1170°

Sony responds to Insomniac's Xbox move

CVG: Sony Computer Entertainment has responded to Resistance developer Insomniac Games' new multiplatform partnership with EA.

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
callahan095102d ago

"We look forward to unveiling Insomniac's next PS3 exclusive properties in the near future."

E3?

FangBlade5102d ago ShowReplies(16)
Forbidden_Darkness5102d ago

I read PROPERTIES, making me think, more then one game

*Gets all happy smiley :) =) ;)*

Pennywise5102d ago

IG won't stop making PS3 exclusives.

BeaArthur5102d ago

Pennywise...I think they will because EA doesn't do exclusives. Anything they are already working on will obviously be released but after that they are probably done doing PS3 exclusives.

Pennywise5102d ago

Bea, Its ONE game. The deal was for one game... IG will not stop making PS3 exclusives. You can mark my word on that one.

Chubear5102d ago

lol dude, you're making sound like EA bought them lol. EA didn't buy IG they're working on a new game together where IG makes the game and EA publishes it.

I think some people are looking to use this news to bite back but there's nothing to bite. IG, a 3rd party developer is making a new mulitplat game.

They weren't bought, and they havent' stopped making exclusives for the PS3 and their well known PS3 exclusive IPs are still exclusive.

BeaArthur5102d ago (Edited 5102d ago )

Chubear...technically they don't own either the Resistance IP or the Ratchet and Clank IP, Sony does.

Pennywise...the deal is for a new IP, they haven't said how many games.

So you are both saying this deal is somehow different from the Bungie deal? All we know right now is that EA has signed a deal with Insomniac and that EA doesn't do exclusives. Not to mention that Insomniac has made it clear that they want to broaden their reach. We don't know the length of the deal or any other details. I could be wrong but I don't know that we will be seeing any more Sony exclusives for awhile (after R3 and possibly another Ratchet and Clank).

eggbert5102d ago

that if this multiplatform games sells well, they are going to continue that franchise. If it doesn't, they probably won't continue the franchise. It's just business for god's sake.

Qui-Gon Jim5102d ago

I'm sure that if this relationship works well for both of them, Insomniac will probably move away from PS3 exclusives in favor of their new IP. That is, of course, if their contract with Sony allows it. They may very well have an obligation to make a certain number of exclusives. That would explain why Insomniac created a second studio. Like others have said, the old Insomniac continues on exclusives, the new one on multi-platform.

Trroy5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

Independant studios do business with multiple publishers. Since publishers don't like studios to internally shuffle teams, they tend to fund an entire physical location, of which IG has two.

I feel pretty confident that Sony will be publishing the 2 games made in IG California, and they'll be exclusives, and that EA will be publishing the one game made in NC, and it'll be a cross-plat.

This is different from Bungie's relationship with MS, because Bungie is no longer working with MS, after Halo: Reach is over and done with, while IG is still working with Sony, despite working on a project with EA. Bungie will have one publisher (Activision), and IG will have two (Sony and EA).

RedDevils5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

so you saying, Mass effect is not exclusive oh right mr smart guy

BISHOP-BRASIL5101d ago

Wasn't that thing running earlier today in my PC the same Mass Effect 2 i did watch my friend playing in his house 1 month ago? Man, that's one hell of a rip-off clone, it gone as far as to say Mass Effect 2 and have both EA and Bioware logos, EA should sue whovever did this! /s

rockleex5101d ago

While the old one will keep working on Ratchet and Resistance.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5101d ago
5102d ago
BeaArthur5102d ago

Sounds very similar to what has happened with Bungie. Their last exclusive will probably be R3 and it will most likely be unveiled at E3 and released in the fall.

Chubear5102d ago (Edited 5102d ago )

Bungie where THE main exclusive developers for the 360 and were not independent. IG games were not the main developers for the PS and have always been known to be 3rd party independent.

This isn't like Bioware either. EA acquired Bioware and Bioware is EA now. IG is not acquired by EA. They just have a partnership w/ multiplat games.

I know you guys know this well but are just looking for drama but the more you try to use this as a poking stick the more you're going to feel it from the other side when some major things are announced at E3.

