movies, but are horrible RE movies. They borrow random shit from the games that don't make any sense(The Executioner in RE5, enemies from RE5)and ignore the rest.

I like the RE movies, but I understand why others don't.

Pozzle4673d ago

I think Wentworth Miller could have been an ok Chris if he had better direction. I feel the same way about Ali Larter as Claire. She could have been good...if she had been directed better.

Sadly, the actual game characters are never given much personality in the films because then they might *gasp* be more interesting than Milla Jovovich's character. And Paul Anderson wouldn't like that.

vglulz4673d ago

I've never seen a really good videogame movie. Someone will do it eventually.

Bioshock would translate very well into movie form if it was handled well.

FAGOL4673d ago

Christopher Nolan "Would you kindly" make a Bioshock movie? But it has to be done right. The game itself was a masterpiece.

house4673d ago

everything Christopher Nolan touches turns to gold, with that said i think the reason why they dont work is because it doesn't make sense to make a movie based on a video game its like making a novelization of movie

WhiteLightning4673d ago (Edited 4673d ago )

They don't stick to the source material.

I have a funny feeling if someone copied and pasted most of the story to the film it would do better then a video game film that changes the entire story.

I mean of course the problem with copying and pasting is that fans of the game would know what is going to happen next but I'd rather know what happens next and enjoy the film rather then see a video game I love ruined.

Look at Uncharted for example would you rather have, at the time, David O Russels story or have a game following the Drakes Fortune plot very closely where, even though we know what's going to happen and what they are going to roughly say, enjoy the film. The best thing I like about DOOM was the fps scene and even though RE Afterlife was crap I liked the way Chris and Claires fight resembled the fight between Chris and Sheva against Wesker in RE5

For once Hollywood should try and change tatics, if changing the story dosen't work then stick closely to it.

ashbc4673d ago

I think that most gamers that watch a game film like to see how the movie directed has gone about doing certain key scenes more than anything. It's not about knowing the story its about seeing how the movie has translated the story from the game to the film.

Baka-akaB4673d ago (Edited 4673d ago )

Even if you stick to the material , when the original material is already an imitation and plyable patchwork of established movies , it's doomed .

And some games genre just can't be translated well on screen .

All of the silliness from RE movies would actually serve something like a DMC movie instead .

billyboi1224673d ago

Prince of Persia was sub-par. But still, better than most of the other crap out there.

Show all comments (47)
60°

The importance of audio: How music makes games better

How do composers make the iconic music tracks from games that we love? And just what makes them so memorable?

Read Full Story >>
gamespew.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community50d ago
purple10116d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Twitter is blowing up right now

All games coming to PlayStation
Next Xbox will have steam
Next Xbox niche and only for “gamers who want it” (it’s a really powerful pc or a steam deck type portable, or both)

16d ago
60°
8.5

Tomb Raider I, II, III Remastered Review – To The Freezer ⏐ Nerdy Bird Games

Tomb Raider I, II, III Remastered is available now on PC, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X/S. Lara Croft is back in a classic remaster of the original PlayStation 1 hit title. Is the remaster any good though?

Read Full Story >>
nerdybirdgames.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community82d ago
220°

The Best Tomb Raider Games Ranked

We've gone on many adventures with Lara Croft. With another reboot in the making, Wealth of Geeks felt it was a good time to go down the nostalgia rabbit hole and remember the best of those tomb-raiding thrills.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community84d ago
Changed: title
Sonic188184d ago (Edited 84d ago )

I do agree that Tomb Raider Angel of Darkness was the worse one 😂 I remember playing some of it and I took it back. That game was just awful in every way. I bought it used at gamestop and glad they had that 7 day return policy for used games 😂

Pyrofire9584d ago

Would it be worth saying why?

ZeekQuattro84d ago

Simple. He's been hating on the Tomb Raider reboots for years. I can't imagine seeing them at the top of a best TR game list let alone being on the list in general sitting well with him because of it.

-Foxtrot84d ago

Zeek

“Hating”

No no, just pointing out how TR mutated into a generic action adventure game losing the appeal of what it once was when it was more about puzzles and platforming over going Rambo, slaughtering waves of enemies

But hey, continue being a dick and speaking about me like I’m not going to see the comment.

MeatyUrologist83d ago

Foxtrot, I'm curious if you have played the most recent games. Sure the 2013 reboot was hugely focused on combat, but each follow up became less and less about combat to the point where outside of a few large scale story missions I don't even remember combat being a part of shadow of the tomb raider. Shadow was so puzzle focused it actually was a bit much for me and I love the TR puzzles.

I still feel like Rise was the best of the series and I was a huge fan of the originals. To me it struck the perfect balance of exploration, platforming, puzzles, and combat. Not saying your opinion is wrong I'm just curious what you think they should have done different. Games do need to evolve somewhat to stay relevant. Would you prefer small linear jumping platform levels like the original?

RavenWolfx84d ago

I would agree Rise for 1 and the reboot as 2. Shadow is a bit high, though.

Sonic188184d ago (Edited 84d ago )

I think Shadow wasn't even develop by crystal dynamics. I thought it was the worse in the new trilogy

Pyrofire9584d ago

That's right. Shadow was developed by Eidos Montreal who who went and made Marvels Guardians of the Galaxy next. (Great game)
Meanwhile after Rise of the Tomb Raider, Crystal Dynamics made Marvels Avengers. (bad game)

MeatyUrologist84d ago

Agrees. First two are correct but Shadow should be around 5-6.

terstomp84d ago

For me, Legend should be alot higher (along with the other two ). Shadow, I enjoyed it, but has too much has fluff, as modern games tend to do. Playing the remastered series, and apart from the controls, is very good.

jznrpg84d ago

I really enjoyed the first 2 games, Legend and the first of the reboots and the rest I didn’t get into so I never finished.

robtion84d ago

Completely subjective list. I really liked Underworld, I preferred Lara's design. That said I loved the horror/uncharted feel of the reboot. I think all the TR games have strengths and weaknesses. None are objectively better in every way.

Show all comments (17)