280°

3xG: How The PS3 Tables Have Turned

3xg says: "It was no secret that when Sony launched their PS3 it was over priced and lacked features.

The console was ridiculed by the press and gamers alike for good reason and it cost Sony dearly. Fast forward to 2010 and the landscape has completely changed, the original underdog of this generation fast becoming the top dog."

Quagmire5070d ago

It's a fine day to be owning a PS3.

nix5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

yup.. it's paying off huge! great AAA exclusive games to play all thru the year!!!

i laugh at the haters!

EDIT:

"For those that want the punch line (I’m looking at you N4G peeps), the main difference between now and back in 2006 are:

* Wealth of games on offer
* Free and premium services that enrich the experience
* Strong ties with big companies
* Innovation and Collaboration
* Influential marketing and good sales
* Powerful technology only now being effectively utilised"

Conloles5070d ago

The exclusives arent paying off if your going off of sales.

Corepred45070d ago

what kind of idiot goes off sales? does anybody here own stock? i buy the games i want so i can have fun. lmao conloles you nerd, lmao. go play wow.

8800gtx5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

@Nix

I might be old and called ancient now a days. 100usd gpus make me look obselete. Equip me with any dual core cpu and i will handily stream roll whatever my predecessor the RSX + CELL can put out.

8800gtx.

rockleex5070d ago

Yea right. The 60GB PS3 has the MOST features any console had ever seen.

It was also underpriced by $200-$300. Sony was losing a lot of money on each PS3 sold.

That's the facts.

Now you can give us your opinion on whether you find enough value in the old PS3 to buy it at $599, but its just that... an opinion.

MorganX5070d ago

That's all nice and all. But don't forget, PS3 had the PlayStation brand behind it. The price drop is the biggest thing IMO.

The games are great too. But nothing trumps price. Just ask Nintendo.

rockleex5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

There's a difference between costing a lot, and being overpriced.

sikbeta5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

"It was no secret that when Sony launched their PS3 it was over priced and lacked features"

Sorry, but the Best Models are The Fat Models, with more stuff than the Slim Models, the PS3 Fat with BC have 10 years of Gaming Library since Day One...

Now the PS3, no matter What Model, it's the Best Console out there, it gives you more for you money, have loads of Features, Exclusives are Awesome and Sony keep adding more features and making more Awesome Games, you can't hate a Console that Support you the Best way possible...

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5070d ago
Raf1k15070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

I'd say it was expensive not overpriced

He says it was overpriced and lacked features when it actually had pretty much all the features it has now plus BC which was removed and I don't think it was overpriced. It was certainly expensive though.

The reason I say that is because it had a whole lot of very expensive tech that cost more than it was being sold for. BluRay players at the time were at least another £400 above the cost of the PS3 which could do so much more. It would have been overpriced if it was like an iPhone in that you don't get much for your money. The reason I didn't buy it until a year ago was because it was expensive as a games console.

5070d ago
Spenok5069d ago

Its been a fine day since day one xD

ThanatosDMC5069d ago (Edited 5069d ago )

Lacked features? There were a ton of features no other console on the market could do. Then even more after the months went by with firmware updates. Oh well, it's his opinion.

But yeah, i do agree with the article at his core points. The $600+ i bought my fatty with was well worth it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5069d ago
Substance1015070d ago

Its still a loss making project for Sony. Infact for the last two years the gaming division has been pulling the entire company into losses.

WildArmed5070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

aww..
and u really care about sony's financial situation i bet.

quite frankly, I could careless.

I'm still getting the best out of my Ps3 with it's amazing games, internet browser, etc.

NJShadow5070d ago

Actually, they WERE losing on each console sold until a short time after the PS3 Slim was released along with the price cut. NOW they are making a profit on each console, albeit very little ATM.

Substance1015070d ago (Edited 5070d ago )

check the financials report. Last year alone was at 850+million usd loss. Which led the company o make a overall net loss of 450million usd, thats more money then most people will be making in alife time.

