FileFront writes: "Fallout. The very name conjures to mind images of an irradiated wasteland rife with mutants, profiteers, slavers, and refugees. Bethesda received both praise and scorn for their take on the universe in Fallout 3, and I have faith that things will be much the same for Obsidian’s entry into the series, Fallout: New Vegas. So, is New Vegas a worthy successor to Bethesda’s epic tale?"
Pros:
* Outstanding overall game experience
* Multiple companions
* Solid narrative and story
* Wild Wasteland Perk
* New perks are fun and useful
Cons:
* Dated graphics
* Pathing and collision issues
* Horrific loading times
BLG writes, "Some of the most popular games have had a rough start, with some of them being downright unplayable.
Despite that, developers have managed to turn it around for them and make their game worth playing. Here are some games that had a rough start but were pretty great."
Sea of Thieves... I'm not disagreeing that the game has improved in terms of content. But I feel that the most significant change between now and its release is actually the public perception. Nowadays, most people are aware that the game is a multiplayer PvP-focused experience first and foremost, and not "Black Flag made by Rare". Consequently, people dismissing the whole experience because the single-player aspect is lacking or the story is plain are much less common.
Days gone! By the end of the game I couldn't drop it down! I went around so many hours killing zombies! It was addictive by the end.
The Fallout Anthology Edition is coming to PC very soon, and is packaged with some very S.P.E.C.I.A.L. bonuses.
It’s an awful downgrade to the last one they did
They included physical disc back then
I would love the classic fallout games on console. Closest I could find was atom rpg, I liked that one a lot
Getting free games is never a bad thing and Amazon Luna has new offerings for Fallout fans looking for free adventures in the Wasteland.
So they highly recommend the perk but say DO NOT use it if you're a serious Fallout player? Little bit of a contradiction.
Horrific Load times, they must be playing with the PS3 version! ;) Kidding
Someone on Neogaf did say the load times on his 360 version were bad. Up to 20 seconds at a time while you are playing. But that's not a issue for me, I can put up with that for such a wide open game.
So the game had horrifc load time, game crashing bugs, yet it gets a 91?