Approvals 10/3 ▼
MattyF (3) - 5080d ago Cancel
NegativeCreepWA (1) - 5080d ago Cancel
MightyMark427 (3) - 5080d ago Cancel
borisfett (2) - 5080d ago Cancel
9002xgn (1) - 5080d ago Cancel
390°

Square Enix "still talking with Microsoft" on FF14 for 360

The Producer of Final Fantasy XIV has told RPG Site that his development team and the company are still in talks with Microsoft regarding bringing the Square Enix MMO to the Xbox 360.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community5080d ago
NegativeCreepWA5080d ago

I think there's something a lot mmo devs are not saying about MSs Live polices for mmos. Which is strange since FFXI and PSU have are already on the 360.

We keep hearing the same thing from every one that's making or has tried to make an mmo for the 360.

AP5080d ago

I think at the start of the gen MS were a lot more desperate for content. Now they're not so much, so they're forcing devs to play by their ridiculous, OTT rules...

ShinMaster5080d ago

If they're already in talks, that almost means it's happening.
Microsoft's got the money and SquareEnix will take.

The only thing in the way is MS's dumb closed ended XBL policies.

zag5080d ago

It won't happen look at APB it was slated for everything then they dropped the PS3 now have dropped the PC and now it been in dev for the last year or 2 and still has no release date.

I reckon it's canned they just don't want to say it.

blitz06235080d ago

don't really care if it's on 360. MMOs are usually better on PC so if I can run it then I'm getting the PC version

JAMurida5080d ago

I personally want to see FFXIV on 360 as well, since it' an MMO and the more people who can play it the better. Though, I don't want to see FFXIII Versus go on 360, but that's another topic...

No Way5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

Uh, I think APB was at E3.. I'm pretty sure.
And, I'm pretty sure it's only on PC, no x360.

Though, I think they jus put off the x360 version.
I believe they are working on it after the PC release.

PiTCHBLaCK5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

You my friend are very wrong, I'm beta testing APB on the PC right now, so you are wrong.

Just the download of the client takes a very long time, so I stopped the download, I'll wait until I have more time to do it.

Eamon5080d ago

Ahh who cares about this MMO. I was never going to play it anyway.

More interested in FFvs13

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5080d ago
Donny5080d ago ShowReplies(7)
Philaroni5080d ago

It is more that you can't disk swap in an MMO. PC it works because you have to install all the data on your HDD. I think it is more of a hardware limitation that Square and MS are trying to overcome.

maxcer5080d ago

lol, you should research shit before you plan to discuss it. FFXI required you to install the game to the 360HDD to play it. it said this clearly on the game packaging; "Hdd Required to play". the only reason the disc was needed for play was to stream the sound track.

Philaroni5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

@maxcer

I played FF11 on the PS2 so I did not know that was the case, no need to be so aggressive about it. Even still I'd expect FF14 to be much larger in size so my point could still be valid. The game could very easy be over 20Gs in size which is the size the avg. Xbox owner still has.

+ Bubbles for correcting me.

zag5080d ago

Normal size for MMO's for me is between 8 and 12gig even after the newest updates.

How ever if the dev isn't too crash hot you'll get something like Age of Conan and it'll be around 50gigs before the 1st expansion is even out.

MadMan005080d ago

Most people have 20GB? I'm the only person that I know that has 20 GB Hard Drive, lol. I don't download anything to my Hard Drive I'm gonna upgrade when ever I need to, I still have 11GBs. Though if this comes to 360 I'm gonna upgrade for sure.

maxcer5080d ago

@1.3.2

same deal i think, the requirements might be over 20BG and the only people who will be able to play are the 60GB+ users with a broadband connection.

personally i would get FFXIV on PC anyway for mod support and performance. the only reason i got ffxi for 360 was to play when i was out of town. but i have a capable laptop now so i don't take the 360 on the road anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5080d ago
AP5080d ago

By the way, a fun point - FF14 actually started production as "Project Rapture" - and that was PC/360 only. PS3 version came later, and 360 version was dropped.

Rainstorm815080d ago

Dont expect this title until Fall 2011- early 2012 at the earliest...if this hold true

Kamikaze1355080d ago

It it comes out on the 360, it won't comes out till 2011 for the 360 only. It's only coming to PC and PS3 in Fall 2010. It was already announced at E3 and SE were trying to bring it to the 360 since it was officially announced.