Now a major story would have been if IG are now developing an exclusive 360 games but ofcourse rejoicing at multiplatform games instead of exclusives.

Simon_Brezhnev5102d ago

i assume their North Carolina studio is doing multiplatform games

Arnon5102d ago

"Bungie where THE main exclusive developers for the 360 and were not independent. IG games were not the main developers for the PS and have always been known to be 3rd party independent."

Bungie has been independent since the launch of Halo 3. They separated from Microsoft to work on their own free time. However, they continued to make Halo games.

It's the exact same thing with Insomniac. Sony owns R&C and Resistance, but Insomniac is still independent.

Monk3y5101d ago

Insomniac Games's and EA Partnership contract covers _ONE_ new IP and ____ONE_____ game for now :) But Ratchet&Clank and Resistance series will always be on Sony platforms

booni35101d ago

your wrong. Insomniac owns all of there IPs. They could make an xbox rachet and clank if they so chose, but heres to hoping that they dont.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5101d ago
Inside_out5102d ago

WOW...this just great for the 360 crowd...A developer of the caliber of insomiac bringing their great talents to everyone...This must be the beginning of the reveals...Sony VP said the other day that the exclusives were coming to and end...When are we gonna here that Gears is multi-platform??...Cliffy-B said there was only suppose to be 2 Gears...

EA is on mission lately...first IW...they said they want a deal with Bungie...now this...what about Activision...they have to reply...

Ju5102d ago (Edited 5102d ago )

It's more like GeOW3 -> 360, Bulletstorm -> Multi.

Same with R3 (?) -> PS3, <new IP> -> Multi.

edhe5102d ago

me ->360, dragon age -> multi..

mrv3215102d ago

Shortening words like Mass Effect is a bit pointless especially with so many other games that share ME.... Mirrors Edge, Windows ME, and probably a ton more.

Just call it Mass Effect.

Hopefully I will still see a Resistance 3, PS3 exclusive... mind you there's one thing I can say about EA.

DEDICATED SERVERS ON THE 360, thank all that is holy I'd hate for a game to co(d)mpermized would with P2P... I love me some 24+ player matches... I love me 0 player R2.

jerethdagryphon5102d ago

one game or 5 doesnt matter, sony own the important ips anything ig make will be theres

i dont think thell stay multi platform
i think thell find disk space limiting eventually

edhe5100d ago

Or i could have faith that you have a brain and understand context.

yes.. having faith in n4g commentors :o

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5100d ago
AAACE55102d ago

I'm confused! I thought I read somewhere on here yesterday that Insomniac was staying exclusive to Ps3! I swear, news in the videogaming industry changes quickly!

Next thing we will hear is Avtivision has run the CoD franchise into the ground so bad that they are trying to give it to respawn, but they don't want it either...lol!

Such a shame things worked out like they did. I really like the MW games and up until a year ago, thought that Activision was better than EA!

Bodyboarder_VGamer5102d ago

IG expanded their studio and now they have the man power to work on multiple tittles. So I still expect a PS3 exclusive game for E3 but too bad that it'll probaly be Resistance 3 instead of something new.

kevnb5102d ago

Id really like to see what they could do on pc!

nycredude5102d ago

Only in this day and age would this be called an Xbox move. It's a business move and they signed with EA, not Xbox. Seriously they can change N4g all they want but it's still the same cesspool it was.

k-Lan5102d ago

That's why you're still posting in here. Same old crap.

gtamike5102d ago (Edited 5102d ago )

gimped game coming soon? (cause of limits)

Socrates5102d ago

Both consoles have limits, just in different areas. The 360 excels at some things and the PS3 at others.

Christopher5102d ago

I'm confused as to how this is a huge blow to Sony? They will still develop exclusive titles for Sony and now they will develop additional games that will still be available to those who own a PS3.

DatNJDom815102d ago

So now the 360 fanboys are dickriding Insomniac now? After saying they were corny developers. Wow you guys are something else. I just LOL @ ya.

absolutecarnage5101d ago

Look in the mirror buddy you guys were bashing bungie and now your all excited for what they make for the ps3. This Fanboy crap goes both ways don't try to make it one sided. By the way I LOL only at you

cloud 2795102d ago

Isn't this for their studio in NC and not in CA?