NJShadow5070d ago

No kidding. The price cut and Slim released happened in early September, I don't think a mere 3 months is enough to put Sony in the black. Obviously they still had a year's worth of losses to make up for.

mattygamefreak5070d ago

What's that? Sony is the only company that cares about their customers enough to lose millions of dollars and still provide the best gaming and media solution to date? Yeh, that's what I thought.

4D5070d ago

Sony didn't make the PS3 because they cared about their loyal customers. Especially at the $600.00 USD launch price point. Bottom line is they used the PS3 as a trojan horse for Blu-Ray. So congrats to them for winning the high definition medium war against HD-DVD.

I seriously hope that you were just acting like a fanboy and you dont actually believe that Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo actually care about any of us. They may care about getting our money but that is where the buck stops. Pun intended...

thief5070d ago

Why should we, as gamers, want gaming companies to make huge profits? Why should we favour Nintendo, selling a last-gen machine for $249, over Sony selling a $299 console that has infinitely greater processing and graphics card power, next-gen disc drive, hard disc, much better online, and supports a larger number of in-house studios which create new IPs?

And this might be an issue if Sony were making such huge losses that they would need to close down PS. In fact, for what they have lost in the past, their cash flows in the next few years look fantastic. There is enough demand for Sony to keep selling at $299, while their costs after moving to slim and 40nm may be close or lower – and that’s before accounting for profits on game sales on 30-40m consoles.

INehalemEXI5070d ago

That happens everytime a new hardware is launched. They make an investment to make money over a decade.

Same thing happened with PS2 in its early years, but over a 10+ year life cycle PS2 eventually brought in mad dough.

Newtype5070d ago

Since PS2 did so well, they could take the loss the PS3 did.

Substance1015070d ago

Check the records, PS2 was profitable in its 2nd year after launch. Infact PS2 was doing so well while the rest of the company was struggling due to intense competition in the other electronic markets.

PS3 in its 4th year is causing the entire company to run in losses.

IMChampion5070d ago

Don't really get why you car how their financials are, from my perspective its all about the games and they have been delivering. I guess you just need to tell yourself that they are still loosing some "war" thats going on in your and many fanboys out there head to feel better about only owning one console.

aaronisbla5070d ago

thats the post of a butthurt person

Newtype5070d ago

All consoles are at a loss, the only company that didn't lose sales for selling their console was Nintendo.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5070d ago
supremacy5070d ago

matter Sony makes its profits through its games, plus the latest batch of slims that came out sporting smaller chip cells and rsx have the ps3slim going even, so no longer is Sony losing money on ps3s.

This is why they had the shortage earlier this year around the god of war 3 launch, because they wanted this new model out there instead. http://www.techspot.com/new...

Plus with all the exclusives coming out they will make their money back if not more than what they spend making said games.

Another thing to note is, both the new 360 and ps3 slim are at the same price this alone makes the ps3slim (with bluray) more attractive while keeping Sony profitable.

Not to mention that at the same time they still got the ps2 system out there making them profitability as well. Sony only spends about 54 on each ps2 made and they sell them things for double the price of that so...yeah Sony is good my friend.

supremacy5070d ago

"The exclusives arent paying off if your going off of sales."

its funny but all Sony has to sell with each of its games is about 2 million and they generate profit suitable enough anything after this point is consider surplus in their check books. besides ps3 games tend to sell in a longer periodic time frame, with the exception of god of war which by the way was the only game in all platforms to break a mill within a weeks time in the month of march.

Show all comments (42)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers16d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken16d ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g16d ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing16d ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H916d ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola16d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66916d ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle16d ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg17d ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos17d ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola16d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies37d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken37d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga37d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken37d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6437d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long37d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197236d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic36d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
DivineHand12537d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91337d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer37d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91336d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit36d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
Christopher37d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6936d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit36d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher37d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken37d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197236d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic36d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2337d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218337d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder37d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts37d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)