Kamikaze1355080d ago

A while back after Final Fantasy XIV was announced, there were rumors that it was going to the 360 as well. However, SE mentioned that something about their game goes against Microsoft's policies and they had to try to work a way around it in order to release it on the 360. I believe they were trying to work with Microsoft to find a work around.

They said exactly what it was, but I can't remember what it was.

AngryFork5080d ago ShowReplies(5)
EvilBlackCat5080d ago (Edited 5080d ago )

that an mmo in xbox live can easily get people hooked to them thanks to Party Chat feature(WHY? because EVERY GAMER ON LIVE have a mic) and then those xboxlive mmo gamers will start ignoring those other games on xbox 360 and its going to affect the devs really hard and also the other thing is that an xbox live year+1FREEmonth subscription cost $35-$50 NOT REALLY THE BIG PROBLEM HERE.

There is people playing THE OLD FF11 on xbox live HELLO!!!

R6ex5080d ago

SE didn't even release an FFXIII version for Asian Xbox gamers.

I'm not buying another SE game! Liar!

Digitaldude5080d ago

Lol then why do they announce "It will be PS3 exclusive!"
Everything SE says is rubbish, I'm more interested in Versus anyway.

punkpop1015080d ago

Eversince all the other Final Fantasy games jumped to other platforms you ps3 fanboys jumped in the conclusion that god hitted you in the face and you now just want Versus more.Hahahaha ps3 are trols , orcs and who knows what.

Consoldtobots5080d ago

you summed it up Digitaldude, SE has pretty much destroyed their business reputation with these moves. NO agreement with them is binding, NO contract is binding (they can be sued for this) and ultimately only care about getting their software on as many platforms as possible regardless of the sacrifices made for that to happen. They are destroying their own work out of greed. F EM.

8thnightvolley5080d ago

this seems to be the case from most mmo devs its actually MS that stops some titles and services from coming to xboxlive.. i.e

bbc iplayer, ffxiv

way too strict xboxlive policies.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5080d ago
5080d ago Replies(2)
omimasum5080d ago

apart from ff13, all their titles haven't been doing well on the 360. too many stupid moves really fucked up their image this generation

5080d ago Replies(1)
play17boy5080d ago

Yea they're talking to Microsoft because they want to make FF14 for both systems.

XxRoosterxX5080d ago

Tell me more! You must be an industry insider to have such information.

play17boy5080d ago

Lol its funny how your trying to make fun of me by being sarcastic when I was already being sarcastic............FAIL!

happyface5080d ago

lol square betrays sony again :(

Show all comments (114)
140°

Square Enix Is Going Multiplatform; The Layoffs & Its Past Don't Inspire Confidence

After its latest games didn't meet sales targets, Square Enix is going multiplatform but the company's track record isn't convincing.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community20h ago
Scissorman20h ago

Square Enix been multiplatform for decades, a few exclusively-deals doesn't make them any less multiplatform.

fr0sty20h ago

Nor is selling their games on a console with only 25 million install base going to bring their sales to where they hope they will be... Unless they somehow manage to dumb down FF7 trilogy to work on switch, they aren't going to have much luck. They already released it on PC, after all.

anast8h ago

Where are you getting that number?

SegaSaturn66920h ago

It kind of does, giving preference to a certain platform by timed exclusivity. Console ports generally feel superior. Legend of mana PC port extremely broken

neutralgamer199219h ago

Sega

It doesn’t when square themselves didn’t want to fund the development of remake. It’s only after the success of the 1st they realized their mistake but now contract is signed. If it wasn’t for Sony there would be no FF7 remakes. Same goes for silent hill 2 with Konami. They don’t want to fund AAA budget. Companies like PlayStation and Nintendo get blamed when in reality they are saving some of these franchises

Remember sega didn’t want to fund bayonetta and epic games didn’t want to fund another gears of war. It’s easy to blame console makers but they are the ones taking the risk and paying huge upfront costs without seeing the final product. FF7 remake trilogy won’t be coming to Xbox now or in the future. PlayStation and PC is what square signed up for. Sony paid them more than they would make from Xbox sales.

