280°

The God Of War Collection Is Coming To PlayStation Store

Via the EU PSB, "I’m pleased to confirm that the God of War Collection (God of War I & 2), previously released on Blu-ray Disc earlier this year, will be available to download from PlayStation Store on 3 November."

Read Full Story >>
blog.eu.playstation.com
vhero4950d ago (Edited 4950d ago )

We need more full PS3 games on PSN but this is RRP when released which is madness as the blu-ray version is cheaper! How they expect it to sell? It's like PSP-Go all over again.

-Alpha4950d ago (Edited 4950d ago )

It makes no sense considering they have the HD remastering on disc.

Why not offer PS2 games that aren't released yet? I'd like to see Dragon Quest IX, etc. I haven't played those games yet.

Better yet, give us Backwards compatibility back :P

himdeel4950d ago

...bringing new games not currently on disc to PSN. Even while more options for a particular game is good, more options for more games is even better.

supremacy4950d ago

Business wise you and I both know sony isnt going to bring back bc.

Besides I would like for sony to use this as an incentive to initiate a ps2classic section on the store based on remastered ps2 games with trophies,3D and even move support if possible.

What would be even cooler to me if it were to be more like an app of its own like netflix, where you go in and they have this huge library of remastered ps2 games available. Heck they could even do this with dreamcast and psone classics, but then again thinking about it doing something like this would defeat the purpose of having the playstation store iguess.

darthv724950d ago

I agree on the ps2 games on psn. I originally thought sony would go that direction and throw in remastering and online/trophy support as well.

Games that sony wants to give the hd treatment can be done at their leisure and released on psn for at or below retail due to no packaging to incur costs.

bananlol4950d ago

Backwards compability suck, have you tried playing a xbox or ps2 game on a hd tv? It looks horrendous to say at least. Id rather play them on a fat tv as they were intended to be played. But i threw the fat fucker away so what do i do? Well fo once i could buy excellent remakes of excellent titles i never got around playing last gen, like the gow or sly collection. Or i get to replay my favorite game ever with the ico collection, remastered in hd and 60 hz.

Why do people assume that everyone that ever would want to play got the chance to when the game was avalible? That beeing said bc is still good to have, but for me bc<<remakes even if i have to pay a price to get them.

And besides that i never got the chance to support team icos games by not bying them second hand, which sux.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4950d ago
deadreckoning6664950d ago (Edited 4950d ago )

"Better yet, give us Backwards compatibility back :P"

Unfortunately that'll never happen. Sony isn't gunna miss out on the sales of HD remakes. Heck, for all we know, thats the reason they removed backwards compatibility in the first place. Doesn't affect me though..my 60gb is still going strong :)

bananlol4950d ago

Suppose you got the ntsc 60 gb, cause the emulation in the pal one is quite awful.

King-Leonidas4950d ago

i think it was a good move from Sony.

gillri4950d ago

MGS : PW and GOW PSP games please

Ocelot5254950d ago (Edited 4950d ago )

or even better: write a PSP emulator for the PS3 so it supports all the PSP games from the store

can't be that difficult and the return on investment would be great

supremacy4950d ago

Is the beginning of a little thing I would like to call ps2classics.

King-Leonidas4950d ago

hahaha, yeah i was exactly thinking the same thing.

mandf4950d ago

Choices are never a bad thing. Isn't digital download the future?

Stealth20k4950d ago

a future option not the only thing

People like physical

mandf4950d ago

i agree, people flip flop on digital downloads to put down sony or ms.

KillerPwned4950d ago

So we are finally getting some content for GOW3?

Show all comments (28)
150°

Ranking the God of War Games

Kratos has been on a rampage, killing Gods in epic battles since 2005. With each release managing to offer high-octane action, I explore each God of War title and rank every adventure from his journey to Olympus to his Norse tales of fatherhood.

Read Full Story >>
cogconnected.com
ClayRules2012542d ago

I won’t rank Ragnarok just yet, although it is honestly leaving me and my wife blown away…won’t go into details right now, not done as I assume others aren’t either, maybe some of you are, idk haha.

But here’s how I rank them

5. God of War 3
4. God of War Ascension.
3. God of War 1.
2. God of War 2.
1. God of War 2018.

MrNinosan542d ago

My same ranking exactly, with Ragnarök at #1.

ClayRules2012541d ago

Wow, that’s pretty interesting that someone has the same ranking as me haha. So, did you beat Ragnarok? I assume so with you placing it at #1

Flawlessmic542d ago

1. God of war 3
2. God of war 2018
3. God of war 2
4. God of war 1

Haven't played the others but about 30 hrs In to ragnarock now so safe to say if it keeps up it will end up being at the top of my list when I'm done.

CrimsonWing69542d ago

I will say the pacing of the original titles and the epic feel to them I feel is way better than the new one’s. Like, I could recognize and appreciate the praise God of War received, but it bores me to tears except for the pivotal moments.