Imperator5102d ago

Insomniac was expanding for a reason. They'll still make Ps3 exclusives, but will also make multiplats. IMO, they deserve as much respect and success as they can get. Good luck to them.

zeeshan5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

EA is well on their way to reach the top once again. I mean just look at them! They are getting all the good stuff. Crysis 2, new insomniac IP, Dead Space 2, Bioware etc etc. I wouldn't mind to see EA back on the top. Just can't stand Activision anymore!

Kevin ButIer5101d ago

Are getting insane deals dont u think?

specialguest5101d ago

Insomniac goes multiplatform, and Bungie will most likely do the same under Activision's umbrella.

IdleLeeSiuLung5101d ago

They will probably release another Ratchet and Resistance 3. After that, I think everything will be multiplatform. It doesn't make sense financially otherwise unless you are owned by Sony.

With that said, this few months have been crazy. First Bungie forms partnership with Activision and goes multi-platform then Insomniac goes multi-platform with EA. Just recently Bulletstorm is multi-platform... how the industry changes so quickly!

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 5100d ago
dangert125102d ago

why don't sony just buy these guys there like batty and bench for real

Forbidden_Darkness5102d ago

They didn't want to be bought up and Sony respected that.

Ghoul5102d ago

not every company acts like ms and makes aggressive takeovers.

sony respects theyre partnership and doesnt buy them.

who cares ffs if they go multiplat, seriously you guys need to get over it.
sonys ip`s stay exclusive microsoft hopefully gets its own exclusive ip from insomniac too.

you know who wins ???

WE GAMERS WIN - hands down.

sikbeta5102d ago (Edited 5102d ago )

This Deal With EA is for a Multiplat Game, so x360 will not have an Exclusive Game, but they'll Enjoy an Awesome Game Developed by Insomniac as PS3 Owners Always Do, good news for them...

@Ghoul

I know what are you saying, but this is EA we're talking about, if there is no "Deal" (you know) games go Multiplat...

dangert125102d ago (Edited 5102d ago )

i don't care i actually own a 360 right now. i just wonder why they were not brought .

what agressive tactics has ms used to buy studio's? :S

ill have both 2moro so wont really care which they dev games to

Ghoul5102d ago

jup thats why i said "microsoft hopefully gets its own exclusive ip from insomniac too. "

i meant in the future, i love exclusives on all consoles.

AAACE55102d ago (Edited 5102d ago )

Aggressive takeover...lol!

Is that why MS allowed Bungie and Bizarre Creations to go back to being independent? They didn't leave on bad terms, it was a mutual agreement. The studios wanted to do something different. MS kept the IP and would find different studios to make those games, while a good working relationship was set up and those developers would always want to put their games on a MS console. The developer is now free to create whatever they want.

Yeah man, that really was hostile...MS are savages...lol!

Insomniac are a talented studio! I tried to play R & C and Resistance but couldn't get into them, but because of their talent, i'm sure they will eventually make a game that I will like!

Darrius Cole5102d ago

You can't really do a hostile takeover of a software company anyway. You can do it on paper, but the all the programmers would just leave. In the end you would have nothing but whatever intellectual property they owned but none of the talent that made it.

jack_burt0n5102d ago

@AAACE5

Bizzare creations had nothing but bad things to say about MS, how the hell did you miss that!?

Ghoul5102d ago (Edited 5102d ago )

aehm AAACE5

you really only see the world through your gaming googles do you.

ms is way more for me then just a gaming publisher and console owner.

MS is the worst company i have ever seen in my 29 years, they have bought killed terminated and destroyed so many companys its not even funny.

anyways you guys totally misunderstood what i said, aggressive takeovers can also be made with insane amoutns of cash (50 mio for gta dlc) noone woul be that stupid not to take it.

What i said was that sony instead of ms gathers theyre developers through good deals and great colaborations in the first place.

Socrates5102d ago

Ghoul, frankly you are talking out your @ss.

Sony is the one that has bought up studios left and right. To the point that Microsoft has been criticized for not buying up ENOUGH STUDIOS.

"Hostile takeover"...lmao. You obviously don't have a clue about economics or business. If the owners of a company accept the offer made by the company making the offer then obviously BOTH companies see it as a mutually beneficial business arrangement.