ravens5219h ago

I just wonder when everyone is going to demand that the Square Enix exclusives with Nintendo come to PS and Xbox. Or it's just the PS exclusives that matter lol

phoenixwing19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

I'd love for the nintendo exclusives to come to pc or ps5. They'd actually be playable then.

neutralgamer199219h ago

Raven

Exactly and that’s where square enix does more exclusive than any other platform. Gaming is square has always been very unrealistic with their sales expectations. Remember when tomb raider reboot sold 7.5 million and square said it wasn’t enough. They need to spend less on development and have more realistic expectations from sales.

And those thinking games being not on Xbox makes a difference don’t understand we have a decade plus of data showing square enix games having less than 20% of their multiplatform sales on Xbox (final fantasy series) and Nintendo consoles aren’t strong enough to run any current games. Nintendo switch should be as strong as Xbox one x atleast but we all know that’s most likely won’t happen

RoadRacer18h ago

@raven

thing is, as neutral said in their comm, the switch isn't strong enough to run flagship SE games
i think what SE does is, it makes unique games for switch only so that it has something for that console too. Thats where all the "underlined sans" rpgs go to mostly

maybe things will change when Swtich 2 drops cuz that's gonna be as strong as ps4 afaik from the rumors flying around

TheGamingHounds19h ago

@Scissorman

Your point is valid enough but when the icon of this company is limited to one console in timed-exclusivity, it means the company has crossed the line. By some degree at least

All things aside, Square itself stated "aggressive multiplatform strategies" so we all know what it's talking about

Scissorman16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Then the headline should read "Square To Drop Exclusively Deals in Pursuit of A Sweeping Multiplatform Strategy". I don't recall this argument when Square Enix released Bravely Default, Octopath Traveler, and Triangle Strategy on one platform. And even if FF is the icon, not all of its titles have gone to one platform. We're talking about three games, one of which is already on PC. Did Square suddenly go 'multiplatform' after it released subsequent Tomb Raider sequels on more than just the Xbox? It's just a silly way of putting it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8h ago
TheGamingHounds19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

SE needs to go all in optimization. Broken PC ports won't help its case, especially with big releases like mainline Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix19h ago

It's actually simple. What doesn't inspire confidence is Square allocating their budgets on the wrong projects such as Forspoken, Avengers, Babylons Fall and Foamstars.

Square has always been multiplatform since PS3/360 days which 80 % of their games are. People kick up a fuss over PS exclusivity but not Nintendo which has more exclusive projects console exclusive from Square.

FF16 has done ok but not enough to fix the blunders that the past mistakes Square has made with some of their projects. FF7 Rebirth is unclear we'll see a PC release for sure so it's hard to say so far not as good as they would of liked.

Then again unrealistic expectations. If it weren't for Sony these games would at least had another 2 years development time. So some people need to be realistic in that regard.

Scissorman16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

It's the blunders that set those expectations so high. If you remove those from the equation, I bet the sales numbers would be more than stellar. Square believes it's okay to release a pile of risky, middling, garbage because the big boys will ultimately subsidize the cost. Don't worry if Forspoken sells poorly, FF16 will surely sell 10 million copies to balance that right out. Oh wait, it only sold like 4 million. Well that's a disaster. Meanwhile games that sell 2 million units with comparable budgets are deemed successful.

thorstein11h ago

I would also add that FFXVI, which I loved has a hint to one of their biggest problems: the number 16.

It's a great franchise, but that's all they've become known for. Dragon Quest is my favorite all time series but it's like they don't know what to do outside of those two IPs.

Valve never makes trilogies. The idea is that they don't want to become stagnant. Gabe Newell hates the number 3.

I can't imagine their talent wouldn't want to try a new RPG.

RoadRacer18h ago

Square Enix just really need to revise its expectations. Maybe consider a change in strategy on dev end as well. Multiplat will help for sure but only good games that are marketed well will sell

Show all comments (18)
70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 2h ago
Psychonaut857h ago

They’re not working on Call of Duty? Give it time.