However, that being said I feel Ragnarok is waaaaay better than 2018. I’m only on Ch. 6, but it’s pretty much rocked my face off from the get-go.

I’m really split between this being my GotY or Elden Ring.

robtion542d ago

I think different games in the series had different strengths but all are great. I liked the original as it was an origin story and the mechanics were fresh. The sequel added smoother gameplay. Three was just so far ahead of it's time graphically it wasn't even funny. Plus great gameplay and bosses and insane gore and nice use of sexy time. The reboot was cool but lost a lot of what I liked about the original trilogy (I don't need my games grown up, just fun). Will wait and see with ragnarok as haven't had time to play it yet.

220°

GameStop Launches Four Pre-Owned Games For $20 Sale

Daily Video Game writes: "GameStop has just kicked off a new pre-owned game sale with a massive list of games that offers four pre-owned ($9.99 or less) games for $20 across multiple gaming platforms, including PS3 and Xbox 360 right now for a limited time!"

Read Full Story >>
dailyvideogame.com
170°

A Look at How Well the Vita Works as a Portable PS3

VGChartz's Adam Cartwright: "As the Vita provides a brilliant portable legacy experience for Sony’s other two home consoles (PS1 and PS2), I decided to focus this article on the next in line – the PlayStation 3. Unlike its predecessors, the PS3 far outpaces Vita in terms of power, on top of being built on an extremely unique architecture which meant porting between the two wasn’t as straightforward as it could have been. Still, thanks to engine compatibility and some brilliant efforts from developers, the two consoles shared numerous pieces of software and, where this wasn’t possible, others sought to provide bespoke experiences instead. Altogether this means that the Vita does a pretty good job at providing a portable PS3 experience."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
FallenAngel19842026d ago

“Sony may have advertised Vita as ‘console quality on the go’, which irritated many buyers due to games with reduced framerates and graphical elements being released“

Why would some people complain about that then but praise the Switch now for doing the same thing?

“The PS3 might not be remembered as Sony’s finest hour in gaming”

I and many others see PS3 as Sony’s best console

Neonridr2026d ago (Edited 2026d ago )

The Switch still offers the same game though. Sure in docked mode the game may have run at a higher resolution or framerate, but the game was still the same in terms of content. Most Vita games were altered from any console equivalents (unless they were smaller indie titles). Look at Call of Duty for example, which made a horrible transition and this was a game that they bundled with the Vita and tried to promote. That's not to say there weren't some great titles on Vita though. Killzone and Uncharted were great and closely mirrored the console games while offering a new story.

Razmiran2025d ago

I remember the early fps hype on the vita was murdered after a few botch jobs (Borderlands, Call of duty, Resistance) which helped put some nails on the "Portable triple A" coffin
Killzone Mercenary was awesome tho

EddieNX 2025d ago

The Switch is doing a much better job of delivering on that premise perhaps?

InKnight7s2025d ago

Because Switch is much larger device + a gen years later device, and despite of that the gap isn't that much.

Bruh2025d ago

The PS3 was the most revolutionary console of its time, Blu Ray, built in WiFi, bluetooth for its accessories, the Cell

It was a multi-media powerhouse

SierraGuy2025d ago

Same ... anyone who disagrees is confused.

@neon...you bring up COD at least that game made it to Vita. We still have yet to see it on Switch I might remind you.

When developers are asked if COD would make it to Switch...they laugh... because it's funny.

Neonridr2025d ago

but look at Doom and Wolfenstein 2 for example. Those games are identical. Sure some sacrifices to resolution or framerate had to be made, but it's still the same game. That was my point. No larger studio games made the transition over to the Vita and remained the same, they were usually stripped down versions much like Wii versions of games compared to the 360/PS3 at the time.

Razmiran2024d ago

That pitiful CoD game on vita was pure trash, you cant even use it as an "At least"

TekoIie2025d ago (Edited 2025d ago )

"Why would some people complain about that then but praise the Switch now for doing the same thing?"

Because the Vita never delivered whereas the Switch delivered day 1. BotW was easily big budget AAA console quality and seeing as it won GOTY it's clear that it succeeded. If we look back at the Vitas initial games from Sony like Uncharted they felt like discount versions of the prior releases in the franchise. BotW stands alongside the top releases in it's franchise. There's a clear difference there.

The Switch is doing the same thing but succeeding. That's why it gets a pass. There were a few gems on the Vita but they were so few and far between that they couldn't be impactful and help the system grow.

TekoIie2024d ago (Edited 2024d ago )

@protagonist

Then refute what I wrote. List all the games that are comparable to a big budget AAA game that would release on the PS3 and how they helped the Vita sell.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2024d ago
WhyWai882025d ago

I heard comment that the unused port on Vita was originally planned for Vita TV function.
But Sony decided to take it out and release a separated failed Vita TV...

Aww... Vita could have been the Switch, but Sony got greedy and worried Vita will capitalize on PS4 market...