ReBurn5102d ago

A hostile takeover is when a company's board of directors refuses an offer to sell the company so the buying company bypasses the board and goes straight to the shareholders. Paying a lot of money for a company is in no way aggressive. If the price is right a board typically sells.

I'd like to see a single example of a hostile takeover of a developer by Microsoft. They tried it with Yahoo! but ultimately dropped it. Hell, I know of companies whose main goal is to be purchased by Microsoft.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5102d ago
ActionBastard5102d ago

So Sony gets exclusives and multiplatform games, Microsoft gets multiplatform games. Gamers still win.

vhero5102d ago

Sony Gamers win.. Sony technically don't lose anything in this deal in fact they just get more games if anything... Sony gamers are still getting exclusives by Insomniac aswell as the multi-platforms.

IHateYouFanboys5101d ago

sony lost bragging rights, because now they cant claim insomniac as one of their exclusive developers.

and as such, sony fanboys will be crying themselves to sleep, while putting on a brave 'who cares' face on here.

madjedi5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

@3.1.1 Just like you and some of the 360 fanboys did when bungie went multiplatform both sides do it, if you weren't a fanboy and just a gamer why would you give 2 sh^ts if sony lost bragging rights or not.

The only reason you mention it is you feel the need to go after sony fanboys, but not 360 ones, funny your name is i hate you fanboys and yet you act just like one. A non fanboy wouldn't go out of his way to attack a specific group of fanboys, they would treat all fanboys the same, unlike you.

Your a delusional idiot if you think any sony fanboys are crying over this, that and any other dumbasses that tells any fanboys to cry more tears ect on articles, shut up, it's annoying, not funny, just childishly annoying.

Cold 20005102d ago ShowReplies(3)
raWfodog5102d ago

Just as long as they dont put out any inferior ports on the PS3. We know that they can develop for it so it shouldnt be an issue for them.

kratos1235102d ago

yo cold did you read the article it says 1 new ip
man why do you always have to start a flame war like i said last time get a life

Applegate5102d ago

Well same goes for bungie, the deal is only for ONE ip.

kratos1235102d ago

why did you bring that up it doesnt have anything to do with this

jack_burt0n5102d ago

@bastard

I dont think so, if the new IP is the survival horror game ps3 gamers lose out bigtime because its not developed for the ps3 it wont be anywhere near the resistance ratchet quality level. Sequels are getting a bit meh to me at the moment.

Am gutted.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5101d ago
Socomer 19795102d ago

BUNJIE AND INSOMNIAC has Gone Multiplatform.
We'll be seeing them in the next generation is all that that means.

yogaflame5102d ago

well they are in the down road alreayd since resistance 2 sucks and ratchet is the same

madjedi5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

In the down road already. wtf does that even mean? Resistance 2 didn't suck it lost, the creepy atmosphere of the first one which more people enjoyed. Just because i think halo or call of duty sucks doesn't make it a fact. And rachet is the same, just like gears2, halo 3, reach codmw2, or every other series out there basically -_- . I guess your one of the types that believe if a game doesn't sell 1 million copies in the first week it's a flop.

The newest rachet already sold better than insomniac expected it to, r2 was no fail in sales either, to any of the retards that think insomniac are going fully multiplatform and abandoning the rachet and clank series, try looking back to see how many r&c games they have done first.

I'm going to say 75%-85% of the 360 guys boasting/cheering insomniac going multiplatform, will never even buy the mp game insomniac makes, all it is to them is something to throw back at the sony boys.

Since neither bungie or insomniac are no longer entirely exclusive, i wonder if their reviews for their respective games will be the same a questionable all 10's across the board and more of the too much variety or not original enough/too similar bs.

Show all comments (171)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers18d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken17d ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g18d ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing18d ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H918d ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola17d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66918d ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle18d ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg18d ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos18d ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola18d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies39d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken38d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga38d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken38d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6438d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long38d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197238d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic38d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 38d ago
DivineHand12538d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91338d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer38d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91338d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit38d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 38d ago
Christopher38d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6938d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit38d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher38d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken38d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197238d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic38d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2338d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218338d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder38d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts38d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)