CVG: But Microsoft was best fit for Codename: Kingdoms, says studio
MovieStinger: "Microsoft started their media briefing off strong today showcasing titles like Modern Warfare 3 and Gears of War 3, there was even a new look at last year’s Codename: Kingdoms, now renamed Ryse, which will run on the powerful Crytek engine (Crysis) and use Kinect’s motion technology. Unfortunately, like the Miami Heat in Game 2 of the NBA Finals, Microsoft’s briefing quickly started to fall apart towards the end. That is, until they debuted Halo 4..."
TechNoid writes: "Microsoft accidentally leaked their E3 line-up, which features the mysterious Ryse. But wait, wasn't Ryse registered by Crytek?"
I think it's already over stayed it's welcome. It can disappear again and never surface again for all I care.
It looked good, but it was too short, and didn't it look like another rail game? I was hoping that it would use kinect to a minimum.
Waste of an 'excusivity contract' with a big name dev if you ask me. Expected so much more from this.
GameDynamo - "The Electronic Entertainment Expo is a show on par with some of the most sought after trade shows in America, showing us all how far video games have come in the last decade. One of the heavy hitters in the show is, of course, Microsoft. It might seem as if there isn't a whole lot in store from the software giant other than Kinect games, but we've been surprised before, so we might be surprised again. So far, there are a few confirmed and rumored titles we've gathered from various sources that Microsoft followers should keep on the radar."
I'm hoping for new exclusives and IPs, but I fear most of their offerings will be Kinect shovelware. ¬_¬
CVG: But Microsoft is the one paying us, says studio.
No they won't, what a bunch of lip service. They need to maximize their profits. hence why Crysis 2 is being made for 360 and PS3 along with the PC version. Stop blowing smoke EA/Crytek.
"We bloody bet they did. That trailer - as if you needed reminding - looks ace." - actually it looks lame - it some live action nonsense with lame speach.
Since no one reads articles, I'll give a summary.
Crytek: We wanted to work with MS, so we are. We also think Sony and Nintendo and great companies. If thinks work out in the future, we would definitely love to work with Sony. Kingdoms was just a good fit for MS.
My only question is what makes Kingdoms such a good fit? Or was it just because MS has be "courting" Crytek for longer?