380°

Microsoft's quest for short-term $$$ is doing long-term damage to Windows, Surface, Xbox, and beyond

Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's plans to increase every department's margins.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2d ago
Changed: content
Brazz2d ago
Brazz2d ago

"The plan to move Xbox games to other platforms is codenamed "Latitude" internally, and I know there's debate and unease at Microsoft about whether or not this is a good idea. More upcoming Microsoft-owned games slated for PlayStation are already being developed. At least for now, they're potentially obvious games you'd most likely expect. And yes, while it's true Microsoft is a prolific publisher on PlayStation already, it has typically revolved around specific franchises like Minecraft. From what I've heard, Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's mandate to increase every department's margins. "

Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware.

Xeofate2d ago

"Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware."

It's for the best.

Quit stringing along xbox fans and screwing over PlayStation owners.

crazyCoconuts2d ago

Take good care of those Xboxes if you have 'em ...

outsider16242d ago

An Xbox game on a Playstation. Never in my years of gaming did i ever thought this was gonna happen.

jznrpg1d 20h ago

It is dying anyway so doesn’t make much of a difference

VersusDMC1d 20h ago

No way can they get rid of the hardware as probably 90% of game pass subscribers are hardware users.

Highly doubtful those users will move to PC or Cloud to subscribe there and the competition (Sony and Nin) will never have gamepass on their system.

If they want to keep the current subscribers, they need to keep releasing new hardware.

PSPSA1d 11h ago

I'm not convinced, why then announce that they're actually working on the next-generation Xbox with “the largest technical leap”, and also looking into handhelds now?

Rols1d 10h ago

Not like MS don’t drop things a hot potato if it is not performing. Look at MS history to see products or platforms discontinued. Xbox is not a charity for MS, it needs to make money and the ABK was the last roll of the dice for Xbox.

purple1011d 9h ago

Xbox hardware team members have been incorporated into surface team

This perhaps shows they are not expecting big things from Xbox as a separate entity

Abear211d 6h ago

Seems like they are planning to win next gen. All the acquisitions were this generation and nobody except Xbox fans expect games from the acquisitions any time soon.

I’m sure Microsoft can afford to lose money on the short term, pretty sure they do risk assessment when acquiring many companies and spending billions, they’ll be fine lol.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d 6h ago
gold_drake2d ago

i think it will kill off the xbox brand. windows will be fine.

but there is and would be a chance that xbox might be killed off in the future. if they fail to make the money they put in. imo.

S2Killinit2d ago

They wont kill it, but they will go fully PC while keeping xbox as a brand, and go multiplatform for the most part. They will also work tirelessly to diminish console gaming’s importance.

PRIMORDUS2d ago

It would be best if Xbox goes the way of Sega, just make and publish games. I know I myself will not support them at all with buying games from them, you all can. 🙃

ChasterMies2d ago

The Xbox brand will live for the games. I don’t expect Microsoft to entirely drop out of gaming hardware. They make Surface tablets and laptops. They’ll make Xbox branded hardware for those that want it.

shadowT2d ago

"Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation"

Forza and Starfield next?

Skuletor2d ago

Starfield would be no surprise and there's the rumor that it will come to Playstation after the Shattered Space DLC, Forza (along with Halo and Gears of War) I find less likely but I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually end up on PlayStation too, especially if Xbox give up on hardware and go the Sega route.

shinoff21832d ago

Not to worried about forza. I'd rather see others like what inxile and obsidian are working on. Starfield sounds like it needs more time in the oven so let it cook first imo. If starfield and it's a small if does release on ps it'll be in the fall around the time for dlc or right at the dlc and come packaged with it.

-Foxtrot2d ago

In the words of Phil Spencer when he was talking about Nintendo last year

“It's just taking a long time for Microsoft to see that their future exists off of their own hardware"

S2Killinit2d ago

Yup. MS are a cancer to console gaming.

Aloymetal2d ago

100%!!
I wonder what happened to that dude that was always here posting those court articles with cartoons about MS spending all those billions in studios. He suddenly disappeared, I guess he doesn't like bad news when the green brand is in trouble. No new articles from him as of late...

PRIMORDUS2d ago

Yup, and it's only going to keep spreading.

Outside_ofthe_Box2d ago

Phil Spencer's words always comes back to bite him lol

2d ago Replies(7)
Show all comments (75)